|
User talk:Vaibhavafro/Archive 1
WelcomeWelcome! Hello, Vaibhavafro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place June 2019
Wikipedia and copyright
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Gazoth (talk) 22:33, 14 June 2019 (UTC) July 2019
@Gazoth: I think you should curtail your actions a bit. Most of the time, you are roaming around Wikipedia deleting good faith edits. Many of your reverts are totally wrong. As an example, see this edit of yours.—VaibhavafroTalk 13:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC) August 2019
Understood.-Vaibhavafro , 14 Aug 2019
ImagesBro can you upload a full picture of INS Arihant and other submarines of its class. The previous image that you've uploaded is not of fine quality? Ritvik0 (talk) 00:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
ImageCan you upload the picture from a different site? Ritvik0 (talk) 05:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
You can upload it from the another source Today I was trying to do this but I was not able to do it so I request you that please upload it from another source by searching it in the internet. Ritvik0 (talk) 06:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Milhist! Hello Vaibhavafro and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history. A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:21, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Special Group (India)
Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
Pending changes reviewer granted Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages. Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. See also:
Mz7 (talk) 09:21, 18 October 2019 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandeep Unnithan (October 26)
@Utopes: I need some advice here. Sandeep Unnithan was the first to write about-
But, there are no WP:RS that clearly state that he was the first. We, the Indian military enthusiasts have concluded this at forums using common sense. A simple google search will reveal that nothing detailed was written before Unnithan. So, can I proceed with adding this in the draft?— Vaibhavafro 💬 04:23, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
If you have time...Hi there. If you have time, please give this article a look over - Indian Military Academy. It is a GA nominee just now and I really hope to make it to GA status. Any suggestions to improve it? Check the talk page for an idea of what I mean if you are not sure, an admin had given pre-GA suggestions which were really helpful. Can you think of any other ways to imrove the article? Thanks. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
Disambiguation link notification for November 3Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agni-V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centre for Air Power Studies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: SSS Defence has been accepted The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Utopes (talk) 04:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
I am so not going to be given autopatrolled rightsLol. Thanks for putting my name on the permissions page but I doubt I am going to get it just now. Thanks. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
@DiplomatTesterMan: Yeah exactly. Even I went ahead and read WP:BLP only after I was (surprisingly) granted reviewer rights... And thanks for starting work on that article.— Vaibhavafro 💬 09:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Special Group (India) On 8 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Special Group (India), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after a secret purchase from Europe, the Special Group became the first Indian troops to be equipped with the AK-47? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Special Group (India). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Special Group (India)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 8 November 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Image questionI was typing my response when you removed your post. I didn’t think your question was silly at and wasn’t bothered by it. I also wasn’t offended by the request you made on my behalf for me to get OK’d as auto patrolled. I just never considered asking for such a user right. If it makes things easier for others than I’ve got no problem with getting it. Anyway, here’s what I was going to post about the image. This is just my opinion and other may feel differently. Hide the image from the article, click “Show preview”, and then read the relevant section of the article. Try and be honest when doing so and try pretend as if the image doesn’t exist. If you’ve got no real problem (again try and be honest) understanding the corresponding article content, it’s unlikely others will have any difficulty understanding as well without seeing the image. This means that it’s likely not going to be considered to pass WP:NFC#CS. What you write in the non-free rationale is important, but it’s not as important as what’s written in the article. I look at this photo and I see some soldiers doing something; soldiers usually can be found in places where military operations take place and I don’t need to see an image to understand that. It would be much better to have sourced critical commentary of the image itself in the article. If the image is historic, then there should be reliable sources calling it historic. There are lots of events that are historic, but that doesn’t automatically mean that photos of said event are also historic as explained in WP:ITSHISTORIC. — Marchjuly (talk) 12:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
A user has already disputed it's rationale as: "Photo is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. Usage fails to meet WP:NFCC#8." Changing the article to Operation Blue Star should solve this, shouldn't it?— Vaibhavafro 💬 13:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Special Group personnel at the Golden Temple during Operation Blue Star.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Special Group personnel at the Golden Temple during Operation Blue Star.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Thankyou for reviewing the rationale of that image. I have tagged it for deletion.— Vaibhavafro 💬 13:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC) SG
@DBigXray: I just want to tell a few more things since you've shown interest. That Sandeep Unnithan article clearly mentions The Mavericks to be Furthermore, after the reading and comparing all WP:RS on this topic with all WP:Not Rs, I have come to the following conclusion: SG was initially formed as 4 Vikas of the Special Frontier Force, but later became a separate unit. Afterall, what else can explain the transition to this badge from this?— Vaibhavafro 💬 10:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
FYIHi Vaibhavafro, It isn't against policy to remove messages from one's own talk page (for IP's and accounts both). It just indicates they've been read. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
VaibhavHi Vaibhavafro, You're That YouTube channel Defensive Offence guy nah? Who regularly took & publish interview video of Major(R) Gaurav Arya. --Kulbhushan Jhadav (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions alert This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:14, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for pointing out Navy Day (India) early in November to me. I don't know if it was a coincidence or not, but the timing was just correct for Navy Day yesterday, and it is good the article was in a better shape this year. The article was viewed over 130,000 in the past two days. DTM (talk) 06:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ajey Nagar
A tag has been placed on Ajey Nagar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[{{{value1}}}]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 20:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Making Amit Bhadana ArticlePlease create a Amit Bhadana Article. Vikas.bikaneri (talk) 01:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC) Please accept this Barnstar
Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019Hi. According to s.1(2) of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, the act shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. Also, the Indian government still not yet appointed the commencement day. [2] Therefore the act is not yet in force.--Mike Rohsopht (talk) 15:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC) New message from DBigXray Message added 10:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. The recent events have further improved the notability. The nominater has withdrawn the nomination. You might want to review your !vote as well. DBigXrayᗙ 10:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC) ITN recognition for Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 On 16 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC) CAA protestper, WP:BRD May I request you to self revert and get consensus for this controversial edit on the talk page ? --Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 13:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Ok.— Vaibhavafro 💬 14:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC) Ds AlertThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. --Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 02:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC) MahushaHi Vaibhavfro I want to contribute with you in your indian defence and nuclear field articles. Please make me a member of your team. Mahusha 18:40 28 Dec 2019 (UTC)
Ok vaibhavfro, I am also Indian & I am also passionable to get our Indian readers and people around the world to get to know about our achievements whether it may be nuclear or any other field. Mahusha (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC) Yes DBigXray I will, thank you. Mahusha (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2019 (UTC) New message from DESiegelMessage added 17:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Stop revert war DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC) Happy New Year, Vaibhavafro!  Vaibhavafro, Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
DYK for Mohan Narayan Rao SamantOn 2 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mohan Narayan Rao Samant, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that India's Mohan Samant managed the largest covert naval operation in history, which resulted in the destruction of around 100,000 tonnes of Pakistani shipping during the Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mohan Narayan Rao Samant. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mohan Narayan Rao Samant), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC) ApologyHi, I am AGIOS PAISIOS. Because I am a disabled person it is easier to me to copy-paste text sometimes. I will be more careful in the future.-User:AGIOS PAISIOS, 12:47, 15 January 2020
Poor SourcesPlease do not used Right wing propaganda sites like Swarajya mag or opinion pieces. --DBigXrayᗙ 10:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
See the talk page of Citizenship Amendment Act protests. This is not the right place.— Vaibhavafro 💬 12:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
We are working as a efficient group together, but I was not expecting this from you. Be careful next time you add any perspective. Higher level warning will be given if you continue such. Thank you. Dey subrata (talk) 02:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
For future reference: Please refer to this version of the talk page to know the context of this notice, because I will not be available for the next three months.— Vaibhavafro 💬 08:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Discussion on alleged biased editing@DBigXray: You are requested to shift your and mine comments related to a future WP:TBAN discussion on my talk page from Talk:Citizenship Amendment Act protests. That is not the right place since the topic is about me, not about the article (per WP:TALK). Please comply.— Vaibhavafro 💬 13:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC) moved below. --DBigXrayᗙ 13:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC) Temple destroyed Moved from Talk:Citizenship Amendment Act protests@DBigXray:Not only was the Temple gate damaged, the idol of Hanuman was destroyed. This event was rare and needs to be added. Please self revert this edit.— Vaibhavafro 💬 18:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Anyway, I have added this incident in the main “Protests” section. This section is dedicated to covering such incidents. Though some editors might consider this incident to not be notable enough for the “Chronology” section, any well-intentioned editor is not expected to dispute this edit of mine.— Vaibhavafro 💬 00:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
@DBigXray: What aspect of my edits were “twisted narratives that are pro BJP-RSS”? I have welcomed the additional details added by Dey subrata; I have not disputed it even slightly. What I see, however, is that there is a slight-to-moderate lack of WP:DUE weightage of narratives from right-wing groups in some Wikipedia articles. That’s why I try to fix that (per WP:NPOV). But some editors misconstrue my edits anyway. Nevertheless, I think that you will never find ANY “evidence” against me to get a WP:TBAN on me. Honestly, I didn’t expect such a statement from you.— Vaibhavafro 💬 11:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
I am a NOOB with regards to Wikipedia policies; I only know the bare minimum I need to know for editing. Today was the first time I visited WP:AE. The only articles related to Indian politics to which I have significantly contributed are 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute, Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir and Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019. I can’t recall any other significant contributions of mine. The main reason why I am on Wikipedia is to improve the quality of Indian-military related articles and those related to India’s space programs. The rest of the topics I am interested in are already well-covered by other editors. I am pointing the aforementioned things out to highlight my interests, and, highlight that I am not on Wikipedia for editing controversial political articles. Nevertheless,
Dummy section for testing archive setupThis is a dummy section meant for testing the bot archive setup on my talk page.— Vaibhavafro 💬 11:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC) SuggestionHi, I saw that you created an article for the new Air Defence Command, a tri-service command. There are also other tri-service commands as you know and have helped with. But the category for some of them is Category:Joint military units and formations in Asia. Is this still a suitable name? Does this need to be discussed somewhere else (Indian milhist talkpage) or is a non-controversial suggestion and could be implemented without much of a fuss? DTM (talk) 12:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Also note that in the US, a true “joint command” is called a Unified combatant command. As a result, Wikipedia has a category called “Category:Unified combatant commands of the United States Armed Forces”. But, even this category is contained within Category:Joint military units and formations of the United States. Congruently, we also have to create a new category called “Category:Joint military units and formations of India” for Indian joint formations. Also note that agencies such as Armed Forces Special Operations Division are not full-fledged commands; they are only ‘joint formations’.— Vaibhavafro 💬 03:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC) Cool downmay I request you to drop this confrontational and hostile tone in which you are writing your edit summaries and talk page comments on the riot article. Please check wP:CIVIL once again. and repeat Om Shanti Shanti. --⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 07:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. I am off to a Wikibreak (hopefully). Hasta la vista until next time.— Vaibhavafro 💬 09:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC) March Madness 2020G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team A messageIf someone do not participate in a discussion that does not always mean oppostion to your proposal, non participation may be due to many other reasons . I tried to put arguments supporting two points made by you i.e. the Islamic extremism and temple vandalism at the CAA protest talk page, realised no point of arguing with users who fails to see reason, refuses to accept when can't counter you.2405:204:3323:9B54:74E0:D3F4:A8D0:A375 (talk) 08:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
AnswerOn second thought, I will answer here, but please don't mention that username any further. In answer, there was WP:OUTING, so they chose to WP:VANISH. El_C 18:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Help creating articleHello, I want your help in creating an article of Indian YouTuber. Because i don't know much english and reffrences. I need your help. I want you to contribute to that article.
I hope for you. Don't disappoint me by saying no. I am waiting for your reply. Mr. Bikaneri (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
bhai, I have created Draft:Amit Bhadana (yutuber), please see. Is this correct and was it submitted? Mr. Bikaneri (talk) 09:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Don't accuse editors of WP:BITE without doing due diligence CommentAt Draft talk:Amit Bhadana (yutuber) you accused Praxidicae of biting a newcomer. Please note that WP:BITE wouldn't apply to a WP:SPA account that is very likely a UPE and is attempting to WP:GAME the system. The article has been recreated and speedy deleted so many times (20+ times) that the draft and mainspace spots for it are salted. The intentional misspelling of the disambiguation is a pretty big red flag. You can also see on the user's talk page that they've created three different instance of this draft alone in a span of less than 24 hours. Just some easy things to look out for before you go and accuse an editor as experienced as Praxi of WP:BITE. Cheers Sulfurboy (talk) 06:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
HelpBhai, Amit Bhadana ban chuka he. Magar notability issue aa agya he. Aap usse fix karwane me madad kare. Thanks Hindu Viki (talk) 02:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 13An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Special Group (India), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC) Milhist coordinator election voting has commencedG'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC) October 2020
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now openG'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closingG'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing DriveHey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soonNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC) WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commencedHey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Marcos logo@Vaibhavafro: I didn't know that it was official logo, so that I removed it. After you mentioned "official logo", I checked its source and found it's official. It was my mistake that I didn't checked it's authenticity before removing it in first place. Sorry. —15:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)FoxtAl (talk)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soonHey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Any more previous copyright violations remaining?I see you were warned in July 2019 about copyright, but I have found one more instance from that time period where you copied content as it is. I request you to please go through your contributions and remove any such edit that still remain. Hemantha (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Marine Commandos (MARCOS) logo.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Marine Commandos (MARCOS) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soonNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC) Correction to previous election announcementJust a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soonVoting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.jpg){kind=link}