File copyright problem with File:Kit right arm blackadidasplate.png
File Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading File:Kit right arm blackadidasplate.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
File copyright problem with File:Kit left arm redadidasplate.png
File Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading File:Kit left arm redadidasplate.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
File copyright problem with File:Kit left arm whiteadidasplate.png
File Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading File:Kit left arm whiteadidasplate.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
Hello VEO15. Regarding your opinion about Benfica's team kit, I have no problem with your edit. I was just trying to show the different color combinations of Benfica's team kit. Take Care. Mnunes76 (talk) 21:21, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see from this edit that you've added information about the first Premier League season. Could you please put a reference inline using the ref tags/or a citation template such as {{citation}}, (i.e. with volume/page numbers etc) as simply mentioning it in an edit summary tends to get lost after a while so people might remove it as being unreferenced.
I have been updating the Spain national team article for YEARS, I did the latest changes and updated the article and now that i'm adding the 1 in bold and the 1 title LIKE ANY OTHER NATIONAL TEAM u deny it?
Don't do it again or I'll report u for vandalism, I'm making this article like anything else. If you have something against Spain don't show in on the Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.184.101.153 (talk) 00:55, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'mnot sure which way the roundel by itself as an amblem should face, however I do know that the Kiwi is to face the front of the aircraft when it's applied, which is why I turned it to the left, similar to the Aussie one which has the kangaroo facing left. I can turn them back though if you think I should. Fry1989 (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Sorry, I reverted your change to this editor's userpage. I can, however, try and help you set up something similar...? I'm an idiot when it comes to fancy HTML, but I could at least set up a User:VEO15/Newuserpage with a copy of HJ Mitchell's userpage, which you could personalise before copying it to your main userpage. TFOWR09:13, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kits
Hey man, excellent work on the World Cup kits! I was wondering, though, if it would be possible for you to go through a bunch of club articles to look for kit graphics that incorporate logos, and then upload logo-less versions for use here. I've given up on reverting User:Bruno-ban on Commons, so it seems that uploading logo-less versions is the only remaining options, and since you obviously have more talent for this than I do, I hope you'll be able to help. – PeeJay23:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, mate. I realise my request was rather a bit much, and since I've got a lot of logo-less kits on my HDD, I can do that for ya. – PeeJay09:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
questions
Hello! Could you tell me where are the files "kit socks puma 2010 red" and "kit socks puma white" in the commons? I can find the green version, the gold and some other, but not them! And how did you change in the pattern the "_olympiacos1011h" to "_ocfph2010" since the file is "File:Kit body olympiacos1011h.png"? - Sthenel (talk) 10:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is there (and where) any discussion-decision that we shouldn't use kits with the logo of the sports company on them? What about the club logo? In some cases they are used. - Sthenel (talk) 14:30, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, is there any chance you could have a pop at editing the Grimsby Town home and away kit for the current season, I am yet to hone the skills to edit it myself and noticed no one has yet to of done it this season. Thanks Footballgy (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey man, thanks for updating the Manchester United kits in the season articles. If you decide to carry on with doing more, then I recommend this site as a fantastic source for all the different kit variants worn by the team during each season. Hope that helps. – PeeJay08:15, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a belated "congratulations" for all the work you've done recently on the Man Utd kits of old! I look forward to seeing how you deal with the 1994-96 home kit with the Old Trafford watermark! – PeeJay15:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi VEO15. I am making contact with those Editors that take an active interest in Finnish football on English Wikipedia.
For a long time I have been happy to work on Finnish football on Wikipedia without making contact with other Finnish football enthusiasts - basically I like preparing articles / undertaking tasks that interest me and contact with others has not been important. However recently some of my work was changed by a Wikipedia Reviewer and this has led me to question what approach I should be following and indeed what approach would other Finnish football enthusiasts wish to adopt?
The basic question I am asking is whether Finnish League and Cup articles should have a Finnish or English title or some form of hybrid?
I provide examples below:
Finnish Title
English Title
Hybrid Title
2012 Veikkausliiga
2012 Finnish Championship
2012 Finnish Veikkausliiga
2012 Kolmonen
2012 Finnish Division 3
2012 Finnish Kolmonen
2012 Suomen Cup
2012 Finnish Cup
2012 Finnish Suomen Cup
2012 Suomen Liigacup
2012 Finnish League Cup
2012 Finnish Liigacup
1938 Maakuntasarja
1938 Finnish Division 3
1938 Finnish Maakuntasarja
1954 Suomensarja
1954 Finnish Division 2
1954 Finnish Suomensarja
1970 II divisioona
1970 Finnish Division 2
1970 Finnish II divisioona
1986 III divisioona
1986 Finnish Division 3
1986 Finnish III divisioona
1997 Ykkönen
1997 Finnish Division 1
1997 Finnish Ykkönen
I have read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) and Wikipedia:Article titles but have not reached a firm conclusion yet on the best way forward in establishing a consistent approach. The issue does matter with respect to the corrections I must make to existing pages and the tens of pages yet to be prepared. It could also carry implications for some of the articles that you currently contribute to.
I think that the matter would best be addressed on a proper basis and encourage that the issue is considered on the Talk Page of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Finland task force. If the matter is of concern to you as well, please add your name to the list of participants on the main page.
You may also wish to comment on the project structure that I have prepared.
Hi,
The change you have made does not make sense. For it to be logical the definition of the "British" category would have to be changed to "People of England, Wales and Northern Ireland native to Ireland, or with Irish ancestry."
Downsize43 (talk) 04:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. To my simple mind, as an Australian descended from both Irish and Northern Irish, the following should apply.
1. All persons born in either Ireland or Northern Ireland of ethnic Irish parentage are ethnic Irish.
2. If they continue to live in either Ireland or Northern Ireland they are not members of an expatriate population.
Good point. Although knowing United, they'll ask Ajax Cape Town to wear their away kit so we can use one of our two new kits and then unveil a new third kit in a few weeks! – PeeJay23:30, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
PROD
Just a friendly reminder that {{prod}} tag should be added to the article and not its talk page. Also, you should use an edit summary which mentions the term "prod" when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! KTC (talk) 23:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ambiguous quote marks
V, quotes in quotes can't use the same marks, as your edits in Sign "O" the Times (song) have caused. That's what I was trying to fix when you called me "anal". Maybe it's not important to you to get such things fixed, but that's not a reason to revert the fixer. I'll give it one more try. Please respond here or on the article talk page if you see a problem with my edit. Dicklyon (talk) 00:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sign o' the times
If you want to work on the typography of this title, please try to do so with some greater subtlety. Putting double quote inside double quotes give mismatched quotes, which is a malformed construct in any case. The double-quote capital O interpretation is rare in sources anyway. Dicklyon (talk) 14:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Manchester United F.C.. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Thank you for your comment, but actually Vietnamese is not really an exception - although it's evident there isn't the SNOW support en.wp has for European Latin names, we had a RfC last year that confirmed 23-10 a majority (or 23-16 with canvassing) that the project favours treating Vietnamese names the same as Czech or French. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Vietnamese) is not an adopted guideline, in effect an essay by one editor who has engaged in repeated sockpuppeting, for which he has been blocked in the recent past, and something between 1400 to 1500 undiscussed moves in his 1-man campaign against Vietnamese names. I have restored the "historical" tag. Perhaps if you're interested in Vietnamese (which I hope more editors would be) you could also add the page to your watchlist. All the best. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Every place I look, I find IIO lying and bullying. The RfC he is talking about was closed as "no consensus" and "too much of a mess to do anything else". If you read though it, you can see why. IIO did everything he could to disrupt it: repeated declarations that he would not accept the outcome, enormous photo galleries, personal accusations, and prosecutor-style questioning for those who dared disagree. There was no vote count. Kauffner (talk) 00:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No one named you vote counter. You putting together the votes of everyone who wrote anything favorable about diacritics, even it was only on your talk page. These people didn't vote for any particular proposal. They certainly didn't vote for marking the page "historical", an idea that didn't even come up at the time. Kauffner (talk) 02:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for August 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irish League representative team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi, your edit on the kits for Melbourne Victory was reverted, but your alteration was in good faith. As similar as the above kit is to the home shirt, it IS the official third kit for the team, which is why it was reverted. Have a good day :)
Prva crnogorska fudbalska liga; 1. CFL}}) {{IPA-sh|pr̂ːvaː t͡srnǒɡorskaː fûdbaːlskaː lǐːga|pron}}) is the top [[Football (soccer)|football]] league in [[Montenegro]]. It is headed by the [[Football
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Montenegrin First League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FK Rudar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
what i meant in the edit summary with "i know my Spanish football" was nothing aggressive or similar, i meant i know how the Spanish football is "taken care" of in Spain and also in England. For what's important, this WP, i know that the club is known as ZARAGOZA as much as REAL ZARAGOZA in your country, same goes for Real Betis (known as solely Betis in England too) and many other clubs, only two clubs that need the REAL prefix all the time are Real Sociedad and Real Madrid.
However, seeing your last reversion and reply (basically telling me "Do what you want in the Spanish entry, leave this one alone") i know i don't stand a chance, don't worry, article stays as you say, not going to edit war over this.
Hi mate, happy new year! I just noticed that the 1999 FA Charity Shield article has been promoted to GA status, but that the Arsenal kit graphic looks a little off. The white sides are too wide, and there should be some navy blue trim separating the red and the white. The shirt apparently also had a white collar and red trim on the ends of the sleeves. Any chance you could have a go at that for us? – PeeJay12:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 FA Charity Shield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
first things first: i apologize if my reaction seemed aggressive, did not mean it like that. Now for the technicalities, he may have that in his shirt, but it's of no encyclopedical interest, player's know as Cissé, period.
Two examples, past and present: Sergio Busquets has "Sergio" in his shirt, is he known like that? No he's not, he's known as Busquets! Guti, in honour of his sons, printed the mind-blowing "Guti HAZ" in his shirt, should we name him like that? Of course not, player's known as Guti.
All in all I have not reverted you again, i am leaving WP for good in July, so can not be bothered to enter an edit war that will produce only negative things in my opinion. The "Sam" stays.
Yes, i totally understand where you're coming from man, but we must keep data simple in my humble opinion. Sergio Ramos may have both his first name and surname printed on his shirt, but we must address him as Ramos no? Cheers again --AL (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Flags should never indicate the player's nationality in a non-sporting sense; flags should only indicate the sportsperson's national squad/team or representative nationality (and it is not an exception to #Avoid flag icons in infoboxes).Where flags are used in a table, it should clearly indicate that they correspond to representative nationality, notlegal nationality, if any confusion might arise. (emphasis is mine)
In a globalised world, players are pursuing their careers abroad in increasingly large numbers. In the case in question, these flags are used to indicate their legal nationalities. Even if some of these are national squad members, I warrant that the use of flags to sex up the article against the players' names is gratuitous and a violation of the guideline. -- Ohc ¡digame!06:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to update a football kit for my local side, Glossop, but i'm having trouble uploading a kit body which i can then use....if the a program you use to create the body and is the any tips you can give me to save it....i'm trying to use File:Kit body NIKE whitestripeonright.PNG which seems to have saved, but i can't use it is a kit box? any ideas?
Hey over there. I noticed that you are also working a lot at that list, great job by the way. I just saw that you use references in this way "Cref2|Note 44|5". Do you know if the last number in this example (5) actually does something? I also did references in this way in the past, but I found it just unnecessary work and deleted them all, e.g. at List of foreign Bundesliga players and am using them in in this format "Cref2|Note 44". I think it's just really exhausting work without a real benefit. What do you think? Kind regards DrunkenGerman (talk) 09:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your message. It's nice that you share my point of view. What do you think about just deleting all of them? (Of course I just mean the numbering) DrunkenGerman (talk) 17:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rhys Ifans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Importance of Being Idle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hey man, how are you? I was looking for someone who update kits for clubs and they name you. Corinthians is launching its new kits this week (1st and 3rd kits, actually) and I'd like someone to create them so we could update the articles related. If you're willing to, I can send the pics for those new kits. The third is based on the template Nike's using for this season (like Internazionale, Barcelona, City...) The first one seems to have the same design as Atlético de Madrid's 2nd kit, but with different combinations obviously. Anyway, thanks! Gsfelipe94 (talk) 22:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Just so you know the editor who posted this message is almost certainly the same editor who has made and continues to make large numbers of clearly nonsensical edits to various random football teams infobox kits, so please don't feel bad about reverting any similar edits on sight. Fenix down (talk) 22:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
October 2015
Hello, I'm Dan56. Your recent edit to the page Electric Ladyland appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of British football commentators, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Helm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1963 (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Order. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Sorry, I made a mistake in reverting you. For some reason when I loaded the page I could not see the Test match table at all, so believed you had removed it all. I have self reverted. Much apologies. Koncorde (talk) 13:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Umbro International Tournament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Campbell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, VEO15. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
International reactions to the LaMia Airlines Flight 2933 accident
Hi VEO15, I appreciate the information you added! As you probably noticed the article is on a debate for erasing it. Could you please vote on this discusion too?
Hello, VEO15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Your edits are being disputed and are being reverted.
Rather than reverting, please discuss things, and get consensus, at the article talk page before reverting to your preferred version of the article.
I do not want to have to block you. Please, talk, discuss, get others to agree with you, then make the changes, or even ask others who agree with you to make the changes. But, no more edit warring, okay? Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Unless I'm mistaken, WP:MOSFLAG does not support your thinking that flags are used when teams are from different countries. It states that "Flag icons may be relevant in some subject areas, where the subject actually represents that country or nationality". Neither North Ferriby United or Wrexham represent the countries in which they are based, they represent themselves. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at Great Britain Olympic football team shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. I take no position on which image is correct. I have also warned Tvx1.DannyS712 (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On his talk page, Tvx1 argues that #17 of the non-free content criteria covers this case. In other words, that the parent entity's logo can't be used for the child entity. Do you want to submit this to a decision at an appropriate copyright board? Admins are not going to let the back-and-forth continue forever. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:28, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, VEO15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
It's not a bot. Amazon prime documentary reads better that Amazon Prime documentary. Not sure what is better english though... Kante4 (talk) 14:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi VEO15,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal!
With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freeform radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester United Treble Reunion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – PeeJay21:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Thanks for providing an explanation in the edit summary of your revert. Yes, I am happy with it - but don't agree. Those post towns are within the Metropolitan Borough of Wirral as you rightly point out, but why change just them in the article? The lead paragraph mentions the CH postcode has 13 post towns and lists them (as do other postcode articles). Why not change the Cheshire post towns from Chester, Neston and Ellesmere Port to West Cheshire and Chester as well? By your definition you could also change the lead paragraphs of all the other postcode articles to list which borough or unity authority they are in then. Snowy 1973 (talk) 14:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. 2005–06 UEFA Champions League qualification until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – PeeJay09:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:VEO15/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:VEO15/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, VEO15!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, VEO15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to '''[[User:VEO15|<span style="color:red;">VEO</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:VEO15|<span style="color:black;">one</span>]][[Special:Contributions/VEO15|<span style="color:blue;">five</span>]]</sup>''' ASAP.
The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature. See WP:SIGFONT for more info.
If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 17:35, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:UAE FA.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
