User talk:Uyvsdi/Archive 1
Hello, Uyvsdi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place Sorry, but Prince is not Sami...Hi Uyvsdi - I saw your addition in the Sami people page regarding Prince as being Sami. The source that Baiki got that from was later to be found as a hoax and they will be printing a retraction in their Spring, 2009 issue. Just to let you know that that what I did was a friendly edit and that Baiki is normally a good source. Good try anyway. Take Care... Dinkytown (talk) 02:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Names listed on Federally recognized tribesUyvsdi, just as an FYI, the names listed are per the most current Federal Register names. Please do not change the names listed unless the names on the Federal Register changes. Also, instead of providing a direct link from the page itself, please instead provide a redirect from the link provided on the page, as this would aid in quick update of the page when a new edition of the "Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs" is published in the Federal Register. Thank you for identifying articles that needed linking, I have gone ahead and created redirects to the appropriate articles. CJLippert (talk) 18:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Hi, looks like the article is long enough to qualify (although a little more would be a good idea to be on the safe side). Have you gotten a new article onto Template:Did you know before? If not, let me know if you'd like help writing a hook. Best regards, DurovaCharge! 04:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Useful Links
Notice the red link above? That's right, Wikipedia has no overview of this topic. I've been thinking about this for some time, and have started working on one at User:Lithoderm/Native American art. It's a vast subject, so I am currently looking for people to collaborate with on this. I noticed your contribution of Ledger Art... any interest in this project? Lithoderm 01:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
MississippianWhy do you consider the comparison of the tehcnology of the Mississippian culture to that of copper age Europe questionable? 01:17, 28 February 2009 (UTC) DYK for Iowa Tribe of OklahomaShubinator (talk) 05:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Augustine Band of Cahuilla IndiansGatoclass (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the update! -Uyvsdi (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi ...has been moved. Please feel free to expand it. It also needs reformatting, which I suppose you can take care of handily. Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy) (talk) 17:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Re: Chilkat weavingNice article! Just ran across it in the DYK queue, and it's always nice to see an Alaska Native article. JKBrooks85 (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC) DYK for Chilkat weaving--Dravecky (talk) 02:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Jimmie DurhamHiya - On another user's talk page you wrote "Jimmie Durham, among other famous non-Indians" - do you just mean unenrolled Indians, or is there evidence that Durham pulled a Forrest Carter? AFAIK, Durham's more genetically and culturally Cherokee than half the enrolled artists working out there, and his case represents everything that's wrong with the IACA. Am I wrong? Vizjim (talk) 07:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I should say, "good enough for me" as a dealer. But as far as WIki and criteria for inclusion there has to be some rules. Otherwise it is a slippery slope. Amerindianarts (talk) 14:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Is that it? Maybe she was not enrolled but she was half Osage. I thought you said there were non-natives in Lester's? Lester edited Snodgrass (1968) and challenges tribal affiliations for some. If you want to discredit Lester for listing "people out there with absolutely no Indian blood or heritage" you are going have to do much better than that. Amerindianarts (talk) 18:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I read your comments on another user's page about Jimmie Durham. He is in Lester too, at least the name Jimmie Durham, but not much else. That is a strange case. You said the 1990 IACA was written basically for him? The Lester listing has little info. No birth date, place, etc. There is nothing else prior to 1991 and a reference to an exhibit at CSU in Edmond OK. So, we have this artist who mysteriously appears in the art world at the age of 51? By all other accounts there is not much on him prior to 1992 either. Wiki article mentions exhibiting in 1965, but in regard to the art world there is really nothing. Do you know more? Is there more than one Jimmie Durham? Did he really not gain notoriety until after the Act? Why no art references prior to the act? Amerindianarts (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Those two articlesI've done my best to maintain a true neutral point of view on those two articles. The Mankiller was the more blatant, as the primary source used for the accusations didn't fit our standards for claims about living people. The Corntassel article was a little peacocky in spots and attackish in others, so I trimmed it as needed and asked for a couple of cites. --Inali | Talk 13:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Apologies for using rollback on your edit. I must have pressed it by accident on my watchlist. I didn't even know I'd done it until I saw your revert. Thanks for catching it and sorting it out. Regards, Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 21:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Cherokee article, October 21 revision, "removing superfluous links as per request"...what was the request? I can't find any listed anywhere.Odestiny (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Could you please take a look at the Native American materials in James D. Hutton and make sure I haven't said anything stupid? (Is "nations" correct in this context?) Thanks. - PKM (talk) 19:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
|