|
User talk:Utcursch/archive/28
Busy in real lifeThe shared IP 196.15.16.20 belongs to Oracle India, and blocking it means blocking edits to a lot of users. Please consider unblocking it. BTW just curious Utcursch, you seem to be busy in real life for a while (over an year?) now? scorpion032 (talk) 08:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Please re-blockGreetings Utcursch - I realise that you're busy in real life, but just on the off-chance that you're on-line now, please consider re-blocking User talk:209.80.152.178. Thanks for being out there. --Technopat (talk) 18:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
The Indian Barnstar of National Merit
Atheism in HinduismHi, as one of the contributors of this article, could you please provide your opinion on this "title change" proposal here. Thanks. Docku: What up? 15:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC) The Shlok ends with जाड्ये, correction done. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 03:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC) Unblock requestBack in September, you blocked 168.221.143.68 (talk · contribs) for one year due to vandalism.[1] An editor,Anthony Krupp, has been caught in the hard block and is requesting an unblock. Do you have any objections to changing the block options to allow registered editing? Thanks. - auburnpilot talk 21:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Ranjit Singh's mislRegarding this, I believe that Ranjit Singh belonged to "Sukerchakia misl" but will need to read back the source again as I had read on his history long time ago. However, "deol" last name addition by editor Khandoor did come as a shocker to me. --RoadAhead =Discuss= 04:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks DanSand (talk) 13:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC) How to use this top Indian Wikipedian list for effective collaborationHi, I have added a section 'How to use this list for effective collaboration' on User:Tinucherian/Indians WP page to see if we can put this list to really good use, pl give your thoughts on the same and we can take it further from there. Thanks. Vjdchauhan (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC). Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of User:Crusey101 Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
Over Smart Peoples of WikipediaHi!! You know why we are not able to expand Mum police and MumFB is due to lack of refrences. With out knowing this fact few people on wikipedia (They are not Indian) says that Articles on Vijay Salaskar, Ashok Kamte, Hemant Karkare are useless articles and should be deleted and says ""the relevant page is WP:NOTMEMORIAL: Wikipedia isn't a memorial site for deceased people. All articles on people who are notable only because they were killed in the Mumbai attacks belong merged into Casualties of the 2008 Mumbai attacks""(This article is not written as a Memorial nor as Homage) read this SAVE THIS THREE ARTICLES FROM DELETION--Suyogtalk to me! 10:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 01:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Is this User Insane?Hi fellow editor, I have been looking at the vandalism on this fellows page, and would like to know whether you share my opinion in thinking this user is insane? :-) Thanks--Sikh-history (talk) 13:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delivered at 05:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable) Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 22:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC) RfA thanksThank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of wikipedia as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again! --Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 22:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC) ThanksI have a special interest & am working on the Kashmir conflict and related articles. specifically I want to contribute articles on all double digit massacres in kashmir by the terrorists there. I am new here but learning my way around. thanx Wikireader41 (talk) 03:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 2 new articles on KashmirHello I have created 2 new articles, 1st 11 July 2006 Srinagar bombings needs verification and the 2nd on Balawaristan National Front which likely existed before but was deleted ( possibly by pakistani wikipedians). I feel we need to make sure that the 2nd article continues to exist as it tells the important story of the peoples wishes in PoK. could you please authenticate the first article since you seem to have expertise on India related stuff and have been around for a long time. Any suggestions for preventing the 2nd article from being deleted would be welcome too. cheers ;) Wikireader41 (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Sardarji JokesAny article ought to present both sides of an issue. A Sikh perspective of the issue need not be removed because it differs from your view. Like the Vir Sanghvi article and its rejoinder both need to be discussed. To present only the views of the so called 'celebrities' belittles the open concept of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kulveer (talk • contribs) 06:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC) ________ Hi, your editing on this instance is appreciable, since you have kept the story on the '12 o' clock' on the page. And I do realise that I needed an authentic source for this story, and hence I searched all day for an authentic research on the subject. I think the page is now more complete, after your thoughtfull editing. However, just wanted to convey that sometimes folklore is as much a part of the literary tradition as is a research paper based on folklore. India, more than any other country has a tradition of 'word of mouth' literature, with even the Rigvedas being written thousands of years AFTER they were recited, having been orally transferred from one generation to another. However we need to qualify a para with the sourced defined as folklore. You can go across hundreds of Wiki pages on the history, purported history of Europe in the dark ages, and it is all dependent on folklore. So, while Sardar jokes are a part of the written tradtion by way of internet and sms's, the rejoinders are not. As for Veer Sanghvi's article, I wonder if you have read the article. It is such a pathetic piece of work that it does not deserve a place on this page. However, if it is at all present, the well considered counter points need to be put across too. See, I am not here to score points, because I know your intentions are honourable. But I hope you see that if a layman goes across this page, he would come across convinced that it is indeed okay to joke a while on the hapless Sardars. So, when you present Sanghvi's comments per se, they need to be countered for a balanced perspective. Kulveer (talk) 06:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)KulveerKulveer (talk) 06:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Oh well!, maybe I'll have to publish my own book on it before we get the counter points on Wikipedia :D. I have added some sections on the Ethnic Jokes Page, wherever good sources were available. In India however, original research on sociologically diverse views is rare. Till then! Kulveer (talk) 07:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)KulveerKulveer (talk) 07:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Wrong categoryI noted that you first removed and than re-added the category "Khalistan Movement People" to article Jaswant Singh Khalra. After reading the description of the category I feel its wrong to add it to this article. Could you please provide neutral and reliable references to justify the addition of this category to the article? Cheers! --Roadahead ★ 20:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009From the editor — A new leaf
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 08:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Re:India quick linksThanks for the links. They are quite useful. I am a member of the Maharashtra Wikiproject and the Mumbai one too! --Belasd (talk) 03:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC) Carole Bayer SagerHi, I just received a message from you about an improper edit to the article Carole Bayer Sager, but I have never been to nor edited that page. Thanks. --71.162.27.58 (talk) 05:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC) The Indian Barnstar of National Merit
Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Block of User talk:PanthkhalsaI've just reviewed and declined this user's unblock request (and extended the block due to explicit legal threats). But I wanted to say that in the future you should ask another admin to do the blocking in a case like this, since you were basically blocking him over his behavior in a content dispute with you. Not that the block wasn't justified, but people respond a lot better to blocks if they are made to avoid the appearance of unfairness. Mangojuicetalk 18:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Request: HelenHello dear Utcursch! User:Cleark, without even discussing, moved the article Helen (actress) to Helen Khan, and then shifted all the content to one of its redirects, Helen Richardson. This created a great deal of confusion. Helen (actress) is the most proper way to call her as it's her stage name and she has always been credited, cited and referred to by that name. Other versions can appear in the infobox. Now I try to move it back to Helen (actress), but I cannot. Apart from that this user created some problems as the talk page of Helen Khan remains full and is not a redirect. If you could please move the article back as it should be, I would be grateful. Regards, Shahid • Talk2me 16:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Advice pleaseHi! I was about to place a message for some advice on Lahore_2009's Talk page, then noticed he had been blocked for various reasons. Having spotted your name there I wondered if you could help instead? Basically I am unsure about this article titled Panhwar especially in view of the e-mail and website links at the bottom of the Renowned_Panhwars section. Also as the article indicates Panhwar's are also known as Panwar's which disambiguates to Ponwar's I wonder if the page should be either deleted and redirected, or merged into the Ponwar article? Also in view of the reasons for Lahore's blocking, ie disruptive edits, would you please review my prior query on his talk page, relating to some of edits and his reply to me to see if the information he gave me is correct and his edits which I queried were okay? Many thanks Richard Harvey (talk) 00:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
SignpostWikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009 — 16 March 2009
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC) Thanks!Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. It probably would have taken me forever to notice. – PranksterTurtle (talk) 04:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
