User talk:UsernogoodThis user is currently frustrated due to blocked indefinitely without expires. Usernogood (talk) 16:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC) This user may be quit this English Wikipedia. Do not add new message. Usernogood (talk) 16:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Inappropriate Section RemovalHi Usernogood. Please do not blank discussions like you did here. Do it again and you'll find yourself blocked from editing. -FASTILY 04:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Okloveokok per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Okloveokok. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} . Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
I just asking administrators
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Usernogood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I want be unblocked so I able to use Twinkle tool against vandalism. Keep blocking Okloveokokok (created by man in house but not me also I don’t have multiple accounts per WP:MULTIPLE) Thank you Usernogood (talk) 14:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Decline reason: Checkuser results are quite clear; the accounts are technically indistinguishable. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Usernogood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: So I ripped his Wikipedia saved password paper before he leaves and he telling a lie me. He is using my device when creating his account and tracked me using his own computer. Notes: *I was telling truth about man *I not using multiple accounts and I read at WP:SOCK and WP:SPI Usernogood (talk) 21:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC) Decline reason: This is incoherent. Yamla (talk) 21:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Usernogood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: This was third times. OK… you didn’t understand or confused because I using deaf voice and using asl sign. How I comment with man? I spoke as writes paper let man understand and He makes me frustrated. He feel guilty for administrators blocked me. You must read carefully: I already ripped his Wikipedia saved password paper that he cannot access his account as Okloveokok and he is tell me a lie says: He is uses my an iPad as creating account and he run to guest room and he opens his Samsung laptop and tracked me Now he is leaved back his home on March 27, 2022. Notes: *I was tell truth about man *I don’t have any multiple accounts *I read and accepted at WP:SOCK and WP:SPI *He is tell me a lie *He made me very frustrated *I made good faith edit *If you unblock me so I can join vandalism training You must trust me and You must believes it was TRUTH!. Usernogood (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC) Decline reason: This remains as incoherent as before, and what little sense there is falls squarely into WP:LITTLEBROTHER territory. Since this clearly isn't going anywhere I'm revoking your access to this page. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
is closed. This is a checkuser block. User may appeal under the standard offer after six months. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC) |