|
User talk:Usernameunique/Archive 1
License tagging for File:BG Ice2 dj 3 sm.pngThanks for uploading File:BG Ice2 dj 3 sm.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC) License tagging for File:BG World's Fair dj small.pngThanks for uploading File:BG World's Fair dj small.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC) A page you started (A. L. Burt) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating A. L. Burt, Usernameunique! Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page. Learn more about page curation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by an unknown user 22:22, 24 January 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blythwood (talk • contribs) 22:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC) License tagging for File:BG6 WF ALB cameo small.pngThanks for uploading File:BG6 WF ALB cameo small.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC) Image tagging for File:1933 World's Fair guide book.jpgThanks for uploading File:1933 World's Fair guide book.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC) Articles with the most references
Non-free use of File:BG Sophomore ALB dj small.png Thank you for uploading File:BG Sophomore ALB dj small.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself. An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC) I have added an explanation on the talk page of why a higher-resolution image is necessary. You might also note that I previously did so "on the image description," as you just suggested, at 04:45, 26 April 2016.Usernameunique (talk) 00:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC) VariousDear Usernameunique, I'm sorry, but I had to do some pruning. First of all I split off the biographical information to its own article, and second I have removed some of the extensive original research, esp. those plagiarism sections. Wikipedia is not the place for original research: what is written here needs secondary verification. In addition, the plot summaries are just way too long; I think we typically have 300 to 500 words or so, without the frequent quotes. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:BG Ice2 dj 3 small.png Thanks for uploading File:BG Ice2 dj 3 small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC) File:BG Freshman G&D dj small.png listed for discussion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BG Freshman G&D dj small.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC) File:BG Sophomore ALB dj small.png listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:BG Sophomore ALB dj small.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC) File:BG World's Fair ALB dj small.png listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:BG World's Fair ALB dj small.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC) File:BG World's Fair dj small.png listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:BG World's Fair dj small.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC) File:BG Junior G&D dj small.png listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:BG Junior G&D dj small.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC) File:BG Senior G&D dj small.png listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:BG Senior G&D dj small.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC) You've got mail! Message added 15:33, 11 October 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. This is related to your request at WP:Newspapers.com --Cameron11598 (Talk) 15:33, 11 October 2016 (UTC) Your account on newspapers.com is now active. Happy editing! --Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Usernameunique. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Herbert Maryon articleHi, I noticed you have been doing a lot of work on the Herbert Maryon page. I just left a suggestion on the talk page. mineffle (talk) 09:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC) Thank you!!Hey,just to let you know I got all the files! Thank you, mineffle (talk) 12:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Herbert Maryon articleHi there! Just wanted to give you props for a good call in your comment on the Sutton Hoo article when you suggested that someone should create an article on metalwork expert Herbert Maryon. Just saw the comment now, but I created such an article a couple months ago. Looks like you had the idea six years earlier! Also, I took the liberty of editing said comment to add wiki links to your references to Maryon and the Sutton Hoo helmet. Hope you don't mind. --Usernameunique (talk) 07:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Your Graphics Lab request)-.png){kind=icon} If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}Regards, AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 02:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC).
DYK for Sutton Hoo helmet On 7 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sutton Hoo helmet, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 7th-century royal Anglo-Saxon Sutton Hoo helmet (reconstruction pictured) was excavated in more than 500 pieces? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sutton Hoo helmet. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sutton Hoo helmet), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Schwede66 00:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC) 24,360 views, wow!. Congratulations, Johnbod (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Usernameunique. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Björn Ambrosiani, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Björn Ambrosiani to be deleted, please add a reference to the article. If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 00:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 The article William Andrew Oddy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sitush (talk) 14:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC) A page you started (Ian Meadows (archaeologist)) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Ian Meadows (archaeologist), Usernameunique! Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page. Learn more about page curation. Elliot321 (talk) 20:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC) NotabilityYou are reverting my notability tagging but the articles do not actually show notability. I think you need to refamiliarise yourself with WP:GNG etc. For example, different Wikipedia projects have different notability requirements and, in any case, articles on other projects may not yet have been reviewed there - you cannot assume notability by pointing to the German Wikipedia etc. And merely writing a few books or papers doesn't make someone notable - you have to demonstrate that those works are significant and you have to find independent reliable sources etc that discuss the person. Together with a problem of citing and a complete misunderstanding of WP:PRIMARY etc in your comment on my talk page recently, I'm beginning to wonder if there might be a competence issue here. - Sitush (talk) 07:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC) Hello, Usernameunique. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sune Lindqvist, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Onel5969 TT me 20:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC) A page you started (John Richard Clark Hall) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating John Richard Clark Hall, Usernameunique! Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page. Learn more about page curation. Boleyn (talk) 20:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Dominic Tweddle) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Dominic Tweddle, Usernameunique! Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page. Learn more about page curation. Boleyn (talk) 15:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC) Incomplete DYK nomination
HiWould you be interested in continuing a dyk review Template:Did you know nominations/Arabization of the Jordanian Army command ? Makeandtoss (talk) 20:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Tjele helmet fragmentOn 23 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tjele helmet fragment, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Tjele helmet fragment is part of one of only five known Viking Age helmets? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tjele helmet fragment. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tjele helmet fragment), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Alex ShihTalk 12:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
A page you started (Birgit Arrhenius) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Birgit Arrhenius, Usernameunique! Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page. Learn more about page curation. —usernamekiran(talk) 20:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC) Nice to meet youNot part of the DYK review: look at other articles, such as Piano Concerto No. 24 (Mozart) (not by me) for a feeling of the relation between lead and body, - the lead a summary of the key facts, which are in more detail - and referenced - in the body. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC) DYK for Gevninge helmet fragmentOn 6 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gevninge helmet fragment, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Gevninge helmet fragment (pictured) once adorned a pre-Viking Age helmet? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gevninge helmet fragment. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gevninge helmet fragment), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC) DYK for Guilden Morden boarOn 8 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Guilden Morden boar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Guilden Morden boar may have adorned a helmet like those worn by the poetical warrior Beowulf? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Guilden Morden boar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Guilden Morden boar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Precioushistoric treasures  Thank you for quality articles such as Sutton Hoo helmet, Tjele helmet fragment, Gevninge helmet fragment and Guilden Morden boar, meeting high interest with meticulous sourcing, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
MussidaeI will act on your comments on the DYK nomination page. With regards to Mussidae, I ought really to add a taxonomy section explaining that the family as originally understood, had been split with many genera now included in other families. We currently have an unreferenced article Brain coral which refers to the family Mussidae as it was before the family was split. After the DYK has gone through, I will propose merging this, or at least removing the taxobox, because it is referring to a form of coral rather than a scientific taxon. Actually, I have been in two minds as to how best to proceed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC) Sutton Hoo helmetA fascinating and well-written article. Great work! I realize the article is still under construction, but wonder have you considered adding something on the Beowulf connection. The poem talks of depictions of boars above the cheek-guards and crests described as 'wirum bewunden' (bound with wire), as seems to be the case with the Sutton Hoo one. --Hillbillyholiday talk 07:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Have just seen this. I have a faint memory of a paper on the Sutton Hoo/Beowulf connection and I think it may have been by someone called Chambers. However, I have had a quick look around my library and cannot find the reference.Abila.pao (talk) 03:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
DYKThe nominator already fixed all the issues I told him in Template:Did you know nominations/Hannah Amelia Wright. I'm new in this so I'm not sure what to do. Thanks.Tintor2 (talk) 13:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Usernameunique. Sorry about that, but I left a message on the Abalos Mensa DYK. No pressure, but if/when you have the time, you can advise about the proposed pic on the Mensa and Rupes DYKs. Thank you again. Dr. K. 16:39, 2 September 2017 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Thanks Adityavagarwal! I appreciate it. --Usernameunique (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
HiHi, you're doing such good work at DYK, I wish you would write something on your userpage so you can have a blue name like the rest of us! Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Abalos Colles DYKHi Usernameunique. You were so fast, that we had an edit-conflict. I added the QpQ, less than a minute before you reviewed the DYK. I have never seen such speed. Thank you again. :) Dr. K. 19:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Elisabeth MunksgaardOn 5 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elisabeth Munksgaard, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Danish historian Elisabeth Munksgaard was given a "fine finale" to her career with a costumed eleventh-century king? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elisabeth Munksgaard. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Elisabeth Munksgaard), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Gevninge helmet fragmentThe article Gevninge helmet fragment you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Your GA nomination of Guilden Morden boarThe article Guilden Morden boar you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Your GA nomination of Tjele helmet fragmentThe article Tjele helmet fragment you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold QPQs in Did You Know candidatesThere is a slight problem at the moment with QPQ requirements on the Did You Know candidates page: there are none left to be done, while you have (rightfully) asked several users, among whose group I am, to review candidates in order to see their hooks promoted. While I understand that this is the normal procedure, we seem to be in unconventional times, where there is now a glut of people having to review non-existent candidates. Should we wait hoping that a surge of candidates solves the problem soon? Because we may just end up with a bunch of perfectly good unpromoted hooks for a reason that, at least for the moment, creates a problem of its own rather than solve one. Iry-Hor (talk) 16:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Help me outI must be losing it. I've looked over all three articles cited in the "Galamsey fight" section and can't find where "Atta Akyea opined that the galamsey fight was not a job for one constituency but a national problem requiring national policy backed by military support." --MopTop (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Prep 5
You've got mailIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Yoninah (talk) 23:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC) I have left a comment on this DYK Template:Did you know nominations/Caroline Augusta Huling, but I do not wish to interact much; on the contrary of the other DYK, I think this one was particularly interesting so it would sad me to see it gone, but I kindly ask you to decide how to proceed. Elisa.rolle (talk) 15:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Thanks Alex Shih! --Usernameunique (talk) 15:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC) My DYK? NominationI've responded to and addressed your concerns here: Template:Did you know nominations/Winfield Hancock presidential campaign, 1880. Thus, please take a look at my DYK? nomination and see if everything in it is in order now. Futurist110 (talk) 02:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC) Template:Did you know nominations/Abbie CarringtonWhat nikkimaria is complaining here is an article dated 1899. There is no copyright before 1923. And I start to question the good faitho of this reviewer... Elisa.rolle (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Rupert Bruce-Mitford
DYK for Rupert Bruce-MitfordOn 23 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rupert Bruce-Mitford, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that scholar Rupert Bruce-Mitford funded his education by burning a book? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rupert Bruce-Mitford. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rupert Bruce-Mitford), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC) DYK for John Doubleday (restorer)On 24 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Doubleday (restorer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after a drunkard smashed the Portland Vase into hundreds of pieces, John Doubleday (pictured) was dubbed "the prince of restorers"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Doubleday (restorer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Doubleday (restorer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC) Hi, just a note that I completed all the changes you asked for 9 days ago. Yoninah (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, please remember to place a notice on the nominator's talk page, rather than just rely on a ping. Most newbies don't see the ping. I closed the nomination and informed the nominator on his talk page. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 12:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
DYKYou are welcome to move nominations to prep and in fact it would be very useful if you did so. I tend to do a set at around this time each day, but more because sets needs to be built and nobody else is doing it. In fact it is better to have several people involved because one has to avoid moving to prep any nomination in which one is significantly involved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Usernameunique, I was wondering whether you would be able to return to complete this DYK review now that Auntieruth55 has responded to your points. (Note that while the first-offered QPQ doesn't seem to have been one, the second is more complete, even though it didn't come with an icon, which is a not atypical beginner's mistake.) Surtsicna seemed okay with your ALT1, and Auntieruth55 never said anything about it that I saw. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 9Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guilden Morden boar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC) Other DYK nomination responsesUsernameunique, there are a two additional reviews where the nominator has responded to your requests; when you have a chance, please check to be sure that you are satisfied with what has been done:
Thank you very much. I've noticed you haven't been active in DYK lately, doubtless because of your FAC and other activities. I hope you'll be able to spend more time at DYK in the days and weeks ahead. (If you're taking a step back from DYK, and would like me to find other editors to finish these reviews, please let me know.) BlueMoonset (talk) 05:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, we're still waiting for your approval tick on this DYK nomination. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
You've got mail!Message added 19:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. — fortunavelut luna 19:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC) Usernameunique, when you get the chance, Antony-22 has responded to your review query. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC) Seminar on Sri Raghavendra Teertha's Contribution to Indian Philosophy and Sanskrit Literature at BangaloreIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Thank you, Prabhanjanmutalik (talk) 20:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
A barnstar for you!
DYK for Benty Grange helmetOn 9 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Benty Grange helmet, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that warriors in the epic poem Beowulf wear helmets like the boar-crested Benty Grange helmet (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Benty Grange helmet. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Benty Grange helmet), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC) Congratulations to the statistics, and now also a featured article! When should that appear as TFA? Any special date? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
RE:Disappearing authorsDisappearing authors? Good god, you should have called the Wiki-Police... But don't worry - The Dark Knight is on the job. I'll just need their names, any witnesses, and their last known location. DarkKnight2149 01:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
1928: BA from UCLA (also listed here 1935: Ph.D. from UCLA (also listed in 1936) 1936: mention at the UC College of Agriculture at Davis (and another) 1937: The Eormanric of the Widsið (read at a 1936 conference) 1938: Becca of the Banings 1938: mention of going to a conference in NYC 1939: mentioned as an "instructor in English" at UC 1939: The Date and Metre of the "hamðismál"
1939: Read paper "Kings Frotho I-V: A Study in Saxo's Historical Method" at a conference 1940: Innweorud Earmanrices 1940: Óđinn and the Norse Jǫrmunrekkr-Legend 1941: Reviewed Work: The Orkneyinga Saga by Alexander Burt Taylor
1941: Promoted to assistant professor 1943: The Legends of Ermanaric 1945: Noted as "Caroline Brady, Department of English, University of California" 1949: In an article saying that she's now working at Klamath Falls Community College, and was previously an assistant professor at the universities of Pennsylvania and California. (see also: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13)
1952: The Old English Nominal Compounds in -rád
1952: The Synonyms for "sea" in Beowulf
1955: Mention that "Miss Brady has now been working for some time at Harvard"
Elisa.rolle, is there any chance you would mind clipping these two articles that mention Caroline Brady? Unfortunately I still do not have full access to newspapers.com: article 1 and article 2. --Usernameunique (talk) 08:38, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Caroline Brady (philologist)) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Caroline Brady (philologist), Usernameunique! Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page. Learn more about page curation. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Usernameunique, there was an attempt to ping you from this DYK template, but it was added without a new sig so it wouldn't have gone through. Just a heads up; I'm sure you would have seen it eventually. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC) You've got mail!Message added 17:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. — fortunavelut luna 17:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC) Halloween cheer!  Happy Halloween!
Hello Usernameunique: Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
A barnstar for you!
A barnstar for you!
Amazing work at the RX
DYK nomination of Caroline Brady (philologist)
A barnstar for you!
A barnstar for you!
Your GA nomination of Nigel Williams (conservator)Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nigel Williams (conservator) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.
Your GA nomination of Nigel Williams (conservator)The article Nigel Williams (conservator) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold
Your GA nomination of Nigel Williams (conservator)The article Nigel Williams (conservator) you nominated as a good article has passed Congratulations, - I remember it from DYK days! Yes, go for FAC. Compare with others, read a few reviews. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Peer review!Whoah, that was fast! If I had been quicker, I would definitely have suggested Peer Review before FAC. The issue with going straight from GA to FAC is that you've really only had one alternative pair of eyes on it, mine. Whereas Peer Review gives you a much broader range of views. As you know, having done them, the standards at FAC are quite a bit more stringent than GAR and I think you might get a grumble or two at making the leap in one bound. That said, I shall certainly Support it, and it is very fine article, so we shall see how it goes. KJP1 (talk) 13:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Usernameunique. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Usernameunique, your review of this GA nomination has not been updated in over seven weeks. Please resume your review as soon as possible. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC) Image without licenseUnspecified source/license for File:Emesa helmet.png Thanks for uploading File:Emesa helmet.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:Emesa helmet.png Thanks for uploading File:Emesa helmet.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Colin Robert ChaseJust a FYI, sources can say anything. Categories are to be determined based on what is in the article. The point of an encyclopedia is to get, at a minimum, the basic information about the subject. For an academic, that would include where they work and where they studied.Postcard Cathy (talk) 03:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Tweaked hook and added another source. Please take a look see. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC) Barnstar
Guilden Morden boar selected as TFAThis is to let you know that the Guilden Morden boar article has been scheduled as today's featured article for December 20, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 20, 2017.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Bournoutian / Khanate of ErevanHello UNU, I just sent you another email about Bournoutian. - LouisAragon (talk) 17:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK workUsernameunique, thanks for all the DYK work you've been doing. I was impressed with your donation of a QPQ to the longstanding Nagtahan Interchange nomination. Would you want to do something similar for Template:Did you know nominations/Paddy Mahon? The nominator has decided to withdraw the nomination—they don't seem to be up to tackling a QPQ and hadn't realized it was required—and rather than close it right away, I thought I'd ask you if you'd like to intervene. Were you planning to return to Template:Did you know nominations/Jie Zhitui? You did an initial review, and LlywelynII has responded, but also unstruck a number of hooks that you had struck. If you will be returning (and, presumably, restriking), please let me know; I'm going to be posting a new list of old DYK noms needing reviewing, and will only include this one if you aren't planning to continue reviewing it. For Template:Did you know nominations/Edward Dodding, you'll want to check Philafrenzy's just-submitted QPQ to make sure it's okay before restoring your tick to the review. I was wondering whether you'd be willing to take on Template:Did you know nominations/Bhogeshwari Phukanani. As you can see, I've not been able to deal with it myself—the two differing accounts of her death have not been accounted for in the article, and I'm very uncomfortable with the author just having stripped out one of them rather than doing so. (Why would one be given credence and the other not?) What would you like to do with your Caroline Brady nomination? Should I call for a new reviewer? I'm completely unable to assess her notability myself. I do think that there is overmuch detail—the street addresses are indeed unusual—but I'm not sure that should be a problem for a DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Added ALT1. Great idea! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 02:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC) dyk Clement Price ThomasHi, I've reworded much of text. Please let me know your view. Whispyhistory (talk) 14:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC) Usernameunique, when you passed this nomination, you didn't make any comment on the special occasion suggestion nor move it to the approved area. The nominator moved it herself to special occasions, but I moved it back because special occasion requests are not automatically granted, as they are not all compelling. Looking at it again, I have to confess that I am not particularly impressed with the reasoning, which only seems to apply if the image is chosen, and then only to people who would recognize Mary and realize that it was a Marian feast day that day. However, I thought I should ping you and let you decide what should be done, since January 1 is not that far off, and the Prep 5 set destined to run that day is already starting to fill. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Coppergate Helmet
Bhogeswari Phukanani at DYKHi, thank you for the effort put in by you on the review of Bhogeswari Phukanani. I have added the suggestion made by you at Template:Did you know nominations/Bhogeshwari Phukanani, could you please have a look, would love to have another pair of eyes look at it. Thank you again. Happy holidays FITINDIA 02:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC) About Template:Did you know nominations/Caroline Brady (philologist): What would you think of a new version of this article that removed the sources that have been criticized? The reference list would have to shrink greatly, with all the census links taken out, and the society memberships. If there is a kernel that ought to remain, my guess is that it would be based on Legends of Ermanaric and her two late papers about diction in Beowulf. It would help if we could find memorable comments on her work from third parties. I looked into a 1945 comment by Stanley Rypins on Legends. His bottom line is rather qualified: “This conclusion, though reasonable enough, scarcely requires the emphasis it here receives.” I haven't yet looked at all the reviews of Legends, but if the book is held by 151 Worldcat libraries, it must have got good press *somewhere*. There is a minimal Google preview of the Ermanaric book available online which doesn't let me read any complete sentences. Quoting some lines from the book would add to the interest. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 21:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC) Dearth of unreviewed DYK articlesUsernameunique, we've run into the very rare situation of nominators not being able to do QPQs because there aren't unreviewed nominations available. I can't believe I've even suggesting this, but if you could temporarily refrain from taking on such unreviewed nominations for a while, until the dearth is relieved, it would help a lot. This is not to say to say that there won't be any DYK reviewing, since there will still be plenty of reviewed nominations that need ALT hooks checked and other help to get them to that final tick. I just have this vision of a handful of people pouncing on new nominations and having multiple edit-conflicted reviews being produced. (Or maybe it was something I ate today.) At any rate, I hope you don't mind. Nominations may pick up with the New Year and the new WikiCup, but I imagine most of the participants will need to do QPQs as well, so it may not improve matters much... Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Nigel Williams (conservator)On 18 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nigel Williams (conservator), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when only 23 years old, Nigel Williams was tasked with restoring "the most iconic object" (pictured) from a spectacular archaeological discovery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nigel Williams (conservator). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Nigel Williams (conservator)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC) For the FAC, first you should initiate the nomination: describe what the article is about, and who worked on it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC) Congratulations to the stats for the conservator! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Russian battleship PetropavlovskI've finished with my changes, so if you could take a look, I'd be grateful.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Tommy Phillips FACJust a heads up I went and addressed everything you noted in the FAC. If you have any other comments I'd definitely appreciate hearing it. Thanks. Kaiser matias (talk) 04:02, 5 January 2018 (UTC) Sources needed for Days of the Year pagesYou're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and added a source to back up your recent addition to October 3. Please try to find sources for additions to these pages as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC) PetrelsPer Template:Did you know nominations/Project Kingfisher; AUM-N-4 Diver; AUM-N-6 Puffin; SUM-N-2 Grebe, this is my reminder regarding my query if you think AUM-N-2 Petrel is worthy of being thrown to the GAN wolves.
|
.jpg)
