en User talk:Ttony21

This is Ttony21's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

A brownie for you!

Hello Ttony21! I hope you enjoy this brownie as a friendly greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 04:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of dorrance entry

Hi Tony, This entry is plagiarized from the internet. I do not know how to delete the entry. The webpage from which it was created is found here: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/08/prweb4421484.htm Also, some information on this release was wrong. Please advise.

Sincerely, Peter.kopecek (talk) 21:08, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good call, I'll get a speedy deletion template on it in a moment :) ~Ttony21^{(talk, contribs)} 21:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NFL on TV

I was only clarifying info in most of my edits. 76.190.196.103 (talk) 00:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted it because the wording came off as un-encyclopedic; instead of "rabid" you should use a term like "dedicated", and typically those statements are best accompanied by a reference so that it doesn't come off as bias or personal research, thank you :) ~Ttony21^{(talk, contribs)} 00:35, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sharks

Ok, I made my point and can thus leave the stage in peace.. 46.196.60.3 (talk) 21:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not really no. Upon reading the section, it's clear that the purpose is actually to discredit the theory, not grant it credence. Therefore it should stay. If you'd like to vandalize the page again as a parting shot before being banned then you are entitled to. ~Ttony21^{(talk, contribs)} 21:56, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Crochet.PNG

The file File:Crochet.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Virtual Bouncer

The article Virtual Bouncer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable software.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 19:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]