Hello, and Welcome to the Wikipedia, Trente7cinq! Thanks for contributing to the discussion on the Andrew Wakefield biography (er, character assassination/doublespeak, as systematically enforced -blatantly- by unrepentant pov-pushers). Here are a few perfunctory tips that, hopefully, will enhance your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:
- Take a look at the New contributors' help page, the Wikipedia Tutorial and the Manual of Style, and If you still need any help, you can always post your question at the Help Desk.
- When you have time, please peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia and Assume good faith, but please keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
- Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
- Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!
And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes: ~~~~. Best of luck, Trente7cinq, and have fun! Ombudsman (talk) 23:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ombudsman . My commentary to the discussion page on A. Wakefield was just that one :
Origin of the - supposed- autism/vaccine connection
Also fascinating that they have tried to portray Wakefield as the guy that invented the autism/vaccine connection, despite the fact that Leo Kanner reported that one of his first 11 cases in the 1940's was a regression following a smallpox vaccine, the VCIP has been paying autism cases for 25 years, and I first heard about the connection in my undergrad psych program in 1988 at George Mason University, so that they can use this GMC hearing to declare the vaccine controversy over. (I have forty or so studies on my "no evidence of any link" page supporting the vaccine/autism connection and I have never even had Wakefield's MMR paper up there. to be read at : http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/2010/02/anatomy-of-witch-hunt.html--Trente7cinq (talk) 08:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Written in the discussion page , this was only meant as a question ...!--Trente7cinq (talk) 14:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
if you don't want it to be red any more: User:Trente7cinq. See WP:USERPAGE for more information. — Scientizzle 13:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Talk:Bradley Manning in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. --S. Rich (talk) 16:45, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear S Rich , If the response to my comment had been cooperative I would never have written in French . I considered that "Perhaps he came of age during the most rapid contraction of the developed world's middle class since the 1930s. Ginger Conspiracy (talk) 12:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)" was not appropriate and not complying with good practise .Writing in a foreighn langage was a mean to indicate that .Ginger could have used Google translation tool to understand and answer . Owing to his irony, he doesn't seem to be resourceless .Sincerly yours .Trente7cinq (talk) 09:13, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Which part of the Bradley Manning discussion page did you want me to pay special attention to? JonDePlume (talk) 22:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello. I have made some edits recently, I don't know if they are related to problems on the talk page, you might want to check them out. Cheers. walk victor falk talk 23:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. When you recently edited Migdal, Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Majdal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I corrected ; link to "al-Majdal, Tiberias"Trente7cinq (talk) 12:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Bill Frist, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ponyo, you are right , I should have checked AND referenced this extract ..I too rapidly took from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli_Lilly_controversies#Eli_Lilly_and_the_Bush_Family Trente7cinq (talk) 16:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
