User talk:Tourbillon

Serbia - GAN

Hello Tourbillon, I would like to ask for your help regarding Serbia's (I hope near) future GA nomination.

What is not done properly, what could be improved and all in all do you think that there are arguments in favour of the nomination?

Thank you, Mm.srb (talk) 15:35, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, well I have to go through it first. But at a first glance it looks pretty good - decent size, not overloaded with pictures, much of the content is sourced and there don't seem to be any content disputes. I'll try to have a better look this evening or over the weekend. - ☣Tourbillon A ? 15:52, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks bratko, looking forward to hearing from you. Mm.srb (talk) 22:56, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Mm.srb: I made a detailed read of the article, which is as far as I can go given my limited time right now. Overall it's not bad. Basically three things should be taken care of before approaching a GAN:
  • Prose;
  • Sources;
  • Image licensing.
The prose is alright, but needs improvement. Some subsections would need a rewrite, for example Slavic settlement and state formation (very choppy), Ottoman and Habsburg rule (the first paragraph is almost word-for-word identical to the similar subsection in the Bulgaria article), and the entire Demographics (somewhat choppy) and Economy (a bit bloated) sections.
Another suggestion I'd make is to split the Balkan Wars and WWI into a separate subsection, then make an entire subsection on Yugoslavia as both a kingdom and then a socialist state, and finally a subsection on the breakup of Yugoslavia coupled with modern history. Logically, it would make more sense - Yugoslavia pre- and post-WWII is still the same state despite the changes in government and territory, whereas contemporary Serbian history involves unresolved issues stemming from the collapse of Yugoslavia.
I could make some edits in the structure (particularly History and Economy) without introducing radical changes to content. It should improve the flow and make the article more compact without trimming valuable details already present. Not sure if it will be tonight, though. - ☣Tourbillon A ? 17:57, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I had the same impressions as you did. It means very much to me to hear it from an editor who can look at the article from another, perhaps more objective position. Thank you for your time. I would be very glad if you should decide to work on the problematic parts and of course several editors from WikiProject Serbia and I would end a hand. The recategorization idea sounds great. Mm.srb (talk) 19:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Will be happy to help out. Will do some edits tomorrow most likely. - ☣Tourbillon A ? 20:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If I might make some observations, there are numerous short paragraphs of only one or two sentences, which should be fixed per WP:LAYOUT. There are also a few short subsections, which could be an impediment to flow (although the MOS treats this as a minor issue). Some images are hardcoded in size without clear significant reason. There are a number places sources are lacking, most prominently throughout the Culture section. Not part of WP:GAC but worth considering going forward, the article prose is 90kB (well above the ~50kB rule of thumb in WP:SIZE), I see a few image sandwiching occurrences throughout the article, and the CoA of Belgrade should be removed from the infobox per WP:MOSICON. CMD (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Spotted those too. Will stay out of source issues for now, but the rest will be edited. - ☣Tourbillon A ? 06:38, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

A year ago ...
Bulgaria
... you were recipient
no. 2001 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus outbreak in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patient zero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:26, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah has it been two years already? :) Very nice. - ☣Tourbillon A ? 16:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Units of the Bulgarian Land Forces

A tag has been placed on Category:Units of the Bulgarian Land Forces requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Units of the Bulgarian Air Force

A tag has been placed on Category:Units of the Bulgarian Air Force requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings,

We are working on a Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları about Ottoman times female slavery with a special focus on the state of non-elite common women slavery in those times.

We are looking for help in further update of the article draft with references about Ottoman time female slavery and slave markets from all Black sea coastal Countries and cities there of that includes Bulgaria and including it's cities like Ahtopol(Ahtenbolu), Burgas, Varna.

Please do have a look at Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları and help expand the draft with (Bulgarian) refs if you find topic interested in.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 10:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:User junta

Template:User junta, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User junta and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User junta during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]