User talk:Totaldramaman

Hollywood Game night

I've posted this also on the Hollywood Game Night Talk page as well. I think the episode grids are pretty great. However, the only thing I would address is to add a sort of guide on top of the grids explaining what all the different colors or the bolding of celebrities name means. That would make it a lot clearer. It would let people know which team won, who was chosen for the final game and if they won the money. Right now, it looks a bit confusing. Hope that Helps! One thing that I would ask your advice on is the "Broadcast' section". i've noticed the edits that user Nick has added in regards to adding different time zone times and the scheduling for season 2. He states that in this past block that two episodes were broadcast each time. That is not really the case as this past monday as referenced by the grid there was only 1 episode broadcast. Also, the program will return earlier than expected after the Olympics which i have sourced. User Nick reverted my edits (I was on my other computer) I know that on other panel and game shows I have seen the usual time slot announced on the official Website (i.e. NBC Monday at 8 pm). I reedited his reversions omitting the Olympic references. I wanted to ask your advice as you contribute to the site and do not want to start an edit war. any help appreciated.!184.160.203.195 (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)samusek2[reply]

I added a key, I hope that helps. I think that the single 8 pm would be fine, but it doesn't really matter to me. ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 16:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

I replied at my talk page, will keep the convo going there if that's alright. Also, I saw your userpage... you know you can have your username changed, right? :P Gloss • talk 03:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do, I've just had no clue what I should change it to for the past few years lol. And is there anything wrong with a dual header? I mean, "Redemption Island" and "Challenge winners" both have it. I don't see any problem with episode numbers having it. ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 03:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. But what makes the episode number more important than the day number? I feel like they're both very significant. Would it be overkill to make them both headers? Hmm.. Gloss • talk 03:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it would be a bit much to make them both headers. Some episodes have two to four (as we've seen in BvW lol) eliminations so I think episode comes first. Day branches out of episode, episode doesn't branch out of day. ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 03:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd have to disagree with that in terms of the game. The days aren't designed around the episodes. The episodes are planned and edited around the days. Does it make sense what I'm trying to say at all? haha Gloss • talk 04:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It makes sense, but I think my main point is that the article's not about the game, it's about the show. But if we do switch the episodes and the days around, I don't think it'd look as great because the numbers aren't in consecutive order, they're all over the place. And if we make them both headers, you may as well just bold the entire table lol ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 04:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this edit you reverted was actually a good edit. Laura M should be where the IP placed her, she only wasn't because when the table was extended for the merged tribe voting history, she needed to be above Laura B and Kat. I didn't undo your edit because I was wondering if that doesn't sound right to you. Gloss • talk 22:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Gloss: Well if the pre-merge order is based on the post-merge voting history, then Laura Morett should be placed there. If she should be placed under Kat and Laura B. then the top 11 should be alphabetical order; just my 2 cents. ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 22:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm only talking bout pre-merge order. The Laura M vote was pre-merge and should be listed in order (before Laura B). Gloss • talk 03:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Gloss: But then why is the post-merge order in the pre-merge table? ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 00:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It makes the most logical sense, why put them in alphabetical order when there is a more Survivor-related order to put them in? Gloss • talk 02:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Gloss: So I don't understand why Laura M should be placed where she originally was? ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 03:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where she originally was or where the IP put here? Gloss • talk 03:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Gloss: Originally. ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 00:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that she should be where she was originally. I think she should be where the IP put her (and you reverted). Gloss • talk 05:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Gloss: Obligatory "why?" so I can state my rebuttal. ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 23:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We just went through my entire reason for why! When someone is voted out, their row should end at the episode they're voted out in. That table is for pre-merge voting results. The order doesn't make sense to have Laura M above Kat and Laura B when she was voted out before them. Gloss • talk 23:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Gloss: I get that but then why are the merged contestants in the pre-merge table in post-merge order?? ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 01:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what I'm trying to discuss here. I'm only concerned about Laura M's spot in the first table. If you think the post-merge contestants should be listed in a different order, that's a conversation for a different place (an article's talk page maybe). Gloss • talk 02:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: Cagayan

Not true. The alternate Brawn vs. Brains vs. Beauty logo is also being used in the Ponderosa videos. See http://www.cbs.com/shows/survivor/video/qXrvuya8p6iMqzxZm1pyPwhWBGUM3arc/survivor-cagayan-sarah-arrives-at-ponderosa/ Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then explain why what YOU SAY is NOT the official logo is used exclusively in the Ponderosa videos???? Steelbeard1 (talk) 15:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Colors

But the Playoffs are not the live rounds, thus the same rules and "consistencies" do not apply... lol. But whatever, no big deal. I still think yellow makes more sense but it ultimately doesn't matter. FaceOffTournament (talk) 01:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Survivor29logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Survivor29logo.jpg, which you've attributed to (Logo). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Salavat: Thanks for helping out with the file, haha. ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 21:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor29logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Survivor29logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan2: Someone re-uploaded it under a different name, it can be deleted. ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 02:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice (U.S. season 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Something to Talk About. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...

You realize the revelation that a "wild card" contestant being brought back happened AFTER our edits? Soooo yeah at the time you were wrong. But carry on. FaceOffTournament (talk) 19:05, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, thanks for finding the video on who voted for who. But the refs are not shown in the article. Please make sure it is not hidden or something. 108.162.157.141 (talk) 22:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you there? 108.162.157.141 (talk) 20:24, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:SecondChanceSurvivorMales.png

Thank you for uploading File:SecondChanceSurvivorMales.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:SecondChanceSurvivorFemales.png

Thank you for uploading File:SecondChanceSurvivorFemales.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed at Talk:Survivor:_Cambodia#Spoilers_before_episode_airs.3F

Hello, you are being message because you made/reinstated edits pertaining to the quit of Terry Deitz from Survivor: Cambodia. These edits are being discussed on the talk page, and it appears I am the only one defending them. Two users are currently arguing that these edits are invalid. I ask that you please chime in the talk page. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


@Thegreyanomaly: sorry, didn't see this till now! ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 00:41, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor33Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Survivor33Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Totaldramaman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:SecondChanceSurvivorFemales.png

Thanks for uploading File:SecondChanceSurvivorFemales.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:24, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:SecondChanceSurvivorMales.png

Thanks for uploading File:SecondChanceSurvivorMales.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:24, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temptation row

Is the temptation row really necessary?, its only lasts for three weeks I don't think we need to add a whole new row to the voting table, an alternative would be a note, plus a separate table for the temptation competition in the Temptation section of the page. VietPride10 (talk) 23:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@VietPride10: It's a new game mechanic that affects nominations like Roadkill, Battle of the Block, MVP, etc before it so I do think it needs its own row. Coach's Comp in BB14 lasted three weeks too. Roadkill lasted four weeks. ~ Totaldramaman (talk · contribs) 23:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, good point, about it affecting the nominations. Thanks! VietPride10 (talk) 23:27, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Totaldramaman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Totaldramaman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor32Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Survivor32Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:18, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Survivor28logo.jpg

Notice

The file File:Survivor28logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

replaced by File:Survivor cagayan dvd region 1 season twenty-eight.png as lead image of Survivor: Cagayan....

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor28logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Survivor28logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor30logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Survivor30logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]