User talk:Tonywalton/Archive-Dec-2007

My name

By the way, my name means "seeds", this in case you wonder ;) Sambure (talk) 16:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, ok, if you knew some italian, I guess it's easy to understand :) If you know Italian then you know also Romanian. Since Italian and Romanian are the latin most closest languages. --Sambure (talk) 16:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I give you an example: Italian: Io sono acasa. Noi siamo due italiani. Romanian: Eu sunt acasa. Noi suntem doi italieni. --Sambure (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's true. That's why there are about 1,5-2 millions Romanians in Italy. I speak also Italian, though I never studied. I can also speak Spanish but there I have to learn for about 2-3 months. For Italian, every Romanian can read a newspaper and understand it. To speak it, one need about 2 weeks.--Sambure (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really secret cabal

Yeah, I don't know the handshake and I've only been an admin for a few months. Don't forget to let me know when I can be allowed in ... :) Pedro :  Chat  23:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Deleted article

  • ~Hey~*

I was wondering if you would consider (no obligations, of course) undeleting the infancy of an article on Ohtahara Syndrome. I accidentally started to follow the tutorial in the main page instead of the Sandbox--the first step of the tutorial is to test the links, which is what I did. I actually have the stub and some of the article already written and am ready to post it. But I completely understand if that's not going to work.

This one has spirit. (talk) 16:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deleted page punches

why did you deleted mt page??? 

     FROM jelboy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelboy (talk • contribs) 01:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for alerting me to the frivolous complaint by User:Perspicacite.

I find it rather ironic that he did not think it courteous or appropriate to bring it to my attention himself - but then that seems to be his persistent habit. Alice.S 16:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I do appreciate you taking the time to give me some good advice to think about and apologize that I was bit "tired and emotional" yesterday evening.
Unless you object, I would like to re-word (and correct the many spelling mistakes) in my last comments and then (and in any case) move the whole section to my "P-Section" where I will probably want to put some of my edits in context.
Since I appreciate that we are probably in different time zones, if I do this before you have a chance to register any objection, you have my full permission to revert my polishing (but not the move).
Keep warm (if you are where I assume you are) and good luck with the job hunting! Alice.S 09:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Piles

I've been called worse. Don't think I've been called "Piles" since I was nine, though. ;-) Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 14:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me?!

I wasn't talking to you Tony, I was having an adult conversation with Giles. Don't intefere and patronise me, I do not appreciate such childish behaviour!

By the way, Piles was a typing error! I'm only human. I make mistakes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alice Street (talk • contribs)

You two are pathetic to actually check! I am not liar, although you seem to think differently! I would say "get a life", but that's "breaking the rules" as well I presume, instead I shall say go and watch star trek! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alice Street (talk • contribs) 14:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To check what? The distance between P and G? I've been using a keyboard for 26 years...I kinda knew that already. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 14:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

26 years too long, like I say get a life!

This adult conversation ended long ago when you made reference to "improving my record" this is not a game, so don't treat it like one! End of. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alice Street (talk • contribs) 14:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Vandalism warnings against Elmo

  • Somebody did not warn the mentioned users, and so that's why it happened.
  • As for the report, it was in conjunction with a warning.

Dalekusa 15:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Bexfield

Thanks for your concern. I agreed with the prod and speedied the article myself! --Dweller (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Yes, there was a bug... maybe that's what made me misunderstand. Yes, that's fine. --Dweller (talk) 20:31, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Memoirsofalisa

You beat me to the block - seems a bit light, though, for creating an attack page eight times? I was amazed the user hadn't already been blocked. —Random832 19:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Reverted attack

I reverted myself with the diff stating that you did it. <DREAMAFTER> <TALK> 23:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:User Smoking

Template:User Smoking has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Ligulem 17:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mentoring

Resolved

Hey - would you feel OK clearing me to post a couple of things? They're listed here under "Clearances" - Dweller's been away for a while, it seems, and they'll become historical quite fast! :D Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 08:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I rarely edit at weekends. Cleared now. --Dweller 11:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thursday's Child

Thank you very much for the Barnstar! My little adoptee is just...high-spirited. I'm sure it's just a phase. No doubt he'll graduate mentoring with flying colors. Of course, the mothers in Rosemary's Baby, The Exorcist and The Omen probably also had such high hopes for their children. Gee...do ya think I ought to consult a priest? :-0 Jeffpw 22:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Block of User:New4325

Thank you for blocking User:New4325 for a week. I honestly don't know whether they'll learn. We can but try. --AliceJMarkham 01:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From SpidermanHero

Thank you very much, You are very kind...

SpidermanHero 11:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


no... I was apparently only blocked for an hour... but the IP adress continued to be blocked into today. why was that? Iamandrewrice 12:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


What Kind of Fool Am I?

Thanks for properly formatting my ANI post. I was so shocked I could barely think straight. Damn, I have been played for a fool. Jeffpw 13:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not mean...

...that I was the person on that account... which you will see from looking @ the IP adresses! Iamandrewrice 13:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not operating that account!... Iamandrewrice 13:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problem user

I think the issue is that I have nominated a lot of non notable fiction articles for deletion lately, and he must have stumbled across one of the discussions about that and decided to "Take me on himself" LOL. I would keep an eye on him, as he appears to be about to make legal threats :) Judgesurreal777 16:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hey, Baby...

I am Andre Corn,

Adopt me, Baby! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Burningandrew (talk • contribs) 18:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...looks rather familiar given the user was only created four minutes before that post. Whitstable 18:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tony predicted this would happen... [1]. I guess he really needs that trip to the pub when he sees this! EconomicsGuy 18:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh. I wish I'd not come back. Thanks to Alison for the quick block. Tonywalton   Talk 20:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
busy guy Tvoz |talk 20:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, and Dom58! goes back as far as May! I'm still wondering about false positives from the checkuser (given that the sockfarmer has admitted to editing from a school), but this, followed by this when he reliased that his socks were being rooted out of the sock-drawer one by one, makes me stop wondering. I wonder, though - how many other dormant socks are lurking... Tonywalton   Talk 21:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
oh... a lot! ;) happy editing people... Andrewsclone 21:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OMG! He's worse than Jason! Jeffpw 21:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No I'm not, I have just simply asked for my IP address not to be blocked. Its a shame things ended like this Jeff. I so wanted to help contribute to wikipedia, but I can no longer do that anymore... and by the way... this isnt me... Andrewsbaby 21:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quervain tenovaginitis stenosans - copyright

Just to let you know: earlier today I tagged Quervain tenovaginitis stenosans with db-copyvio from http://tubious.com/quervain-tenovaginitis-stenosans, and you duly deleted it. It has been pointed out to me by Mentifisto that in fact tubious.com had copied it from Wikipedia, not the other way about. There was still a copyright problem, as the article said "Copyright. 2006 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins", so it's as well it was deleted; but I have learned something to check in future. I have also deleted the copy from tubious.com in case anyone should see it there quoted as coming from Wikipedia. JohnCD 17:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the sequence is: (1) E.baracke copies something out of a medical textbook into Wikipedia, (2) within minutes tubious.com copies it, perhaps automatically, from WP, (3) I see it in New Pages, think "this looks like it was cut and pasted from somewhere" and do a Google which turns up Tubious. I've never met tubious.com before, and after looking at its home page I'm no wiser. E.baracke has only made one other (surviving) contribution, also a medical definition, Subacromial bursa, presented as a nine-word sentence, which somebody has tidied up and made presentable. I'll keep an eye out for any more contributions from him/her which might have copyright problems. JohnCD 17:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geometallurgy

HI THERE COULD YOU PLEASE UNDELETE GEOMETALLURY FOR ME? I CREATED THAT THIS MORNING.... I WORK AT SGS>.. AND WE OWN THE MATERIAL AS WE HAVE WRITTEN IT OURSELEVES. I HADNT EVEN HAD A CHANCE TO SOURCE THE MATERAL BEFORE IT GOT DELETED..... IF YOUR NOT ABLE TO UNDELETE IT COULD YOU PLEASE GET IN TOUCH WITH ME ANYWAY TO LET ME KNOW WHAT I CAN DO NEXT.... IT IS THE MATERIAL OFF OUR WEBSITE (INFORMATION) SO I AM NOT VIOLATING ANY COPYRIGHT REGULATIONS.... ALSO I HAVE EDITED THE MATERIAL SO IT IS IN NO WAY PROMOTING SGS AS A BUSINESS... THIS ARTICLE IS MEANT TO RAISE AwARENESS ABOUT GEOMETALLURGY.

THANK YOU

Geomet —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geomet (talk • contribs) 18:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gave me a right scare you did

Your move gave me quite a scare when I came back and my contributions said I did a speedy request on a user page. For a minute there I thought that in my haste and sleepiness I didn't pay attention to where the page was at. It's all good now though, I figured out what you did. Thoguht you might get a laugh out of this like I did. Have a good one. Mikemill 19:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geometallurgy redux

Hi Tonywalton,

Thank you for processing my request. However I can not "relicence" that material right now... I need to run it by my supervisor is that is what will happen. So you can remove the information afterall.

And with all do respect Mr Tonywalton, when someone writes a message in caps, it doesn't always mean that they are shouting. I was simply writing that in a hurry as I am at work and don't have a lot of time to be writing messages back and forth.

Thank you :)

Geomet 19:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once Upon a Time in the West

I just had to say hello to someone who referred to Once Upon a Time in the West as "toweringly excellent". It may be my favorite movie and it's certainly was an amazing well done homage to the American Western genre. Too bad it didn't do better in the US initially, and the cut version was a sin. I have very fond memories of watching it with my father, who also liked spaghetti westerns. We both loved it. — Becksguy 19:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Brilliant.

Brilliant! Oh the wasted keystrokes! Thank you for this one Tony. (Although they lost me about the slash for subpages - will have to re-read that another time when I'm not as euphoric for having this new trick.) Tvoz |talk 16:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that may be it - let me know if it works! Tvoz |talk 16:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And the colon trick too - you've added years to my life! Tvoz |talk 16:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to know that this will be making an appearance on the barroom bathrrom walls - it is that important. I was thinking of making a bumper sticker, actually, but can't decide between "GodGoddess bless [[User:Tony Walton|]]" and "[[Help:Pipetrick|]] forever". What a find. Tvoz |talk 18:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha- actually, "God bless" is rarely in my vocabulary. I'm not sure where that even came from - must have been too overwhelmed to think straight. Tvoz |talk 18:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Bad Seed

Thanks for pointing that out to me. As it happens, I was going to post to ANI that he emailed me with a long explanation of what happened. He wants me to post it to ANI, but I refused. I did say I would offer it to admins who may or may not want to look at it. If you think it might be useful, let me know and I will forward it to you. And thanks for that cute trick with the pipette! God, it saves a TON of work! Jeffpw (talk) 23:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is just insane. What does this guy hope to accomplish by continued negative attention seeking? Well, better to have learned all this after only 2 weeks than 6 months down the road. Thanks for the heads up, and my thanks to all you administrators who seem to do nothing but clean up other's messes. Jeffpw (talk) 14:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Manning

Hey, thanks for the note and the heads up about that. I'll have to look at The Tangent better, but I can't do it right now, probably in about 14 hours. Peace, delldot talk 11:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

University Musical Society

Dear Tonywalton, I would like to create the article "University Musical Society" but am unable to do so because there is a redirect. University Musical Society is the name of the organization and it goes by no other name. UniversityMusicalSociety (talk) 16:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

University Musical Society

Ok, I created a new user name (amyfing). I'm unsure where to go from here, as clicking on the redirect link takes me to "University Music Society". I can't be more elegant with the name because there is no name to include, unless I do something like "University Musical Society (UMS)". Any advice? Amyfing (talk) 16:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will definitely take your advice and put the article on my user page. Obviously, there is a lot more to add to the article but it will take some time to include everything. Thanks for your help. Amyfing (talk) 17:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tony tony

I see that you, too, are involved in the Iamandrewrice phenomenon on the ANI... please go check the message I left there... and the message I left on EconomicsGuy... you have to understand... those sockpuppets were not from me... but my friend. Although yes I did make 3 sockpuppet accounts afterwards to try and let you know what was really happening...(but these were blocked, with my friend also going on these [as he knows I always use the same password] and getting them blocked before I had a chance to explain anything...). Please listen to me... I am not the one causing all these problems... if you listen to me I can tell you how and who it is that is causing this... but blocking me is in no way going to help because Im not the one doing it... If you dont believe me at least go and ask Jeffpw of his oppinions... Benniguy (talk) 18:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

It still lives...

The most recent sock of Iamandrewrice is User:Maltesepuppy. Can you block please? This getting really annoying and I wish I had never encountered this person on newpage patrol. EconomicsGuy (talk) 18:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

so many people are involved in this I forget who said what, but somebody told him to make one account anonymously, and give me the name for verification through email. He is doing that now. IF the community thinks it's ok, and IF an admin signs off on it, I am willing to supervise him IF he promises not to make one single error on this website again. Lotta ifs, I know. But if it is possible, I will make a formal contract that he may not edit in mainspace or user space until I or an admin says he is ready to be trusted again--only sandbox edits that are approved to be placed in mainspace, and no annoying messaging. Let me know what you think. Jeffpw (talk) 20:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well nobody could ever accuse you of equivocating! :-) This was actually the message that made me think it might be possible. No worries on my end either way. Jeffpw (talk) 22:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UI spoofing

Replied here.--Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 22:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Roeder

With any luck, his feet have been placed in quick-setting concrete, so no-one can pinch him.

What a transformation! --Dweller (talk) 11:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

hello... sorry i didnt get back to you sooner... My manager just got back and i had to speak with her fisrt... I need your help understanding something... The information i want to post it from our information on our website... however i am removing anything to do with SGS as I i know we can not promote businesses on here.... my reasoning for posting the info is to raise awareness about the topic... Can I post the information off the website? also... if I cite the info... does it still belong to SGS?

Thanks so much.. I have to get this done today as it is very important.. Thanks again:) Geomet (talk) 19:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again...

i really really dont have the time to rewrite all of that article again so can you please help me out here....thanks:) Geomet (talk) 20:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Geometallurgy (2)

Thank you very much! I really appreciate that!:)

Take care!

Geomet 20:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Sorry, I wasn't aware of the circumstances. Should have thought to check your talk page first. Revert away! :-) —Caesura(t) 20:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More Geometallurgy silliness. Geomet re-created the page again, and since I still didn't see a licensing assertion, I tagged it for speedy again, and an admin deleted it. Geomet then explained that the licensing situation had been cleared with you via an e-mail message from a company account. This seems fine to me (although maybe the permission should be sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org as well just to be completely by-the-book), so I told Geomet to re-create the article and this time leave an explanation of the situation on the talk page. When Geomet does so, maybe you could leave a note on the talk page too, just to support his assertion that he has verified his employment status to an admin—just so dummies like me can stop tagging the page for deletion. —Caesura(t) 15:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL

LMAO yeh no worries man, the only reason I said that was because it is what I truly feel, and I didn't think I could get in trouble as that user is no longer a user. And yeh, as you have probably already gathered from my comments I am exactly that OVER IT and would now like to return to my happy experience with wikipedia. I now know not to use swear words to attack other users, no matter how pissed off a user makes me (or extremely angry if you don't like swear words) and use more creative methods of insulting like those used on me. P.S. How did you leave me a message so quickly? TeePee-20.7 (talk) 11:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, lol I didn't even see the second link. Yeh that was just to let him know what was previously left on his page by me, I was thinking of changing the word to the translation "queers" but I thought if he was going to read my user page and try looking up the incident he should know exactly what was written. TeePee-20.7 (talk) 12:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
LMAO, yeh i getcha man. It was definately a one-off edit summary :). But yeh I see where your coming from with your examples regarding maricon, but I still don't see how it would be derogatory to a gay person. Like I said it was actually my cousin who is gay, and he doesn't take offense. I know that it is derogatory to a straight person in spanish, just as calling a straight person a queer in english would be derogatory, but I still fail to see why it is derogatory. TeePee-20.7 (talk) 12:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But I already explained myself to you from my second reply in this section, and explained myself to the user on their page which you were also able to read. I think you are being influenced and manipulated by a user I am currently not communicating with. TeePee-20.7 (talk) 14:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Derogatory terminology

Well I think that Big Brother person was a bit of a bad example as he was mentally unstable lol, so he would have been pretty unpredictable anyway. But also from a bit of reading of that link I think the controversy was caused from the combination of the two words. And PC yeh I wouldn't call it that, it's just a translation. If I had used the word "queers" I would not even be having this discussion. TeePee-20.7 (talk) 13:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you would have. Just as it is considered racist for white persons to use the N-word about blacks and not offensive if blacks use it themselves, it is offensive for straight people to use the word Queer. That is a homophobic expression that gay people have reclaimed, but still offensive if used by others. Perhaps you should read the Queer article. And I would take Ton's advice about your edit summaries. I see your edit summary when deleting my message from your oage as uncivil. Jeffpw (talk) 13:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Having been off-wiki for a time doing off-wiki things, I've had a think about this and I'm placing this here for both of you to read. FWIW I don't see the point — save to be gratuitously offensive (or at least uncivil) — in drawing attention in any way to someone's sexual preference or, come to that, their hair colour in a discussion where that attribute is entirely irrelevant to the discussion. Consider the following completely fictitious examples:
  1. I and another editor A are engaged in reverting what appears to be vandalism by an editor B on the article High-temperature flora of the Antarctic. I and A both identify as "straight" on our userpages. The editor B, who identifies themselves as gay, contacts a fourth party asking for assistance with these "straights".
  2. I and another editor A are engaged in reverting what appears to be vandalism by an editor B on the article High-temperature flora of the Antarctic]. I and A both identify as "black haired" on our userpages. The editor B, who identifies themselves as brown-haired, contacts a fourth party asking for assistance with these "black haired editors".
  3. I and another editor A are engaged in reverting what appears to be vandalism by an editor B on the article High-temperature flora of the Antarctic]. I and A both identify as "Aquarians" on our userpages. The editor B, who identifies themselves as a Saggitarius, contacts a fourth party asking for assistance with these "air signs".
In no case is a derogatory term used but it's clear that editor B is at least acting against assumptions of good faith - the subtext of their message is "these two editors have an agenda unrelated to improving the encyclopædia - their actions derive from their sexual orientation/hair colour/triplicity". The derogatory nature of the comment comes in implicitly accusing of bad faith. The same would apply were the different attribute skin colour, height ("help me out with these short people"), whatever. It could be argued that some attributes give different perspectives on a subject where the attribute is germane (though perspective isn't enough in itself; however a gay editor may be able to cite The Pink Paper as a source where a straight editor may not have read it, for instance).
Thank you both for giving me something to think about while sitting on the London Underground! Tonywalton Talk 15:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dually noted Tony. That jeff fella must be have a hard time understanding! I already told him I wouldn't be replying to him, yet he still continues to direct comments at me, even after saying "As far as I am concerned, this conversation is now concluded.". Am I the only one who thinks this is stupid? TeePee-20.7 (talk) 13:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Tell this dude to knock it off already.--EndlessDan 14:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hi can you delete this page

Hi can you delete this page because it dont want it anymore. User talk:Sunderland06/ 30 November 2006 - 9 September 2007. Thanks.  Sunderland06  21:40, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now, leave it.Thanks. Sunderland06  22:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion on the The Digital Pinoy Article

You just recently deleted the article "The Digital Pinoy", is there anything I can do to get it back? Anything I need to add or do?

Btw... I'm kind of a new here too, so I wonder what can I do then?

Mystiq vale (talk) 17:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Happy Holidays

test

did jpw's fix work?

yes Tonywalton Talk 22:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Indefinite? I thought he was just banned for a year. I think the user doesn't grasp what the term ban truly means. --EoL talk 23:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Adminship

Wishing Tonywalton/Archive-Dec-2007 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Its my job. Enjoy the rest of the week. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wishing Tonywalton/Archive-Dec-2007 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!  Idontknow610  (WANNA TALK??) 09:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah0000000ga

It's your right to decline to block a user. However, I don't like to talk with him/her, because his/her intention of adding the image is merely trolling. By the way, thanks for reverting my user page. Dekisugi (talk) 15:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iamandrewrice accounts

Fresh from the user creation log...

Just thought I'd let you know. EconomicsGuy (talk) 19:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. Why doesn't he just go and drink 300 Breezers and throw up in a bus shelter, like most teenagers do? Tonywalton Talk 19:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
At least that would be more productive. He actually had one more, Hazeltheturkeyfarmfaceinyourfacemunchingonyourlips (talk · contribs) but that one was of course blocked due to the name alone. The good news is that none of these are sleepers so I seriously doubt his claims about having any real sleepers he could use. EconomicsGuy (talk) 19:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrewrice or whatever ^_^

Piet Mondrian

Yes, now we are talking art - Broadway Boogie Woogie is a late painting, and it has what can be construed as grey. However his edit is to the opening remarks that address Mondrian's classic paintings - Black, white, red, yellow and blue. Hey - he also painted trees and flowers. Modernist (talk) 00:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well gee whiz, Tony, maybe next time you should go to the museum. I'll look the opening over, although truthfully I've had very little input into the Mondrian article. Thanks Modernist (talk) 00:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

images

i am not adding it "just because i can", i added them to articles specifically relating to the sexual practice of anal sex, gay sex, and unprotected sex. For example the article for Bareback (sex) had no image whatsoever, i feel the image adds an illustration of unprotected anal sex or "barebacking" to the article. Its very beneficial and is in line with similar images on other articles, for example autofellatio has an image which is a photograph of a man sucking his own penis. As for you suggestion i talk to the other user, please check his talk page and mine, he only warns me and has never responded to any of the messages or questions i have left on his talk page. In fact he has never replied to me at all. He only has threatened to have me blocked if i continue vandalizing the wikipedia, but he would not tell me what or how i was vandalizing nor did he say how it was vandalism. I am assuming it is the image of anal sex meandmybf.jpg, but thats just logic. Any thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ah0000000ga (talk • contribs) 02:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. your my little pony comment was hilarious. rofl.Ah0000000ga (talk) 02:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

speedy deletions

delete the article on Adonis Naces because it is a misnomer. correct article is Arturo Tolentino. if the GENIUS Tonywalton insists otherwise, then the GENIUS tonywalton better check the article on Arturo Tolentino. same goes to Vicentico Villegas article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.14.85.246 (talk) 10:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]