User talk:Tommi1986/Archive Feb21

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Tommi1986, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome, I have been here nearly three years (and around 4 years under a different user name), but if you are handing out free cookies I'll take them! - Tommi1986 (talk) 13:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Tommi1986! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:56, Friday, February 19, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Dancheong

Hi Tommi1986,

please keep WP:3RR in mind. Special:Diff/1008379818 seems to lack a justification; please add one in a dummy edit (Help:Edit_summary#Fixing) or on the article's talk page. Alternatively, you may like to self-revert if you agree with the change and the source.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

checkY Done, my apologies. Tommi1986 talk! 01:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Could you take a moment to write on the article's talk page that the cited source is unsuitable to verify the added content? Because if I see correctly, that's the problem. The other user can currently not edit the page, but they'll need a short explanation on the article's talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
checkY Also done! Tommi1986 talk! 01:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect, thank you very much. 🙂 And because the other editor appears to be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing outside Wikipedia, I have now warned them about that too, and protected the page to prevent further disruption as requested. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help! Tommi1986 talk! 01:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Starship development history

I'm seeing what's going down on Starship development history. Thanks for you watching that too.

I see you have reverted the large unexplained addition a couple times. I'll get the next one if necessary; but I'm gonna let it cook for an hour or two first, since I just added a caution to the IP editor's user page.

Give 'em some time to revert their own edit per WP:BRD
OR
Allow some other editor to join to warn more sternly about edit warring.

Cheers. N2e (talk) 11:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I have now reported the user, mainly due to the edit warring but also they seem to be removing the warnings left by myself and other editors such as yourself. Tommi1986 talk! 11:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"E.T." Article - The term "alien" is culturally insensitive. This is a fact.

The term "alien" is culturally insensitive. The matter is not up to the speaker (who is alienating) but the subject (who is alienated). We have visitors from approximately 40 light years away attesting to this, here and in other instances: https://twitter.com/SandiaWisdom/status/843097997223186432 It should be considered a settled matter. / Also see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DrcG7VGgQU&list=PLaQ1pzuoBvRNUTej2z9PX7Uoh3tNyZZz0&index=1&t=2s / https://tubitv.com/movies/560916/unacknowledged-an-expos-of-the-world-s-greatest-secret / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6pXZB2za40&t=1s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.235.223.163 (talk) 14:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As previously stated it is not insensitive in this context but, feel free to use the article talk page to discuss and see if there is a consensus for change, in the mean time please refrain from changing the article. Tommi1986 talk! 14:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tommi1986 talk! 18:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gift included

I have a pic for you, but I can not figure out how to get it to you. Cbruce18 (talk) 18:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's very kind of you, I'm afraid I don't think you would be able to add it on here due to copyright issues Tommi1986 talk! 18:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RedWarn Glitch

Sorry if you notice a few self reverts on articles, it seems my RedWarn went a bit crazy, it's ok, it's been reprimanded and promised not to do it again! Tommi1986 talk! 10:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Toyota concept vehicles (2020–2029)

Just a reminder that the entries I removed from the article were actually fictional vehicles made by some independent artists. They're not and never officially approved by Toyota. I'm not pushing this with my own terms. The information added were just some results of original researches. 182.29.31.69 (talk) 13:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick look at the pages edit history, it shows three editors have been reverting your contribs. Please feel free to use the article talk page to discuss and see if there is a consensus for change. Have a good day 🙂 Tommi1986 let's talk! 20:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Toyota concept vehicles (2020–2029) (2)

It seems like you haven't quite grasped the situation at the Toyota concept vehicles (2020–2029) article. As 182.29.31.69 has pointed out, the vehicles that I removed (and previously removed by 182.29.31.69) simply doesn't exist, and mostly are made up. A simple Google search, and a quick look to the references attached would prove that. Obviously, the only right thing to do is to remove them. I've also warned DestinationFearFan through their talk page about these additions. So, I'm asking you to take a closer look at the situation, and not reverting the deletion just because there are 6,200 characters removed and was reverted four times. Thank you for your attention. Andra Febrian (talk) 10:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2021

But you haven't added any yet. --60.248.225.142 (talk) 12:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Related request: Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects_and_categories#Redirect_request:_Danqing --60.248.225.142 (talk) 12:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have made a request at AfC therefore, you must wait until it is accepted there. If and when it is accepted there, an admin will make your requested changes. Tommi1986 let's talk! 12:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What about the Dancheong? --60.248.225.142 (talk) 12:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Tommi1986 let's talk! 13:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! --60.248.225.142 (talk) 13:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]