User talk:Toa Nidhiki05/Archive 16

Archive 10←Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18→Archive 20

A new barnstar for you!

Anti-Wikibullying Barnstar
I just wanted to say that I appreciated your original comment a lot. Actually, I liked it so much that I mirrored some of what you said here. Thanks for being a voice of clarity in that thread. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 13:02, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
I appreciate it, MJL. The discussion has started to veer into outright gaslighting at points. People are casting wild accusations at anyone who either take issue with Eric’s behavior or would like a final judgement on the situation from ArbCom and it is really baffling to me. I saw someone recommend you get indefinitely blocked for starting this case and that’s what made me post my second comment. I doubt I’m going to say anything else there but I sincerely hope ArbCom takes this case. Toa Nidhiki05 13:22, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
[Thank you for the ping] I can take solace in the fact that I didn't make my filing for the benefit of the community. I simply reviewed the types of statements Arbcom has historically found the most persuasive, and I based mine of those.
However, it's slightly... disheartening to learn that what you said may have been considered a personal attack, but this or this are not considered equally problematic. I mean... I was literally being told I add no value to the project.. That stuff hurts. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 13:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Toa, I hope you don't mind, but I revised my statement to reproduce parts of your original statement because I think what you said is much more valuable that what I had to say. If you do mind, please accept my apologies and let me know, and I'll remove it. Either way, thanks for writing it. – Levivich 18:58, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
No problem at all, and I appreciate that someone found it valuable. :) Toa Nidhiki05 19:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Open Here peer review

Heya! You had previously expressed interest in weighing in at the FAC for Open Here before it was archived. I wanted to let you know I've just submitted it for a peer review, with the ultimate hopes of improving the article for a second FA nomination. If you wanted to weigh in at the PR, please feel free to do so! If not, no worries, I'm sure someone else will at some point, and then I may ping you again later when I submit it for FA a second time. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 11:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Sounds good! I’ve try to give some input by the end of the day. Toa Nidhiki05 13:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Please help me find a way and place to have a positive discussion regarding Reagan talk page

I do not wish to cast aspersions, run people down, or do anything of the sort.

However, I think we do have a right to know why the big upsurge of participation (which was several times baseline). I can accept that you did not approve of the following approach:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ronald_Reagan&diff=909659205&oldid=909659025

Please help find a positive way and place to have such a discussion. Thank you. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 22:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Numerous controversial changes have been proposed. Why wouldn't activity increase? Toa Nidhiki05 22:47, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Yes, some of them quite controversial, and plus with a big news item to boot. But I've seen other controversies/news items which did not generate this kind of interest. Maybe it's simply the luck of the draw. All the same, I think it's a good idea to have a polite, even-tempered discussion which basically just gives people a chance to volunteer information, for example, if they've talked it up on another board, have invited a handful of people, etc. None of which I would personally consider all that big a deal, but I do think it's better that our small working group be open with such information, rather than closed. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 18:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
I really don’t like your repeated insinuations that there is something nefarious at play. If you have evidence of brigading, bring it but, but we’re not really going to run an inquisition to see where editors came from. High-profile pages with major changes and disputes will often get a lot of traffic in times like this. Toa Nidhiki05 18:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm using language like "polite" and "even-tempered." And I'm saying, "better that our small working group be open with such information." FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Why would you assume people aren’t being open? Toa Nidhiki05 18:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Okay, well, my post has been twice deleted, seemingly for simply asking the question. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 17:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Aug. 3rd: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ronald_Reagan&diff=prev&oldid=909179224
Aug. 6th: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ronald_Reagan&diff=909659025&oldid=909656709

Precious anniversary

Precious
Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MercyMe House of God.ogg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MercyMe House of God.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:How Great Is Your Love.ogg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:How Great Is Your Love.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

FAC source review request

Hello. I hope you are doing well. Thank you again for your help with the "Jill Valentine" FAC. I was wondering if you could do a source review for my current FAC too? Feel free to disregard this message if you do not have the time or interest. Have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Aoba47 I still plan on doing this, just a busy weekend. Will do when I can this week. :) Toa Nidhiki05 01:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • No worries. Take as much time as you need. Another editor has recently looked over the sources, but I would greatly appreciate if you would look over it as well. It is always nice to get as many different perspectives as possible to avoid anything slipping through the cracks. I can completely understand about a busy weekend. I live in Florida right now so I am dealing with all of the hurricane business lol. Good luck with everything keeping you busy! Aoba47 (talk) 01:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Stop reverting

Can you stop reverting my edits to the article List of states and territories of the Untied States? It seems that no matter what I do on that article, you revert it. I'd like to add back the changes I made, but first I'd like to be sure you're not going to revert it again. LumaP15 (talk) 15:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

I have explained why I have reverted your edits in edit summaries. I would highly advise you go to the talk page (as you have done) instead of edit warring on a featured list. Toa Nidhiki05 15:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice to all registered editors who have contributed to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film over the past year (Sept. 15, 2018-present) that a Request for Comment has been posted here. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Thank you for your tireless contributions!

Steve The Squid (talk) 13:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Lying

I started the talk page discussion, I said the MCU films were not part of the SMU, and you are the one that has been breaking 3RR not me. You claiming otherwise is uncivil and not going to get you anywhere. Instead of telling me to go to the talk page, please stop edit warring and do the same. Instead of saying that I think the MCU films are part of the SMU, please acknowledge that I said the opposite and stop using it as an excuse to attack me. I'm not going to be bullied like that. - adamstom97 (talk) 13:35, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

You have continued to insist, without evidence, that there is a connection between the two - first that they were “adjunct” (based off of a quote Pascal herself disowned) and now that Homecoming and Far From Home are in the SUMC. This goes against what Sony execs and Marvel execs have said, as well as dozens of sources. Toa Nidhiki05 13:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
I have never said that the MCU films are in the SMU, stop trying to put words in my mouth. - adamstom97 (talk) 13:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
doubt (x) Toa Nidhiki05 13:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Yeah ... still never said it. - adamstom97 (talk) 13:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

American football

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article American Football has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I would say apart from some older statistics which could be updated the article is in excellent shape.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you so much - changes look very good! I’ll take a look at what can be updated and then maybe proceed into peer review, but this looks really good. Toa Nidhiki05 18:16, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Polynesian and Māori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 11:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

CGCN Group

Hi, Toa Nidhiki05! I wanted to let you know about a new request of mine to update outdated information at Talk:CGCN Group. You reviewed requests in the past on that Talk page, so you might be interested. As you gather from my username, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest; I am an employee at CGCN.

Thank you, Lauren at CGCN (talk) 16:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Hey, I appreciate you reaching out @Lauren at CGCN: but given I do paid editing as well now I don't quite feel comfortable approving other requests at this point unfortunately. Toa Nidhiki05 17:22, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Toa Nidhiki05! I understand! Thanks for replying. Lauren at CGCN (talk) 00:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Your GA nomination of Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui

The article Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

GAN

Since you reviewed Tracy Lawrence, a previous GA of mine, would you be interested in looking at Mark Chesnutt and Eddy Raven? The former has been sitting in the GAN queue since March and no one's touched it. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

TenPoundHammer I’ll see what I can do Toa Nidhiki05 14:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui

Hello! Your submission of Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:

  1. Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points
  2. England Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points
  3. Norfolk Island Casliber (submissions) with 817 points
  4. Wales Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
  5. Washington (state) SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
  6. Antarctica Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points
  7. United States Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
  8. Indonesia HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 points

All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

List of Political Party

Toa Nidhikio5, From seeing the "List of Political Party" all of the party were given Ideology and Founders by PoliticalWiz. The Parties pages are linked to the side if you needed to double check, but you remove mostly all of his work with out doing your own research. If you won't look at these pages and plug in information. No one would give these parties the opportunity for a second look and further Research. ("Fill Out this Chart the information is out there."-Observer#1) -Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by PolicalWiz (talk • contribs) 19:55, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

If you are into uncovering anti-immigrant sockpuppets, you might want to look at this character who has all the hallmarks of a sockpuppet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/88Dragons. Reminds me of the Darryl.Jensen sockpuppets, but also happens to edit the same pages as E.M. Gregory[1] did. I don't have time to look into it. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

I’ll look into this if I have time. Toa Nidhiki05 04:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Adrian Vermeule page

Hello, please check out my comment on the Adrian Vermeule talk page. —Matthew Benson (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

FA review?

Hey. I noticed your current FAC nomination, and was wondering if you'd be interested in trading reviews? I'd love to get as much feedback as possible this time around for my nomination, and would be more than prepared to review yours in return. I understand if you don't have the time though. Kind regards, Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 01:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I'd definitely be interested in that Homeostasis07! You seem to be in a similar situation to me - I've nominated Almost There (album) for featured article three times now so I get the frustration. I definitely have the time to look at it and will get started tonight. I respect your tenacity in trying to get this to feature article, hopefully third time's the charm for both of us. Toa Nidhiki05 01:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I currently have 2 FAs, both of them album articles, so hopefully I'll be able to provide something substantial during my review. I've already started reading Almost There, and will hopefully have my initial review posted within 24 hours—although I'm not seeing much to complain about. You did a pretty damn fine job with the article thus far. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 01:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! Yeah, it's mainly been a lack of discussion that's slowed things down in my opinion. It happens, but thankfully it has more attention this time. Toa Nidhiki05 02:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey again. Couldn't help notice Jo-Jo Eumerus' criticism of the sound files currently used in the article. I remember receiving more or less the same criticism with one of my own FAs – The Pale Emperor – when I was advised to study (well, copy) the description and FURs of the samples found at OK Computer. I'd advise you to do the same. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice and I'll definitely keep that in mind in the future. Unfortunately I don't think there's going to be a strong enough case to convince him here, and Nikkimaria raised similar issues. I'd prefer to have a sample, but it's not a necessity. Toa Nidhiki05 01:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
The Premium Reviewer Barnstar
Thank you for contributing to Jill Valentine's FAC. You probably had no idea of the sort of quagmire you were stepping into by reviewing Jill's article, but your uninvolved, unbiased critique was exactly what was needed: it genuinely helped clear the air surrounding the article of a lot of its toxicity. I can't explain in words in a barnstar of how appreciative I genuinely am. Just... thanks for all your help. And congratulations on your own nomination being promoted as well. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 02:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Open Here?

Do you plan to continue the Open Here PR, or should I seek it from someone else? No offense either way, just let me know so I can proceed accordingly. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 02:11, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Star Wars: The Last Jedi

I reverted your removal of the talk page comment at Star Wars: The Last Jedi and responded to it before noticing your comment on the new account's page. If the account is sock, please feel free to remove/strike it and my response. Thanks. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

No problem. I’ve opened an investigation so we’ll find out soon. Toa Nidhiki05 21:37, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I had also just asked NinjaPirateRobot to run a check, and so I let them know about the SPI. I wouldn't have restored the edit if I had seen it was for a sock evasion, which seems pretty clear based on the behavioral evidence. Probably best to ignore them for now until they are CU blocked. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Not a sockpuppet

I have responded on the talk page of Christian right, but to answer your question, I am not a sockpuppet, but felt the material warrants inclusion. SuperCarnivore591 (talk) 14:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

@SuperCarnivore591: Are you aware that is exactly something a sockpuppet would say? Attribution: Twitter (CC-BY-4.0)
Clearly, you are a sockpuppet! [FBDB] (talk page stalker) –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 14:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

No personal attacks please

Regarding this: It's a personal attack either way. Don't do that, or you might end up blocked yourself. Huon (talk) 22:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Sometimes, when responding to sockpuppet trolls, ridicule is an adequate solution. Toa Nidhiki05 22:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

WP:HOUNDING

Tao, you are following me around to noticeboards that have nothing to do with your WP interests, but clearly are a form of WP:HOUNDING as I have mentioned before. Please focus on content and not on what I am up to in other parts of the Pedia lest you end up at AN again. Mentioning my topic ban to discredit me is strictly prohibited, and I have previously informed you of this. There is absolutely no reason not to leave our issues at the Attkisson talk page, or a related noticeboard, unless you are literally trolling. Please convince me you are not here for that. petrarchan47คุก 20:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

I’m not following you anywhere. I follow the COI noticeboard and saw the discussion. It is not prohibited to mention your topic ban, especially when it’s pertinent to the discussion at hand. I would suggest you stop casting aspersions on other editors, especially given your history here. Toa Nidhiki05 20:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui

On 1 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after development builds of the cancelled video game Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui leaked online, Bionicle fans created a video game development studio to complete the game? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lego Bionicle: The Legend of Mata Nui), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Ichthus December 2019

ICHTHUS

 WikiProject Christianity
December 2019
The Top 3 Articles

By Stalinsunnykvj

The Top 3 most popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Dolly Parton - an American singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, record producer, actress, author, businesswoman, and humanitarian, known primarily for her work in country music. Quotations related to Dolly Parton at Wikiquote: " I just depend on a lot of prayer and meditation. I believe that without God I am nobody, but that with God, I can do anything."
    2. Harriet Tubman - an American abolitionist and political activist. Born into slavery, she escaped and made some missions to rescue enslaved people, using the network of antislavery activists and Underground Railroads. During the American Civil War, she served as an armed scout, spy for the Union Army.
    3. Henry VIII of England – King of England, He was an accomplished musician, author, and poet; his known piece of music is "Pastime with Good Company". He is often reputed to have written "Greensleeves" but probably did not. He had six marriages.
Did You Know?
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
  • ... that St. Charles College in Louisiana was the first Jesuit college established in the southern United States?
  • ... that the ancient Jewish text of Perek Shirah asserts that spiders and rats praise God using verses from Psalm 150?
Featured article
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj

Being a Ghost Story of Christmas, commonly known as A Christmas Carol, is a novella by Charles Dickens, first published in London by Chapman & Hall in 1843 and illustrated by John Leech. The book is divided into five chapters, which Dickens titled "staves". A Christmas Carol recounts the story of Ebenezer Scrooge, an elderly miser who is visited by the ghost of his former business partner Jacob Marley and the spirits of Christmas Past, Present and Yet to Come. After their visits, Scrooge is transformed into a kinder, gentler man. (more...)

Bible Verse

Romans 12:10 New King James Version (NKJV)

Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.

Quotes
" I will honour Christmas in my heart, and try to keep it all the year."
Charles Dickens – British novelist, journalist, editor, illustrator and social critic.

Happy Holidays!

The end of the year is a time of year for remembrance. We take stock of where we came from, and have a moment to think about where we are going...

At this special time of year, we give thanks for editors like you who have made our Mission easier and our lives more fulfilling.

May your New Year be all that you hope for, and may it be sprinkled with love and friendship.

Best Wishes!


WikiProject Christianity
Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity © Copyleft 2019
Questions • Discussions • Newsroom • Unsubscribe
Delivered: 16:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


Sockpuppet

I couldn't make this shit up: is one of the dudes who fought to get me banned last month literally an anti-Muslim sockpuppet account?[2] I don't have time to investigate further, but the circumstantial evidence alone strongly points to "yep". Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

This is shocking to me, nobody could have possibly guessed this! Toa Nidhiki05 18:25, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Edit question

Curious as to why you reverted my edit on Return of the Jedi? I did a BRD revert on a change someone wanted to put in, explained it on the talk page and in the edit, but you restored the original edit with a talk purely of "Stop", (which could come across as a bit rude, but that's by the by). Curious as to your thinking. Canterbury Tail talk 13:40, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

The consensus has been for years that he is dead. There is no consensus for a version that says he isn’t. Toa Nidhiki05 13:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Actually the mention of the emperor's death has changed constantly over the years, with long periods of both sides of it. Though I now notice it's never been formally discussed and an actual consensus arrived at in the talk pages, so that's where it should go then. Thanks for the explanation. 13:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Mentioned

You've been mentioned here. Senegambianamestudy (talk) 11:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

"May tonight's light keep us all gently soothed"

Thanks again for all of your help this year. It was very much appreciated. Wishing you and all your loved ones a happy and healthy holiday season. And remember to take the time to do what you want to do in 2020. Over the course of human history, only a relatively minuscule amount of people will ever be able to say they lived through the year, so make it a good one! ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 21:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2015 Camellia Bowl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camellia Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!

Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Toa Nidhiki05. I'm just posting to let you know that Steven Curtis Chapman discography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 31. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Ichthus January 2020

ICHTHUS

 WikiProject Christianity
January 2020
The Top 3 Articles

By Stalinsunnykvj

The Top 3 most-popular articles about People in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Pope Benedict XVI – retired prelate of the Catholic Church who served as head of the Church and sovereign of the Vatican City State from 2005 until his resignation.
    2. Pope Francis – the head of the Catholic Church and sovereign of the Vatican City State. Francis is the first Jesuit pope, the first from the Americas, the first from the Southern Hemisphere, and the first pope from outside Europe since the Syrian Gregory III, who reigned in the 8th century.
    3. Dolly Parton – an American singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, record producer, actress, author, businesswoman, and humanitarian, known primarily for her work in country music. Quotations related to Dolly Parton at Wikiquote: "I just depend on a lot of prayer and meditation. I believe that without God I am nobody, but that with God, I can do anything."
Did You Know?
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
Featured article
Nominated by Stalinsunnykvj
Сретение Господне ("The Meeting of the Lord"), a depiction of Simeon recognising Jesus at the Temple, from a fifteenth-century Novgorodskye School Russian icon.
Сретение Господне ("The Meeting of the Lord"), a depiction of Simeon recognising Jesus at the Temple, from a fifteenth-century Novgorodskye School Russian icon.

A Song for Simeon, is a 37-line poem written in 1928 by American-English poet T. S. Eliot (1888–1965). It is one of five poems that Eliot contributed to the Ariel poems series of 38 pamphlets by several authors published by Faber and Gwyer. "A Song for Simeon" was the sixteenth in the series and included an illustration by avant garde artist Edward McKnight Kauffer. The poem's narrative echoes the text of the Nunc dimittis, a liturgical prayer for Compline from the Gospel passage. Eliot introduces literary allusions to earlier writers Lancelot Andrewes, Dante Alighieri and St. John of the Cross. Critics have debated whether Eliot's depiction of Simeon is a negative portrayal of a Jewish figure and evidence of anti-Semitism on Eliot's part. (more...)

Bible Verse

Psalm 20:4 New King James Version (NKJV)

Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.

Quotes
"Faith lived in the incognito is one which is located outside the criticism coming from society, from politics, from history, for the very reason that it has itself the vocation to be a source of criticism. It is faith (lived in the incognito) which triggers the issues for the others, which causes everything seemingly established to be placed in doubt, which drives a wedge into the world of false assurances."
~ Jacques Ellul
French philosopher, sociologist, and professor who was a noted Christian anarchist.
Quotations related to Jacques Ellul at Wikiquote

Happy New Year!

At this special time of year, we give thanks for editors like you who have made our Mission easier and our lives more fulfilling.
May your New Year be all that you hope for, and may it be sprinkled with love and friendship.

Best Wishes!

WikiProject Christianity
Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity © Copyleft 2020
Questions • Discussions • Newsroom • Unsubscribe
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

1rr Ilhan Omar

You have made 2 reverts in less than 24 hours in Ilhan Omar.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

No, I have not. I made a revert on January 5 at 10:02. Today is 7:58 on January 7. That’s almost two days. Please retract your claim, SharabSalam. Toa Nidhiki05 13:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, my bad. I didnt know when the revert happened.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 13:12, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Neutral notice

As an editor who commented at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film between Jan. 1, 2019, and today, you may wish to join a discussion at that page, here.--Tenebrae (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Reverting my multiple edits

After reverting several of my edits[3] saying "Not a good edit" can you say which edit you were refering to? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Wars:_The_Force_Awakens&action=history GregKaye 14:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Star Wars sequel trilogy edits

@Toa Nidhiki05: Can you please keep an eye on user Rosvel92 as he continues to be be disruptive by ignoring previous edit comments and reverts by re-introducing prose on what he thinks should be included in the article such as the conspiracy theories surrounding the J.J. Abrams' cut and Colin Trevorow's script for IX; any deletion results in him changing the wording and then moving it to different sections in the article. He doesn't seem to be a user that responds to pings or notices on his talk page. -- Wikibenboy94 (talk) 09:13, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Will do! Toa Nidhiki05 14:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)