User talk:Tlc356

Welcome!

Hello, Tlc356, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  David Ruben Talk 02:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re Jock itch edit - one person's experience would not consitute WP:Reliable sources, but instead is not permitted under the WP:No original research guideline. David Ruben Talk 02:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Gazaway Bugg Lamar was accepted

{{hilite|Good enough for public eyes, so I published it. That said, note at top a list of fine-tuning needed, to please address those. Also, if you can find any picture of him it'll clearly be in the WP:Public domain, so please upload one to WP:Wikimedia Commons and code it into the article. Good to have coverage of this interesting fellow! MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Gazaway Bugg Lamar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

William Lynch Lamar

To be realistic, the problem of the article William Lynch Lamar is plain notability. Wikipedia uses independent, reliable, prior published sources to establish notability. An obituary as almost single source is not enough for that, especially because it makes not clear what makes mr. Lamar special. Being a soldier/officer is not unique. You give no indications for medals or other awards.

To make it even more difficult, genealogical sources are usually not regarded as a reliable source. Especially, when used by the author of that same book...

So, what we need is independent, reliable, prior published sources to establish notability. The Banner talk 22:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way: the same points count for Gazaway Bugg Lamar. The Banner talk 22:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that this does not meet the notability requirement. Tlc356 (talk) 13:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tlc356. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tlc356. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gazaway Bugg Lamar

Hi - if you're still interested in him, I've added some content (especially about his legal problems postwar) and cites from new sources. I encourage you to explore more academic materials for biographical information, in addition to the self-published XLibris book by Coughlin. It does not meet Wikipedia standards for Reliable Sources (RS), which are supposed to go through third-party review before publication. Thanks for your contributions on the Lamar family - Parkwells (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the content for Gazaway B. Lamar and yes I'm still interested in him and other Lamar family members. Tlc356 (talk) 19:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tlc356. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noland's Ferry (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Nolands Ferry I Archeological Site. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Tlc356! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your response. Beacuse I was able to get the information into the existing Nolands Ferry Archeological Site article, I deleted my draft. One question I have is-can the name of that article be changed to "Noland's Ferry & Archeological Site" if not just Noland's Ferry? Tom Tlc356 (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noland's Ferry

Thank you for your work on the Noland's Ferry article. I could get some images for you to illustrate the article with reasonable ease - are there any in particular that you'd be looking for? I would probably wait for the first green of spring in March for serious photography, before the leaves are fully out, but can scout the location now. Acroterion (talk) 18:43, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I only know the area from a distance (my g-g grandfathers ran the ferry) but with that said, I believe that ferry-traffic forded to Noland's Island and then went by boat to the MD shore. If there is any evidence on Noland's Island of a wagon road, cart tracks or evidence of the landing, perhaps some of them could be subjects of your camera. Thanks, Tom Tlc356 (talk) 14:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]