User talk:Theredproject/Archives/2013

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Theredproject. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Intern trying to delete David Horvitz page

Hello, my name is Joe, and I'm an intern and have helped David Horvitz on many of his Wikipedia based projects. His newest endeavor is to attempt to delete his own Wikipedia page.

I want to be able to help him and accomplish that. I'm new to the whol Wiki editing/deleting and I've accidentally thought deleting the content would bring on a deletion, but it brought on moderators claiming me as an abuser and vandal, which is incorrect.

I want to be able delete the page properly and it's public knowledge that the artist wants this to happen, if you can help me with this and provide me the information to do so according to Wikipedia's rules and regulations, I'd greatly appreciate it.

I've attached a link from ArtInfo that mentions this project of his to delete his own Wikipedia page. Any help would be great!

http://www.blouinartinfo.com/news/story/898465/emerging-david-horvitzs-multiversed-multimedia-and-oft — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joebunkeo (talk • contribs) 14:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Lee Walton

Please do not add unverified material to Wikipedia articles. The article looks like little more than a resume, and completely lacks reliable sources. Please acquaint yourself with our guidelines, including WP:Verifiability and WP:Reliable sources. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:33, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Referencing

See WP:REFB. Ty 23:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

course page listing

Hi! I see you're trying to add your course page to the listings... sorry about the confusing instructions, we've been moving some of the pages around somewhat. I'll list your course page at the right place right now.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Sage. This image should go in for the university picture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CSI_logo.png . I can also insert this afterwards, if it is clear where to do so. Theredproject (talk) 16:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Here's the place for the upcoming term's courses: Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/2011 Q3. We can't use the CSI logo, because it's a non-free image and by Wikipedia policy can only be used in actual articles, rather than on project pages like this. Since we don't seem to have any CSI photos, I put in a shot of a bridge to Staten Island. --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

The bridge works. I will have my students take some campus photos for future use. Theredproject (talk) 16:35, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

:) --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:53, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I'm just dropping you a quick note to let you know that I will be helping out as your course's Online Ambassador. Feel free to drop me a note if you need any help or if you have any questions. Cheers. – SMasters (talk) 02:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

That's great. Thanks in advance. Theredproject (talk) 15:38, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

I see your course is using much of the content designed by me; let me know if you'd have any questions. I fixed one tiny part, at a glance I note you currently keep 3 out of 5 5% deadlines, but it does not appear you have made adjustments to the second grading section (perhaps you weren't intending on adding it at all)? PS. If you reply to me, please do so (or copy the reply) to my talk page so I get a notification that you've done so. If you reply here, I won't get such a notification and my reply to you may be significantly delayed. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 16:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

I posted a response on your talk page.Theredproject (talk) 17:30, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Sure, I'd be happy to help out as another (2nd?) online ambassador. Many WikiProjects are indeed semi-inactive or inactive. They are currently very much hit or miss, but I hope the teaching initiatives will change us, as people like us become more involved in wikiprojects related to our disciplines (this in in fact encouraged by some professional associations, such as the APS and ASA... ). With regards to Good Article reviews, I usually get helpful ones, but you definitely need to ask for them in advance, because the WP:GAN has a 1+ month backlog, which we obviously cannot afford in class (look at the pink box at the top of Wikipedia:Good article nominations, if you check the dates below, those oldest noms are from late June, so we are looking at 2.5 months backlog now). What I have done, to great effect (and will do again soon) is to go to talk of GAN, note that I am teaching an educational course, note that I cannot afford delays, ask for reviewers and in exchange, offer to review another GAN for each one that other reviewers help out for my class (see here). I'd also encourage you to try to write one GA within the next month or so, to get a feeling for how the writing and reviewing process looks, to get a good feeling for what you are asking students to do. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 18:00, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi Michael, welcome to the Global Education Program! Annie Lin (Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 21:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome Annie. Theredproject (talk) 22:41, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

New User Greetings

Greetings Michael, just leaving a mssge regarding my contribs for the last point in Week 2's wiki assignment. Rl081289 (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Check Nboffa (talk · contribs) for latest contribs. Nboffa (talk) 03:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Click link to diff for one contrib.

Just leaving my contributions. 03:33, 15 September 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:In-N-Out Burger ‎ (→Spreading the joy) (top) 03:33, 15 September 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:In-N-Out Burger ‎ (→Spreading the joy: new section) 03:21, 15 September 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:X3Kimmie ‎ (→Hi!: new section) (top) 21:33, 8 September 2011 (diff | hist) College of Staten Island ‎ (→Library Building) 21:33, 8 September 2011 (diff | hist) College of Staten Island ‎ (→Library Building) 21:17, 8 September 2011 (diff | hist) Wikipedia:Ambassadors/Courses/History of Design and Digital Media (Michael Mandiberg)/Students ‎ (→Students) Rox1286 (talk) 03:47, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Just leaving my username and contribs for week 2 Ellebrager (talk) 03:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Possible Articles

Please post notes/links to your entries about your 3-5 articles here.--Theredproject (talk) 20:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I just posted a few articles I've been thinking of working on for class on my user page. Which of these do you think would be best to work on? Also check Sabinajm (talk · contribs) for my contribs! Thanks, Sabinajm (talk) 23:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

A couple ways of looking at it: Which one would be the most useful to wikipedia? Which ones would have the most information/resources out there for you to use (especially non-copyright visual material)? A secondary concern would be which ones would you have the most luck at finding others who are interested in to work with you on it.--Theredproject (talk) 02:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

I think I'm most definitely more interested in working on the rococo article. I put a suggestion on it's talk page re adding in a section on rococo graphic design and typography. Sabinajm (talk) 04:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello Michael, I put up some topics on My Talk page. Rl081289 (talk) 20:51, 21 September 2011 (UTC) Hi Prof Mandiberg I put in an idea and I am interested to hear what others are doing Drichard02Drichard02 (talk) 23:05, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I left a suggestion on Type design page. Rl081289 (talk) 00:56, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Good suggestions. --Theredproject (talk) 02:05, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure if you wanted us to post the additional information we add to an existing article related to class backed up with a citation on your talk page, but I made one on the Movable type page, the 2 very last sentences under the Wooden Movable type category. Rl081289 (talk) 23:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi Michael, I put up some topics on My Talk page.Anonymous0123 (talk) 03:59, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello. My topics for the research paper are on my user page. Any further comments can be posted on my talk page. Nboffa (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2011 (UTC) I contributed to a discussion about commercial art. Nboffa (talk) 05:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

My topics for the research on my talk page. Aking174 (talk) 05:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

My topics for the research on my talk page. Ellebrager (talk) 05:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

My topics for research on Ed Fella User_AleMarie--AleMarie (talk) 15:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC) [1] and [2]

The possible articles that I will be using for my Irma Boom project are posted on my talk page. I am having trouble figuing out how to use the codes and create links. M01022011 (talk) 14:44, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi!

Hope you get a chance to visit my page to see the list of designers for the assignment. I also found a good page related to the reading for this week. My TalkPage. Roxy1286 (talk)

I also made a suggestion on the page about Graphic Design

Hope I'm on the right direction!

Rox1286 (talk) 03:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

--AleMarie (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

5 paragraphs on 2 potential articles

Please post your notices here--Theredproject (talk) 17:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

I have my summary on My Talk page. Rl081289 (talk) 23:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

I have posted my summary on My Talk page. KatanaBeatsPaper (talk) 23:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

I have posted two topics for you to look at (Drichard02 I editied the College of Staten Island page

Drichard02 I am working on the coverart page I added something about album coverart artist Alex Steinwiss)

Two things I would like to work on is Graphic Artist April Greiman and I am interested in researching cover art Drichard02 (talk) 01:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

my summary has been posted My Talk page. Token718 (talk) 03:05, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

My summary has been posted on my talk page [[3]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxcarollo91xx (talk • contribs) 07:27, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I have posted my summary on my talk page [[4]]

Ellebrager (talk) 06:05, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Here is the link to my talk page containing my paragraph summary. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aking174

Aking174 (talk) 06:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Possible articles on my talk page Nboffa (talk) 08:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

--AleMarie (talk) 15:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Here is a link to my talk page, where I posted my summary. [5]--TheBauhausCure (talk) 15:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I have posted my summary. My Talk page. X3Kimmie X3Kimmie 15:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Posted my summary My Talk page. RecKLUSs32 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC).

My summary is on my talk page. MYoung1030 (talk) 8 October 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.174.247.140 (talk) 21:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

I have posted the two potential articles on my talk page. Dalmazo (talk)Dalmazo (talk) 01:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

I have posted my summary. My Talk page. Anonymous0123 (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi prof. here is link to my talk page for plan of attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kpervaiz

I have completed Assignment #3 that was due week 4 - Thankyouforbeauty (talk) 20:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Thankyouforbeauty

1 to 2 sentence contribution

Put your 1-2 sentence contribution here. Please be sure to add it as a "diff." For more on diffs, please see Help:Diff. For example, is the diff for Rl081289's excellent addition to the wooden type section of the Movable Type page. Note that when you create a link to a diff, you only should use single "[" and "]" brackets, rather than the conventional double brackets, because you are using a full URL, rather than just linking to pages inside the wiki.--Theredproject (talk) 02:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

This is my contribution, its not much, but I hope it's good. Here's the diff KatanaBeatsPaper (talk) 23:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Very good, and good for you for catching your spelling mistake.

Heres my contribution the diff Token718 (talk) 01:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

not sure if my previous contribution was what u wanted heres another the diffToken718 (talk) 02:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Your second contrib is excellent. The first was to the talk page. While that is useful, it is not what the assignment called for.--Theredproject (talk) 02:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This is my contribution. old version [6] new version [7]

Ellebrager (talk) 05:39, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This is my contribution. The previous contribution to the wikipedia article is, [8] & mine, the most recent contribution is, [9] I hope this is what you were looking for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aking174 (talk • contribs) 05:41, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Here is my diff Nboffa (talk) 05:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This is my diff of my 2 sentences plus reference to the Irma Boom page. [10] --M01022011 (talk) 15:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This is my diff of my contributions plus the reference to an outside source on Geofroy Tory. [11]--TheBauhausCure (talk) 15:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This is my diff for William Caslon. [12]--X3Kimmie X3Kimmie 15:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Here is my diff on the Hobby Horse. [13] MYoung1030 (talk) 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This is my diff for contriubtion plus reference to the Muriel Cooper page. [14] --Jckulas (talk) 15:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This is my diff for contribution plus reference to the Erhard Ratdolt page [15] --Cpm22 (talk) 15:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Current diff of Jenson article that I've been working on - [16] also a diff of an article I am working on on Zuzana Licko [17]--Sabinajm (talk) 15:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This is the diff where i added the citation [18]--Sha22357 (talk) 16:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

here is second diff [19]--Sha22357 (talk) 16:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

This is the diff for Ed Fella; added a paraphrase and fixed citations [20] 16:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fi89419 (talk • contribs)

is my diff on Ed Fella CCCSSAA7 (talk) 16:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Here is my talk page with the dif on Zuzana Licko. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zuzana_Licko&action=historysubmit&diff=454249313&oldid=454248859 Rox1286 (talk)

This is the diff for Ed Fella [21] (AleMarie (talk) 17:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC))

• This is the diff for Paula Scher [22] (AnonymousAnonymous0123 (talk) 21:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

This is my first diff for Ed Fella http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ed_Fella&diff=prev&oldid=454242901 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ed_Fella&diff=next&oldid=454242975 --Fi89419 (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Final Project (interim updates)

Please put your diffs and your interim updates on your final project here. Remember to put a empty line between your post and the post that precedes yours. Also, when you are in a comment thread (e.g. when responding to another post) put a colon ":" for each entry in the comment thread before your post; if there are two other entries before yours in the thread, the second one will start with ":" and your comment in that thread should start with "::". You only do this when you are in conversation with earlier comments. --Theredproject (talk) 00:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm a little confused, what diff are we supposed to put? I thought the assignment for tomarrow was just to fill out our talk pages with more sources as well as fill out our name on the table on the course syllabus next to our topics?-Rl081289 (talk) 20:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

You are correct, and I am using the term "diff" too loosely. Each time I assign you something, I want you to post your results here. I want you to check in and post your work here. This week it should be a link to the talk page for your subject article. R1081289, make sure to post your (good) sources to the subject article's talk page, not your own.--Theredproject (talk) 23:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Here is my diff [23].- Rl081289 (talk) 00:15, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Excellent. Glad it is on the article page now.--Theredproject (talk) 00:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Here's my diff for 10 sources so far: [24] MYoung1030 (talk) 19 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.168.124.172 (talk)

Great work MYoung, but be sure to add them to the talk page for the article!--Theredproject (talk) 00:56, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

MY SOURCES diff Token718 (talk) 02:12, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Here is my diff for my sources [25] Jckulas (talk)

Here is my diff. --Nboffa (talk) 04:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Updated diff. --Nboffa (talk) 04:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

My articles for reference on Ed Fellas talk page. [26] (AleMarie (talk) 15:03, 20 October 2011 (UTC))

My sources and potential changes are written on Katherine McCoy's talk page [[27]] . I also posted my week 7 assignment diffs on my talk page [[28]]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellebrager (talk • contribs) 15:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

My page about Hoefler & Frere-Jones will soon have it's sources. [29] --CCCSSAA7 (talk) 19:08, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

My sources for Jessica Helfand on my talk page. [30]Dalmazo (talk) 01:24, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Sources and Explanations [31][--Sha22357 (talk) 18:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)]

Brief summary on my plans for the MUriel Coopers Article [32] [--Sha22357 (talk) 19:00, 21 October 2011 (UTC)]

My sources are on the article talk page<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jessica_Helfand>Dalmazo (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

We spoke in class today about my sources being posted onto my talk page on time however they were in the wrong place. Again, a few of my sources are posted onto my talk page. M01022011 (talk) 15:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Here are my sources posted to the talk page of Geoffroy Tory. Geoffroy Tory--TheBauhausCure (talk) 19:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

250 or 500 word summaries update

Please post a link to your article talk page with your 250 or 500 word summaries, and outlines for work completed. Your article talk page should also have at least 20 references on it (30-40 if you are going for GA)--Theredproject (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Here is the diff for my additions plus more sources [33] -Rl081289 (talk) 01:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Good work here. --Theredproject (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Here's the LINK to my articles talk page, with summary outline and twenty sources. Hopefully, I did it right! KatanaBeatsPaper (talk) 23:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

This is good work. --Theredproject (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Heres the link for my projects talk page. [34] this includes my summary, my sources (still need to add some more, I emailed Ed Fella personally and I'm waiting for a response) and my outline. AleMarie (talk) 03:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Here's my Link to my talk page where my Ten additional sources as well as my Summary for Lorraine Wild are. Jckulas (talk)

Reposted on article talk page Talk:Lorraine_Wild. Jckulas (talk) 17:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

HERES THE LINKof my SUMMARY and additonal SOURCESToken718 (talk) 03:54, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Summary/outline and sources --Nboffa (talk) 06:04, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is the diff to my summary outline on Irma Boom. Hopefully I did this correctly! M01022011 (talk) 12:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is the outline for my summary on my talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HRJ21. HRJ21 (talk) 13:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is the 250 word summary and sources updated [35]Dalmazo (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is my 250 word summary and updates 20 sources on Katherine McCoys Talk Page [36] and my week 8 assignment is on my talk page [37] Ellebrager (talk) 16:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

I've had everything updated on my page, forgot to post this *The Hobby Horse - MYoung1030 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MYoung1030 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is my 250 word summary and updates 20 sources [38] Cpm22 (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is my 250 word summary and sources on Hoefler & Frere-Jones [39] --CCCSSAA7 (talk) 17:33, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is my 250 word summary and updates 20 sources on Jon Ives Talk Page Ives and my week 8 assignment is on my talk page [40] Aking174 (talk) 18:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is my 250 word summary on Paula Scher [41]Anonymous0123 (talk) 03:59, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is my 250 word summary on Antiqua (typeface class) i know it is late but i am catching on to the assignments all will be done by monday [42]Chcpal (talk) 14:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is a link to my talk page ]Jckulas (talk)

with my 500+ word essay that I added to Lorraine Wild 's page.

Here is the link to Katherine McCoy with my 500 words added. Ellebrager (talk) 03:08, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is the link to Arthur Heygate Mackmurdo with my 500 words added. Cpm22 (talk) 03:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is the link to Paula Scher with my 500 words added. Anonymous0123 (talk) 04:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is the link to N.W. Ayer & Son with my 501 words added. KatanaBeatsPaper (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Up to date writing on the article for Ladislav Sutnar & the diff. --Nboffa (talk) 05:41, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Here is the link to my updated article. Jon Ive

Aking174 (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

My 500 words on John Henry Bufford. Here is my diff. HRJ21 (talk) 14:08, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

My 500 words on Irma Boom.M01022011 (talk) 14:43, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Article updated [[43]]Dalmazo (talk) 03:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

500 words to article. [44]. Some guy also began making minor edits to my post too. --Rl081289 (talk) 05:44, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

THis is the link to my 250-500 words on Muriel Cooper [[45]] the only thing is that i made multiple contributions and saved as i was going on 11/15/11 so when you look at the diff its like i only made one but, its multiple paragraphs citations and organization. --Sha22357 (talk) 02:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

here is a article I added 250 worls William Caslon edited by user:Kpervaiz —Preceding undated comment added 16:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

My 500 WORD CONTRIBUTION TO ARTLICE diff 1 diff 2 diff 3diff 4 diff 5 each 'diff' contains a seperate contributionToken718 (talk) 01:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

This is a link to my 250-500 words on william Caslon [46] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpervaiz (talk • contribs) 20:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Blank out - Response from SMaster

Hi, this is what SMaster response to me.

The editor that blanked this out should not have done this. I would even go as far as calling it vandalism. You can restore all your work from the diffs. I am now watching the article, and will revert any unreasonable changes. In addition, one of the editor's edit summary says, "Edits made at Paula Scher's request", which suggests that the editor knows the writer personally, and this presents a huge WP:COI. The editor should explain or refrain from editing this article. Let me know if you have any more troubles. Cheers. --SMasters (talk) 02:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Is this mean, it would be harder for me to get pictures from her to create a gallery? Should i even email her now? Anonymous0123 (talk) 03:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Seems like you have an interesting case on your hands. She probably won't be so reluctant judging from the edits so far, but it can't hurt to try. --Nboffa (talk) 05:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

First things first, revert the edits, and restore the page. If the editor messes with the page again, SMasters is watching, and you have backup. Beyond that, I doubt that the article subject is going to be particularly friendly about cooperating providing you w/ CC BY-SA images of her or her work, but you can always ask. And good work on communicating w/ SMasters, and following through. You have learned a lot in this process. Good work. --Theredproject (talk) 22:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

peer reviews

put a link to a diff of your peer review changes here, in order to be given credit

I have peer reviewed User:HRJ21 article on John Henry Bufford and have added a few "citation needed." I have also written on the article talk page a few suggestions on things he might want to fix and/or change. Here is the diff. M01022011 (talk) 00:45, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

I reviewed and left a sugggestion for User:MYoung1030 for the The Hobby Horse. Diff [47]. --Rl081289 (talk) 17:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

I have peer reviewed Muriel Cooper for User:Sha22357. Diff [48]. --MYoung1030 (talk) 18:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

I reviewed and left suggestions for the Piet Zwart artlicle for User: X3Kimmie here the diff. Token718 (talk) 00:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I peer reviewed for User:cpm22 on the designer Arthur Heygate Mackmurdo and here is the diff [49]. Jckulas (talk) 01:49, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I peer reviewed for User:M01022011 on the designer Irma Boom and here is the dif f [50].Cpm22 (talk) 04:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

hello, I reviewed Nboffa's work on Ladislav Sutnar. Here is the link to my comment: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANboffa&action=historysubmit&diff=461068356&oldid=459748573 Rox1286 (talk) 05:31, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Review of User:Jckulas's Lorraine_Wild. diff for edits & diff for comments on talk page--Nboffa (talk) 06:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I peer reviewed for User:ellebrager on the designer Katherine McCoy and here is the diff [51]. User:Anonymous0123 Anonymous0123 (talk) 07:30, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I peer reviewed User:ellebrager . The diff is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Katherine_McCoy#Peer_review Aking174 (talk) 14:30, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I peer reviewed User:M01022011 on the designer Irma Boom here is the link to the articles talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Irma_Boom#COPYVIO_issues &the diff for my edits [52] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellebrager (talk • contribs) 15:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

peer review for Antiqua http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Antiqua_(typeface_class)&diff=prev&oldid=461865544 --Sha22357 (talk) 01:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

I peer reviewed User:chcpal for Antiqua (typeface) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Antiqua_(typeface_class) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAntiqua_%28typeface_class%29&action=historysubmit&diff=461881188&oldid=461865544 --Fi89419 (talk) 03:56, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

This is my 1st peer review. [[53]] (AleMarie (talk) 02:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC))

2nd Peer Reviews & 1000 Words

I have done my second peer review for Arthur Heygate Mackmurdo for User:cpm22. Diff [54]. --MYoung1030 (talk) I also did 1000 words on my own article. There is no section for either of these yet so I figured I'd post it here. 00:04, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Ive completed my 2nd peer review on the N.W. Ayer & Son article for User:KatanaBeatsPaper In addition ive also responded to both reviews diff ive also finished my 1000+ words are completed heres the diff Token718 (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

here the diff for peer editing http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hobby_horse&diff=prev&oldid=463347343

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hobby_horse&diff=prev&oldid=463347023--Sha22357 (talk) 19:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

I peer reviewed User:chcpal article on Antiqua. [55]. For my 1,000 words total, I added in a section for Film Creative Directors. I am currently up to approx. 1,140 words [56].--Rl081289 (talk) 20:12, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

I commented back on the people who left feedback on my talk page. [[57]] are the comments. M01022011 (talk) 20:30, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

I made a few revisions to my article on Irma Boom. I will be adding more information before the due date. M01022011 (talk) 20:37, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

1,000+ words & restructure post-review diff --Nboffa (talk) 02:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Opened up first peer review for User:Rox1286's article on Zuzana Licko; diff for edits and diff for comments on talk page. --Nboffa (talk) 07:01, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I have done my second peer review for Irma Boom for User:M01022011. Diff [58]Cpm22 (talk) 03:34, 1 December 2011 (UTC) I also did my 1000 words on my article. [59]Cpm22 (talk) 03:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I also peer reviewed HRJ21 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AJohn_Henry_Bufford&action=historysubmit&diff=461883675&oldid=460872109 --Fi89419 (talk) 04:11, 22 November 2011 (UTC) --Fi89419 (talk) 04:53, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

1,000 Words & 2nd Peer Review for User:Fi89419 on Ellen Lupton. Here's the diff for Peer Review & Discussion [60]

[61] Here's the diff for 1,000 words [62]Anonymous0123 (talk) 07:51, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Here is my Peer Review on Zuzana Licko. HRJ21 (talk) 13:39, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I have done my second peer review in Emigre and left a comment on the talk page. M01022011 (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I have done both peer reviews and the 1000 words and as for the paragraph done by the user jessica helfand, I was going to ask if that wouldn't be a conflict of interests. I read about it when I made the stub for winter house. The first peer review was for User:Rl081289 his/her article was on Talk:Creative directors and the second peer review was on User talk:AleMarie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalmazo (talk • contribs) 02:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Yup, it is a conflict of interest. I have asked our ambassadors for guidance on this. Also, please be sure to sign your posts to talk pages. --Theredproject (talk) 03:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Here is the diff from the original state of my article and the new version [63] . 2nd peer review Hoefler & Frere-Jones on talk page.

(Ellebrager (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

hi MalikaZ (talk) 00:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Here is my link for 1000 words [64]Kpervaiz (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)kpervaizKpervaiz (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Class talk experiment

Hey guys! come say hi... MalikaZ (talk) 00:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

hi! Chrissy9876 (talk) 00:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

this is Janice!! Chisholmredproject (talk) 00:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

hi!--Meilingaddress (talk) 00:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

hi! KRibble (talk) 00:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

HELLO!--Nbwrites (talk) 00:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm starting a new thread. --DaLearnedOne (talk) 00:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Cool. Hi. Appknyc (talk) 00:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Greetings TO CUNY Grad Center from GCChisholmredproject (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello all!--Theredproject (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Timeline for current course -- when do the weeks start?

Regarding Wikipedia talk:United States Education Program/Courses/Interactive Technology and Pedagogy (Michael Mandiberg), when does the first week start? I see that in week three I should expect to see students introducing themselves to me on my talk page and also leaving a message for a classmate on the classmate's talk page. I did have six people introduce themselves on my talk page this past week -- were they early or is everyone else either late or pushing the deadline? Banaticus (talk) 19:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for checking in on that. Those weeks refer to the weeks in the semester. I just added the assignment to the wikipedia page here, and that has the relevant dates. The course site outside of Wikipedia is on the CUNY Academic Commons. Right now they are starting to make their plans for revising the articles on the talk pages, for example here. Two opportunities for guidance:

1. Are there any particularly good (e.g GA, A or Featured) articles on these kinds of theoretical/historical books that you could recommend the students could model their writing off of. Most of what I found was B class.
2. The students are starting the discussion of how to rework the article on the talk pages for the three articles. Feel free to jump in and offer guidance to them. Free Culture (book), Wealth of Networks, and Experience and Education--Theredproject (talk) 00:12, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

"The early mid-term assignment will be to take blog posts from the Fall course blog and add the appropriate info to the WP article for the subject." The students goal is to basically take a sort-of CliffsNotes version of the book and use that to expand the articles in question? I don't know what the Fall course blog is like, but in general, blog posts aren't valid sources for Wikipedia articles because they generally don't have editorial oversight or any built-in fact checking process, so the blog post itself couldn't be used as a reference for something like a "Literary and cultural significance" section in the article. Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources says that "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." In those cases, though, generally the previously published reliable third-party publication(s) should be cited as a source instead of the blog post. Regarding information only reported in a blog post, "If the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else will probably have done so." This can make it difficult to put in a literary analysis section for a book when an editor has to find someone who has published a literary analysis of the book, and then quote them (and can't just write up their own literary analysis). Although perhaps I don't fully understand what the goal of the course is? Banaticus (talk) 10:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

I see your concern with the way that it is written. The course is a PhD level seminar, and as part of these kinds of courses it is customary to have the students write "Reading Response" papers in which they summarize the main arguments of the reading, and offer their response/interpretation of the reading. In our program, students write these on a blog. The assignment is to take that text they wrote in the fall, and rework it for Wikipedia. They will have to cite their sources (which will mostly be the primary source of the book they are writing about). No worries, there will be No Original Research. Only summary of other people's research (e.g. Lessig, Benkler, and Dewey. And if they choose to have a "Reception" section, they may have summaries of other scholars interpretations of these texts. Given that, I will rw for clarity. How about "The early mid-term assignment will be to rewrite your blog posts from last semester into articles for Wikipedia, being careful to cite each sentence of summary to the page in the original text."--Theredproject (talk) 18:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Submit a diff of one paragraph added to an article related to your research

SoniaG2 (talk) Hi Michael, I added a section Youth and New Media to an article on New_Media.

I think I did it right: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Civil_society&action=historysubmit&diff=477247325&oldid=472930647 If not, please let me know!!! KingfisherBlue11 (talk) 20:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

This is the link to the changes, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_media&action=submit. SoniaG2 (talk) 20:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)SoniaG2

Nice paragraph. Two notes. This is the proper way to do a diff to your contrib (we actually haven't covered it yet, so no worries there.) What you do is compare versions in the page history Also, shouldn't sign your comments *in* the actual content. Wikipedia keeps track of your contributions automagically. Where you have to remember to sign things is on talk pages, like this one. And do that with the four tildes, or the signature button at the top of the text edit interface.--Theredproject (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Nbwrites (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC) Hello Michael! I added to a paragraph in the Messiah (Handel) page, in section 5.1. It started out as a whole paragraph, but then when I started integrating it into the existing article, I think I ultimately only added 3 or 4 new sentences (with citations) - here is a link to the original diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messiah_%28Handel%29&action=historysubmit&diff=477131297&oldid=473090142 and then this morning i caught one minor mistake, and fixed it: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messiah_%28Handel%29&action=historysubmit&diff=477204521&oldid=477131297

ria4983 (talk) Hi Michael! Here is difffor an article I added content to. I tried to look up diffs etc., and sorry for anything wonky! sbnrj33 18:43, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Michael, here is [diff on biopower] Chrissy9876 (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Student project

I have moved Talk:Experience and Education to User:Theredproject/sandbox because it is more suitable for a user page or a Wikipedia: page. Re Experience and Education, the title should probably be experience and education. Utterly amazing, I actually read "at the meeting with Malika I learned how to create a /sandbox, SoniaG2". So what does SoniaG2 do? Create a rubbish stub in the (article) namespace. Better explain to her again about sandboxes. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Experience & Education

The cover of the book seems to indicate that the title of the book is "The World is Flat". Where does "Experience & Education" come from? Banaticus (talk) 06:38, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

It looks like they grabbed the formatting from The World is Flat, and they haven't swapped the image out yet.--Theredproject (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Free Culture

Hi Michael. We wanted to bring you up to date with where we are with this assignment. As you know, we have been communicating on the book's Talk page. We have also been otherwise communicating extensively to strategize how to best approach and succeed with this project. Applying some of what we learned in the latest workshop, we have decided to go ahead by using the book's themes to cover the Introduction, Piracy, Property, and the Conclusion. We informed DavidMcEddy of our plan, and invited him to contribute to the two remaining themes of Puzzles and Balances, since those were not a part of last semester's work. In this way, the entre book can be covered. We expect that our first stab will be up by or before early next week. Please share any thoughts, advice, cautions that ocur to you? Chisholmredproject (talk) 20:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Excellent, see my comments on your sandbox talk page. --Theredproject (talk) 18:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm sure you've seen User:DavidMCEddy's edits to the Free Culture (book) article. I started a discussion on what to do next at User talk:Chrissy9876/Free Culture (book)/sandbox#Changes to the original page. Banaticus (talk) 22:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Please see recent post on talk page from User:DavidMCEddyre: flagging for copyright issues. Does open license for book preclude this policy? --Meilingaddress (talk) 17:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

You can see my response on the talk page.--Theredproject (talk) 21:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your response, Michael. It is both enlightening and clear. AS our group discussed, we each have started to edit the article, and it seems to be shaping up, nicely. I must say there is LOTS to edit, but I really feel good about engaging in this project. Thanks again for your guidance and encouragement. Chisholmredproject (talk) 00:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes, thanks, Michael. Chrissy9876 (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Excellent all! Keep on kicking ass.--Theredproject (talk) 04:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Confusing

Re this edit: please do not confuse your students. What on earth are you talking about? The denizens of the Commons seem happy that this image is already public domain. So why should anyone need to "convert the image to a CC BY-SA license"? If you are actually discussing a shot of the book cover, then that is equally simple: there are several on the web which may be ripped off with a clear conscience and posted as "fair use". The draft article already carries a good example: File:Worldisflat.gif. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Yup, that what I was saying to her. See my comments on the sandbox talk page. --Theredproject (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Moving a page

Please use the procedure in wp:moving pages for renaming / moving a page. It is best to keep the page history. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

The Free University of NYC

Hello, Theredproject/Archives, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, The Free University of NYC, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Free University of New York. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

1. a link to the article you copied from
2. the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, The Free University of NYC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, The Free University of NYC. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Free University of New York. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Free University of New York – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. smileguy91^talk 23:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Re:Speedy deletion above

Reply is on my talk page.smileguy91^talk 23:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Response per your request

I did respond to your undeletion query at WP:UND. The consensus so far has been that the article did not state why the subject was notable. If you have any further queries, please respond at the WP:UND discussion or on my talk page. Regards, smileguy91^talk 17:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:American women novelists

Do you want to upmerge this category to Category:Women novelists and Category:American women writers, or do you want to do away with those categories as well?John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome back!

Hi Theredproject, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the course instructor right to your account, as you have demonstrated a need for it through the Wikipedia Education Program. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and will just allow you to be able to access the course extension as well as create and edit course pages. If you are interested in accessing the course extension so that you might be able to create a course page right now, here is the link. For more information on the course instructor right, see this page. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I live in Yonkers so it would be difficult for me to attend your class on Staten Island, however, if it would be useful I could attend your class by video conference. I use "webex" so I could be on video and show my screen to give a tour of Wikipedia. I could also be around to field questions from the class. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Blue Rasbery. A video visit would be great. I have never used webex before. Do I need to install software on the machine I am using, or just pull up a URL? My class meets 230-530 on Wednesdays. This week I was going to give them a walkthrough of the basics of making simple edits, and cover NPOV, 5 Pillars, What Wikipedia Is Not, etc. Maybe if you popped in the following week for 45-60 minutes or so, and showed them around a bit, and talked about talk pages, help desk, what flags mean. Or other stuff would be fine too. Let me know if the date/time works? Thanks--Theredproject (talk) 22:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

COM 232 First edits

Hello, this is Annalisa Giordano from your communications 232 class. I edited a few articles on punctuation. My user name is ag715. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ag715 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Joel Ogaja

Hello Professor,

I posted the paragraph on my sandbox as discussed, I will keep working on it, but the links are there to try and support the article.

User:Offensiveb/sandbox

Offensiveb (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

7 Annotated sources and likely uses added, sources are repetitive of the historical information on Herdeg, more to follow. These are posted here User talk:Offensiveb on my talk page. Offensiveb (talk) 23:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

1140 words added as well as sources, images and citations, due for thorough editing, and review. See User:Offensiveb/sandboxOffensiveb (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

peer article on Ed Fella reviewed Talk:Edward Fella Offensiveb (talk) 01:56, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer review edited and sources added on talk page. Also article has been edited with a new section and more info. See Edward Fella And Talk:Edward Fella

Offensiveb (talk) 03:57, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Links for the discussion: http://new-aesthetic.tumblr.com/

                         http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/15/google_thinking_machines/
                         

Offensiveb (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello Professor, I'm unable to find the Finals revision notes. Are they posted here, or are we just using the notes we took in class? I may have missed a few... Offensiveb (talk) 20:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

The notes are on the course talk page--Theredproject (talk) 22:25, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello Professor, I added the Images that were deleted here Walter Herdeg . I saw Prof M.A.Polger, 2nd time however I failed to clean the article to a level that you might have wanted to see, but while time outran me, I tried to what I could... Thanks Offensiveb (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Plan of attack

Hi Professor, Here's the link to my talk page with this weeks assignment. Assignment

19:07, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Citing problem

Hello, I have my two sentences from an article abstract on the Academic Search Complete database. I am having trouble referencing on wikipedia from the web citing template and it keeps showing this in red, "Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page, but references will not show without a {{reflist}} template". I am not aware of what a reflist template is I was just using the web citing template from a database.

1. Be sure to preview your edit, as you would have noticed that your edit contained functional code (the ref tag) which caused the rest of your edit to be treated as the reference. Use the <nowiki> tag to ensure that your code is not treated as functional code. I added that in, as it had caused all further text on the page to be hidden inside that initial opening ref tag.
2. The reflist is required at the bottom of the page, in order to display all of the references on the page. The gist of it is that you need to put a {{reflist}} at the bottom of the page. It is best practices to put that in its own section. So put it after a line with ==References== on it. For more on this, please see Template:Reflist. You can also see this in action on most developed (non-stub) pages if you edit and scroll to the bottom.--Theredproject (talk) 16:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Jenna Cozzolino - Plan of Attack

Hello professor here is the link to my talk page with the finished assignment.

Plan of Attack

ZH92 (talk) 20:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Plan of attack

Hi Professor I have finished the plan of attack assignment here is the link Kpol1298 (talk) 00:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Allison Scully - Plan of Attack

Hi Professor, I have just added my plan of attack to my talk page for the two articles I want to work on. Allyscully (talk) 01:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Plan for attack

Hi Professor- i hope you don't mind that i have changed the designer that i plan to write about. Thanks [65] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moiselle4dreaa (talk • contribs) 04:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Alexandrea Caccamo - Plan for Attack

Hello Prof.Mandiberg. I have added my plan of attack for the two individuals I wish to reasearch furthur, Otto Eckman and Daniel Berkeley Updike on my talk page. ACaccamo (talk) 14:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

My citation on Daniel Berkeley Updike talk page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Berkeley_Updike#References ACaccamo (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Plan for attack

Hi professor, I just added my plan of attack to my talk and user page. The guys are Will Burtin Stephen Henry Horgan Joseph Blumenthal (printer) I am going to continue to work on the suggestions for the articles as I do more research. Jfgx4 (talk) 15:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Annalisa Giordano COM 232

The two articles I will be editing are:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_Grandjean and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Hohlwein.

Ag715 (talk) 17:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Plan for attack - Justin Gaetani - Updated

I've decided on Joseph Blumenthal (printer). I am updating my Plan of Attack with the sources and also posting them on the Joseph Blumenthal (printer) talk page.Jfgx4 (talk) 01:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jfgx4, post to my talk page when you are done with your work. When you post, I am notified, and I check in. It seems as if you are just starting your work. I do think that Blumenthal is a great choice, though. Please post again when you have finished your plan with your sources.--Theredproject (talk) 01:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

more citations on Pigouchet

Hi Professor- im not sure if you went over how to apply your username into the table of all students (review schedule) during last weeks class but i cant seem to get my way around it. I missed your class last week I did switch over to my user page name. i did some more searches on Phillipe Pigouchet- mostly books to purchase.

[[66]

[[67]

French Book of HOURS? [[68]

Early Printed books [[69]

[[70]

[[71]

--Moiselle4dreaa (talk) 03:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Moiselle, I'm glad you figured out how to sign your comments, and have found some materials. Please keep all of your work on your talk page, or on the talk page of your article (when it becomes focused on the article.) Post here to tell me that you have finished your work, and point me to where the work is. Please take a look at the way the citations were done here User_talk:Jfgx4 and Talk:Claude_Garamond#Bibliography for ways to make your citations more complete.--Theredproject (talk) 13:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

bibliography

So far I have only 2 sources I will be using for Ludwig Hohlwein's article. Here is the link for the article with the sources on it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Hohlwein

Ag715 (talk) 15:03, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

bibliography of sources I would like to use to expand this article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Edward_Fella Kpol1298 (talk) 15:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

John McCarthy COM 232

Professor, sorry about the confusion earlier as I was just not use to Wikipedia.

These are some articles that I'd like to work on for my finale project:

Emil Ruder
The only thing of real value on Ruder's page is his creation of Swiss Style, which is notably his biggest contribution. There should be a picture, more on his life before his work, some of his other prominent works and what he brought to the field, as well as other biographical information . References for Ruder:
Typographie: A Manual of Design Hardcover by Emil Ruder

Philippe Grandjean
There is not much knowledge of Grandjean on his page. There should be more biographical information, a picture, and more about how he created the King's specific style of writing for royalty, known as Romain du Roi.
References for Grandjean:
The History of Visual Communication: http://www.citrinitas.com/history_of_viscom/masters.html
An Era of Typographic Geniuses: Alexander Crook | Leland Tong | Karin Hsu
Typography, Referenced: by Jason Tselentis
Le Romain du Roi: http://www.garamond.culture.fr/en/page/le_romain_du_roi
A History of Graphic Design: Meggs, Phillip B.

Jessie Wilcox Smith
While Smith's page has more to it than Ruder and Grandjean, much of it deals with her biography which could be more fine tuned. There is not much on her work except for a list of her works, which I am not sure if it is complete or not. Few of her works are referenced but more could be added to show the scope of her artistry.
References for Smith
Jessie Willcox Smith: American Illustrator by Edward Nudelman
Jessie Willcox Smith A Bibliography by Nudelman, Edward D.,
Biography for Jessie Wilcox Smith: https://secureapps.libraries.psu.edu/PACFTB/bios/biography.cfm?AuthorID=7356
JVJ Publishing: Illustrators: http://www.bpib.com/illustrat/jwsmith.htm
Jessie Willcox Smith – Her Life and Legacy: http://serenitystitchworks.com/art-and-design-information/artist-biography/jessie-willcox-smith-her-life-and-legacy/

I plan on either using Jessie Wilcox Smith or Philippe Grandjean . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnmccarthyyy (talk • contribs) 16:30, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Peter_Sch%C3%B6ffer

--Af918 (talk) 16:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Af918

Plan of attack for Emilia Maggi

Hi Professor, I posted my plan of attack to my talk page and added a fact and citation to [Benito]'s page. Emariemag (talk) 17:33, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

I have narrowed down my focus to two men that had a lot to do with the innovation of printing early on in the technology's history. Peter Schoeffer and Bi Sheng were both very influential in the making and working of early print material and I would like to gather much more information on both of these two and make that information more accessible to the general public. I plan to do that by gathering information and notes about their lives throughout extensive research.

Peter Schoeffer was a printer in the German city of Mainz. Before he was adored for his work in helping create the 42 Line Bible with Johann Fust, Schoeffer was the apprentice of Johann Gutenberg. He ended up testifying against Gutenberg in a case that would ultimately lead to Gutenberg not obtaining the credit that should have been his. I would like to dive more into the personal side of that story and try to get as personal as I can regarding information on Peter Schoeffer.

Bi Sheng made the first known movable type using Chinese porcelain. Known as a common man, there is not much information on Sheng's Wikipedia page. He brought about a giant change in technology and I feel as if more people should know about the life and times of Bi Sheng. I will do my bests to gather as much information on Sheng as I can because his contributions to early print technology were more significant than he gets credit for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Af918 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Link to my article's talk page

Here I have listed my 5 sources to cite from for the Claude Garamond page: Claude Garamond Talk Page — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZH92 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Good. Be sure to sign your comments!--Theredproject (talk) 17:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Matt Quinn Plan of Attack

Hello professor, I have a plan of attack for two articles on my talk page and my three designers for the "pick 3-5" assignment on my user page.

The two designers I chose to to do a plan of attack on were Jean Dupas and James Huston . Neither of the articles are as detailed as they should be, and in the case of the Huston article, it has maybe 4 sentences, none of which paint any kind of picture as to what the man was about. Jean dupas wasn't on the recommended articles list, but I'm a fan of Art Deco and have actually seen some of his work before, so I figured I'd take a look at his article, and it definitely needs some work, substantial work mind you. You'll find the rest of the details on my page(s).

I'm currently compiling sources for Dupas ( hoping to have luck in the library ), and I need serious help with research regarding Huston. I posted an SOS of sorts on either my User or Talk page, not sure at ToW. I'm leaning toward making my main article Jean Dupas, but I'd like your input first. --TheShark93 (talk) 19:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Allison Scully - Emil Ruder edit

Hi professor, I dumped the Emil Ruder wiki article into my sandbox and I started to work on it. I added some categories such as "early life", "education and career", and "design work" as well as an artist infobox (which needs a picture, I will eventually add one). Right now I am working on getting the 250 (or more) words that is required for this weeks assignment. Question, is it going to stay in my sandbox until I complete the final assignment? Also, when I am finished, am I going to insert the article as a whole of what I worked on or do I insert the sections I have worked on? Just want to make sure I do it right before it goes onto the main page. Allyscully (talk) 21:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

As of right now, I have added 364 words to the Emil Ruder article in my sandbox (not including category titles). Allyscully (talk) 22:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Matt Quinn- New Designer Proposal

Hello professor, something came up and I will most likely be unable to make class today, but I wanted to submit a new designer proposal that I think could work. I want to do the article for video game designer, graphic artist, and screenwriter Ken Levine. His page has a little bit to it already, but there could definitely be more added to it. I personally feel this man is a genius. He made the Art Deco-heavy game Bioshock and it's sequel Bioshock Infinite, as well as the System Shock series. These games are idealistic, aesthetic and narrative masterpieces that bring together multiple art styles from different periods of time together with amazing storytelling, and he was the mind behind it all. This man, along with his studio Irrational Games, have almost single-handedly matured video games into art. I think he's worthy of an article in the class. Let me know what you think. I can make his article amazing. He's contemporary, he's breaking and has broken ground, and he's a visionary genius. He's the Gutenberg of video games in a way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheShark93 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Starting my article

Hi Professor- I met with Professor Polger and he helped me so much with looking for more information on Philippe Pigouchet. I started my article and of course will try to have 250 words by tonight/tomorrow morning. I just have one question- do we have to put the page on our talk page first or go straight into starting the page because i always started mine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_Pigouchet

Please let me know if that's okay so far.

Moiselle4dreaa (talk) 19:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Glad to hear that Professor Polger was so helpful. This looks like a good start. One question: in the History tab, it looks like there is a second person editing it: User:Dreambeaver (This is okay, and normal for wp). If they make additional edits, you should talk to them on their talk page to discuss strategy/collaboration. --Theredproject (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Johnmccarthy219

Professor, I began writing my article on the actual page and began to work on it there. All work is completed, so far, on Jessie Willcox Smith page with over 250 words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnmccarthyyy (talk • contribs) 08:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Good start. You need add your sources as you write the article. Also, don't forget to sign your comments!--Theredproject (talk) 12:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Allyscully

Hi Professor. I am continuing to work on the Emil Ruder article in my sandbox, I was not sure if you wanted us to keep it in our sandbox until it was complete, but I have not yet updated the actual article page. Also, I am having trouble finding more sources other than the 9 or 10 I have that are useful. I don't think I am going to make the 20 sources that you have assigned. I picked up the books I requested from the Library and they seem to be of little help with information on Emil Ruder himself. I have yet to meet with the Librarian, which I will do soon. I just wanted to give you an update with where I am at on the project. Allyscully (talk) 21:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Meet with the librarian! I am 100% sure you can find 20 sources. What about the book Ruder wrote? Also, it looks like you only have about 350 words here...--Theredproject (talk) 23:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hi Professor, I did a peer review on Philippe Pigouchetarticle talk page. Allyscully (talk) 14:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hello professor, I am giving you the link to my peer review on the Emil Ruder talk page

ZH92 (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

1,000 words

Hello professor I have gotten my Claude Garamond page a little over 1,000 words. I'm still going while I'm at it.

ZH92 (talk) 01:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

First Review

Hey Professor- I added a table of content for joaquin Ibarra wikipedia page and also posted on her talk page on using a gallery on the page.

Moiselle4dreaa (talk) 05:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

first review

Hi professor I did my first peer review and have added my name to the table. Kpol1298 (talk) 05:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hi Professor- I added some links on to Claude Garamond wikipedia's page. Over all the article is very detailed and organized. MagnifyIt (talk) 16:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

My Article Joaquín Ibarra

I have added more content on to my article. It was also reviewed and edited by one of my fellow peers. I wanted to add more since Mark and I had found a PhD dissertation on Joaquín Ibarra. However, the more I began to read this document the more grammatical errors I found which made me a bit doubtful. At this point I'm a bit stuck since I depended on this dissertation. However, I will make my second meeting with Mark to see how I can move forward with this. MagnifyIt (talk) 16:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review

Professor I did a review of Ag715's article last week and have just been waiting for a review of mine. Johnmccarthyyy (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review

Professor, I did a Peer Review of Will Burtin for Emariemag. Posted on her talk page. Also, added an edit to the "style" section on Will Burtin page. ACaccamo (talk) 02:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

New Aesthetic Examples Here

The New Aesthetic I read about is PRESENZE COLLECTION | Studio Nucleo on page 78 http://new-aesthetic.tumblr.com/page/78 Moiselle4dreaa (talk) 17:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

The New Aesthetic Studio I read about was Studio Gang Architects | Aqua Tower MagnifyIt (talk) 19:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Put your New Aesthetic Examples Here here!--Theredproject (talk) 03:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer Reviews and 1,000 Words

Hi Professor, I did two peer reviews and put my username on the chart under peer review 1 and 2. Also, i have been using this online toolto see how much I have added to the Emil Ruder article, and I have added 2,224 to the existing article.Allyscully (talk) 21:41, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks so much,Allyscully!! i'm going to use this as well!! ACaccamo (talk) 15:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Second Peer Review

Hey Professor- I peer reviewed Anthony Ferrera's page on Johan Fust. I wrote on Anthony's talk page if you want to check that out on books he might find useful when writing his article. I also met Prof. Aaron Polger for the second required time and he helped out with more research on Pigouchet. I felt like i was a little stuck on what else to write but it seems like there should be a good amount of research that i can add to the page to "beef up" the article after the meet.

Thanks.

Moiselle4dreaa (talk) 21:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review #2

Completed my second Peer Review and will start making the necessary changes and add big works to the article over the weekend. Waiting for my second Peer Review. Johnmccarthyyy (talk) 01:10, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Matt Quinn, Misc.

I completed both of my peer reviews ( I'll add more to them as I go along, people I reviewed still are, by the majority, sandboxing), made up most of my prep work and finished my article professor. All I have left to do is finish up the annotated sources and I should be done. I edited the Levine article like you suggested, I took the fat off of it and left the discussions of his style, how he implements it, and the reception and effects of his decisions. I also added some of his influences for his writing. --TheShark93 (talk) 18:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review #2

Hello Professor,

I did my second Peer Review for Ag715 on Ludwig Hohlwein. I made an edit to the page by adding sections to help with organization. ACaccamo (talk) 00:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Second Peer Review

Hi Professor, I did my second peer review this time on Max Miedinger. I added a sesction on the history of Heletica. I also added a few suggestions on he/she talk page. MagnifyIt (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Justin Gaetani

Hi professor I completed both my peer reviews and I will continue to add to my article throughout the week. I completeld the first 1000 words that were due and I have much more to add when I can find time through the rest of the week. Jfgx4 (talk) 18:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Assignments Done

Hello professor I have completed my article and my peer reviews, but I am still going to try and find more information. ZH92 (talk) 05:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Article Moved From Sandbox to Live Article

Hi Professor, I just moved my article on Emil Ruder from my sandbox to the actual page. Allyscully (talk) 04:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Article Moved (problem)

This is the link to where my article was moved to, I just checked and it is not on the actual Emil Ruder article, did I do something wrong? Allyscully (talk) 05:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Added my information to the Emil Ruder Article

Hi Professor, I moved my article to the Emil Ruder page, so it shows up now.Allyscully (talk) 14:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Citations

Hi Professor, I made many edits to the wiki article in my word doc version. I haven't updated the actual article yet. I saw your post to my talk page and I will have the final edits done by this evening and I will post to your talk page again to let you know when its completed. Thanks! Emariemag (talk) 08:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Professor, I finished my wiki article edits. I have added about 2,000 words from the original stub. Thanks! Emariemag (talk) 15:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

I will look at it. Thanks for notifying me.--Theredproject (talk) 17:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Art and Feminism edit a thon

Thanks for your message. I think people are interested in participating synchronously because there will be camaraderie on twitter etc, so I think we will try to have the best of both worlds and do both an event at the same time and an event later. Tullyis (talk) 01:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Sounds good. --Theredproject (talk) 21:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Art+Feminism press kit

Hey—would you happen to know where I can find the press kit for next Saturday's edit-a-thon?  czar ♔ 21:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

I emailed for access to the Google doc, but I haven't heard back yet czar ♔ 13:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I pinged them yesterday, and reminded them again today. I heard back that they were about to respond. Please ping me again if you didn't get the info.--Theredproject (talk) 15:17, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simone Leigh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Installation and NYFA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

cookiemonstah!!! Failedprojects (talk) 16:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)