User talk:Thegreatdr/2011archiveInvitation to join WikiProject United States--Kumioko (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC) Hurricane Able rainfallSo quick question, and I hope it's not too big to ask. The page on TC rainfall in the Southeast says Able 52 peaked at 6.11 inches in North Carolina, but the MWR says the NC peak was 6.33 inches. I'm wondering what the discrepancy is. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
I have another rainfall question. The state maxima map says Nevada's rainiest storm was Olivia 82 with 3.52 inches, but Doreen 72 caused 4.14 inches in Nevada. I'm wondering what the discrepancy is, as I figured that'd be a good article to make for DYK purposes. Thanks! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
DeletionsI deleted the talk page for the AVHRR because it said, and I quote: "ridiculo". And that's it. There were no previous edits to revert to. So I got rid of it. Have a little faith in my good judgment, okay? DS (talk) 17:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Re: Satellite temperature measurementsYes, the article is in better shape. While there is definitely a desire to have a discussion on satellite temperature measurements on climate change studies, it also seems important to describe the technology itself, and provide some history. The subarticle method works. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 06:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC) Your/my GA nominationJust to let you know, I have put your GA nomination - Braer Storm of January 1993 on hold. You have seven days to address the comments. Cheers! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
I'm happy to pass the Braer storm. Just one minor thing (didn't feel like holding up the GAN over it), but I still have no idea whether the storm caused snowfall or not. That's the only thing. Otherwise, thanks for addressing my comments! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
I seriously had no idea that even existed! You're darn right it's an interesting article. I love the coverage on older stuff like that that no longer exist. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Yay, thanks about Carol. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC) re: 1950 AHSHey, good call about the timeline, I always forget about those! As for the naming, I knew about them, but they didn't seem to be very official/consistent. I think the current wording in the article is fine, how it was "the first year in which tropical cyclones were given official names in the Atlantic basin". I know User:Jason Rees has been pursuing that topic recently, and I think he has another example or two of pre-1950 AHS naming. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up about the numbering thing in the article, I removed that. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC) Online AmbassadorsI saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 00:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC) State rainfall mapHi Doc. The table for Florida in List of wettest tropical cyclones in the United States lists Easy as the wettest tropical cyclone for the state, but the state map says Georges was the wettest. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 21:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Did you know?DYK for Weather ship
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC) DYK for Weather buoy
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC) DYK for Atmospheric model
Thanks for this contribution to Wikipedia Victuallers (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC) 1953 Atlantic hurricane season reversionFair enough. I was thinking that the statement was significant in that the month was a strange one to have a hurricane, but you're right; it isn't in this case. Anyway, my bad; sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BunBun002 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC) Hi again, I just wanted to explain about the character counting system for DYK nominations. DYK rules do not take into account the total byte count of the page, which is reflected in the page history (i.e. the page stood at 3,019 bytes before you started on January 27 and at 15,961 bytes when I reviewed it on January 31). Instead, we count characters of main text, not including subheads, charts, lists or references. Please see Rule A2. The special 2x expansion only applies to biographies of living persons which were previously unsourced and which now are sourced with references and doubled in text size (again, not including the references). Best, Yoninah (talk) 10:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC) NWPIf we decide to send Numerical weather prediction to FAC, when would it be most convenient for you to do so? I'd rather not send it if you'll be gone for three weeks or something like that... Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 19:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I have completed the GA review for sea surface temperature. The article passed under most of the conditions. You can see the full review here. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 03:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
United States snowfall climatologyIn view of United States rainfall climatology, your contributions, the request at Reference desk - Average snowfall per state, would you be so kind as to develop United States snowfall climatology. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 15:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC) With the rather significant expansion, would it be a good idea to send it to DYK? Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 20:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of History of numerical weather prediction, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.freebooknotes.com/wiki/Numerical_weather_prediction. It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues. If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Re: 1953Thanks again for the review, and totally understood about Florence ;) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC) Re: GingerWow, that would be amazing! The current pics are rather lackluster, and none showed any significant intensity or an unusually large eye. In fact, I was really surprised the NHC didn't have anything in their electronic wallet on storms in 1971. They have every other year from 1968 to 1983. Do you have any idea why? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!Thanks for the barnstar! [1] I am currently trying to get all three basic cloud types up to GA status, and am considering making a good topic on "cirriform cloud genera", including cirrus cloud, cirrostratus cloud, and cirrocumulus cloud. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:41, 22 February 2011 (UTC) AutopatrolledHello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
Re: Christine image for 1973 AHS articleHm, that's bizarre.... I'm not sure what's going on there, I guess commons is still having ongoing issues with trans-wiki stuff. Sorry I couldn't be of much, if any, help there. Thanks for uploading all of those images though, they're much appreciated by everyone. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Re: Helen ReviewThanks for the review DR and for passing it :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC) Just to let you know, I've completed the review for Cold-core low. There are several quirks that need to be addressed before I can pass the article but all in all, it was a good read. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:26, 1 March 2011 (UTC) weather numbers
TyphoonNice work - though i must say that the rainfall totals you found for Morakot are wrong. Per the WMO records department and the CWB of Taiwan. Regards Jason Rees (talk) 16:54, 6 March 2011 (UTC) Useful linki saw this and thought it might benefit you with the NWP articles.Jason Rees (talk) 04:00, 11 March 2011 (UTC) Oceanic ClimateHello Thegreatdr. I respect and appreciate your efforts to improve Oceanic Climate. I’m still a little confused as to why you’re electing to not list examples of cities with this climate. Not only does it conveniently link the page to cities with this climate, it gives readers a better feel as to what constitutes an Oceanic climate. Also, all of the other Koppen climate classification pages are listed in the same fashion. G. Capo (talk) 20:03, 15 March 2011 (UTC) There's very little original research here (or for that matter all of the Koppen pages). Koppen's system has a specific set of guidelines as to what constitutes a certain climate and this can be applied to a city provided the city's weather data is accurate. Koppen's climate classification is based purely on math. It's not a conclusion from a set of apparent facts (i.e. the sky is blue), which would be OR. Also this [2], provides a relatively detailed map as to what city has what kind of climate. I like your new chart set-up, but I'm convinced that a reader would have a better understanding of what constitutes a certain climate if notable global cities are listed G. Capo (talk) 02:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC) Re: Tropical cyclone forecast modelFor the SWIO (Reunion) - i think you will find the information you think you need if you take a look at the RSMC Reunion website under "About the RSMC" "Research" and the "Education" Section.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Weather shipThe article Weather ship you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Weather ship for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:43, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Service award levelThere has been a major revision of the the Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable. Herostratus (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC) Actually you bumped up two levels. Congratulations, and thank you for your many contributions to the Wikipedia! Herostratus (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC) Thanks[3] Yeah, I feel dumb for saying that. Thanks for the catch. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 12:08, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
The article Typhoon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Typhoon for things which need to be addressed. I'm sorry for the delay, I had to clone and replace a hard drive before I could get back on line. I've done some more reviewing of this nomination yesterday and this morning; and I regard the review as complete appart from certain minor corrective actions. Pyrotec (talk) 17:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC) I have just review a GA nomination you had, Tropical cyclone forecast model, and I have decided to put the article "on hold" until improvements can be made. My comments can be read here.--12george1 (talk) 20:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC) Could you also revise and edit the Mediterranean climate, Semi-arid climate, Arid climate and Humid continental climate articles, like you did in the Oceanic climate and Humid subtropical climate articles?Could you also revise and edit the Mediterranean climate, Semi-arid climate, Arid climate and Humid continental climate articles, like you did in the Oceanic climate and Humid subtropical climate articles? Your editions in the latter two articles are very good and to the point. For instance in the other climate articles there is an endless and growing list of cities and also little towns, some of whom may not even have these particular climates and cover a large part of these articles and without any reference. Thank you Saguamundi Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 25 DYK Medal
Why did you delete so much parts of pages about different climates?Why? You deleted tons of cities and climate charts in most of the climate classification pages, what was wrong with these? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Someone35 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC) Clean-up of Koppen main articleYes, and I am going to have to consider removing the city lists from there as well. Too many editors, especially Americans, adding in cities that have climates similar to what is already on the list. Removing these lists and adding a note should stop these silly disputes once and for all. –HXL's Roundtable and Record 00:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC) Help with some Wikipedia-related research?Hi Thegreatdr. My name is Sanjay, and I'm a 1st-year PhD student working on a project aimed at improving the quality of scientific articles on Wikipedia by providing easier access to relevant published refereed articles. I found you on the list of Wikipedians with access to Web of Science and I noticed that you edited a variety of pages pertaining to Meteorology. If you are interested in lending your expertise and advice to this research effort, I have posted a set of questions on my talk page - I would greatly appreciate your taking the time to answer any or all of them. The answers will help inform the design of a tool which I believe will benefit the Wikipedia community. Thanks! Sanjaykairam (talk) 18:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC) wpc vs. EC rainfall mapsHello the Thegreatdr, I am coming to you with an issue brought up by Hurricanehink at the FAC for Hurricane Michael (2000). There is rainfall data available from both wpc and Environment Canada (EC). However, Hurricanehink said "There isn't consistency between the wpc map and the EC report, with regards to the peak Nova Scotia rainfall."; what he was wanting me to do was ask you why there is discrepancy between the two.--12george1 (talk) 19:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:32, 10 June 2011 (UTC) The lower table in the "Size and terminal velocity" section got pretty messed up by someone...they added a bunch of new size comparisons, some falsely referenced with others not referenced at all. Some of them (especially the ones larger than 6.50") are most likely unnecessary, but I'd like to give them all a chance if there's a legitimate source for them being used as hail sizes. I was wondering if you perhaps know any sources besides the SPC page we presently have for hail sizes, and especially non-US ones, since I think ones like Olive, Squash Ball, and Cricket Ball are probably more applicable comparisons outside the United States. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 04:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC) Windmovement on weathermapsHi! I came across this request in the Graphic Lab archives and was wondering if an image like this is still needed for anything? If it is, it would be fairly simple to create. -MissMJ (talk) 04:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Hello, Thegreatdr. You have new messages at MissMJ's talk page.
Message added 21:47, 2 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:33, 8 July 2011 (UTC) Citing sourcesI replied to your comments on my talk page. ★ Auree talk 22:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC) Re: postYou know I always love the internal drama :) One thing I was always surprised about was how the NHC never/rarely used remnant low for the Atlantic. It seems like they always insisted on maintaining advisories until the storm was either extratropical or dissipated, quite unlike the EPAC. I really love how bold they were with Laura 08 and calling it post-tropical. Sometimes you need an unusual storm to change the game. I am a bit surprised that Allison as a 35+ kt storm didn't cause more issues. Was it Erin 07 and Laura 08 that convinced everyone the need for post-tropical? Given that the former was a 50 kt "remnant low"? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Interesting rainfall totals for Arizona TCsHi Doc. When I was updating List of Arizona hurricanes, I saw this reference for historical flood events in the Santa Cruz river basin. It includes information for some tropical cyclones that might come in handy for the rainfall climatology page… Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 09:21, 24 July 2011 (UTC) TDHi do you know anything about the NHC using the letter A instead of L? - i recently found a few copies of the hurricane plan from the 80s, early 90s and they say NHC were meant to use the letter A when designating TDs. Regards.Jason Rees (talk) 18:25, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
1987 PHS MWRHello Thegreatdr, I have some good news. I found monthly weather review for the 1987 Pacific hurricane season. The bad news is, it only has individual storm info on the systems that became hurricanes. However, it also includes a table listing all tropical cyclones, so then we can also add more info about the TDs. Here is the link: [4]--12george1 (talk) 03:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC) Acid rain from ammoniaI removed two sentences from the acid rain article and now saw that you had written them. I thought I would check if you agree. You can find my motivation on Talk:Acid rain#Livestock and ammonia. Ulflund (talk) 18:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC) State maxima[5] - hey, I was wondering about this. You have the 1954 unnamed depression causing over 9 inches of rain, but that isn't listed as the peak storm for New Mexico. I just thought I'd let you know while I'm (hopefully) redoing the 1954 AHS page. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC) Main page appearanceHello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on August 10, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 10, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC) Numerical weather prediction uses mathematical models of the atmosphere and oceans to predict the weather based on current weather conditions. A number of global and regional forecast models are run in different countries worldwide, using current weather observations relayed from radiosondes or weather satellites as inputs to the models. Mathematical models based on the same physical principles can be used to generate either short-term weather forecasts or longer-term climate predictions. Manipulating the vast datasets and performing the complex calculations necessary to modern numerical weather prediction requires some of the most powerful supercomputers in the world. Even with the increasing power of supercomputers, the forecast skill of numerical weather models only extends to about six days. Factors affecting the accuracy of numerical predictions include the density and quality of observations used as input to the forecasts, along with deficiencies in the numerical models themselves. To quantify the large amount of inherent uncertainty remaining in numerical predictions, ensemble forecasts have been used since the 1990s to help gauge the confidence in the forecast, and to obtain useful results farther into the future than otherwise possible. (more...) Hello, Thegreatdr. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— at any time by removing the Laureninspace (talk) 19:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC) IreneThe hurricane is basically at your doorstep now… hope everything is ok over there. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 01:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC) Help with Pacific windsHi. I am trying to find out why the Spaniards had trouble sailing from the Philippines to Mexico. The problem is important in early maritime history and none of my sources give a good explanation. The problem shows up in Trinidad (ship), Andrés de Urdaneta and Manila galleon. After reading your Monsoon trough article and its references I partly understand. Do know any references on sailing ships in the northwest Pacific or why winds in this area are strange?. Thanks in advance. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 02:56, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC) Colonial Farmers and the EnvironmentHi, David, I'd appreciate your assessment of a passage in a textbook, The Enduring Vision (Paul Boyer, et al) regarding temperature changes due to deforestation by colonial farmers along the eastern seaboard. You can click that link to see the context; I'll copy out the most pertinent lines here. You have to scroll down just a tad to get to the topic heading. Sorry for the huge, messy link; I don't know why WP won't allow tiny url links.
First, do you believe this assertion is accurate? Second, if so, do you believe it is significant? Thanks! Yopienso (talk) 20:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC) 1979 Atlantic hurricane season tropical depressionsHey, I noticed you did a lot of work on the 1979 Atlantic hurricane season, and I'm wondering why the TDs aren't numbered. HurricaneFan25 17:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:32, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
1962 September Florida depressionHiya DR. I was doing some research for the 1962 Atlantic hurricane season, and I came across this USGS article that indicated that this storm caused 16.7 inches of rain (page 18). However, you only list a peak of 14.61. I wasn't sure if the 16.7 figure was wrong or not, but I thought I'd bring it to the expert! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Heh...Thanks for the reminder. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 21:46, 9 October 2011 (UTC) 1906 Pensacola hurricaneHi, I'm wondering if the NOAA or other government agencies have has any specific location-by-location death totals for the late-September 1906 Pensacola hurricane. If you do, could you post the links on my talk page, or provide details? Thanks! HurricaneFan25 15:06, 13 October 2011 (UTC) FYII have restored the merger on the Atlantic hurricane season article and have thrown together a requested move for the list of Atalntic hurricane seasons.Jason Rees (talk) 00:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC) Season infoboxHiya. I was wondering if you could spare some food for thought. We're having a discussion on IRC about how we list the strongest storm in the season infobox. For modern seasons, it works pretty naturally having it listed by pressure, although there are cases that are unusual (such as Isidore in favor of Lili 02). At a certain point, it becomes more troublesome to list by pressure. For example, 1950 had a Category 5 hurricane, yet if we listed by pressure it would list a Category 3 storm in the infobox. Do you have any thoughts on this? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:45, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Pressure for TS 1 in 1906Jose Partagas's books say that at Havana, the first tropical storm of 1906's pressure was 29.59 inches (1002 mbar). Will this be added to the Atlantic hurricane database? Just wondering, thanks. HurricaneFan25 18:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Cindy mapAny update on the surface map for Cindy? HurricaneFan25 | talk 17:11, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:20, 29 October 2011 (UTC) NWP baby articlesYeah I haven't been able to edit them much either. Grad school is kicking my butt this semester… Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 04:22, 13 November 2011 (UTC) Hurricane Andrew rainfall discrepancyQuick question. I'm trying (once again) to do something with the Hurricane Andrew article, and I noticed that the total you have for Louisiana is lower than what's mentioned in the TCR. I just wanted to make sure that was correct. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
WarningSubtropical Storm One of 1979 AHS was not a hurricane. Subtropical cyclones never are classified as hurricanes. Jeffrey Gu (talk) 04:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:48, 26 November 2011 (UTC) Merry Christmas!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. HurricaneFan25 — 13:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:22, 25 December 2011 (UTC) Please review article - climate oscillationHi. I've expanded the article I created after merging content from a previous article ("climate cycle") that I found covered the same subject and had been around for five years. Please take a look at the article and suggest room for improvement. Currently, it does require more references, but please point out any other issues in the current state. Thanks. ~AH1 (discuss!) 20:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC) |