User talk:The Master

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Sheffield Pharmaceuticals

The full text was "Pharmaceutical company located in New London, CT specializing in creams, ointments, and lotions. A cGMP facility. The site where tooth dentifrice (modern day toothpaste) was founded by Dr. Washington Wentworth Sheffield in 1850."

Your version is much better!

Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 20:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOL well, there's definitely not much I missed out on! Thanks Steve. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 03:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nagant

I've changed the target to Fabrique d'armes Émile et Léon Nagant, as the old target was a disam that didn't really help. If you think Leon could do with an article, feel free. Peridon (talk) 19:30, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Simon City Royals

You missed a bad edit on SCR. I fixed it. Kindzmarauli (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alexander Shulgin may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Category:Mensans]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Typ 94 Nambu Pistol

I am concerned about your decision to delist a good article without it going through good article reassessment along with deleting sourced info on the basis of it being Original Research. I rolled you edits and would like to talk about this further. Every sentence has a citation, and wanton deleting can be seen as vandalism. --Molestash (talk) 00:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you think my edits are "vandalism". The real issue is that the article is not GA material. First, there's a glaring date conflict. Second, the article has a fairly heavy POV slant and appears to be making a judgement call regarding whether this weapon was well-designed or not. Encyclopedic articles aren't supposed to do that. Third, the lede itself makes a number of POV claims that the gun is poorly designed and none of them are sourced. Fourth, the writing itself contains a great deal of passive voice... passive voice is generally a sign of weak writing and an article that contains a lot of it is not GA material. My edits to the lede improved the POV claims and some of the passive voice, yet you've reverted the edits, which degrades the quality of the article. Then you accused me of vandalism, which makes me think you want to WP:OWN the article. Do you want the article to be good, or do you want to control it? Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, so you need to accept that articles you work on will be edited by others, and that in many cases this is for the better. These article issues need to be dealt with if you want this to remain a good article. You can fix them or I can, but as it currently stands, ChrisGualtieri missed a lot of issues in his review. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 00:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for the inappropriate use of the rollback. I should be slapped with a trout and see what you mean about the article not being up to GA standards. I have begun the rewrite with issues noted above and appreciate the help. I would like to use the renomination page for discussion from there. Thank you, for the input on the article. --Molestash (talk) 03:48, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Alexander Shulgin

Thanks for the archive link for the Mensa website. I'm having a tough time finding Shulgin in the list of names. Is there a Polish name he goes by? Sizeofint (talk) 02:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I used the wrong ref. I've added the correct one. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LOLZ

I seem to have stirred up a hive of angry deletionist power trippers today! Hope you are well and miss seeing you here. Kindzmarauli (talk) 21:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This crap is why I mostly stay away. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 03:33, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@The Master: This apologetic party crasher thinks this crap is exactly why you should not mostly stay away. It would be even more awful without you. FeatherPluma (talk) 05:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, FeatherPluma. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 14:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, The Master. You have new messages at Molestash's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wayne Ray article

Sorry about posting that - I thought anyone who doesn't read Wikipediocracy should know why this page is nominated all of a sudden. (Like I said, I really don't hold an opinion on this as I don't know much about how notable this guy is as a poet - that's all I wanted to contribute). Hope that's OK. Blythwood (talk) 15:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Clarity is always best. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 23:01, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gamaliel and others arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others. The scope of this case is Gamaliel's recent actions (both administrative and otherwise), especially related to the Signpost April Fools Joke. The case will also examine the conduct of other editors who are directly involved in disputes with Gamaliel. The case is strictly intended to examine user conduct and alleged policy violations and will not examine broader topic areas. The clerks have been instructed to remove evidence which does not meet these requirements. The drafters will add additional parties as required during the case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Evidence.

Please add your evidence by May 2, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. This notification is being sent to those listed on the case notification list. If you do not wish to recieve further notifications, you are welcome to opt-out on that page. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning Jesse Waugh...

The page is now unprotected. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 07:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How have you been?

I noticed your comments about Nambu pistol. Have you started working on it offline? I didn't see any progress made for the last few weeks.Hope you're doing well. Night Ranger (talk) 18:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's my next project here, but I'm still considering how to break it up. There's a fair amount of history all thrown together currently, which kind of makes sense in the existing article. But the Type 14 really needs its own article. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Don't you think the three versions should all have their own articles? Like the Baby Nambu doesn't even use the same round the others use. Night Ranger (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with that is there's not really enough content... Molestach and I discussed this briefly. I'm not opposed, just curious as to where we'd get content to create more than a stub. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 03:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template doesn't like URLs with pipes

Regarding your edit with the summary "template doesn't like URLs with pipes". Did you try using | in place of the pipe symbols in the URL? - Brianhe.public (talk) 08:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, but I'll give that a shot! The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 12:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed

An arbitration case regarding Gamaliel and others has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. Gamaliel is admonished for multiple breaches of Wikipedia policies and guidelines including for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, removing a speedy deletion notice from a page he created, casting aspersions, and perpetuating what other editors believed to be a BLP violation.
  2. DHeyward and Gamaliel are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with or discussing each other anywhere on Wikipedia, subject to the usual exemptions.
  3. DHeyward (talk · contribs) is admonished for engaging in incivility and personal attacks on other editors. He is reminded that all editors are expected to engage respectfully and civilly with each other and to avoid making personal attacks.
  4. For conduct which was below the standard expected of an administrator — namely making an incivil and inflammatory close summary on ANI, in which he perpetuated the perceived BLP violation and failed to adequately summarise the discussion — JzG is admonished.
  5. Arkon is reminded that edit warring, even if exempt, is rarely an alternative to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE.
  6. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing WP:BLPTALK policy by developing further guidance on managing disputes about material involving living persons when that material appears outside of article space and is not directly related to article-content decisions.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed

Nomination of Jesse Waugh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesse Waugh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Waugh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bilby (talk) 06:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Artists

Where do you find these guys? I added another citation to your Thomas Darnell article. There's some other stuff online but you need to dig through a lot to get to it. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 14:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dennis Stamp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exterminator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Texas Wrestling Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ken Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Master. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bernardini

You commented on my personally when you restored content to a deleted article, however many of the sources you supplied don't mee WP:GNG (as they are not independent of the subject) and several others don't discuss the subject in detail. Besides, other editors decided to delete: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Bernardini. I'm not planning nominating the article again, but I will remind you to comment on content, not on the contributor. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First, you're wrong. I did do BEFORE so stop saying that I didn't. Second, even if I had not done BEFORE, that doesn't make the AfD invalid, it makes the nomination invalid. Big difference. The fact that other editors made the decision is all that is needed. Finally, you didn't even address your inappropriate discussion of an editor. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Dean Bernardini that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tatum Reed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silver Lake, California. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Posksa

Thanks for adding this!! I bought one of his pieces a couple weeks ago in Milwaukee just because I liked it, had never heard of him before! GigglesnortHotel (talk) 14:49, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I nommed for DYK. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Roland Poska

On 16 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Roland Poska, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Roland Poska's painting From Blue to Blue, which appears in Milwaukee's Henry S. Reuss Federal Plaza Building, is 270 feet (82 m) long? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roland Poska. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Roland Poska), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Master. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GPA

I'm glad those articles helped! GigglesnortHotel (talk) 14:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, definitely. Thank you again. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Granville Pearl Aikman

On 15 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Granville Pearl Aikman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1912, Granville Pearl Aikman, a judge of the 13th District Court of Kansas, appointed the first female bailiff in US history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Granville Pearl Aikman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Granville Pearl Aikman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Thanks for adding the sources to Central Kansas League and sorry you got dragged into this nonsense. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 13:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jesse Waugh

The article Jesse Waugh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article of non-notable subject with misleading sources. Freewaves is not MOCA, and isn't enough to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theredproject (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jesse Waugh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesse Waugh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Waugh (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theredproject (talk) 20:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hi

Sorry, my health hasn't been great the past couple of years and I'm trying to spend less time online in general. My eyesight is not good now. I will have a look and see what I wrote before. Night Ranger (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see much progress at the Nambu article. I'm sorry that I just don't have much energy or time for this. Night Ranger (talk) 01:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Completely understandable! I hope things improve for you. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:14, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Working together over Machine Project

Hello The Master, I see you have followed me over to Machine Project and made some edits there. Machine Project is an article I created way back when, and recently made some edits on. Welcome your support in working on that article in a productive way, but please don't blow it up. You deleted a bunch of things that are quite NPOV and not OR. It would have been more helpful if you added some citations, rather than just deleting. Here are a few quick examples:

Or at worst, just put a [citation needed] on it. I am going to revert the edits, and add [citation needed] to the items that clearly need it (rather than deleting them). I agree that the last paragraph could probably go for now. I'm going to move it to the talk page, with a note that some of that could be added back later w/ good WP:RS. I welcome you assisting me in adding those citations in. --Theredproject (talk) 01:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That seems fine, just please don't source exceptional claims to primary sources. I'll see what I can add as well. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Anything that I may have sourced in such a way was a long long time ago. 10 years ago. When bare URLs were fine for citations. Though many others have edited in between, so likely they added. At this point, the project/space just closed, and they ran a major story in the LA Times, so there is a lot to go on there. Kind of an obit, so to speak, for the project/space. Going to bed now, but will work on in the next few days--Theredproject (talk) 01:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Same with Etiquette in Society, in Business, in Politics, and at Home. Emily Post's Etiquette is pretty important, so it doesn't need the flags.--Theredproject (talk) 01:24, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It may be important, but we can't source an article about a book to the book itself (exclusively primary sources). Maybe it would be better merged with the page about the author if no third-party sources are available covering the book. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:31, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And they wonder...

... why people leave this place in droves! Next time I see one of those whingeing posts about editor retention I'm sending them the link to this Waugh AfD. Voting "delete" is fine, but the snark and plain old rudeness is uncalled for! GigglesnortHotel (talk) 14:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's amazingly absurd. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 18:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, The Master. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:20thcenturymotorcorplogo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20thcenturymotorcorplogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Airlife Magazine

Hello, The Master, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username GeoffreyT2000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Airlife Magazine, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airlife Magazine.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GeoffreyT2000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of an article on Wikipedia

Hello!

I really like the articles you create, publish or edit on Wikipedia. I’m not a Wikipedia specialist, so I would like to collaborate with a professional who has experience in this field. I would like to publish an article about one entrepreneur, business angel and international investor, on the German or English version of Wikipedia.

I see it as a text about his professional career, investments and philosophy of life. Not PR or advertising articles. My name is Emma Rogers

Let me know if you are interested in describing Hartmann's biography as an author, please. I can give you more information RogEmma (talk) 08:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]