User talk:The Last Arietta/Archive 1

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Taishan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * Taishan Peiying Vocational Technical School ({{zh|s=台山市培英职业技术学校)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All I want to know is why they are removing my edits to the Simpsons edit Girls Just Want to Have Sums and the number 27 118.92.62.213 (talk) 07:29, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

118.92.62.213. Because it's strictly popular culture. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 07:30, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nanchang District may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Nanchang District''' ({{zh|s=南长区 |t=南長區 |p=Nán Cháng Qū}}, [[Wu Chinese|Wu]]: Nu Zang Qu)) is one of six urban districts of [[Wuxi]], [[Jiangsu]] province, China.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you undo my edit?

I apologize for my lack of summary in regard to my edit of the Christian Metal page. This was my first time attempting an edit. While it may have seemed as though my removal of material was not constructive, I would argue the opposite. While the information may be historically accurate, recent events surrounding the lead singer for "As I Lay Dying" (i.e. coming out as a longtime atheist, and conviction for attempting to hire a hitman to kill his estranged wife), clearly have stripped this band of any "Christian" metal affiliation. This band should be removed from this page so as not to confuse researchers on this topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.128.247.182 (talk • contribs)

First, note that most of the reversions on Special:RecentChanges are on topics I don't care for in the slightest bit. What catches my eye is removal of large quantities of sourced text w/o an edit summary or explanation on a talk page. If any of the conditions are not satisfied, I almost always won't bother reverting. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 03:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

Hi The Last Arietta/Archive 1. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! EdJohnston (talk) 05:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Xi'an

added links pointing to Hukou, Weiyang District, Beilin District and Xincheng District

Baqiao District

added a link pointing to Xincheng District

Beilin District, Xi'an

added a link pointing to Xincheng District

Lianhu District

added a link pointing to Xincheng District

Lintong District

added a link pointing to Xincheng District

Weiyang District, Xi'an

added a link pointing to Xincheng District

Xuzhou Guanyin Airport

added a link pointing to Suining County

Yanta District

added a link pointing to Xincheng District

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
5		Rilong Town (talk)						Add sources
253		Gary Becker (talk)						Add sources
9		Xi'an Shiyou University (talk)						Add sources
186		Recoil operation (talk)						Add sources
200		Time in China (talk)						Add sources
4		Yuanjiang (talk)						Add sources
88		Hengyang (talk)						Cleanup
978		Adebayo Akinfenwa (talk)						Cleanup
14		G15 Shenyang–Haikou Expressway (talk)						Cleanup
7		Lingling District (talk)						Expand
5,566		RSS (talk)						Expand
7		Chang'an Flower (talk)						Expand
61		High king (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
270		TRIPS Agreement (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
11		They Don't Know About Us (song) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
186		Hokkien dialect (talk)						Merge
118		Group of Five (talk)						Merge
3		Aihui Town (talk)						Merge
9		Dagang District (talk)						Wikify
8		Xingbin District (talk)						Wikify
7		Château de Domecy-sur-le-Vault (talk)						Wikify
1		Buxi, LengshuiJiang (talk)						Orphan
1		Alaying Town (talk)						Orphan
1		Yingpan, Lanping County (talk)						Orphan
2		Tuojiang, Fenghuang County (talk)						Stub
11		Wuxi New Area (talk)						Stub
18		AsiaWorld–Arena (talk)						Stub
161		Kalraj Mishra (talk)						Stub
9		Baiyü County (talk)						Stub
4		Shambala, Xiangcheng County, Sichuan (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tai'an climate box

Why do you insist on deleting climate box of Taishan? As the source of HKO shows Mount Tai is clearly in Tai'an's administrative area, and you regard it as Qingdao's. Mount tai(Taishan) has no relationship with Qingdao AT ALL.Lzy881114 (talk) 02:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Newbie contributions

Are you aware that your edits are listed at "User Contributions for newbie editors" [1]? Why is this? Piguy101 (talk) 03:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Piguy101: Yes I patrol that page from time to time, so I see my own name appear. Perhaps it's because any user under a month or so old is considered a "newbie", and we can bring this issue up? TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 03:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not realize how new you are because you have a large edit count. I thought that the Mediawiki was making a funny bug. Keep it up. Piguy101 (talk) 03:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Piguy101: Thank you. It's a result of working methodically and patrolling Recent Changes, and not experience. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 03:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CAIC Z-10

Hello, The Last Arietta. My name is Jon and I am the original contributor for the WZ-10 page. Recently two person one named Pvpoodle and the other Shulinjiang have been vandalizing the WZ-10 page. Pvpoodle posted biased western source to mock the WZ-10 that it was designed by Kamov, however this have been openly denied by both Chinese and Russian source. Later Kamov's chief designer recanted his words by saying that Kamov was only involved in the early brain storming back in the 1990's while WZ-10's detail design and core technology were all done by the Chinese themselves. This means that WZ-10 can not be counted as Russian design. Shulinjiang tried to debunk Pvpoodle's claim, and Pvpoodle's source were all posted in 2012 two years ago.

Right now, both Pvpoodle and Shulinjiang have been blocked due to vandalizing Wikipedia pages.

Please leave WZ-10 page as it is, I have spend many hours posting constructive materials on it. As you can see, it was well written in every section and I have spend many hours posting actual Chinese sources and pictures to back them up.

Please do not let people vandalize that page by posting none Chinese and biased sources. After all, WZ-10 is a Chinese military hardware.

Thank you

Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.160.102 (talk) 16:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@64.134.160.102:/Jon, I sympathize with the Chinese on many issues, but I don't normally edit military-related articles and don't care for them. You need to be clear on what vandalism is. See WP:VAND. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 16:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you The_Last_Arietta for your understanding. If you take a look at Pvpoodle's sources, they are all western sources citing the words from Kamov's chief designer, however Kamov's chief deisnger have recanted his words. This alone make these sources unreliable. Second, these source were all written in December 2012, when the Chinese officially revealed WZ-10 to the public. Now you get an idea why all these sources all came out and bash China's accomplishment. I am not saying that Western sources are all like this, but there are quite a few of them.

Pvpoodle is Indian, and I have carefully read his edits which were all politically related stuffs. He recently got banned for 3 days for vandalizing. Shulinjiang got banned for two days for repeated editing. I am the original contributor for the WZ-10 page, having spend hours if not days on that page posting constructive materials not for any awards but for the good of Wikipedia. I really hope that you will protect the WZ-10 page. I am sure that when Pvpoodle was unbanned in three days, he will come back once again, I do not want to see anyone getting hurt anymore over this issue.

BTW, if you want the Chinese or Russian source to debunk Pvpoodle's biased sources.

I will be happy to provide thm for you.

Thank you

Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.160.102 (talk • contribs)

@64.134.160.102: (Jon), Pvpoodle is Indian That's ad hominem, not to mention irrelevant and assuming; some of my friends' fathers are native Chinese and hold some opinions of China which I consider to be borderline treason. however Kamov's chief deisnger have recanted his words I'll take your word for it, so you're good to go in my eyes. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 17:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this guy not an original contributor to the article. edit history reveals no one by the name jon. he links he provides to "debunk my claims" are actually chinese versions of the same news reports i have cited. the chief designer has not actually recanted anything. he mentioned that kamov was involved in the design and to quote him directly "I know what I have done" from flightglobal. both the news report and the wiki article on z-10 both mention clearly that while the design is kamov's all further development work is chinese. i believe this preserves npov as it is only mentioning the news. however the same user has been sock puppetting with multiple ips and adding whatever he pleases without any valid reference in an attempt to spread his own propaganda while making ad-hominem attacks against me personally. you may wish to check Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shulinjiang before you continue to encourage his behaviour.Pvpoodle (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About the source issue with the reception section of the Squidward page...

While it seems that the review by Mrenter is commonly known and somewhat notable, there is none of it in article form. This is mostly due to him strictly reviewing shows on YouTube due to the format being easier for his type of content. Does this mean it's not notable enough to put here, and if it is notable, what would this mean about said edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.38.83 (talk) 23:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know of no exceptions to the rule, and you had best wait for a news release or similar. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 23:43, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the page where rules like this are applied and there is nothing saying that one can't use video. It said that you can't use someone's blog or Twitter posts to provide evidence to a fact about the person who posted it or their opinions. YouTube hasn't been deemed an unreliable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.38.83 (talk) 17:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SELFSOURCE. Since the video you posted appears to be a review, it involves a claim about a third party and is not acceptable. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 20:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will fix it. This was a mistake.

There was a mistake in Template: Infobox school/doc that where the foreign names of examples were not italicized like they should be because the words are not adopted in English and normally they should be italicized. I will correct the mistake, don't worry. 66.87.81.86 (talk) 07:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I thought you were removing </nowiki> tags altogether, which would have been a formatting no-no. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 08:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Henderson

I have no idea who you are but if you believe that Wikipedia should be full of unaccountable lies, then go ahead and keep deleting my edits. The part I have edited is pure supposition and cannot be verified so please stop messing around with an article that you clearly have no sensible knowledge of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zayed8 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I already self-reverted per the edit summaries I failed to see, so you really shouldn't be complaining any more. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 08:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm Sfan00 IMG. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Neil Clark Warren, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confession

The movie review cited states that Hyun-tae's mother gets killed during the staged robbery/arson. The version you restored falsely states it was a "homicide" and doesn't clearly state who the victim was. 203.215.117.157 (talk) 09:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@203.215.117.157: Clearly my mistake. No need to explain yourself. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 09:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

southern europe

turkey and cyprus are not in europe so remove them or i will — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.118.59 (talk) 09:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Hello, I'm The Last Arietta. An edit you recently made to Jesus walking on water seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page."

Dear Sir,

It wasn't a test, it was the real McCoy. It was simply adding a link for an uncommon word (at least to me) -- Pericope -- that could perhaps save a future reader the step of having to look it up separately like I had to do.

If you deem that the change is unnecessary, so be it.

Keep up the good work!

Blessings and peace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.242.85.221 (talk) 17:44, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of people born at sea

There's been an IP adding nonsense to List of people born at sea, and a few people have been reverting. In one edit, the IP added some nonsense but at the same time removed some more of their own vandalism. I then reverted badly, removing one piece of vandalism but accidentally reinstating another. The IP then removed their own remaining piece of vandalism - and that's what you reverted, thinking it was an unexplained removal. — Alan / Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nibal Yamout Article

Hello,

I did not know this is public.

Nibal is not dead I messed with her page.

Please remove the death part.

09/07/2014

Hi, that removal wasn't a mistake. Actually Mazandarani peoples have their own language, culture, and their similarities with Persians is due to the fact that both of them are part of Iranian peoples. It's more or less the same case for Kurds, for example. They are Iranian (by ethnicity) but surely not Persian. Please take a look here and you will probably understand what I mean: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_peoples Gilamard9 (talk) 01:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Edits to Wayne Allwine

I simply reverted vandalism. The sources on the page state the years in the version I reverted it to. The man died in his 60s, not at age 104. And he most certainly wasn't voicing Mickey Mouse eleven years before Mickey was even created. 68.9.233.100 (talk) 06:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference for change in "Battle of the Falkland Islands" (1914)

My reference for the change I made was a Wikipedia article "Histoire du procédé Haber-Bosch" If that won't do, forget it. -WREverdell — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.38.97.189 (talk) 21:56, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi i m shubhu i am student of boilogy nd i read all the topic bt i realize that some topics was very high nd something wrong that s why i have remove some points — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubhu dhanke (talk • contribs) 16:46, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JPview

Looking at your contributions it seems like you're quickly skimming through recent changes. However, regarding JPview, please see WP:G7. If the author blanks the page, it generally shouldn't be restored like that. The editor is permitted to do this as long as they are the only substantive contributor to the article, which was the case. - Aoidh (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated a few pages under G7 myself, and I reverted my warning on his/her talk page; I almost never look at page histories beyond the first five or so, and perhaps this should change. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 20:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12th Virginia edit

Hi, i'm the 12th VA Grunt, I was still updating the page from information in the regimental books, i hadn't added the citations yet, as i want to get the information placed correctly before i add citations. I have done this multiple times in the past without causing conflict. The info comes from the book from William Henderson, author of the 12th Virginia, and Library of congress info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12thVAgrunt (talk • contribs) 22:18, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Myanmar Democratic Reforms

According to 2008 The Union of the Republic of Myanmar Constitution, and there was 2010 general election, the first election after 1990 . Start from this 2010 election, Myanmar citizens have enjoyed their voting right again ( a very important stage for democratic reforms in Myanmar ) to choose their representatives from many political parties. At least, we can say that political liberalization---especially for people who really want to participate in politics-- is introduced in Myanmar , start from this 2010 general election . If you say Myanmar democratic reforms was started from 2011 under "civilian" administration of president U Thein Sein, it seems it neglects the election , especially the vote of Myanmar people and the several political parties they involved . So far, some of their representatives are doing great jobs in Hluttqw , Parliaments . Since I respect Myanmar people, I edited that Myanmar democratic reforms were started from 2010 not 2011. [1] bala (talk) 01:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Linhtetaung: It matters not. The title is currently 2011–12, so that is what should be in bold. See WP:MOS. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 02:00, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burmese_general_election,_2010

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Caidian District

added links pointing to Hanyang, Jiangxia and Hannan

Dongxihu District

added links pointing to Hanyang, Jiang'an and Jianghan

Nanguan District

added links pointing to Chaoyang, Siping and Kuancheng

Qiaokou District

added links pointing to Han River, Hanyang and Jianghan

Sujiatun District

added links pointing to Heping, Tiexi and Dongling

Wuchang District

added links pointing to Hanyang, Jiang'an and Jianghan

Chaoyang District, Changchun

added links pointing to Kuancheng and Nanguan

Heping District, Shenyang

added links pointing to Tiexi and Dongling

Hongshan District, Wuhan

added links pointing to Hanyang and Jiang'an

Huanggu District

added links pointing to Heping and Tiexi

Jianghan District

added links pointing to Hanyang and Jiang'an

Luyuan District

added links pointing to Chaoyang District and Siping

Shenhe District

added links pointing to Heping and Dongling

Dalian

added a link pointing to Hukou

Dehui

added a link pointing to Yushu

Dongling District

added a link pointing to Heping

Hannan District

added a link pointing to Jiangxia

Hanyang District

added a link pointing to Jianghan

Huangpi District

added a link pointing to Jiang'an

Jiang'an District

added a link pointing to Jianghan

Jiangxia District

added a link pointing to Hannan

Liaozhong County

added a link pointing to Tiexi District

Nong'an County

added a link pointing to Siping

Qingshan District, Wuhan

added a link pointing to Jiang'an

Shuangyang District

added a link pointing to Nanguan

Tiexi District, Shenyang

added a link pointing to Heping District

Xinmin, Liaoning

added a link pointing to Tiexi District

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2000

I do not know how to do Sources so I put it in parentheses after my edit. I also corrected 1900. 1800 and 1700 are probably incorrect also but I did not check them. Mcleodsmith (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2014 (UTC)mcleodsmith[reply]

Leap year covers the rules adequately. No need to mention it at 2000, IMO. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 16:22, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hemington Church

Please change back my edits. The existing page is about the WRONG Church (Hardington) but the page is supposed to be about Hemington Church which is a totally different building in a nearby village. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.190.147 (talk) 17:40, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joel Brand Edit

Sorry about that edit, my brother just went on the computer and showed it to me. I apologize for anyone who's been offended by this edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.197.66.210 (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Philadelphia Museum of Art

There are people there that will shake you down for money. Why must you remove this information from e page when people deserve the advanced warning? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leroyj87 (talk • contribs) 02:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Finch edit

I went to high school with Chris Finch, I assure you the edit was correct. Thanks, Jamestdickerson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamestdickerson (talk • contribs) 02:43, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamestdickerson: Then add a reliable source that verifies your previous edits. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 03:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

USA23 (talk)USA23USA23 (talk)

Irish American edit

All edits I made to the Irish American page were very correct and anyone who does efficient researching can find out indeed that all people I edited in fact did have Irish blood in their veins. I am a very proud Irish American and the people I edited into the Irish American page deserves to be known for their feats as Irish Americans. Thanks. Comment added by User: USA23 — Preceding undated comment added 04:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Everingham

Maybe User:Smemostitt can provide some sources to support the deleted edit he wishes to add. His userpage is a strong indication that he correct. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mø

Found a source. 80.111.184.146 (talk) 16:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reign wiki page

Hi,

i edited Reign (TV Show) page to add the broadcast in different Countries. I added it started airing in India from June 20, 2014 Monday-Friday 10pm on Zcafe. but the edit was removed since i did not provide any source. below mentione dis the legit source from the cahannel in which it airs. i just dont know how to add the link in the page.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW1XbzWR7gg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.61.17.86 (talk) 22:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Warning to Me

My edit to Chris McDaniel was perfectly legitimate and written from a neutral point of view. It is pretty obvious that Thad Cochran stole the election from him. Just look at the evidence that continues to pile up day after day. The facts speak for themselves! 72.82.255.2 (talk) 03:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does this not convince you? http://intellectualconservative.com/electionwatch-2014-challenge-in-mississippi/ 72.82.255.2 (talk) 03:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing in Mississippi state law to suggest voting cross-party in primaries is illegal, even if one has no intention of voting for said primary candidate in the general election. As if one could prove the latter. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 03:24, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zamalek sc page

you restored some information i removed from Zamalek sc article , the reason I removed it is because it is in Zamalek's 2013-14 season page and don't belong to the main article — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshrafFahim96 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Addition to Education Section

Hi, I just added an update to the education section regarding the recent renovations and new construction at Opelika High School. This information is from Becky Brown, Public Relations Coordinator for Opelika City Schools, and Dr. Mark Neighbors, Superintendent for Opelika City Schools. Please let me know how you would like me to source it. OEDD (talk) 19:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@OEDD: Any story by local papers or even by the school district itself is fine. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 19:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of information pertaining to Robin Hood

To whom it may concern,

Please repost the information to Wikipedia that you have edited. I think that you will discover that all academic research was once 'original'. And, as far as I am aware, the information that you have removed discusses a piece of recent academic research pertaining to a work published by Scott A La' Chance, entitled 'The Origins and Development of the Legend of Robin Hood' published under copyright by the University of Leeds in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 in the year 2014. A hard copy of this text can be located in the Brotherton Library at the University of Leeds, and has been reviewed prior to publication by leading medievalist historians, including Professor Graham Loud of the University of Leeds, Dr Emilia Jamroziack at the University of Leeds and Professor Graham Loud at the University of Hull. A full citation of this work was, I believe provided on the page, but if it was not, and if you wish to make yourself useful, you will aid me by citing the source correctly.

Thank You

Siggasonswin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siggasonswein (talk • contribs) 20:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

Before I did anything I wanted to ask, that last sentence on your userpage, is that supposed to read that way or is it vandalism. Figured I'd ask before I took any sort of action. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^♪ 話 ♪ ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 03:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard, your revert answered my question :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^♪ 話 ♪ ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 03:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editor gutting own article

Hi. I had the same instinct as you, and still do if the editor seeks to gut only part of an article he created ... but if he seeks to gut the whole thing, I'm not sure but that he might not have the right. Since I'm not sure, I've posted at the AfD page asking for someone with a better handle on that rule to step in. Best. --Epeefleche (talk) 03:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Epeefleche: Well of course they aren't the same account, so the relationship will have to be established before any claims of 'original authorship' are valid. As to contributors who made major edits, I'd say Onel5969 is the other, at the most. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 03:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Brilliant. I've noted the murkiness of all this in my post to the talk page, which you can find (and comment on/clarify, if you like) here. Epeefleche (talk) 03:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More to come. Epeefleche (talk) 03:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	you are so good at fighting vandalism, regards Mohamed^Talk 17:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gladvertising

The entry for "Gladvertising" incorrectly states the term was coined in a July 2011 report by the Centre of Future Studies. It was actually coined by author Sinclair Lewis in 1918.

I edited the entry to reflect this and the edit was removed by you because of lack of citation. I'm responding to your message.

Sinclair Lewis: 1918: "Gladvertising", The Popular Magazine, October 7, 1918

cited in: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_Lewis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.100.107.243 (talk) 22:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cite the magazine, NOT Wikipedia, which isn't a reliable source for our purposes. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 00:29, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to "Motion Picture Association of America film rating system" (PG-13 section)

Hello -

I have twice made a correct edit to the PG-13 section of this article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Association_of_America_film_rating_system) and twice have had it removed. I actually made the edits while I was not logged in, but you should be able to identify me from my IP address. The note I received from you said you were removing the edits because I did not cite an official source. This confuses me. I don't particularly need a source, because I can just watch the movie, which very clearly features two F-words. I don't think there's an article out there that I can use as a footnote confirming how many F-words are in the movie, but having seen the movie several times, I know that there are two. (I can cite the scenes in question if need be.) Can you please clarify what I need to do to make my edit permanent?

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yossarian82 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Yossarian82: The having seen the movie several times argument doesn't hold up in the face of our policies on verifiability. There is a source for 2013's Philomena having two instances, so you may have a chance of finding a source for yours. Personally I don't see how this is worth fussing over, as I could give a shit about anything the MPAA does, especially over a few commonplace (and not that offensive compared to racial epithets) 'swear words'. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 17:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you completely about the MPAA in general, and the inoffensiveness of these words (in general, and compared to racial epithets). As for whether this is worth "fussing over," I don't know, this is Wikipedia, it's 99 percent minute details, so I don't know why this particular update is any more or less important than most of the other updates on pages that happen every day. I don't often edit, but I happened to be reading this particular article today, and I happened to notice something I knew was wrong, so I figured I'd update it.

Anyway, I'm not sure if this will work, but here is the video evidence of both F-bombs in "Ocean's Eleven":

F-bomb #1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mJf24luhuo F-bomb #2: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xmj74e_did-you-check-the-batteries-from-ocean-s-eleven-2001_shortfilms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yossarian82 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Yossarian82: I'd be careful about YouTube, per WP:SELFSOURCE. The 2nd link appears finer, although I've never visited that site before. Stating "at least one F-bomb occurs in Ocean's Eleven" is good enough. It's not the difference between zero and a few dozen, for that matter. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 02:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subject/headline

Hey there, I am sorry about all the edits that were posted via my profile a little earlier on. Those posts were posted by stalker ex-girlfriend who can't get over the fact that I broke up with her two weeks ago. I know it might sound lame but its the truth and I just changed my passwords after seeing this on my profile and was quite horrified with stuff posted. I hope we move past this as fellow Wikipedia editors.

Thanks, Timekeeper12345. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timekeeper12345 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for removal of sanctions

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Last Arietta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The starting terms are: violation of any of the below is automatic grounds for a block of 10 days and increasing in duration exponentially by a factor of two to three for each subsequent violation. #3RR. #Personal attack intentionally directed at another editor, be it in user-space or anywhere else. #Screwing around with others' talk pages or user pages other than ##To post on them, provided they've not asked me to stay away. ##Obvious maintenance, such as removing non-Wikipedian categories per WP:USERCAT. As to the ability to keep my cool, I find counter-vandalism to be good at clearing my mind and working to be 'pissed off'; this is not to mention the work I perform that only attracts reverts once in a mine due to a syntax f***-up on my part. If I am involved in a dispute I actually care for, then if the above measures fail, I will consider WP:3O or ignoring them, per "I do not attempt to convert my opponents--I am at converting their audience. As to why I am not requesting from the perceived 'main account', even if that were unblocked, I wouldn't continue editing under it. Time for a new beginning. Take my pristine record under this account as a metric to measure me against and as evidence there is no ongoing disruption to others or the project as a whole. To avoid TL;DR, I won't say any more, so if you feel this request is lacking, bombard me with questions. Lastly, don't mention any other non-admin user name, please. Diffs only. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 22:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block was for sockpuppetry, which was confirmed via CheckUser evidence. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Removed information from wiki page

Hello, you recently removed information on I. Marlene King's page about her relationship with her girlfriend/wife. There is no formal statement to a relationship but multiple photos on her instagram around Mother's Day confirmed that she is in a relationship with a woman. I will be putting that information back in the page and suggest that before you remove anything from any page you conduct a search yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.65.147 (talk) 17:24, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:SELFSOURCE, you must ensure there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity, where 'its' refers to the Instagram account ownership. I would write something like 'King posted photos on her Instagram suggesting she entered a relationship with an unidentified woman'. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 17:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reasonable doubt to it's authenticity, her VERIFIED twitter account confirms this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.65.147 (talk) 17:44, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter of course is better than Instagram for these purposes, but why are you claiming it is Twitter here when you referenced Instagram ([2]). Also 'who's' ≠ 'whose'. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 18:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit requests

This edit request to Guangzhou and Shuyang County has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Before responding 'perform these edits yourself or post the requests on the respective articles', there currently are sanctions against me.

1. Revert the last two edits WP:MOS-ZH disallows the provision of any Chinese-language information on the title of a page in the first sentence of an article when {{Infobox Chinese}} is transcluded, which it is at Guangzhou.
2. Revert to my last revision at Shuyang County.
   1. Removal of maintenance tags which I placed with NO explanation, or any attempt to resolve the problems mentioned therein, whatsoever.
   2. Uncited changes to population figures.
   3. Grammar issues/Removal of prepositions, such as Huaihai Opera was born in the years around 1830s.
   4. That weatherbox is inaccurate. See Ganyu District#Climate. This county doesn't have 1971–2000 normals computed for it; see [3].
   5. Insertion of many {{Infobox settlement}} fields that will likely never be used.
   6. Government type = "Province Managing County" Obscure terminology, and likely a screwed-up translation

TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 02:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: James Garner#Later years is marked as unreferenced, but there currently is one. Please alter or remove the maintenance template for that section alone. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 20:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it's marked as need more references. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:22, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I'm working on something else. Perhaps its B-class rating should be downgraded to C-class due to the presence of a major, reference-lacking section? This is not a subject I would be prone to giving "the benefit of the doubt". TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 20:23, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Sorry, but you'll need to get your block lifted first, as otherwise this would look very much like editing by proxy. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♪ talk ♪ 06:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

#[4] Then you had better take a proper shower or bath.

1. [5] Unsourced fumbling with the numbers.
2. [6] Rated too high for quality and too low for WP:CITIES importance.
3. [7] 'Forbidden' and 'discooperation'? What the bloody hell? Sometimes the project has allowed total nonsense/hoaxes to stand for six months. We need people who watch, with great care and detail, over neglected city articles.
4. 2sc945 sock. Probably more out there. Needs SPI and a possible indefinite community ban. Another sock: Apipia
5. [8] No, just no. Administrative borders change regularly in the PRC.
6. [9] These types of unexplained edits should be reverted ON SIGHT.
7. [10] Unsourced and poorly written.
8. Del Rio, Texas. BSh
9. Bishop, California. BWk (or BWh if going by 0 °C cold month isotherm)
10. Muskegon, Michigan. Dfb
11. [11] Unexplained removal.
12. Clayton, New Mexico. BSk (or BSh if going by 0 °C cold month isotherm)
13. [12] Damned annoying. Perhaps it's time I added in those mean temps in borderline cases.
14. [13] Unsourced
15. [14] and [15] No, per WP:FORRED
16. [16] Unsourced and likely not notable
17. [17] I don't know if you can be jailed simply for expressing said separatist view in the PRC, but it's definitely something that will get you noticed, and negatively so, by the CPC/CCP.
18. [18] Unsourced
19. [19] Another 2sc945 sock.
20. [20] Then place it elsewhere.

[21] No, just no. Administrative borders change regularly in the PRC. If that is the case, please help us, by providing references that can be verified. But I did cover the fact that there are differing opinions or "references". If what you say is true, that the borders are in a constant state of flux, provide that info with references to help with this and future cases. Thanksspeednat (talk) 04:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Speednat: I moved your post down because it just looks awful when inserted among the list. As I said in the e-mail I sent you, the differing opinions or "references" are instead differing time-frames, as your reference is from 1998. While I used the Yearbook/Report from 2011, which is more often than not requires payment to access or is otherwise very difficult to search on Baidu. Which makes me sympathize with those ?who wish to verify things, as I did the dirty search work. I can do it again, but I need to sleep and it'll have to wait a few hours.

that the borders are in a constant state of flux No they aren't, with respect to a fixed place. Every few years local governments cede/annex land, with the State Council's or provincial government's approval. But there are several thousand of local governments just on the county-level, guaranteeing that every year, across the country, there are several changes. As to the source for that, I rely on XZQH (the bloody "www" is required), which acts sort of like a news feed to these changes. Just this year, there an administrative change in Harbin, albeit just an upgrade for Shuangcheng District. Their recent history for Acheng is more of an administrative nature, and I can find nothing in that link to assert there was ceding over/annexation of land with Acheng. With nothing yet to explain this change in area, I'd rather there be no mention of historical area. You can ask ASDFGH as well, but he rarely responds to queries.

On that site, you can see many counties, which are mostly rural in nature, converting towns to subdistricts, a more urban designation. This is another testament to China's breakneck urbanization, and is fascinating to watch. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 06:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temp

1. "Help from the Hill: Wikipedia-lovers from US House of Reps edited Russia articles":

   “The editing process of writing an online encyclopedia is very selective. A lead group of super-admins rule the narrative by majority consensus and mob opinion was accepted as fact,” she said. “Clearly this poses a big problem.”

   —Abby Martin

+3,400

I'm Watching Over 3,400 Pages

This person lives near these Interstate Highways.

This person lives near these U.S. Routes.

This user scored 500,058,089 on the Wikipediholic test (revision 618741592).

This user owns an Android phone.

This user lives in the United States Commonwealth of Virginia.

This user has been on Wikipedia for 10 years, 6 months and 13 days.

This user has a zero tolerance policy on vandalism.

This user is a WikiHobbit.

582	This user once made 582 edits in one day.

Category:Wikipedians with Wikipedia articles about them

Some views

1. Sviatoslav Richter avoided publicly performing or recording pieces where he felt he could hardly add interpretative insight to. I feel similarly towards discussion anywhere, generally avoiding participation (namely XfD, Requested Moves, RfC, general user conduct threads) in discussions if I feel I don't have a new perspective. The key is argumentatum ad infinitum doesn't work.
2. Knowing when to NGAF (not give a f***) or to drop the stick, including 'not taking sth personally', is a great skill. Some may call it maturity. But it also entails professionalism. Although I hate the term, 'cost-benefit analysis' comes into play, and the failsafe litmus test is: 'Are you blowing an atom into a planet with this dispute?' Take this exchange from GoldenEye:
   • M: I don't want you go running off on some kind of vendetta. Avenging Alec Trevelyan will not bring him back.
   • Bond: You didn't get him killed.
   • M: Neither did you. Don't make it personal.
   • Bond: Never.
3. Myself included, I have not met A SINGLE person who can realistically/objectively evaluate his/her own actions while they are taking place. Take yet another exchange (Skyfall):
   • M: Where the hell have you been?
   • Bond: Enjoying death. 007 reporting for duty.
   • M: Why didn't you call?
   • Bond: You didn't get the postcard. You should try it some time. Get away from it all. It really lends perspective.
4. It's commonly noted that sarcasm on the 'Net doesn't work/come across well. While not entirely true, what I do think hardly works is weeping in apologies, plastering them with 'I'm terribly sorry', 'I regret...', and the like; in person, one could determine if such appeals to emotion are sincere via the usual body+eye language, tone of voice, and maybe a lie detector, but this is the bloody Internet, not in-person conversation or Skype. When you've had a kerfuffle, IMO such phrases are nothing but extraneous fillers. Acknowledge the manner/area in which you screwed up, show evidence of improvement/rectifying the problem (if possible), and only if needed, demonstrate a concrete proposal to avoid 'cocking it up' in the future.
5. While nasty, unwelcome and possibly indicative of an intolerance to others' viewpoints, calling real-world adherents to a viewpoint or practitioners of a custom names is definitely not a personal attack directed at a specific [or group of] editor. IMO, inability to make this distinction makes your criticism of others' incivility that much less valid.

Pings

@Xaosflux: You got mail (in your WP e-mail account). And I'd like to know how you set the personalized message in Special:Email User. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 07:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Read, done, ping me again if you want to get in to a more in depth conversation about it. Regarding setting the editnotice for email, create a page at User:The Last Arietta/Emailnotice and it will appear there. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:25, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently mail delivery failed, and I hadn't noticed until now; sorry about that. The conversation about rights should take place solely via e-mail. And thanks for answering the Emailnotice question. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 14:51, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: Not to rush you, but are we discussing this over e-mail in-depth, or not? If it's just about user rights, I don't see how this issue is complex in the slightest. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 21:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted my change when you asked about it. I really don't have anything else to say, I thought you wanted something else. If you want to talk more, then we can revisit at such time as you are no longer blocked. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you for all that; I just thought there was a genuine disagreement over AutoPatrol policy. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 23:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TParis: Almost two more weeks since last I ping-ed you, and no word from you at all, and you-know-who is still away. If you are too preoccupied to deal with my situation or have for some other reason lost interest, just tell me directly. Otherwise, this is just idling on after having constructively reached quite a level of agreement on my release conditions. In the mean time, here I have gathered at least 15 diffs of incompetent edits that could have been dealt with had more watchful eyes such as my own had been put to use; let's not allow this list to balloon. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 20:27, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I keep forgetting. I've got several other things going on and this hasn't stayed in the forefront of my mind. I'll send you an email.--v/r - TP 20:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New River, Nanjing listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New River, Nanjing. Since you had some involvement with the New River, Nanjing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Harbin districts

Template:Harbin districts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]