This user is busy in real life, and may not reply swiftly, and if they do, may reply in an abbreviated fashion.
Do you like my editing? Do you want to say hi? If so, please check out my guestbook here. Note: This message is also on my user page.
If I send you a message on your talk page, please reply there. I will be waiting. If you'd like, ping me. If you send a message on my talk page, I will reply here, and please expect to be pinged.
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
This is TheTechie's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.
I had researched what you had mentioned. The article has 27 references from a variety of sources. Outside of a list of ships from the reference you mention, I am having trouble seeing what you are describing. Any details on this issue can help me fix this issue right away Starlighsky (talk) 17:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What I am trying to say is that there isn't copyright infringement. The article was created from over 27 references. However, if you see something that sort of matches something else, I am glad to fix it. Starlighsky (talk) 04:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my bad. Yeah, either NewPagesFeed or Earwig said Copyvio but I wasn't too sure so I tagged it as potential copyvio but didn't mark it for speedy deletion. I will take another look when I get some time later @StarlighskyTheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 05:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I might be my fault. If NewPagesFeed or Earwig said Copyvio, let me work on the article. I don't see it, but I can spend more time improving the article...which I have already done since this review. Starlighsky (talk) 12:15, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TheTechie, you cannot blindly trust a copyvios report. Please make sure you are actually looking to see what and how much text is actually in violation; there were at most a few paragraphs that were copied, and not nearly enough to decline the entire draft because of that. I'm not really sure why the tool was saying 75% match when it was that low, but then again I rarely look at the given value when I'm doing a CV check. I do see that the cv has since been cleaned, so I have resubmitted the draft. Primefac (talk) 17:30, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac Though who do you think it would be a good idea to bring the concern of NewPagesFeed potentially incorrectly tagging pages as copyvio to? I've seen so many pages (no exaggeration) that flag as copyvio in NPF but Earwig has a field day saying they aren't copyvios. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 04:57, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Flagging something as a copyvio isn't a problem, because it gets a human eye on the situation. As has been shown the bot is good at finding copyvios but not evaluating them, which is why we don't have any bots that delete copyvios automatically. Primefac (talk) 14:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Context: I admit that sometimes I will patrol AFC in NPF and use tags such as "no citations" and "copyvio" to help other reviewers. It gets annoying to me when sometimes is flagged as copyvio, but Earwig says no. When I use the link NPF provides for details it claims there is no copyvio. Maybe I'm missing something and you could enlighten me :) TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 02:58, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page watcher) Page Curation uses CopyPatrol cases to tag copyvios. If it tells you there is no copyvio then someone has already closed the case as "no action needed" (i.e. the tagging was a false positive) or "page fixed" (they have removed the violation). CopyPatrol is essentially an automated Earwig — it uploads diffs to Turnitin, and if there is a match a case is created for human review. CFA23:21, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It does, eventually, but it takes several hours. I'm not sure if the delay is intentional or not, but it doesn't really matter. If you see that someone has closed the case, then there is likely not a copyvio (anymore, at least). You could always check the listed source yourself against the article if you are unsure. CFA16:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings, TheTechie! I just want to inform you that you have marked the page Draft:Organocalcium chemistry under review, but have done nothing to it for the past 24 hours. If it's taking you too long to review, you may always contact me and I'll review it. No hurry though! Pygos (talk) 14:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
