User talk:ThePromenader/archive 01
- Re your mail - if thats a promise to be good (reply here if so; means you promise to obey 3RR carefully in future and leave the article alone for 24h) I can unblock you William M. Connolley 19:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course I'll be good : ) My breaking the WP:3RR rule was not at all intentional - in fact I had made a point quite some time ago of making sure not to. I lost count today though, and for that I apologise. Thank you. THEPROMENADER 19:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You're unblocked. You can, if you so choose, file a 3RR report on H; though I had a look at the history and it wasn't obvious William M. Connolley 19:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much. Nothing was very obvious in today's move/move reverts - one of the reasons I lost count.
- If clarification you would like, this was the version reverted to, but this became this with User:Metropolitan's edits, and this after many corrections/edits by yours truely. I don't know how it was done, perhaps by cut and paste or moving a precedent version, but in moving the page, User:Hardouin somehow reverted it to its former state.
- Although it is quite clear that he broke the WP:3RR rule too, I think I'll drop it for this time - although I don't agree with his pushy reverting and his pushing opinon as fact, I don't have a vendetta out for the guy. You gave me a break, so I'll give him one too. Thanks for your being quite kind through all this. THEPROMENADER 19:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
|