User talk:TheNuggeteer/Archive 7
August 2024 Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from 2010 Pacific typhoon season into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., Why did you tag this new article for notability concerns, and then mark the page as patrolled? If an article is not notable, it should be draftified and/or deleted, but certainly not patrolled immediately after tagging until multiple people have seen it. I see you've recently received the NPP bit. Generally speaking, "checking for notability" is a hot topic for NPPers (at least, according to WP:NPP#Notability). If you go into the New Page queue and take a look at all the oldest articles, you'll see them all marked for notability, and/or several other tags, because nobody particularly wants to sign and vet them out so they're always chilling at the back-end. (This also includes redirects that are recently converted into articles). If a page is tagged with "passable" tags that are not AfDable, such as a "too long lead" tag, those are safer to patrol as an article shouldn't be deleted for having "too few sections" or etc. But because notability is policy, if something isn't notable, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia, and shouldn't be patrolled immediately if there are notability concerns. Just something to consider moving forward. I do believe the topic in question is notable, because clicking on the coordinates takes me to a populated, legally recognized place named "Panda", and populated places have presumed notability per the info contained in WP:GEOLAND, so I've removed the tag. Utopes (talk / cont) 13:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: 2025 in hip hop musicHello TheNuggeteer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 2025 in hip hop music, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 in hip hop music. Any fault here, either as Admin or just as a regular editor, is entirely my own. . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC) Incomplete DYK nominationHello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/No Poop July at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 13:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC) ChanthuThe reason i reverted Chanthu's GA nomination is because it is nowhere near ready for a GA Nomination and needs a very thorough expansion to tell the story of what Chanthu did, how it evolved and what impacts it caused etc. As for you not being a significant contributor, when you nominated the article you barely had 3 edits to the article, which barely added anything to the article. Compare Chanthu, to one of my GA's Cyclone Anne of 1988. Sure its not perfect but it tells the story and is probably the best summary of Anne out there, which is the standard required for a GA nomination.Jason Rees (talk) 12:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
DCWC September updateThe Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:
Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC) DYK for Iloilo Central MarketOn 5 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iloilo Central Market, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the demolition of the Iloilo Central Market was criticized as being unlawful? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iloilo Central Market. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Iloilo Central Market), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC) Mayor of Pasay moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Mayor of Pasay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Talas (2017)Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tropical Storm Talas (2017) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 17:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Talas (2017)The article Tropical Storm Talas (2017) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017) and Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 20:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC) Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article .tv you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sohom Datta -- Sohom Datta (talk) 01:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC) The article .tv you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:.tv for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sohom Datta -- Sohom Datta (talk) 03:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC) Old Pacific typhoons, List of typhoons in the Philippines (1900-1929), and a check-inHey there TheNuggeteer. I saw you published List of typhoons in the Philippines (1900-1929). I see you have 1900-1902 done, but that's it. I wondered if you needed help finding the sources for the rest of the early 1900s. I know you've been using the Selga chronology, but there are plenty of other sources for that time period, especially pertaining to the Philippines. It also seems like you're trying to tackle a lot of different articles. I just wanted to check in how you're doing with your editing. It seems like you're really ambitious to getting stuff done, which I think is great and really admirable! However, it might lead to stuff getting rushed, or not properly researched, and maybe a rush to publish incomplete works. I've been editing for a while, and I know that some projects take some time to really get right. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)The article Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TyphoonAmpil -- TyphoonAmpil (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)Hello! Your submission of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC) DYK nomination of Typhoon Nat (1991)Hello! Your submission of Typhoon Nat (1991) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 23:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC) Your recent edit to your user pageHey there, I saw you recently added your birthday and location to your user page. It's not a good idea for young users to add their age and location, on such a public website. Check out the page Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. If you want, I can delete the edit where you added that. I suggest removing your birthday and exact location for privacy reasons. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
I noticed your username when you promoted this DYK to a prep set because I hadn't seen you around DYK backrooms much. Just wanted to say thanks for working on the prep sets. They are kind of a hassle to do, and only a handful of editors build. Thanks and take care, Rjjiii (talk) 04:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC) DYK for Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed TamanoOn 13 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that two kidnapped activists were released after claiming at a press conference that they were abducted by government forces? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. —Kusma (talk) 00:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Hey :) I've left some comments on the GAN for Ernie Pike recommending you close the review as a fail. If you disagree then let me know, else you should probably close the review. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Talas (2017)The article Tropical Storm Talas (2017) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017) for comments about the article, and Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 05:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)The article Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC) Slow downHello. Over the past couple weeks I've seen your edits and the issues over at GAN, and while I can appreciate wanting to be bold and work on what you can, you do need to slow down some, as you seem to be taking on more than you can chew. There were concerns raised on the GAN talk page about taking on things without finishing them, and the response to that now appears to be nominating something at FLC, which has surface issues that have already been commented on. To be honest, it's starting to cross the line from "I want to help out where I can" to not wanting to listen to the constructive criticism you are getting. The line between being productive and disruptive is unfortunately not as clear-cut as it probably should be here, and you need to take care to not ride that line too much. To start, I'd suggest just focusing on one process you want to work on and get good at that before branching out, rather than trying to tackle everything at once, as that's just going to be a recipe for disaster on both sides. Wizardman 16:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I’ve been seeing a lot of you over at GA and I was wondering if you would like to collaborate on your review for the page Tumor necrosis factor. It’s a pretty big page and I’m interested in reviewing it but would also appreciate some help. I think we could both learn a lot this way. Usually with co-reviewing one person picks something to tackle but we could also just both work on the review together and share our process. If you’d prefer to collaborate via email as well I’m open to that as well. IntentionallyDense (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |