User talk:TheMediaHistorian

January 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, KMAX-TV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at KMAX-TV, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 10:23, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See: https://imgur.com/oNKBqmn TheMediaHistorian (talk) 04:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination Heads Up

Hi there! You've been pretty active in the talk page for 2023 U.S. Senate sex tape scandal, and at one point seemed to have an opinion on the notability issues that were discussed. Although I suspect your views differ from my own, I wanted to let you know, if you hadn't already seen that the article has been AfD'ed here, in case you continue to have thoughts on the matter. All the best, Arcendeight (talk) 21:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I had seen this before it went kaput. TheMediaHistorian (talk) 02:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A7/G11 on Ticker News

Hello TheMediaHistorian -- I've declined this speedy because the article has at least minor claims and does not appear unsalvageably promotional. You might like to take it to Articles for deletion for a full discussion on its notability. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 12:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK thank you. TheMediaHistorian (talk) 02:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Jeff Jarvis

Hello TheMediaHistorian. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jeff Jarvis, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: @TheMediaHistorian: It would appear to me that this is quite obviously not a WP:G7 candidate. While a controversial person, I see no indication of that. As for the "WP:G11" tag, I see also no indication of that here. Could you possibly start a discussion on the article's talk page with your concerns that address why WP:G11 tag may be appropriate here? Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC). Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]