User talk:TheEpicApartmentLord

OD (horror game) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to OD (horror game). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and and appears to be a work in progress that is not yet ready for the main space. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 18:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can people still see and edit the WIP article? TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 18:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced editorializing

It's often tempting to add your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, but this is forbidden by our policy on original research. This includes guessing whether a film was a "box office success" or synthesizing your own Rotten Tomatoes-style critical consensus. Per MOS:FILM, these details need to be cited to a reliable source that has already done the analysis. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you calculate or determine the budget or box office money a movie makes? TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 04:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OD (video game) (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
WP:TOOSOON. Re-submit when you have more secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 16:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TheEpicApartmentLord! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 16:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greenland: Migration (upcoming film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Greenland: Migration (upcoming film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 17:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greenland: Migration (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fix the references, i must. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 02:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Greenland: Migration has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Greenland: Migration. Thanks! Qcne (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greenland: Migration (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Couple things, it's probably WP:TOOSOON for this per WP:FFILM since principal photography hasn't begun yet. The available sources don't seem like enough for a standalone article, so it might be best to let this wait a bit. Also, can you fix the refs to be inline citations?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 02:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When is the best time to submit the articles? More further, are the sources a problem? (ignoring the inline citations problems) Thanks, for the feedback. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 14:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi TheEpicApartmentLord! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:13, Friday, January 19, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Killer (2023 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TheEpicApartmentLord! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 03:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 03:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ninja Kamui, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ninja Kamui Poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ninja Kamui Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Backrooms (upcoming film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Backrooms (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Backrooms (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Not0nshoree (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ninja Kamui Poster.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ninja Kamui Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Run 3 (2013 video game) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Run 3 (2013 video game). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 19:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greenland: Migration (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:
  • 1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
  • 2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
  • 3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Sideswipe9th. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, OD (video game), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While there are citations available to use for the new content, I didn't want to add them since I tried to do that with the Greenland Migration draft, which made for a quirky citation that read "Greenland-M Citation One." So I'm not really great at doing citations. If someone can add a citation for me, then thanks. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 13:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Learning with Pibby (2020 short)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Learning with Pibby (2020 short) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 18:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I did not know of this "recently deleted article" that looks like a repost. Could you please provide a link to this deleted article or draft? I couldn't find an article of "Pibby" online. Thanks. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 18:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, it was previously created under the slightly different title of Pibby, and the deletion discussion in 2021 was at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pibby. There is still a draft article at Draft:Pibby, which you're welcome to improve and submit for review when it's ready. There have been some edits made to that draft since it was declined by a reviewer, including some as recently as March. If there's been substantial coverage of the series since then from reliable sources, then a reviewer could publish an improved draft, but I can't find much at the moment. Wikishovel (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you. By the way, you are completely welcome to delete the article from yesterday, as I will begin to fix up the Pibby draft article from 2022. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WORLD. (Google Slides Presentation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WORLD. (Google Slides Presentation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Justiyaya 00:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheEpicApartmentLord, we don't really allow users to put personal things on Wikipedia, see WP:Notwebhost. You could always post this on another Wiki (that allows this), the back end of Wikipedia is open source, so many other Wikis run on the same software. Justiyaya 00:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please just put it as a private draft? thanks. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 00:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the community would love it :/ From what I can see it's not related to Wikipedia at all. It's really best to put it to some other Wiki that would be more open to it. Justiyaya 01:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
just erase the page. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 01:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 01:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could we discuss this issue here? TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 01:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But... I worked months on that article, I don't know where else to put it, I don't know how to migrate to another Wiki, and apparently I can't even put my article on my own wiki? what do I do now? TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 01:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a Wikipedia article, it's nothing to do with Wikipedia-->you can't put it here. That's literally what NOTWEBHOST is about. I don't know how to "migrate" it either, but it's up to you to figure that out if you want to keep it somewhere. You can copy the code into Notepad. I'm not going to delete your entire user page to make that go away, but it should NOT go back up and you should find another venue to host that kind of content, like a blog. Please don't restore it again because I don't want to block you. Drmies (talk) 02:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please just send the code to me? I'll then find a way to put it on my website, which took a really long time to make, but it got really popular for that outcome. I guess my work is no good here, and doesn't get 322,000 views here. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 02:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What. It's not gone: it's in the history. You have a website? Why did you ever put that here? Never mind: good luck with it. Drmies (talk) 02:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 02:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bubble (upcoming animated film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bubble (upcoming animated film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 16:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for keeping this as a draft. I will work on it in the meantime, improving it with more information and citations. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 16:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bubble (upcoming animated film)

Information icon Hello, TheEpicApartmentLord. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bubble (upcoming animated film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. BaranBOT (talk) 14:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]