No, I'm not biased against you, and I could be wrong.
If you (hopefully respectfully) disagree with me, come and leave a message on my talk page, described below (click SHOW)
Sometimes, I can make mistakes. That happens, and given one civil message, I can redact the warning, restore your content, and everything should be okay. However, to do so, please comply with some ground rules:
Discuss, in a calm manner, why you disagree with my revert.
If you, in hindsight, actually think I was right, then all is well, and things should be okay.
I'm willing to apologise for my actions, but in turn, you should be too. Like me, you're not always right, and please don't insist you are, especially even if I've provided substational evidence to the contrary.
Lastly, after the revert is discussed and done, I may be willing to guide you on your Wikipedia career, or at least refer youto somewhere you can get help.
You can leave a message here. I should respond within my next time I'm active.
Please keep the following in mind:
My preferred method for replies to threads I've made is using the : wikitext to indent the reply and using {{ping|TheDragonFire300}} or {{reply to|TheDragonFire300}}
Please make sure messages comply with WP:CIVIL, WP:HARASS and WP:NPA. Failure to comply will result in your messages being ignored/removed, and in the case of WP:HARASS and WP:NPA, a warning being issued.
If I did something stupid, trout me. Even I make mistakes sometimes. (Counter-vandalism is hard).
SHOUTING AT ME RARELY MAKES THE SITUATION BETTER.
There is rarely any need to reply to discussions with a resolved box on it or a discussion in the archives.
Want to leave a message? Click here! Note: If you create formatting errors using the link above, I will correct them for you. I will not edit any other part of your comment.
Advanced actions
These actions help you to notify me of any messages you may send me.
If you've left a reply on a page, but you feel I don't know about it, click here.
Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Following an RFC, the policy on restoration of adminship has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, T5, has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.
A request for comment is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
Technical news
The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
