|
User talk:TheChunky/Archive 2
I probably added more reliable citations in article Chewdara, check them. Please Ttttt321 (talk). 13:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
hii..i added all the citations except one, there is no reliable citation for that but that article is present in wikipedia, then what will i do? Ttttt321 (talk). 11:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
ok, but you removed the "schools in chewdara" which were with reliable citations and if i add the wikipedias link to any subject instead of citation? Ttttt321 (talk). 18:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Is this (Chewdara) ok now...? check it... Ttttt321 (talk). 12:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Is this ok now? Chewdara. Ttttt321 (talk). 07:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
can you show me where is citation need, now? please Ttttt321 (talk). 07:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC) Check it Chewdara, where it has been completed or not? Ttttt321 (talk). 14:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Thankyou for suggesting, but i checked all the references in Bhalessa, search from references i found nothing about chewdara. Ttttt321 (talk). 07:59, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you... for adding information in chewdara Ttttt321 (talk). 07:07, 15 August 2021 (UTC) hii, is Chewdara has been completed? Ttttt321 (talk). 07:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Hii, can you help me in this draft Draft:Tehreek i Soutul Auwliya, please? Ttttt321 (talk). 16:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Ttttt321 Please don't submit this draft until it meets notability criteria. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) TheAafi Thanks. Sure, the creator of this draft and I will find the better sources regarding this. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 17:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ttttt321, can you please check the website you added on Draft: Tehreek-e-Soutul Auwliya. I don't think it is working! Was it working when you added? Regards. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 18:01, 25 August 2021 (UTC) Hii, i removed tHe website and now can i submit it. Ttttt321 (talk). 16:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC) TheAafi, please check this draft. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) Rollback granted Hi TheChunky. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 08:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Thank You. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 13:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC) September 2021
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC) ARBIPA sanctions alert This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Atul RaghavHi,TheChunky (talk · contribs) Thanks for the edits. Can you please help me to improve the articles of Indian Taekwondo Players. If this article gets accepted then we can create more articles of Indian combat Players. I cross verified from different reliable sources and its's confirmed that he is the youngest athlete from ghaziabad who played in ranking events and won medal. Can it be mentioned? If you have any extra reliable information about Atul Raghav, you can add it in the main description section.--Divineplus (talk) 09:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thank you for the response and the edits you made to help the draft more precise,TheChunky (talk · contribs). Draft:Atul Raghav has not been reviewed yet. can it be done from your side so that i can keep contributing towards indian taekwondo players? what are your opinion, can it be accepted?Divineplus (talk) 09:14, 8 September 2021 (UTC). Deborah Santana copyright issuesHi TheChunky, Thank you for reviewing my page for Deborah Santana and alerting me to the copyright infringement issues. I have re-written the article to remove the copyrighted text and resubmitted it for consideration. Can you please let me know if what I did was good enough, or if I need to make more changes to make it acceptable? Thanks so much, --Moviecat (talk) 22:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for responding, TheChunky! I have removed all the IMDb sources and added some new ones instead. I have also changed the wording to remove more of the copyrighted text. Now, when I check the Copyvios tool (thank you very much for that, by the way!), the only similarities I can find are things like book/article/film titles. I am using this Temp page to make changes. I am under the impression that I should make all my changes to that Temp page rather than resubmitting the Draft article, is that correct? Thank you so much for your help! --Moviecat (talk) 00:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC) New page reviewer granted Hi TheChunky. Your account has been added to the "
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
from what you can seewhen a new article is created by a 32 edit user, usually a prod is much more productive than Afd - which really is a WP:BITE action on a new user and discouraged at all times. Also a good reason for a supposed limitation is the full company name is not given in title or lead and is a term so common anywhere it is not possible to judge anything agaihst such a name. Really, it should be speedily kept and we could all move on to more productive work - if you stay with it - that's your problem, but for an operation to have the extent of operations - railway transport, lithium mines and iron ore - I for one cannot understand where it fails anything. Hey have a good day! JarrahTree 07:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tehreek-e-Soutul Auwliya (September 15) New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021 Hello TheChunky, Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs. Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here. At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages. There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers. If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.  Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC) Deborah Santana paid contributor tagYou removed the
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tehreek-e-Soutul Auwliya has been accepted Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 08:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)You declined this draft several hours ago. I found the draft it when I came to write the article and have completely rewritten the body text. I'd be glad if you could take another look at it please. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Asif Iqbal Naik (September 27)
Article: Atul RaghavHi TheChunky (talk · contribs). I would like to invite you for an discussion on Article: Atul Raghav as it has been nominated for deletion. Kindly share your thought and help me to save the article. It's happeing due to non-notability of Taekwondo in India.Divineplus (talk) 05:19, 9 October 2021 (UTC). Draft:The Association of Private Museums of RussiaHello! What should I do ro publish my draft. Should I only remove non-reliable sources or something else? --Priestone (talk) 12:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Can I publish our draft in Wiki? We discussed all criteria, and, in my opinion, the article follows them--Priestone (talk) 06:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 23An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ramban district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ramban. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC) November 2021 backlog drive
Draft:Humanity's Last BreathHi, TheChunky. 51 days ago you declined my draft due to a lack of sources. I made major improvements to the sourcing, but the article has still not been re-reviewed or accepted. May you please have a look? Highly appreciated, Elias --Elias9922 (talk) 11:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Your submission at Articles for creation: Shah Huzaib has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Rusalkii (talk) 03:50, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Request on 05:45:58, 18 December 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Mwill66
It might be notable but please check the tag I added there. Orignal work of anyone is not allowed on wiki. It needs articles from primary and secondary sources. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chenab Times (January 3)
Hey Jeromeenriquez, It's okay, I thought it was likely notable now, because I work on WikiProject Chenab Valley. and this is one of the articles from that project. I submitted this draft after 1.5 years when it fell under the notability criteria. Well, no worries. I will improve it more and resubmit it after it gets more notable for having Wikipedia. Thanks. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 01:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chenab Times (February 6)
Based on my evaluation, the references 1,4,6,9,18,19,20 and 21 are reliable and independent sources of newspapers and reliable news media. So this generate notability. There nothing like advertisement. Hope you will check this. Thanks and regards. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 16:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Draft: Time (Five album)How does this fair now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:331F:C301:A0FB:5139:DEDC:1B87 (talk) 13:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Narwal (February 13)
WP:AFC Helper NewsHello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
Features for new users coming soon (and mentors, like you, wanted!)Hello. As you're currently listed as a host at the Teahouse, I wanted to make sure you're aware of the imminent rollout of new Growth Team Features which every new account will be getting by default. Each users will soon see a new 'Homepage' tab next to their User page. It contains two main elements which might impact on your involvement - and you'd be welcome to get involved and help out directly with one of them.
To spread the load on our current list of around 65 mentors, I'm reaching out to ask if you'd like to help out and sign up as one? The workload is relatively small; User Panini! reports receiving four questions a month, on average, all of which were simple ones of the type we already get at the Teahouse, whilst I've had just one in the last 3 weeks. To view a list of every question asked of all mentors over the last 14 days, click here. If becoming a mentor and being available to help new users on their first few days here interests you - just as have done at the Teahouse in the past - then please consider signing up at Growth Team features/Mentor list. But please only do so if you are genuinely willing to be available to help. Existing users can already 'opt-in' to seeing the Newcomer Homepage features via their Preferences. Thank you! Nick Moyes (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2022 (UTC) Kishtwar articleHi The Chunky, sorry to bother you. I am leaving this message as you are an active contributor to the Kishtwar article. An anonymous ip user has been making since several days unsourced changes to the page. Can you have a look into it ? The same ip user left me a message on my talk page insulting my person. Thank you. Imranqazi90 (talk) 07:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 15An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chenab Valley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ramban and Doda. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC) New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022 Hello TheChunky, At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue. Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant. In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 822 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 847 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP. This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear. If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chenab Times has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! — The Most Comfortable Chair 14:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Help me in improving my first draftHi, hope you are doing well. I have checked your profile and found that you are editing various places in Chenab Valley and I have started a draft of a village in the same region Draft: Badanoo . If you can contribute or help in improving this, I shall be thankful. Thanks. ManhasArvindKattar (talk) 07:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello ManhasArvindKattar, thanks for dropping this message here. I want to let you know that I am working on Wikipedia: WikiProject Chenab Valley and you are also welcome to contribute articles in that project. The above draft you mentioned will be added in this project as it belongs to it. I would love to contribute articles like these. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 07:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC) Nomination of Danish Manzoor for deletion The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danish Manzoor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AlexandruAAlu (talk) 13:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC) New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022 Hello TheChunky,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May. Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b] In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month). While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here.
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
There is a new template available, Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 11532 articles, as of 12:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC), according to DatBot There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC) July 2022
NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!
(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Nomination of The Chenab Times for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chenab Times until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Maihuwikieditor (talk) 13:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Confirmation, pleaseA very angry person from the Chenab Times came on live help chat and said he paid you to write an article about them, and also that you promised it would be up forever. Is this true? DS (talk) 14:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
A simple solution is to take the real ID of that person and verify it with The Chenab Times staff list. If it is found, then it is discussable, but I don't think that this is the matter. This is simply the harassment of Wikipedia editors by such sockpuppets.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 09:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Pradeep Narwal
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Asif Iqbal Naik (July 28)
New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022 Hello TheChunky,
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details. Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC) NPP messageHi TheChunky,
For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC) New page reviewer grantedHi TheChunky. Your account has been added to the "
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Narwal (September 7)
October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive
(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 24An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kishtwar district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marwah. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC) October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive is on!You are receiving this message because you signed up to participate in the drive, but have not yet reviewed any pages in October. We would love to see you over at the backlog drive! Buidhe 10:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC) Early end of the backlog driveA few days ago, new page patrollers got the backlog to zero. Due to the unprecedented success of the backlog drive, it will be ending early—at the end of 24 October, or in approximately two hours. Barnstars will be awarded as soon as the coords can tally the results. Streak awards will be allocated based on the first three weeks of the drive, with the last three days being counted as part of week three. Great work everyone! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC) NPP Backlog Drive Award
Thank you.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 14:18, 30 October 2022 (UTC) Ways to improve ShibnoteHello, TheChunky, Thank you for creating Shibnote. I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Onel5969 TT me 12:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
@Onel5969:, the "area" here refers to "location", as I have been watching the news of rafting at this location since 2021. So I belong to Jammu and Kashmir (union territory) and I work especially on Chenab Valley and articles related to it. So, I verified the location from my own sources too, which is actually a village in Doda district. So, there is legal recognition that this place is shown on the government website here. and its population is counted in the 2011 Indian Census, which can be obtained from here. So a place that is legally recognised and has an even lower population is notable under WP:NGEO.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 04:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add A barnstar for you!
I saw you editing this article in which you added incorrect information about her that she was born in 20 September but as of Moneycontrol.com and Jagran Josh, she was born in 17 September not in 20 September. You can see the references https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/who-is-sargam-koushal-mrs-world-winner-2022-1671430002-1 https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/trends/sargam-koushal-navy-officers-wife-brings-mrs-india-crown-to-india-after-21-years-9730331.html Thanks. Please ping me if you want to reply. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk ! 17:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi @LordVoldemort728: , thanks for your message. Yes, I saw that many articles says 17 September as her birthdate. But I came across an article https://thechenabtimes.com/2022/12/19/jks-sargam-koushal-wins-mrs-world-2022-title-after-21-years/ . Where it says As per different media reports, her birthdate was different, while confirming her birthday to The Chenab Times, Sargam Koushal said that she was born on 20th September 1990 to GS Koushal and Meena Koushal in Jammu. She is married to Aditya Manohar Sharma who is an Indian Navy officer. and yesterday when I visited her instgram page, I saw that she shared the above link in her story. That's why I got confirmed that 20 September is correct.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️)
InvitationHello TheChunky: WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a two week long Backlog Drive! Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive. And also, I've been using an improvised version of your signature since quite a while ;) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 13:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Request on 00:23:19, 6 January 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Pugliese23
Pugliese23 (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Pugliese23 Can you please clarify to me that the mayor of Pichilemu City Council, whose name is also Roberto Córdova, is a different person!!! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 14:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Request on 19:40:39, 6 January 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by VideŁitt
hello, you have recently rejected my proposal for an article. i have reworked the article. i#ve scrapped most of the text and added a boatload of sources and a 'further reading' section. could you maybe have a look again and check whether this would be ok now? best, best Vide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ulrike_Lienbacher
TheChunky thanks for having a look. aren't you setting the boundary unusually high for me here? especially for a living artist? basic noteability rules say "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject." i have cited 7 renowned newspapers, in-depth-texts in photo journals, texts in 4 different catalogues in english language – all published completely independent of the artist. i listed numerous exhibitions in internationally know exhibition venues. all the people I've quoted (in the longer version too) are notable curators, art historians and journalists relevant to the field (if you want, google Silvia Eiblmayr, Thomas D. Trummer, Roger Malbert, Martin Hochleitner, Reinhard Braun...) i have also used a few quotes from longer in-depth texts that were published in lienbacher's books (they are not self-published though) to describe her approach. i think this is legitimate for contemporary artist. i hope you can reconsider your verdict. best, Vide
Your sigI don't know if you noticed, but your signature points to Talk:TheChunky and not user talk:TheChunky. Please fix it. Primefac (talk) 15:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Question about page declined?Hi TheChunky, Thanks for reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Or_Hen! Unfortunately it was declined, and I'm unsure I understand why? The 8 criteria for science bio pages talk about "elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association" and give being an IEEE fellow as an example. The person I wrote about is an APS Fellow (which is the equivalent of IEEE for physics researchers). The APS website says "... no more than one half of one percent of the Society’s membership (excluding student members) is recognized by their peers for election to the status of Fellow of the American Physical Society", which speaks to its distinction. In addition, the person received several international prizes by APS and IUPAP. So I think there are two objective criteria that they meet (and also more subjective ones based on the impact of their work but I leave that out of the discussion for now). What can I do to improve the submission for approval? 18.10.70.75 (talk) 20:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Another question about page declinedHi TheChunky, Thanks for reviewing my https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yves Winkin. But I'm confused: I do not understand why this does not meet the requirements of an encyclopedia article. I've actually published half a dozen articles in print encyclopedias (I'm a retired professor), and I've previously created a couple of Wikipedia entries as well, so I thought I understand the basic requirements. Can you provide more specific information about what you're finding inappropriate, or do you prefer that I use the real-time chat help? Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz — Preceding undated comment added 04:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Request on 15:03:13, 12 January 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Armer Thor
Page declined - request for more guidelinesHello @TheChunky, I've recently submitted a draft on the Polish MarTech company RTB House. I added more sources as you've advised but they are in different languages (not just English or Polish) - is that ok? I also delated some, that may have been considered not independent. Another thing - since the topic is a b2b company from a very specific line of business, most of the materials are from industry but also business media. I've also stumbled upon a couple of companies-related articles on Wiki which were citing their own websites or were giving no sources at all, so I hope that what I did is enough. I'd appreciate your feedback. Additionally, I added a couple of new information on the company since these were the main reasons I believed it's worth publishing that article on wiki (the company grew from just a tech start-up into a large company and it managed to establish its presence in various countries in - which for a Polish company is a real success story; and most importantly it's involved in the Google's Privacy Sandbox project which goals and results are important for an average internet user). I tried to be as matter of fact as possible - hopefully, I managed to do just that. But if something sounds too vague or seems unsubstantiated, please let me know and I'll do my best to improve the draft. Msg 2507 (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, You have got a email It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. @Divineplus Divineplus (talk) 12:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC) Draft:YayzyHi TheChunky, Thank you for reviewing Draft:Yayzy earlier. I rewritten it almost completely and was wondering if you'd have the time to have another look at it? Any tips, contributions, help is greatly appreciated. Jerry3zs (talk) 12:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
A cute goat for you!.jpg) Salam Al Kashmiri! Absolutely wonderful contributions you have made to Wikipedia. As a new editor, I would definitely look up to you and follow your steps. NamkeenChai (talk) 13:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Page declined - Robert (Bob) GartlandI would like some assistance with the references that you have questioned? I will keep adding more references but I’ve already referenced several website sites, news sites, and Wiki links. I would appreciate some support to ensure this page is accepted. I’m new ish to wiki. I tried to follow convention of other sites about living people which have been published . Thanks GeelongManifesto (talk) 05:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Clear the drafts related to Chenab Valley
Wilson fermionHi TheChunky. Concerning your declining of the Draft:Wilson fermion article (I didn't write it but I feel like I must advocate on its behalf); you seemed to decline it on the basis of its references/notability. However, the article clearly lists 3 secondary, reliable, and independent textbook references (they are the standard textbooks in lattice field theory) which each have a in-depth cover of the topic. Wilson fermions are THE lattice fermion discretization of the field along with staggered fermions. The original paper (by Wilson, cited in the article) has 2.8k citations, which in a physics context is insanely good. I also did research in lattice field theory for a year last year so I have a solid grasp of the area of physics to be able to say that Wilson fermions are fundamental to it. I agree that the article is stubby in how it's written, but this is a separate issue. Either way it would be helpful to know what specifically the article is missing in the reference/notability context? OpenScience709 (talk) 10:42, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Page Extended Peer CommunityHi TheChunky I am puzzled by your second rejection of the page "Extended peer community" because of unclear context. I see that you have not commented on the talk page of the same voice, which is surprising - as I understand these are the pages where issues are discussed and controversies solved. Anyhow, thanks for suggesting improvements. I now discuss the context more and added a new See Also section with pointed to pages where this kind of subjects are discussed. Hope you will find this new version sufficiently clear. Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 3An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Masrat Zahra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC) Hi Chunky! I am very surprised by your decision! The person I'm trying to write an Article about is part of Category - Eurovision, and for long time belongs to a fairly steady stream of musical life of Latvia. I am comparing already existing articles of persons from the same categories - Mārtiņš Freimanis, Ingus Baušķenieks and Markus Riva. And these Articles are more than poor in content and citation level. The content of this Articles includes material that real meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations, as opposed to the target article?? Of course, I saw Referencing for beginners and Citing sources and learn it (btw - from 2006 year in Wiki). Please consider about your opinion regarding these long-existing Articles. Arminius-fun-nick (talk) 23:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
Page Declined - Request for reconsideration.Hello TheChunky, Thank you for reviewing & for your feedback on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Braden_Allen_King. Although, I do not agree with the outcome. In the Wikipedia:Notability (people) page under Entertainers it says, “Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions”. This entertainer has had significant roles in 6 notable stage productions, 2 of those being Broadway productions, which is the pinnacle of the American musical theatre industry. I would think that 500+ stage performances in these notable productions would be considered “multiple”. This page is also backed by published & reliable Broadway sources, for instance: Playbill, BroadwayWorld, Broadway Podcast Network & IBDB. I don’t see how this entertainer wouldn’t be considered notable, based on the aforementioned requirements. If possible, I would like to request a different editor and a different set of eyes to review this. Someone with American musical theatre knowledge would be helpful and more suitable to review this page. If that is not an option, let me know what I can do to help this page become accepted. Theatreman90 (talk) 21:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
I understand that you believe the person you submitted for a Wikipedia draft is notable, and in some cases, that may be true if certain criteria are met. However, notability also relies on the reliability and verification of the sources provided. From the sources you provided, I noticed that many of them are primary sources or passing mentions, which are not considered reliable for determining notability. For example, the first source from the Internet Broadway Database is a primary source, and the second source from Playbill is not opening and showing a 403 Forbidden error. Additionally, the third source from BroadwayWorld is connected to the subject, which makes it unreliable for determining notability. Furthermore, many of the other sources you provided, such as the official website of Braden Allen King and the Prom Music website, are also primary sources and cannot be considered for notability. Direct interviews, such as the one from the Broadway Podcast Network, are also not considered as independent sources for determining notability. The 4th is "EastbayTimes" which again is a passing mention for the above subject. Then we come to the 5th source, which is "Lesher Art Center", which is a primary source for the award, can't be considered again. Now, if we observe the 7th source, which is "BroadwayWorld" again, so it's primary and can't be considered for notability. Now, the 7th source is "ActorsAccess", which is not reliable. Now, the 8th source is "BroadwayWorld" again which is not reliable for notability, The 9th source is "the official website of Braden", which is again a primary source and connected to the subject, which can't be considered for notability. Then we have the 10th source: "Broadway Podcast Network", which might be reliable, but direct interviews are not considered independent sources, so again, not considered for notability. Now, the 11th source is "BETM The Sky Kid", which is not reliable and primary and can't be considered for notability. Now the 12th source: Prom Music is again primary and cannot be considered for notability. Now, the 13th source: "Buffalo Rising" is a passing mention that can't be considered notable. Now, the 14th source: "New Jersey Stage" is again a passing mention and can't be considered for notability. Now, 15th source: "Variety" is a passing mention for this subject, which is again not considered noteworthy. Now, the 16th source is the official website of Braden, which is again not considered noteworthy. The 17th source is "App.com" is reliable and notable. The 18th source is "Plan B Entertainment" can be considered for notability. Now 19th source: "V Media Backstage" can be considered notable. Now, 20th source: "BroadwayWorld" is a primary and also passing mention, which can't be considered for notability. The 21st source is "Prom Musical", which is again primary and can't be considered for notability. Now the 22nd source: "Ticket Holders Award" is again primary and can't be considered for notability. In order for a Wikipedia draft to be accepted, it is important to provide reliable and independent sources that verify the notability of the subject. I recommend researching and finding additional sources that meet these criteria before resubmitting your draft. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to help.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 04:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Baabarr MudacerHello TheChunky, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Baabarr Mudacer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks! Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Pradeep Narwal Hello, TheChunky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pradeep Narwal". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Request on 20:13:31, 10 March 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Sylvan1971
I disagree with the rationales for rejection. Depth: if you look at previous drafts, I cut this down after receiving rejections from other editors. Reliable: In previous drafts I did use sources deemed unreliable by wikipedia. These have all been replaced with reliable publication sources. Secondary: Please provide examples so I can address them. Independent: This is just plain wrong. I received no input from the subject of the article. He is a well-known television production designer with hundreds of credit. I know IMDBm despite being owned by Amazon, isn't considered reliable by wikipedia but check him out. Thank you for reconsidering.
ARBIPA sanctions reminder
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC) Draft:Maranao kolintangHello, I just wanted to let you know that I will be working on the Draft:Maranao kolintang, since the original editor hasn't touched it since your rejection. I have sufficient sources in my collection that I can get this article up to Wikipedia's standards. I will work on it this month, and then resubmit. If you would look at it then, I would appreciate it. Best wishes, Jacqke (talk) 06:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello TheChunky, I addressed your recent concerns regarding the draft. Kind regards User1719 (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2023 (UTC) Hi User:TheChunky could you please review the above article? I'm sure other would get around to it eventually, but thought you might be interested. Happy to address any changes or feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.181.162.126 (talk) 08:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC) New pages patrol needs your help! Hello TheChunky, The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help. Reminders:
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, TheChunky. Thank you for your work on Sampat Prakash. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Revertwhy did you revert edit at love bhagwa trap? 150.129.164.195 (talk) 08:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Talk page on main spaceHi there, kindly have a look on article Masroor Abbas Ansari a Kashmiri leader who became famous after his father’s death. Problem is when the name is searched on search engines then only talk page of article is visible... please have on article and fix that problem . Thanks DrMosaviSyed (talk) 02:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC) Kindly upload photosHi there, kindly upload these photos to articles. I am temporarily blocked from editing, that’s why I am unable to upload these photos to the article.
Kindly download and upload this photo <ref>https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0aAVChhgZTXVzdHwyjg6hVY6wm9ETCmHKr1TNBMKbRCh5dWRm6qfQdM8GToofh1Lxl&id=100022032190618&mibextid=qC1gEaCite error: The opening
Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?
New page reviewer grantedHi TheChunky. Your account has been added to the "
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. signed, Rosguill talk 21:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Masroor Abbas Ansari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)  A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Ramban district indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested maps in Chenab Valley indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Chenab Valley indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Kishtwar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Doda district indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Deepak Kalal for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Kalal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. New page patrollingHello. Can you please explain why you added "context" and "no footnotes" tags to Chernor Bah in this edit? Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC) Hello, would be able to help review a page that has been taking too long to review?Asalamu Alaikum/Hey @TheChunky i had created a page Lewis Raymond Taylor recently about two weeks ago, but it has been taking too long to get reviewed despite the page reviewers improving it, it is still pending the review. it will be very appreciated thank you. Tintantuckle (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, TheChunky. Thank you for your work on Digdole. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by RotciW (TᴳRᴴAᴼIˢNᵀ)-(Cₛ) 03:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
