User talk:TheCatalyst31/Archive 16

Happy New Year, TheCatalyst31!

Happy New Year!

TheCatalyst31,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 04:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ⋠T⋡ 04:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Hello, TheCatalyst31! You might be interested in endorsing an essay in which creation I participated – WP:NOCONFED. Of course, this is just a suggestion, nothing more. Cheers! — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 23:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in February 2023

Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • Explore Wikipedia for all variations of the woman's name (birth name,
    married name, re-married name, pen name, nickname)

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Teal Bend, Missouri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teal Bend, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teal Bend, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hog Farm Talk 19:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Three Way, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Three Way, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three Way, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) 00:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Annie Pike Greenwood

hey, nice work on this page! Your editing interests look pretty broad, but if you have an interest in editing more pages related to Mormon literature, I would be happy to invite you to the Discord server for the Association for Mormon Letters, where we have a channel where we discuss editing Wikipedia. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I admit that I think Annie Pike Greenwood is the first article I've written related to Mormon literature (and even then only by association, since according to one of the sources she wasn't Mormon herself.) Thanks for the invite though. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2023

Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Mobile phone readers may only see the article "lead" – take some time to make it shine!
    Include something to keep people reading.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Old Columbine, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Old Columbine, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Columbine, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sunflower, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunflower, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunflower, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Turner Landing, Illinois

Notice

The article Turner Landing, Illinois has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Fails WP:GEOLAND as an unincorporated community

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 15:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Denika Kassim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denika Kassim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denika Kassim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2023

Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red May 2023

Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Use the Google translate app and camera on your phone to translate text from an article or book

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - June 2023

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Red Rock, Yavapai County, Arizona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Rock, Yavapai County, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Rock, Yavapai County, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 16:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2023

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red 8th Anniversary

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francisco Romero Arribas

Notice

The article Francisco Romero Arribas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Acorn, Santa Barbara County, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Acorn, Santa Barbara County, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acorn, Santa Barbara County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Onelys Alvarado for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onelys Alvarado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onelys Alvarado until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 21:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anuvis Angulo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anuvis Angulo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuvis Angulo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 21:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Philicity Asuako for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philicity Asuako is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philicity Asuako until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 22:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2023

Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280


Online events:

See also:

  • Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the
    affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aptakisic, Illinois

Notice

The article Aptakisic, Illinois has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Aptakisic has either never existed, was annexed by Buffalo Grove and Lincolnshire, and/or merged into unincorporated Prairie View, IL. See talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Bishop Ford Freeway

Template:Attached KML/Bishop Ford Freeway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/California State Route 238

Template:Attached KML/California State Route 238 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Edens Expressway

Template:Attached KML/Edens Expressway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ramona Mibuy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramona Mibuy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramona Mibuy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 20:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Interstate 238

Template:Attached KML/Interstate 238 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Interstate 24 in Illinois

Template:Attached KML/Interstate 24 in Illinois has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023 at Women in Red

Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Deprodding of File:Florida 010.jpg

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} tag from File:Florida 010.jpg, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this file should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Thanks! —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) {user page (@ commons) - talk} 09:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that the image was a high quality image of a sunset that could viably be used on Commons. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) {user page (@ commons) - talk} 09:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Judith Zulu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judith Zulu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Zulu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 03:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Fall 2023

The Center Line
Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter

Features

• A New Future for Road Articles Online

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bern, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bern, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bern, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Counsman, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Counsman, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counsman, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2023

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - November 2023

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello TheCatalyst31:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/West Virginia Turnpike

Template:Attached KML/West Virginia Turnpike has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Elgin Bypass

Template:Attached KML/Elgin Bypass has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Skokie Highway

Template:Attached KML/Skokie Highway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Stevenson Expressway

Template:Attached KML/Stevenson Expressway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Tri-State Tollway

Template:Attached KML/Tri-State Tollway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Midway, Bossier Parish, Louisiana

Notice

The article Midway, Bossier Parish, Louisiana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wholly unreliably sourced boilerplate 2-sentence substub mass-import only supported by Dragonrap2 (talk · contribs)/Futurewiki (talk · contribs), a sock-puppeteer with a record of deleted bad Louisiana "unincorporated community" articles. No such name on the National Map. Uncle G (talk) 09:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Narlon, California

Notice

The article Narlon, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence found that this ever was a populated or notable place, just a non-notable railroad junction. Found a shipping rates guide and ICC abandonment filing from the 1930s describing this as only a railway point, and news articles only discuss the site in context of a bridge replacement. Geolocates to an empty dune field on Vandenberg SFB. Appearance on maps or GNIS does not confer notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pine Grove, Bienville Parish, Louisiana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pine Grove, Bienville Parish, Louisiana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pine Grove, Bienville Parish, Louisiana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mangoe (talk) Mangoe (talk) 23:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pleasant Hill, Bienville Parish, Louisiana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pleasant Hill, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pleasant Hill, Bienville Parish, Louisiana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cairns Corner, California

Notice

The article Cairns Corner, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location. Not a "community", simply a crossroad; this source from 1950: [1] specifically describes it as an "intersection". Satellite images reveal only a house, a farmstand, and a solar panel field. No evidence this was a populated or legally-recognized place, thus failing WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2023

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dunneville, California

Notice

The article Dunneville, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't a community at all, it's a bar/restaurant that according to this source: [2] got its name for a regular there. I can find several passing mentions to a Dunneville Corner, but none describe it as a community or say much about it at all. The link above is the closest thing to significant coverage that I can find. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Satellite view shows the restaurant, a quarry or gravel yard of some sort, and a few agricultural buildings.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:41, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Latham, Alabama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Latham, Alabama, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latham, Alabama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buchanan, Tuolumne County, California

Notice

The article Buchanan, Tuolumne County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location. I can find references to a Buchanan Road and a Buchanan Mine, but nothing about a "community". No evidence this was a populated place, and no coverage of any type found, so article fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. Most likely this was just a mine; satellite image locates to empty forest with a dirt road running through. Another low-effort GNIS stub polluting the internet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Keystone, Tuolumne County, California

Notice

The article Keystone, Tuolumne County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No information found about this location, except for two passing mentions: It appears as a spot on a map of the Gold Country c1960 ([3], and there is one passing mention in a rail tourist guidebook from 1913: [4]. Nothing else found. Satellite view shows a wood chip plant surrounded by range land. No evidence this was a populated place and no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yosemite Junction, California

Notice

The article Yosemite Junction, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A rural intersection, not an "unincorporated community". Satellite view shows a T intersection with a single house. No other information found. Clearly not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:28, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dunneville, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dunneville, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunneville, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bear Creek, San Joaquin County, California

Notice

The article Bear Creek, San Joaquin County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to be a populated, legally-recognized place in accord with WP:GEOLAND. I can find lots of information about Bear Creek, the creek, but nothing about a "community" of Bear Creek. There are several news reports from the late 1950s and early 60s about a Bear Creek "district" or soil/water management unit (see, e.g. [5], which is the only source I could find mentioning Bear Creek having "residents"). But most sources are either about the waterway or the Bear Creek flood control district. Satellite images show a winery and several spaced-out residences surrounded by farmland. This is a borderline case, but in the absence of clear evidence that this is a recognized populated place (not just a flood control/soil preservation district) I think it fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gillis, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gillis, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gillis, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Binghamton, California

Notice

The article Binghamton, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable location. This was a real place, but seems to have been an informal sub-division of Maine Prairie: [6]. Outside this book, I can find references to a "Binghamton hall" or "Binghamton center": [7], which suggests there was a rural meeting hall here, but that's not a "community". Present satellite image shows a crossroads surrounded by farm fields. I can see keeping Maine Prairie but not this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bucktown, California

Notice

The article Bucktown, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location; GNIS does not establish notability. Only two extremely trivial mentions of this place could be found, both from the 1920's: [8], [9]. The first of those two mentions a Mr. Buck, suggesting this may have been an informal name for a ranch. Without solid evidence this was an actual community, we can't have an article, and in any case we shouldn't have articles that only say x is a place at y coordinates.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dozier, California

Notice

The article Dozier, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable railway point. Only passing mentions found, establishing there was a location by this name but saying nothing about the place. A surprising number of articles about people named Dozier could be found in local press, suggesting this was just a flag rail stop on land owned by the Doziers (it was once common practice to name railway points for adjoining landowners). Clearly this was not a "community", satellite image just reveals an inactive level crossing in the middle of open fields.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rio Vista Junction, California

Notice

The article Rio Vista Junction, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another non-notable railroad point on the long-defunct Sacramento Northern railroad. No coverage found that was independent of the museum at this site. Could support redirect to Western Railway Museum.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yolano, California

Notice

The article Yolano, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another non-notable point on the Sacramento Northern, now abandoned. No coverage of the site found other than passing mentions. Not a community; satellite view shows two homes and an agricultural facility. Railway points are not inherently notable and without secondary coverage (not present), we shouldn't have an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lala Dicko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lala Dicko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lala Dicko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 23:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ramhurst, Georgia

Notice

The article Ramhurst, Georgia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia:Notability_(geographic_features)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 04:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yonah, Georgia

Notice

The article Yonah, Georgia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Census designated places are specifically excluded from WP:GEOLAND, no discussion needed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 07:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2024

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carvin Creek Homesites, California

Notice

The article Carvin Creek Homesites, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location; I can find references to a "Carvin Creek Tract", but those are passing and not clearly equivalent to this place. Satellite image of coordinates shows forest with one or two houses nearby. Without any other information this is a failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. GNIS is insufficient for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Plumbago, California

Notice

The article Plumbago, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not an unincorporated community; this was just a mine: [10], page 92. Mines are subject to WP:GNG which is failed in this case because no other coverage of this location could be found; GNIS is insufficient for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]