User talk:Terriffic Dunker Guy

Archives
1

Errors

Hello, I'm afraid your edits and article creations are very problematic. Here is just one example, the article Molykreio:

• The geographic coordinates did not point to Molykreio, but to Perithori, another village 17 km west of Molykreio
• "Molykrioi" is not a valid transliteration of Μολύκρειο
• Molykreio was never part of Chalkeia
• There is no mention of Molykreio in this reference you gave: "Gavrolimni". Nafpaktia (in Greek). 2018-06-21.
• The Greek National Road 48 does not run through the village Molykreio; it runs a few km east of Molykreio, along the coast. It does not lead to Agrinio or Ioannina either
• "The settlement is named after an ancient settlement which, where Velvina is nearly located today." is unintelligible
• Molykreio became part of Antirrio in 1989, not 1997
• your reference link to the 2001 population census results is broken (and the link title was "Census 2011")

If you want to continue editing Wikipedia, you really have to improve your contributions. Given the error pattern in your edits, and the subjects you chose, I would very much appreciate an honest answer to this question: are you User:Pumpie?

Markussep ^Talk 12:56, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Pumpie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Sro23 (talk) 05:07, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Terriffic Dunker Guy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #22316 was submitted on Aug 09, 2018 19:53:49. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Terriffic Dunker Guy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am appealing for an unblock for the user, as said by the other user Just Chilling. Already applying for at the Unblock Ticket Review System

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 00:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not modify a decline for a current block. You are welcome to make a new request, but you are not permitted to edit or remove an existing decline. --Yamla (talk) 13:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pico Agudo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pico Agudo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pico Agudo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 14:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vitória FC (Cape Verde)

Template:Vitória FC (Cape Verde) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:58, 30 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Terriffic Dunker Guy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #23090 was submitted on Oct 31, 2018 03:02:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:02, 31 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Terriffic Dunker Guy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #23561 was submitted on Dec 12, 2018 22:18:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:18, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Derby of the Académicas of Maio

The article Derby of the Académicas of Maio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clássico da Ilha do Aeroporto

The article Clássico da Ilha do Aeroporto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boa Vista Island derby

The article Boa Vista Island derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mindelense–Académica rivalry

The article Mindelense–Académica rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mindelense–Batuque rivalry

The article Mindelense–Batuque rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mindelense–Derby rivalry

The article Mindelense–Derby rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:34, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mindelo Derby

The article Mindelo Derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:34, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of São Nicolau derby

The article São Nicolau derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:35, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sporting–Académica rivalry of Praia

The article Sporting–Académica rivalry of Praia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:35, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sporting Praia–Mindelense rivalry

The article Sporting Praia–Mindelense rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sporting–Travadores rivalry

The article Sporting–Travadores rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tarrafal Derby

The article Tarrafal Derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vulcânicos–Académica do Fogo rivalry

The article Vulcânicos–Académica do Fogo rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies and rivalries are not inherently notable and need to show GNG as an event in themselves. Two teams simply meeting a number of times does not necessarily create a de facto derby or rivalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:38, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Capeverdean football derbies

Template:Capeverdean football derbies has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:University of Cape Verde

Template:University of Cape Verde has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^Talk to me/_{What I been doing}) 22:14, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tchadense

Template:Tchadense has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^Talk to me/_{What I been doing}) 22:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Progresso Associação do Sambizanga

Template:Progresso Associação do Sambizanga has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^Talk to me/_{What I been doing}) 20:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Os Garridos

Template:Os Garridos has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^Talk to me/_{What I been doing}) 20:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Celtic da Praia

Template:Celtic da Praia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^Talk to me/_{What I been doing}) 18:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2012–13 ASC Diaraf season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012–13 ASC Diaraf season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 ASC Diaraf season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matt294069 (talk) 22:48, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014–15 Académica da Praia season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014–15 Académica da Praia season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 Académica da Praia season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 05:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2017–18 AD Bairro season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017–18 AD Bairro season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017–18 AD Bairro season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 02:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cape Verdean football clubs 2014–15 season

A tag has been placed on Category:Cape Verdean football clubs 2014–15 season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 18:20, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cape Verdean football clubs 2015–16 season

A tag has been placed on Category:Cape Verdean football clubs 2015–16 season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 18:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Santiago South Premier Division-winning seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Santiago South Premier Division-winning seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:43, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cape Verdean football championship-winning seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Cape Verdean football championship-winning seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cape Verdean football clubs 2016–17 season

A tag has been placed on Category:Cape Verdean football clubs 2016–17 season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 02:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cape Verdean football clubs 2017–18 season

A tag has been placed on Category:Cape Verdean football clubs 2017–18 season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 02:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:CS Mindelense seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:CS Mindelense seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:AD Bairro seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:AD Bairro seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Boavista FC (Cape Verde) seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Boavista FC (Cape Verde) seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:02, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:São Vicente Premier Division-winning seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:São Vicente Premier Division-winning seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:05, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sal football seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Sal football seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 16:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Brava football seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Brava football seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 17:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Boa Vista Island football seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Boa Vista Island football seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 17:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:CS Mindelense matches

A tag has been placed on Category:CS Mindelense matches requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 17:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Santo Antão (South) football seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Santo Antão (South) football seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 17:50, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sporting Clube da Praia matches

A tag has been placed on Category:Sporting Clube da Praia matches requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 17:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maio football seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Maio football seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:22, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cape Verdean football club matches

A tag has been placed on Category:Cape Verdean football club matches requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 02:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st century in Santo Antão, Cape Verde

A tag has been placed on Category:21st century in Santo Antão, Cape Verde requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:São Nicolau football seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:São Nicolau football seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buska Santu

The article Buska Santu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since November 2018.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Batuque FC players for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Batuque FC players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Batuque FC players until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solar eclipse of October 19, 1808 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solar eclipse of October 19, 1808 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of October 19, 1808 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Q28 (talk) 09:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solar eclipse of February 3, 1859 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solar eclipse of February 3, 1859 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of February 3, 1859 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Q28 (talk) 01:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solar eclipse of January 22, 1841 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solar eclipse of January 22, 1841 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of January 22, 1841 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Q28 (talk) 01:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solar eclipse of December 13, 1898 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solar eclipse of December 13, 1898 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar eclipse of December 13, 1898 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Q28 (talk) 01:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Annona (crater) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annona (crater) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annona (crater) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:32, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st century in Santiago, Cape Verde has been nominated for merging

Category:21st century in Santiago, Cape Verde has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:47, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1886 disestablishments in Portugal

A tag has been placed on Category:1886 disestablishments in Portugal indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rhizaria species

A tag has been placed on Category:Rhizaria species indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of ASC Diaraf players

The article List of ASC Diaraf players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List is mostly unreferenced. Falsely states nationality as Cape Verde, but main article and French article say Senegal. Page creator has been blocked.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lists of association football players by club in Senegal

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of association football players by club in Senegal indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nelson Nunes Lobo

The article Nelson Nunes Lobo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes ^(💬 • 📝) 19:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan. Qwerfjkltalk 16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Olímpio Ferreira Chaves for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olímpio Ferreira Chaves is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olímpio Ferreira Chaves until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 09:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § X by Y in Z

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § X by Y in Z on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 11:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Sporting Clube da Praia players for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Sporting Clube da Praia players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sporting Clube da Praia players until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 15:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Desportivo da Praia players

The article List of Desportivo da Praia players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. The player base from most of the club's history is completely impossible to verify, the list is utterly impossible to maintain and the vast majority of entries on the list would be amateur footballers that fail WP:GNG individually. People that do meet GNG individually, and whose playing for Desportivo da Praia we have verified, can be collected in a category.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• List of Académica do Porto Novo players
• List of SC Santa Maria players
• List of Académico do Aeroporto players

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Académica da Praia players

The article List of Académica da Praia players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:INDISCRIMINATE list of mostly non-notable players.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of AD Bairro players

The article List of AD Bairro players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Indiscriminate list of players, fails to meet the WP:LISTN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 01:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Boavista FC (Cape Verde) players

The article List of Boavista FC (Cape Verde) players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Indiscriminate list of players which doesn't meet the WP:LISTN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 02:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of CS Mindelense players

The article List of CS Mindelense players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Indiscriminate list of mostly non-notable people, fails to meet the WP:LISTN criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 02:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of AD Bairro players for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of AD Bairro players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of AD Bairro players until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 17:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guardador de Margens

The article Guardador de Margens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Old article that fails Google test.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 00:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Salensis

The article Salensis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Specific epithets are never used alone and as WP:partial title matches do not warrant disambiguation pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul_012 (talk) 13:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Webbianum

The article Webbianum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Specific epithets are never used alone and as WP:partial title matches do not warrant disambiguation pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul_012 (talk) 13:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Santomensis

The article Santomensis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Specific epithets are never used alone and as WP:partial title matches do not warrant disambiguation pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul_012 (talk) 13:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]