User talk:Tekaphor

Click here to start a new message section at the bottom of this talkpage.

TALKPAGE ARCHIVES : Archive 1 (2007-2009 inclusive) | Archive 2 (2010-2011 inclusive)

Placeholder

Thanks you for work

I would just like to say a brief thank your for your positive input on the CFS-Treatment page of WP, it has shown some improvement since your involvement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leopardtail (talk • contribs) 01:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! - Tekaphor (TALK) 02:45, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aggressive Reverts

Hi Tek,

ScienceWatcher has yet again revert my edit (this time to the NADH section). I have found no less than three reviews that do not support his negative statement about the study. He has reverted the content and removed all of those references. I have created a slightly softer version in an attempt to compromise - would you please check is and see if you think it's even handed? (Just in case we need to deal with further aggressive reversions). User:Leopardtail

I will leave a comment on the talkpage. - Tekaphor (TALK) 04:06, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great work.

Tek, well sourced, well written content has effectively addressed NPOV vis-a-vis CBT on the CFS Treatment page. Great work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leopardtail (talk • contribs) 07:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! - Tekaphor (TALK) 01:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

I just stumbled across a review of criteria, not had chance to read it yet, not will I till later in the week, but thought you also might want a look at it. Case definitions for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): a systematic review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leopardtail (talk • contribs) 21:22, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will have a look later. - Tekaphor (TALK) 02:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subsuming ME under CFS is prejudicial to the ongoing debate.

There are two distinct opinions: one that ME is the same as CFS; and two, that ME is not the same as CFS. Having only one entry (for CFS) prejudices the ongoing debate (in favour of the idea that ME is merely a synonym of CFS and therefore not worthy of its own separate entry). But it remains a debate and in the interests of fairness, there should be a separate entry for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. Rialto Davies (talk) 22:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me for butting in but there was once an article specifically for ME. Then it got merged into CFS creating an article which encompassed more than one ICD code (International Statistical Classification of Diseases) entry. Leaving us with the mess of an article we have today. So, I support having such a split again. Medical science (as you are already aware) advances by applying ever finer definitions, not by taking two or three steps back and lumping together, everything that produces red spots as the same disease just because the common main signs and symptoms are red spots and a high temperature.--Aspro (talk) 17:30, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tekaphor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

“CFS” article title change to “ME/CFS”?

Hey Tekaphor, how are you? Looks like u haven’t been editing recently, but there’s an important issue up for discussion- whether to change the title of the CFS article to “ME/CFS.” We could use the perspective of an informed editor like you… “It has been proposed in this section that Chronic fatigue syndrome be renamed and moved to Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.” Talk:Chronic fatigue syndrome#Requested move 15 April 2023 JustinReilly (talk) 12:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]