User talk:Tango Mike Bravo


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
21 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C High School for Gifted Students, Hanoi University of Science (talk) Add sources
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Carsten Müller (talk) Add sources
359 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Nguyễn dynasty (talk) Add sources
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Christine Buchholz (talk) Add sources
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Louis Soldan (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Paris by Night 91 (talk) Add sources
792 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Antiochus IV Epiphanes (talk) Cleanup
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Jenevieve Aken (talk) Cleanup
9,967 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Akshay Kumar (talk) Cleanup
434 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Imran Tahir (talk) Expand
504 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Chartism (talk) Expand
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Olga Tass (talk) Expand
337 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Wolfgang Schäuble (talk) Unencyclopaedic
4,356 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Red states and blue states (talk) Unencyclopaedic
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Timon Gremmels (talk) Unencyclopaedic
257 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Award (talk) Merge
169 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B MoveOn (talk) Merge
26,637 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA 2020 Republican Party presidential primaries (talk) Merge
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ali Lajami (talk) Wikify
25 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA James Galanos (talk) Wikify
57 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Majed Abdullah (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Olusegun Adejumo (talk) Orphan
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Mfon Ekpo (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Raimond Beccarie de Pavie, Seigneur de Fourquevaux (talk) Orphan
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Majiziya Bhanu (talk) Stub
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ulla Jelpke (talk) Stub
73 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Bernd Riexinger (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ghaffar Kazmi (talk) Stub
28 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Sevim Dağdelen (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ingo Wellenreuther (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Devere Rogers

Notice

The article Devere Rogers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage about them to pass WP:GNG, and with only 1 significant role (in My Spy), doesn't pass WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 13:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Box

Hello, Tango Mile Bravo

Thank you for creating The Box (Swedish TV series).

User:Atlantic306, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, can you please add a reference section detailing reviews of the series in reliable sources such as newspapers, magazines etc

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Atlantic306 (talk) 05:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: Hi, thank you for the feedback/suggestion. I have looked, but have found no reviews so far. There is a page on Rotten Tomatoes but no rating. I have added a Reception section to the article that reads "As of 9 December 2021 Rotten Tomatoes had insufficient reviews to calculate a tomatometer rating.[1]"
If this is not suitable please let me know. Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks that's fine for now but as the reviews come in the ones from reliable sources should be detailed, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 03:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Atlantic306: Hi, periodically I've been updating as of when there were insufficient reviews. Recently I found the page on rotten tomatoes was missing and updated accordingly. Other editors have since deleted the whole of the text from the section but left the section heading. I am writing for your advice on whether to restore the text or delete the section entirely or something else. (I have added an archive URL to the reference in this section). Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "The Box (2021 - )". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on 2022-02-20. Retrieved 9 December 2021. Not enough ratings to calculate a score. AVERAGE TOMATOMETER
Hi, it's not customary to mention that there are no reviews at Rotten Tomatoes or elsewhere but I suggest it is worthwhile to keep the blank section as it may prompt other editors to help search for reviews. If you were not aware, reviews in any language are acceptable and welcolmed, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Atlantic306: Thank you. I will leave it as is. Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 08:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yogananda Pittman: archive-url

Hello. I edited the Yogananda Pittman article to replace a dead link to an MSN.com page that had previously published an article from CBS News with a live link directly to the CBSNews.com original page of the article (that would have been a better link in the first place). You edited my ref tag to convert the link to a version at Archive.org , using an archive-url URL value instead of my CBSNews.com URL url value. Why point at Archive.org instead of to CBSNews.com ? If that were the best practice, then every link to outside Wikipedia would be archive-url at Archive.org . — Preceding unsigned comment added by DocRuby (talk • contribs) 12:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DocRuby Hi, thanks for the correction to the original CBS News article. I agree it would have been better. As to the addition of the archive-url, this is common practice. There are three parameters, archive-url, archive-date and url-status associated with an archive-url. If the original link is alive then url-status=live is used, otherwise url-status=dead. In the first case the reference is linked to the original live URL, which is the case here. However if the original link dies, it is easy to change the url-status=dead and the reference is linked to the archived version. Having the archived version recorded before the link goes dead is a safeguard. Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see that your edit retained my link to CBS News, but just added an archive link. Thanks for the improvement, and for pointing out your reasoning. DocRuby (talk) 16:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Folley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Folley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Folley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nosferattus (talk) 02:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]