User talk:Tanbircdq/Archive 2015
Speedy deletion nomination of Jelina Berlow-Rahman
A tag has been placed on Jelina Berlow-Rahman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jersey92 (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Akhlaq Choudhury
A tag has been placed on Akhlaq Choudhury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 03:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Jelina Berlow-RahmanThe article Jelina Berlow-Rahman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Hi Tanbircdq, Thanks for formalising the references I added to Tulip Siddiq's page. I'm new to Wikipedia editing and was looking for an expert to advise me on how to do that properly. And thanks for pointing me towards the Wikipedia policies - that makes a lot of sense and will help me be less subjective in the future. However I do feel that there is now a section missing from her career - how would you feel about reinstating something along the following lines (sticking to the facts and trying to avoid anything that sounds promotional): 'During 2013 and 2014, since being selected as Labour's candidate, Tulip has campaigned against HS2, the proposed north-south train line expansion, and in opposition to high pay day lender charges on Kilburn High Road. She has also campaigned to keep Belsize Fire Station open, to improve disabled access at West Hampstead tube station and for the Swiss Cottage post office.' All with references, of course. Without this paragraph it sounds like she hasn't done much since becoming a candidate, which I think would seem strange to a reader. What do you think? thanks Graham (gs300) Gs300 (talk) 23:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Category:2010s crime drama film stubsCategory:2010s crime drama film stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:27, 12 January 2015 (UTC) how is goingAssalamualikum. I am Aldota brother. How is going your editing in wikipedia. I hope well. You created many good articles. I started again to edit wikipedia. Everyone should be free to use wikipedia, even a sockpuppet like me. It was better if you did not report me again in sockpuppet investigation. here Did not you tell me " I will not report you but I am pretty sure that eventually someone else will", and " If you continue to sockpuppet then I do not wish to engage with you any further, take care." As i can see, you did not respect this kind of promise. I do not know what is your profit to report me, maybe a vengeance for "yousufmiah" , which is blocked for me. I am very sad about this. This is our problem, i report you and you report me. I do not know for how long we will continue to do this. Anyway take care, may Allah give us sabr and right way to follow. See you. Shukran Rimidogla (talk) 11:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
gift
Hi, thanks for the kind gesture of appreciation, most grateful, take care. Tanbircdq (talk) 19:02, 19 January 2015 (UTC) Riaz AminHello, I am Riaz Amin i would like to ask you how you found out the infomation about me and who gave you authorisation to do this. Please can you contact me as soon as you get this. Many thanks, Riaz Amin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riaz Amin (talk • contribs) 17:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Missed your pingSorry I didn't respond to this but I never did receive a ping (I've only noticed now because a block notice popped up on my watchlist). I don't know why the ping didn't work. Maybe if you launched the SPI using a form or template then it wouldn't work even though you had signed it? Anyway, I'm glad to see your defence of the encyclopedia's integrity succeeded. NebY (talk) 19:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A Kind of English, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.movies.com/kind-english/details/m38695. It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues. If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC) Great workIf I may say, as someone who's grown accustomed to 'filling in' missing documentary film categories, your categorization work is impeccable. I know that may sound like faint praise -- but it's not meant to be. Great work. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
February 2015Your addition to A Kind of English has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:53, 12 February 2015 (UTC) British Bengali lawyersHello there! In which firm are you working? I've noticed that you're a very experienced writer on this encyclopedia. As you should know (or already be known), most of the notable bengali lawyers are not sylethi. Therefore why here -----> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_Bangladeshis#Legal there are comprehended just the sylethi one? In my and everybody's opinion just Muid, Maya and Khatun may be considered as notable. Why other notable barristers and solicitors like Nashit Rahman, Fahmida Islam, Saiful Islam, taj uddin and so on are not included there? There are not any pages on wikipedia about them. We would be grateful if you could give some explanations to us and solve this issue. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.191.126 (talk) 22:47, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Re: Aldota sockpuppet accountsRe your message from months ago: Sorry for the ridiculously long delay in responding to you. I took a break for awhile. As for your question, unfortunately that happens with some sockpuppets. They start playing games with their tagged accounts because it inflates their egos. If it becomes a problem on a particular account, ask for the page to be protected or mention on the SPI that the user page should be protected when the account is tagged due to past behavior. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC) British Bangladeshi GA reassessmentBritish Bangladeshi, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC) Hello! You wrote this article under the title Akhlaq Choudhur. The article was then moved to Akhlaq Choudhury. You requested speedy deletion of Akhlaq Choudhur, which was done. The article Akhlaq Choudhury is still live. A new user claiming to represent the subject has blanked the page; they said the subject wants it deleted. That user cannot request speedy deletion, because they are not the article's author. However, since you are the author and sole contributor to the page, you could request speedy deletion of that page (G7), if that is your intention. Or if you still believe the subject is notable, you could restore the content and keep the page. I'm just letting you know the situation; not advising you one way or the other. --MelanieN (talk) 22:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC) Mohammed El-leissyHi You created a page about me. My name is Mohammed Elleissy. There is a factual error I am not a Liberal politician. Please correct this. You can reach me at elleissy@gmail.com I am happy to verify my identity if you like — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.75.197 (talk) 12:16, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
NoteThe motive for having moved the friendship was to get readers' attention (although Wikipedia is not censored.) You are invited to vote here---> Talk:Indian_people#Requested_move_1st_April_2015. Thanks.--115ash→(☏) 09:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC) Awakening RecordsMany apologies, I somehow completely missed/forgot this. I see the page has been protected and the editor blocked, although both are about up. However, it should now be easier to deal with Ame123ojfish if they continue with the same behavior. Dougweller (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Invite
ThanksThanks for helping straighten out the naming for the Sayeeda Warsi and Pola Uddin articles. Ravensfire (talk) 18:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
listen to meyou need to stop to change the artIcles' name. Go to ask to a Bangladeshi where he is originally from, he will tell you BANGALI. -- AHLM13 talk 16:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
ArticlesAssalamualikum. I hope you are fine. Can you create articles about Pakistani people which are red-linked in the list of British Pakistanis, especially on politicians? Also, I think "BRITISH BANGALI" would be the perfect title for the article. Let me know. Thank you. -- AHLM13 talk 19:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC) InfoboxesLook, this has very little to nothing to do with the title of the infobox, which functionally changes nothing in terms of how the data is displayed, but on the content displayed and the removal of unused and unneeded, therefore superfluous, sections. I don't appreciate the patent wikistalking into my edits even the past two months, especially into articles far outside you're usual purview. Infobox bloat is rampant throughout political articles and your continuing to add the needless empty sections makes it more difficult to keep the data clean and the editing simple, and your hiding behind whether or not the top of the box says "judge", "cabinet official", etc in lieu of the neutral "officeholder" is insidious. If you want to make those distinguishing markers, fine, but I highly resent your wiping out all my edits wholesale because of the single clause and I have to ask that you stop. Therequiembellishere (talk) 23:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Akhlaq Choudhury
A tag has been placed on Akhlaq Choudhury, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —SpacemanSpiff 05:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC) Nomination of Amaan Reza for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amaan Reza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amaan Reza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arr4 (talk) 14:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Nomination of Dilruba Yasmeen Ruhee for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dilruba Yasmeen Ruhee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilruba Yasmeen Ruhee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arr4 (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Muslim/Islam@Tanbircdq:, Hi I see you have repeatedly reverting my changes without leaving any comment (check [1], [2] and more). Can you please clarify yourself here. Altaf (talk) 20:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Nyth63 03:07, 1 August 2015 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Guild of Bangladeshi Restaurateurs
A tag has been placed on Guild of Bangladeshi Restaurateurs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC) Merge tagsI have removed your latest merge tags. You are free to put them back, but please start the discussion and outline your rationale. --NeilN talk to me 12:16, 7 August 2015 (UTC) Nomination of Helal Miah for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helal Miah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helal Miah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 14:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Page for Jobeda AliHello, thank you for creating a Wikipedia page for me. It's flattering to be considered a public figure. I was just wondering if you know me or have a connection to me, or what your interest otherwise is for creating this. Thanks again for your amazing collation and hard work gathering all this information together. Jobeda Jobedaali@me.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.225.136 (talk) 18:29, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sugapuff
A tag has been placed on Sugapuff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 00:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC) Nomination of Enamul Hoque for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enamul Hoque is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enamul Hoque until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC) Nice workEspecially on Brit Bengalis like Leesa Gazi and Mukul Ahmed and their work for the stage and other media. As a long-term editor and a fellow Brit Bengali familiar with their creative work for many years, a big well done! --Peripatetic (talk) 15:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015Your addition to List of people who have been considered deities has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 01:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC) British Bangladeshi GA reassessmentBritish Bangladeshi, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Tess Holliday articleI am not sure why you deleted some of my edits from the Tess Holliday page because it violated NPOV. I do not understand why you are say this. Tell Holliday IS morbidly obese and the that is deeply relevant to an article about her and her fat acceptance movement. Morbid obesity is defined as either 1. a body weight 100 pounds or more than what is medically recommended or 2. a Body Mass Index (BMI) of over 40. By either measure she is morbidly obese. Custodiet ipsos custodes talk Hello. As there is a majority in the talk page, and this version was there for a week, I reverted. Trust me, I am well acquainted with the subject. This article was quite an OR, and filled with mistakes. Of course, if you'd like to debate the issue further, I'd be happy to oblige. Please read the bottom of the talk pages there and in Reform Judaism; two users in total, HG and Malik, agreed. And they are the only ones who bothered to comment in a year. AddMore der Zweite (talk) 21:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC) Yisrael KatzYou have violated 1RR on the Yisrael Katz article. Kindly self-revert or I will have to report you. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 23:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC) Aldgate tube stationPlease see WP:NAMB. How could Aldgate tube station possibly be confused with Aldgate railway station, Adelaide? --Redrose64 (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Pregnancy over age 50: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. FYI Auric talk 17:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC) Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Amin al-Husseini. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page. If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC) This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.DavidLeighEllis (talk) 19:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC) DS alertThis message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.“WarKosign” 12:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC) Hi, TrinacrialucenteThis editor does not have 500 edits - they have 332. Please undo your revert. When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 15:39, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello @Tanbircdq:, I appreciate you looking into this. But as you can see, the kabal has spoken. I think any rational person would agree this "prohibition" was meant to prevent saboteurs and vandalism to these topics. Instead it is being used to target anyone with an opposing (note: NOT dissenting) view. None of the edits I made could possibly be seen as vandalism or sabotage, so for the moment we'll have to abide by this very blatant Wikipedia segregation and the subjective interpretation therein.Trinacrialucente (talk) 18:25, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
FYI, on Polish wikipedias where I also tinker all IPs are prohibited, while all edits are reviewed/accepted by experienced Wikpedians via an agreed verification process. Zezen (talk) 11:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC) ANII have raised my concerns about your behaviour at ANI. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Tanbircdq and Israeli politician articles. Number 57 22:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC) Reliable sources for MujaddidSurely you don't think a kindle study guide by Cram101 is a reliable source? I commented on it at the talk page. Doug Weller (talk) 20:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Ism schismIsm schism probably working for Iran gov. Just see his recent edits, becomes quite obvious.--Sheildy (talk) 23:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC) Kharijite Rebellion (866-896)Hi Tanbircdq, I saw that you had moved the page Kharijite Rebellion (866-896) to Kharijite Rebellion. With respect, I don't think the new name is appropriate, as it implies that this particular rebellion was the only Kharijite revolt to occur, when in fact there were dozens that took place throughout the seventh through tenth centuries, some of which were more important than this one. In the Jazira area alone, for example, Kharijite rebellions also took place in the Abbasid period in 750-1, 776-9, 784-5, 787-9, 792-3, 794, 796-7, 802-3, 805-06, 817-8, 829, 845-6, 862-3, 870-1, 880-1 and 929-31. Ideally, a "complete" Wikipedia would have articles for every Kharijite revolt that ever took place; it just so happens that we currently only have the one for 866-896. If you don't object, I'd like to move the current page back to "Kharijite Rebellion (866-896);" let me know what you think. Thanks, Ro4444 (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
|