This user may have left Wikipedia. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? has not edited Wikipedia since April 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
User talk:59.100.3.101
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]March 2009
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Online flower delivery. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 07:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Online flower delivery, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 07:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
TO: THEN WHO WAS PHONE this link is NOT spam and it is NOT advertising. It is a legitimate link that provides facts to warn the public about scammers that operate as Online Relay Florists. As such it is a matter of PUBLIC INTEREST and as such the activities published at my PRIVATE Fair Trading site are reported to the appropriate authorities that include the Police and the ACCC. Please provide your name and address and contact email if you wish to continue with correspondence.
SIGNED Gordon Craven, 63 Nandroya Road Cooroy QLD 4563 gordon@gordoncraven.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.3.101 (talk) 10:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DYK for
On February 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article [[]], which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
On February 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article [[]], which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Do you want me to delete your userpage? I could set it [create=autoconfirmed] too, if you want. That would allow you to create it if you want, and at the same time, most vandals would be unable to. J.delanoygabsadds20:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
LOL barnstar faggot? o man. obviously a disgruntled wikipedian who never received such a prestigious honor. awesome name for an Amish/emo band.Lawshoot!03:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Haha. I totally laughed out loud. That is so funny. I guess if you're gay, the punishment is a cock-block. I'd help you with the vandals but I'm busy trying to justify why I'm writing articles about every bar I've visited in the last week. Lawshoot!03:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Of course - it was necessary. You don't go to Hooters cuz the sandwiches are sooo tasty, right? I went there last night with a couple of gals, which makes it just even weirder. Lawshoot!04:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't it protected from evil? Maybe you should just give in and make it like a MySpace - give the people what they want. Lawshoot!00:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Only from the first wave of evil, but I have now accepted my blue destiny. A few too many of my edits were being reverted since I went red, so it maybe for the best. I don't think I could go myspacy, but then again, I swore I would never have a userbox. Thanks for tidying it up before. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 00:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there are varying degrees of credibility when it comes to editing. IP, regged user with red page, regged user with blue page, admin. The higher up, the less likely you are to get reverted, unfortunately! That userbox is a bit over the top. Now I know you are either from California, Wisconsin, or have access to a grocery store. You need to be more careful with your private data. Lawshoot!00:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What a shame Pparazorback warned him, I'd have loved to have seen what else he would have come up with. How about this as a candidate for edit summary of last month. I can just imagine some dude stumbling across the page and yelling it out loud at his computer screen. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 06:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for cleaning up after me! Can't believe I spent so much time writing a stub without noticing these obvious errors and omissions. Drmies (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
heh people are cleaning up after me all the time ... about time I gave a little back, and it's easy for a second set of eyes to spot things. Although I'm bound to have missed something in there :D. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 15:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Now that you have had time to think about your actions, I have re-gifted you this barnstar. Haha! I like the colors on my userpage. They are pretty neat. Lawshoot!23:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That comment was completely unacceptable. I really don't understand why someone would feel compelled to leave such an incivil opinion. If you have nothing nice to say, don't say it, right? Lawshoot!00:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That comment reminds me of those poor translations that occur between Asian languages and English. What do you suppose the bottom line was? You suck? WP sucks? We all suck? Lawshoot!01:55, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Come on you guys (people)! It's obvious what it means - The entity who provided for the supply of this webpage sucks (ahem, male genitalia). I think. Or, perhaps it means something much more deeper than that.
Now, I'm starting to get confused with what I originally thought was a clear understanding that I had. Nevermind. Hey, regardless, thanks for the brightening of my day with this entertainment on one of my quite infrequent visits to behind the scenes WikiP! I also like cheese. Tim Sailor (talk) 15:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If I had known it was going to make such a stew, I never would haave said it. Anyway, there's only one meaning to it: it's really quite self-explanatory. E. Novachek (talk) 16:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It goes without saying that you are free to comment on any aspect of my editing activities. The derisive nature of your choice of words was the only point of issue. Loss of constructive editors because of an unpleasant editing environment being created though the exchange of uncivil words happens far to often, so people will come down hard and quickly on perceived incivility issues. That you have been made aware of that by a handful of editors would indicate that this is now a non-issue. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 08:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for saying anything in the first place. Obviously, you have the right to feature anything you choose on your userpage. I was simply annoyed that I had vistied your userpage, expecting to see who you are, why you're here, etc., and I had found a relatively uninformative page. I'm sorry, and I should have expressed myself in a more civil manner. By the way, I have friends who live in Wisconsin, so I know what eating cheese is all about. What I really wanted was to find out was the origin of your username. If you reply, please do so on my talk page. You'll find the link on my signature. If I remember to sign, that is... E. Novachek (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC) Huck2012[reply]
Temporary injunction and your use of my monobook script
Hi THEN WHO WAS PHONE?,
I have to let you know on your talk page that ArbCom has announced a temporary injunction against the "mass delinking of dates". You can still delink dates on an occasional basis; however, you may wish to be cautious and use the script only for its non-date functions until the issue is resolved by an RFC poll. You may wish to express your view on autoformatting and date linking in the RFC at: Wikipedia:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Glenn Poshard. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Ian Weller (talk) 02:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I know you previously declined to be nominated for the sysop flag, but your anti-vandalism work has been first-class and I think you would be a very good admin. Would you consider running? Stifle (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is a moving discussion & survey going on, on the page "Bitch". Your opinion has been requested, click here to vote, it is urged that you vote in a timely manner. Thank You.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resident Evil (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
