|
User talk:SwissArmyGuyWelcome
January 2020
List of best-selling books RevertI wanted you to know I reverted your edit to List of best-selling books because the article you cited claims Mein Kampf only sold 85000 copies in its current release - not the 12 million you claimed. Furthermore, the introduction of the article indicates "All books of a religious, ideological, philosophical or political nature have thus been excluded from the below lists of best-selling books for these reasons" (emphasis mine) so please do not attempt to redo your edit without a discussion on the article talk page. Thank you. --KNHaw (talk) 00:07, 22 February 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth (February 26)
List of parties to international copyright agreementsPlease slow down and take the time to read and understand the edit summaries. in that context, "Geneva" and "Paris" are not city names; they are the names of the treaty "Acts" -- essentially versions -- named after the cities where they were concluded. TJRC (talk) 01:40, 29 February 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth (March 5)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ulundandar Kovil (March 17)
Notice
Indefinite blockSorry, but even the potential harassment of minors is something we take very seriously on Wikipedia. You said  SwissArmyGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I just want to apologize why do i harass User:Kingerikthesecond have been emailed for asking social media accounts. It is my incident while ago, I've been emailed for several times for i've asking when he has Discord, YouTube, or Instagram. If it is very possible to assume good faith when I just made my mistake, just messing around, making potential harassment of people's emails, and it would violates WMF's Terms of Use. Also, I didn't vandalize articles or pages on Wikipedia. But it is very hard to explain why if I am blocked until when I provide cogent and coherent answers to a number of questions on Wikipedia, so I have to contact to Arbitration Committee. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: This is not a convincing appeal; it does not properly explain the motivation behind the behavior that led to the block, and I'm afraid that a proper, honest explanation might require keeping up the block as well. I have forwarded the matter to the legal-reports address just in case your attempt to reach them was unsuccessful or made up. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
A suggestionSince you do not seem to be capable of writing fluently and coherently in the English language, perhaps it would be better if you tried contributing to Wikipedia in whatever language you speak best. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC) My apologySwissArmyGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Here's the reason that would explain: First, I've been emailed to this user "Kingerikthesecond" for suggesting coronavirus articles, (but, he only fixed minor edits for all time), Second, i've ask for social media accounts, (but unfortunately, he only used Discord), Third, he also asked who follow me on Instagram, so didn't get it. But meanwhile, his bio userpage reads, "Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks." to make sure keeping safe from personal attacks, bullying, or harassment, that was a series to protect minors (see Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors#Your safety and security). And then when it appears might be an incident while I'm emailing to the Administrators' board while I'm apologizing to "Kingerikthesecond" last night, soon it would be declined and blocked indefinitely. But, I only speak English, I'm very sorry, and I promise not to harm anyone, also thank you for consideration. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 01:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: Your e-mails to another editor were unacceptable, and your explanations for sending them are not understandable. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. SwissArmyGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Here’s my evidence that I made myself: Decline reason: As you've already been told, we need a satisfactory explanation for your sending the emails before we can consider unblocking. I appreciate that English doesn't appear to be your first language, but this unblock request is incomprehensible. As it reads, you're claiming that you accidentally tracked another editor down on Instagram and followed them, which isn't remotely credible. ‑ Iridescent 06:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. SwissArmyGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: The only reason why I've been accidentally emailed to User:Kingerikthesecond for stalking his Instagram account. It is my fault when I'm blackmailed to this user asking for social media, then it would violates WP:OUTING. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 07:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: I'm sorry, but the dialogue below is almost totally incomprehensible, and it means I really can not accept this unblock request. If you can not speak English, you can not work on the English language Wikipedia, it is as simple as that. Please, voluntarily withdraw and work on a Wikipedia in a language you can speak instead (and perhaps try again here some time in the future if your English improves). If you continue with these incomprehensible attempts at discussion here, someone is likely to remove your ability to edit this talk page too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Talk page access revokedYou are clearly unable to communicate in English in a manner that is comprehensible. You have been wasting everyone's time here — no one can understand you. As a result, your talk page access has been revoked. El_C 10:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC) You did not need to email me about your intention to appeal via UTRS. But since you did, a word of caution: if you continue to to waste the time of volunteers there, too, you are likely to see the same result in that avenue, as well. El_C 11:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC) Since inappropriate emails have been the reason for the block in the first place, and even talk page access had to be revoked due to persistent disruption, I have revoked email access as well. To my knowledge, there has not yet been new abuse of the email feature; this is a preemptive measure. The block should prevent the user from ever continuing what they did; a block with email access enabled does not serve this purpose. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Cross-wiki block circumvention will not be toleratedmeta:Special:PermanentLink/19974188#Help_me ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Susie Hargreaves has been accepted Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! MurielMary (talk) 03:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)ArbCom block You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee. Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list. For the Arbitration Committee –xenotalk 18:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hermann Zapf in 1960.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Hermann Zapf in 1960.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Hydrophilian (talk) 01:49, 27 July 2020 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Hermann Zapf in 1960.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Hermann Zapf in 1960.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Hydrophilian (talk) 22:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth Hello, SwissArmyGuy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 09:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Da Vinci Kids logo.svgThanks for uploading File:Da Vinci Kids logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)  The file File:Britten signature.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing The file File:Alfred Hitchcock signature.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing The file File:Hermann Zapf signature.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing |
.svg){kind=link}
