This is an archive of past discussions with User:Surturz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi, I hope you don't mind that I added a section heading and an explanatory note to your Signpst comment - at first sight I couldn't see what it had to do with Edina, and I thought I'd save other readers some effort by clarifying and describing the source. PamD13:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
I think I have edited between 10 and 15 of them -- it would be neat to have a tool to compare any editor with that list though <g>. Collect (talk) 13:36, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
In the media
Thanks for your contributions last night to the "In the media" of the Signpost, If you are interested, we can always use all the help we can get. Gamaliel (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Whale
Smash!
You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.
Then say something else besides that, and/or actually engage with the discussions that have been said and the arguments that have been made against some of your suggestions. The Drover's Wife (talk) 16:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Just Between Us (disambiguation)
Still think "the left" is underestimating Abbott? Do you seriously think Abbott can last until the next election, and, win it? The Manager Of Government Business is accusing the Prime Minister of branch-stacking the SSM vote! What a shambles! Oh the lulz. He's trying all the dog whistling he can think of but it just simply ain't 2001 anymore! Polls stuck around 54-46 to Labor. No govt has come out of this level of deep and extended poll rut and survived. Gawn!! Timeshift (talk) 02:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Ahh, a first-term govt tearing down their first-term PM. I could say so many things but you'd simply label them droll. So let me just ask one thing, because I can't find it. Can you locate on which wiki page you said (paraphrasing) "the left" needed to give up on their "anti-Abbott obsession" which would "cause them to be in opposition for a decade"? kthx :D Timeshift (talk) 07:15, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Surturz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:
The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".
The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:
The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".
Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thor actor for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Hello, Surturz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Surturz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I have asked you multiple times on the Talk:Scott Morrison page but I will ask you here again. Do not undo my edits which are constructive to the article. Check WP:DE and see what you are undoing. There is an active discussion also happening on the talk page about the phrasing, hence the dubious tag I placed in the article. Please contribute there with some correct policies before undoing my work again or you will have violated WP:3RR. CalDoesIt (talk) 06:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Just following up on my comment on WP:ANEW, do not revert on the article again or you will be blocked. Once there is a consensus on the talk page, the page can be modified accordingly. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:17, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
I have participated in the discussion with @Surturz: and @CalDoesIt: and followed your direction in this matter @Callanecc:. The article has sourced "praise" and some balance criticism. The matter seems to be resolved at the moment. Erasmus Sydney (talk) 03:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
