User talk:Suresh Elangovan
JainismThank you for your edits to Jainism and related articles. Seeing your contributions to Jainism, you may want to add your name as Jainism Project member. However, the section "Main Points in Jainism" seems to be Original Research and in violation of No Original Research Policy and may be deleted. However, all the best and happy editing.--Anish (talk) 10:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC) Thanks for your reply.....I saw your main points and they are excellent and show clarity of thought. But Please reference each of these points as they may be deleted by someone who may come to clean up the article.--Anish (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC) I am not sure whether that would be correct referencing. May be you can reference each point from the text that you picked up. While I have no disagreement with what you have written as I know it to be true, non-jains may dispute it for want of reference. Anyways please keep on contributing. The state of Jain articles is pathetic and we need more serious editors like you.--Anish (talk) 11:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Improvements in JainismHi, Sorry for delay in responding. The problem is that there are practally no editors involved in articles on Jainism. The existing articles have no proper lead sections, no charts and diagrams, no tables, no proper pictures, and most of them have no references. I thnk we must try to improve on these things. Atleast try to have more A-class articles. Then there are Hindutva fanatics who are hell bent on subverting truth and proving that Jainism is an offshoot or part of Hinduism and that Mahavira is the founder of Jainism. Articles like Indian religions need to be watched for these things.--Anish (talk) 11:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC) Hi Suresh….Let me congratulate on your initiative on Triple gems of Jainism. This is one of the most important concept of Jainism. However it is better that the article should be of encyclopedic quality that can be graded and peer-reviewed maybe upto A-class or Featured Article class. I suggest you go through the following guidelines also – For this particular Article I suggest following sections:
I also suggest you use IAST spellings with diacritic marks. These are just my two cents for improvement of article.--Anish (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
HelloJai Jinendra Suresh, nice to see your updates.Chirag (talk) 18:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Good workYou have been doing good work on Jainism. Now the article looks much better. I was just going thru Statistics of Jainism. Do we have a population break-up of different sects of Jainism?--Indian Chronicles (talk) 10:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC) Award of a Barnstar
Jain universeYou have changed the image that I had created and uploaded from File:Jain_universe.JPG to File:Jain Universe.jpg with directs wherein south is on top and north is on bottom. Ditto for east and west which are inmterchanged and opposite from the conventional understanding. Now the question is: on what basis you have you made the changes? Can you give me some reference to show that south is up and north is down. I have tried searching for the reference but could not obtain the same. --Indian Chronicles (talk) 07:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Hello, Suresh Elangovan. You have new messages at Indian Chronicles's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. License tagging for File:Bhavjale.jpgThanks for uploading File:Bhavjale.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC) File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Bhavjale.jpgThanks for uploading File:Bhavjale.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 15:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC) Namokar Mantra
I'd love to hear your feedback. I appreciate another editor interested in the Jainadharma! Ogress smash! 15:30, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Tamil JainsIncidentally, I note that Tamil Jain article does not mention Tirukkural. Most scholars do consider that a Jain work. Malaiya (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Suresh Elangovan (talk) 21:31, 23 March 2012 (UTC) Tamil Jain MathasHi Suresh, my name is Aayush and like you, I also have a deep interest in Jainism. I wanted to seek your help about 2 articles that I've been meaning to create. I wanted to create articles on the Thirumalai Jain Matha and the Sithamoor Jain Matha. However, I wasn't sure of what names to use. I'm confused with the following names- 1. Should it be Thirumalai Jain Matha or Arhanthagiri Jain Matha? 2. Should it be Mel Sithamoor Jain Matha or Sithamoor Jain Matha? It would be great if you could help me out here.--Aayush18 (talk) 07:15, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Hi Aayush, I have seen your edits in Jainism article. Keep up your good work. My comments for your queries from what came to my mind are: 1. I will try to find out - however the term "Matha" does not sound right; do you mean Mutt (Tamil word MUDAM) 2. In Tamil, 'Mel' means Western side; Mel Sithamoor is West part of village Sithamoor. Again the term Matha may be incorrect. I will try to find out through my relatives in Tamilnadu the specific details you are after. Suresh Elangovan (talk) 09:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC) Hi Suresh, thank you for your efforts in finding out the details. I was referring to 'Matha' as in the following article- Matha. I believe the reason people have avoided 'Mutt' in that article is because 'Mutt' means something else in the English Language. In any case, the 2 Mutts (or Mathas) have been mentioned at Tamil_Jain#Religious_head and I just wanted to create articles about them and use the correct name (with the generally accepted spelling) as the title of the article.--Aayush18 (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC) Jainism for FACHello, I have nominated Jainism for FAC. Since you are one of its top contributors, you might want to review it and provide feedback. Thanks. Rahuljain2307 (talk) 07:33, 6 December 2012 (UTC) Hi Rahul, let me know what the process to be followed - or point me to an instruction webpage so that the feedback is provided in the right channels. Thanks. Suresh Elangovan (talk) 03:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 16Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jainism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 16 December 2012 (UTC) GA Review of JainismHello, I see that you are reviewing the Jainism article. Please review it fairly in accordance with the good article criteria. If you feel the article meets the Good article criteria:
If you feel the article does not meet the Good article criteria:
Your review of JainismHello, I am writing to inform you that under the good article review rules you are not, and never were, entitled to review Jainism' GAN. You are the top contributor to the page and no-one who has significantly contributed to the article may review it. You must immediately request a second opinion, explaining in it that you mistakenly reviewed the article. JZCL 18:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC) Please see the above investigation. Thank you, J Milburn (talk) 23:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Jainism: Peer review requestHello, I have listed the article Jainism for a peer review. You might be interested in it. The link is here: Wikipedia:Peer_review/Jainism/archive2. Regards, Rahul Jain (talk) 11:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC) WikiProject Jainism
These articles need immediate attention - Rtalk 13:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC) GA reassessment of JainismJainism, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Nimit (talk) 12:17, 14 June 2015 (UTC) Hi,
|