This is an archive of past discussions with User:Suffusion of Yellow. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi. I tried to undo my vandalism because I felt bad. But it wouldn't let me because I was replacing with a large amount of text with some URL links and some of the links were like... special links that aren't allowed...? So I couldn't undo it. I'm sorry. But: THEDA BARA IS A GODDESS. Love, Internet vandal, 2A00:23C5:FE0C:2100:443:8281:DEF6:8F9E (talk) 02:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Maybe you would like to watch some old Theda Bara films. All modern films are very bad consumerist rubbish, especially superhero bullshit. Maybe you could take a couple of hours of your life and watch a good old black and white Theda Bara film. It's just a thought. I'll leave you alone now. Good night from vandaltown, England! 2A00:23C5:FE0C:2100:443:8281:DEF6:8F9E (talk) 02:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
I've noticed that you reverted the edit from this user on my talk page, thank you! The guy is the same user reported here. If you have the permissions, could you please block him? If you don't have the permissions, I think no further actions are required, since I've already notified @GiantSnowman: of the user's actions.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Enterprisey's parsoid-round-trip uses Parsoid to convert wikitext to HTML and back, and then shows the result and the difference between the original wikitext and the post-conversion wikitext.
Frietjes's infoboxgap assists in renumbering infobox labels/data/classes, so that a new line can be inserted in the middle of the infobox.
Twinkle has made a number of improvements, including using a change tag to identify actions made with it and automatically filing edit requests for protected XfD nominations.
GeneralNotability's spihelper updated to 2.2.10, fixing a number of small bugs, automatically tagging globally locked socks as such in the sockpuppet template, and restoring open cases following an SPI history merge.
Enterprisey's script-installer gadget has been updated with more internationalization of messages, as well as addition of a user preference, window.scriptInstallerInstallTarget to allow controlling where new scripts are to be installed.
My apologies for the delayed issue. As always, if anyone else would like to contribute, help is appreciated. Stay safe, --DannyS712 (talk) 18:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Enterprisey's copy-section-link adds popups to section headers which has an appropriate wikilink and external link to the section.
DannyS712's FindBlacklistEntry can be used to figure out which line(s) in either the local or global spamblacklist prevent a particular url from being added.
The Watchlist Expiry feature worked on by the Community Tech team has been enabled on Wikipedia. For scripts that include watching or unwatching pages, developers may want to update their code to take advantage of the new functionality. See the documentation on mediawiki.org.
As noted in the prior issue, Enterprisey's links-in-logs script has now been implemented as part of MediaWiki core. By my count, this is his third script that was replaced by implementing the code in MediaWiki core or an extension, along with link-section-edits and abusefilter-hide-search. Additionally, his reply-link script is being converted in part to mw:Extension:DiscussionTools. Are there any other scripts that might be worth integrating directly in MediaWiki? Thoughts would be welcome at Wikipedia talk:Scripts++.
Thank you for your change to the "notable person" edit filter! I have been spending a good portion of my time on-wiki tracking this stuff down. Dolotta (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Actually, you have saved me a whole bunch of time by checking the disallow option. I added every municipality and school in my native state to my watch list to catch this issue a couple years ago and it had never been more than 3-4 per day -- until the other day. It definitely needed to be done. I just checked the public filter, and at least the last few dozen or so didn't have a single false positive, so that's a good sign! Thanks again! -- Dolotta (talk) 15:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for fixing my edit filter issue just now. Much appreciated.
By the way, I know RegEx, PHP, JavaScript, and some other languages. Not sure if you have any openings, but I'd be happy to help with something easy (clerking some of the EFFP IP requests?) and work my way up.
@Novem Linguae: Your help would always be appreciated! There's no official "clerk" position at EFFP. Just start with the easy ones. But be warned: the situation is ... unusual ... right now. See WP:ANI § Broad-based spam adding non-notable people and WP:EFN § Filter to detect new additions to "Notable people" sections. This TikTok garbage is accounting for about 3% of all (attempted) edits, and more than half of all disallowed edits right now. I've never seen a situation like this. So we're being much much less WP:AGFy with EF/FP reports than usual. I'd recommend just removing unsourced reports from 1112 (hist·log) right now, unless you want to patiently explain WP:N and WP:V to a bunch of 14-year-olds. However, normally we only remove reports that are obviously misleading, trolling or repeating BLP vios. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:55, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Awesome. I'm excited to help. I'll read over those threads you linked, and jump in once I feel caught up.
Yeah, good luck explaining WP:N even to intermediate editors. Probably our most complicated policy. Need NPP school to really master that one.
By the way, what language are the edit filters written in? I googled "rlike" and it looks like it's SQL? I know SQL, must be more advanced syntax than the CRUD stuff I'm used to. –Novem Linguae (talk) 01:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
I made a minor change to 1112 with an additional term that crops up frequently, due to it's use in the origin; I assume the notice I got about the filter being throttled was a coincidence? Making 1113 as a fall back was a great idea, thanks for your work on that. OhNoitsJamieTalk14:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Oh, I totally agree it wasn't someone reclaiming. And while if we decide that someone doing it like that should be blocked on sight, I'll do it, I'm sure we have to allow for those people who do use it to reclaim.
However, given the minimal activity from that IP, I don't think a block would have accomplished as much as simply reverting the edits and warning them did. They could easily have moved on to another IP (and probably were/are planning to), and/or were hoping to "draw a flag" to make some martyr out of themselves by highlighting the supposed unfairness of being blocked without any warning for something so superficially innocuous. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: Over the past few days I've broken probably ALL my two years of accumulated self-imposed EFM rules dealing with this TikTok shit. I'm always worried that my next click of "save filter" is going to block every fucking edit. This is putting me on edge a bit, and I might have been letting off some steam, truth be told. But I suppose we could bring the question of "Are triple parentheses (except reclaiming) insta-blockable?" somewhere, later. What would be an appropriate forum? Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 05:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Well, without you our jobs would be near-impossible. Let me give a shoutout to ToBeFree; I just checked the filter log and clicked on a few, and BOOM ToBeFree is already blocking like a machine. Seriously, I cannot thank you enough--and of course the other filter-builders who make things to make it easier for us. Drmies (talk) 21:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
For consistent, extremely competent, high-quality edit filter management that is probably not only being relied upon in the English Wikipedia, but also extends to other Wikimedia projects because the creations are universally useful, almost magical. Thus, for being an edit filter wizard. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I don't have access to that, but I think I found what you're talking about. Please check. And man, that filter of yours, holy moly. My log is just crazy. Drmies (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
User:Ahecht/Scripts/pageswap - version 1.4 fixes reading destination from form field if destination is not in article namespace, and fixes self redirects.
Wikipedia:XFDcloser - version 4 brings a new user interface for dialogs, some preferences for customising XFDcloser, major behind-the-scenes coding changes, and resolves various issues raised on the talkpage. Also, since version 3.16.6 non-admin soft delete closure have been allowed at TfD.
Open tasks
As a reminder, the legacy javascript globals (like accessing wgPageName without first assigning it a value or using mw.config.get('wgPageName') instead) are deprecated. If your user scripts make use of the globals, please update them to use mw.config instead. Some global interface editors or local interface administrators may edit your user script to make these changes if you don't. See phab:T72470 for more.
Miscellaneous
For people interested in creating user scripts or gadgets using TypeScript, a types-mediawiki package (GitHub, NPM) is now available that provides type definitions for the MediaWiki JS interface and the API.
A GitHub organization has been created for hosting codebases of gadgets. Users who maintain gadgets using GitHub may choose to move their repos to this organization, to ensure continued maintenance by others even if the original maintainer becomes inactive.
As always, if anyone else would like to contribute, including nominating a featured script, help is appreciated. Stay safe, and happy new year! --DannyS712 (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
(This is a test, please do not take it seriously)
Hello, I'm Shinyedit. I noticed that in an edit you attempted to make, you appeared to add yourself, friends or family to an article as part of a TikTok incitement. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute the TikTok incitement and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's verifability and BLP policies by adding non-notable people as part of a TikTok incitement, you may be blocked from editing.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's verifiability and BLP policies by adding yourself or other non-notable people as part of a TikTok incitement.
This is your only warning; if you correspond with the TikTok incitement by adding non-notable people (and thus violating Wikipedia's verifiability and BLP polices) again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Shinyeditbonjour.02:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
@Shinyedit: Thanks. I'm not sure I'll be using those; my preference is to WP:DENY recognition to the video creators. And this is probably paranoid of me, but what if some of the IPs are reassigned to people who haven't heard of this nonsense, and they watch the video because of the warning? Wouldn't want them to restart the trend! Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 18:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Oh, that is true....Well, I was originally gonna broaden the warnings once the raid concludes, but now I think it'll just be temporary. Shinyeditbonjour.21:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Shinyedit, Suffusion of Yellow makes a good point about the video, and in most cases the warnings are pretty useless anyway--it won't stop the actual vandals cause they don't care, and most of the ones caught in the filters are in fact vandals. Plus, if I see a redlink I know no action has been taken; a bluelink means I have to click more things in order to see what's been happening.
Suffusion, I don't know if you're involved with 1116, but I saw this, which is a false positive. Maybe this is of use to you. Thanks again for all that work you've done. Drmies (talk) 18:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. I think I mentioned how ignorant I am in this field; I'm flipping back and forth between filters (1112, 1113, 1116) to find what I missed--but I do check all of the hits, so to speak. It has tapered down a bit--from three per minute a few days ago to once every two or three minutes on 1112 and 1113, last time I checked. Thanks again, Drmies (talk) 17:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
@RandomCanadian: This looks like it could be part of the TikTok nonsense, but as it's died down quite a bit now (last 50 hits of 1112 (hist·log) go back 3 hours; at the peak it was about 10 minutes), I don't think there's a need to block on sight. That was a "necessary evil" given the overwhelming flood; most of these users are just kids who don't know any better. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi there SOY. Your name has been ringing out around me lately in all the best ways. I see in 2018 you felt it was a little too soon to think about adminship. Well it's 2021 and so I'm wondering if you'd be open to a discussion about it. If so I'd love to adjourn to email to explore a possible candidacy. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
THANK YOU for creating Edit filter 1120. It is working like a champ and I think stopping the meme'ing trolls vandalism from being published will cut down on the persistent Chucking of Sneeds. I check it from time to time and confess I sigh a sigh of relief that none of us who keep an eye on the general Sneeds have to clean up the trolls' messes anymore. HUZZAH.
.jpg)
