User talk:Structuralgeol

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Structuralgeol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Atmoz (talk) 17:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for mediation

Hello, I see you have requested mediation on the power law article. However, there is no evidence that you have attempted to discuss this on the article talk page. If you cannot come to an agreement with the other user on the talk page, then the next step is to request a third opinion. See also WP:DR. I hope this helps, and happy editing! :) -Atmoz (talk) 17:25, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Structuralgeol. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-05-08/Power law.
Message added 21:25, 13 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please feel free to add a rebuttal to Derek's statement MacMedtalkstalk 21:25, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Structuralgeol. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-05-08/Power law.
Message added 23:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MacMedtalkstalk 23:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Structuralgeol. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-05-08/Power law.
Message added 21:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MacMedtalkstalk 21:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have my support

You have my support in bringing awareness of the disruptive behavior of Derek farn. Unfortunately, you may find that his odd perspective on certain topics has supporters within Wikipedia. Prof McCarthy (talk) 18:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Prof McCarthy, thanks for your cooperation. I will keep you informed about. With my best regards and have a nice day, Structuralgeol (talk) 18:36, 23 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

User:Derek farn

Hi, Structuralgeol. Although I disagreed with one of Derek's edits, and I see that he has a pattern of pissing people off, I don't think the solution is to form a secret conspiracy against him using one-use-only Rocketmail addresses and burn-after-reading talk-page notices. Instead, I think the solution is most likely to explain to him why his actions are annoying, ask him to please behave in a less annoying fashion (giving specific suggestions as to how he could achieve his goals in a less annoying way), escalating to mediation if necessary. So far I don't see anything suggesting bad faith on his part, just a truly remarkable lack of sensitivity, combined with an apparent passion for maintaining the quality of Wikipedia, even at the cost of becoming involved in personal conflicts — something many of us shy away from, sometimes to the detriment of the encyclopedia. Kragen Javier Sitaker (talk) 00:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]