User talk:Stetsonharry

Archive1

Talk page entries through 11/11/08 can be found here.

WikiProject Films November 2008 Newsletter

The November 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. My apologies for the late delivery, and thanks go to both Wildroot and Erik for writing the newsletter. Remember that anyone can edit the newsletter, so feel free to help out! Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Linda Greenlaw

On 14 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Linda Greenlaw, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 03:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Rod steiger in the pawnbroker.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rod steiger in the pawnbroker.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James Cagney

Hi there! Thanks for your assessment of this article. I'm hoping to get it up to featured article status in the not too distant future, so I may come to you for your opinions/reviews on how to improve it. Hope that's OK! Cheers. --Ged UK (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stetsonharry. You have new messages at Ged UK's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WikiProject Films December 2008 Newsletter

The December 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:51, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Two headed spy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Two headed spy.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Stetsonharry (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A. P. Scotland

I saw you request on MILHIST, and I've added what I could track down to the talk page of your draft. David Underdown (talk) 12:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and impressively! Thanks so much. I was wandering around, not knowing where to begin, but this is a solid start. Stetsonharry (talk) 15:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WP:MILHIST!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, article logistics, and other tasks.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts and copy-editing alerts.
• The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! —Ed 17 ^(Talk / Contribs) 18:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perkshire

I've never heard of Perkshire - I just assumed it was a typo for Perthshire, which is in Scotland so seemed reasonably likely. David Underdown (talk) 22:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alexander Scotland

On January 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alexander Scotland, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 23:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Defiance

Stetsonharry, thanks for the support and help. Keeping the editing efforts on the article focused is turning out to be a bit challenging, but I'm sure it'll work out fine in the end.
Jim Dunning | talk 05:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BLP followup

The matter which you mentioned on the BLP noticeboard earlier this month has not been ignored, but has been followed up by myself and another administrator, & dealt with. If there are any traces left, or if it is added again, please let me know on my talk p. or by email.DGG (talk) 00:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I followed that up also. DGG (talk) 04:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please email me from my talk page. DGG (talk) 16:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Aron Bielski

Hi Stetsonharry

I did a spot check of the first 20 or so "External Reviews" to reviews linked to at IMDb's entry on Defiance (2008). There was not a single mention of any of Aron's activities (or critique of the actor playing him). Hence I don't think it's correct to say that Aron is "one of the major characters in an Oscar-nominated movie", and I question the individual's notability whatsoever. I am not going to join in the talk page discussion, but if this article is nominated for deletion for notability concerns, I know my view.

Bongomatic 06:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

His notability is due to the Resistance, not the movie. I conside rit worth fighting for the article, despite the attempt to use it for dubious purposes. DGG (talk) 16:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Violent Saturday

Thanks for the kind words. As to the benzedrine, it's not mentioned in the movie, but it was a common addiction in those days, until benzedrine was finally disallowed as an ingredient in nasal inhalers. Great movie, isn't it? Monkeyzpop (talk) 18:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films January 2009 Newsletter

The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject Films newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Murder, Inc. (film)

On February 8, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Murder, Inc. (film), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky 01:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note

[1] Believe it or not, IMDb is more reliable than NNDb ever aspired to be. :) Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Husbands (film)

On February 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Husbands (film), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 20:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films February 2009 Newsletter

The February 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Coordinator nominations

DYK for The Pawnbroker (film)

On March 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Pawnbroker (film), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 03:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Coordinator Election

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Stetsonharry. You have new messages at IRP's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- IRP ☎ 19:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fourteen Hours

On March 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fourteen Hours, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 09:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films March 2009 Newsletter

The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kings Row

On April 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kings Row, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 07:42, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Reagan

I received the same treatment in an attempt to add a single sentence. It was more politically charged than what you're attempting to do, so Happyme trotted out all of the Wiki legalism he could find, shifted arguments several times, and eventually brought in some of his buddies. It was frustrating and very annoying. Good luck, but this is clearly a case in my view of WP:OWN. If you do take to another level, I'll be happy to help out. Mattnad (talk) 14:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your note. I was indeed a bit put off balance by the reversion of my edits without discussion, and the policy you cite did cross my mind. However, I am assuming good faith and hope that it can be resolved peaceably. What is at issue is, as you point out, not political in nature, except tangentially as my feeling is that the article is a teeny bit slanted against RR by denigrating his acting career. Entire books have been written about Reagan in Hollywood, and I just found one on Google Books that indicates he was one of the most popular leading men of his era.

While I can understand the WEIGHT and summary writing concerns that have been raised, my feeling is that they are not applicable in this instance and should not be used as a pretext to bar corrections or insubstantial additions that make a positive contribution to the article or rectify (unintentional, of course) distortions. What I've experienced has been, as youy say, a bit frustrating, but I am hopeful that it is all a misunderstanding and will be resolved. If not, well, there is always dispute resolution. Stetsonharry (talk) 15:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I helped in some way. I tried to approach it as diplomatically as possible but still bring in the point that the film career was the catalyst for everything that followed. Perhaps a separate article with more in-depth content about his film career would be better, but they would really need to leave the summary of it intact in the main article with the "see film career" included. It sounded as if it did help a bit. Wildhartlivie (talk) 13:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think that issue is resolved in any way, but getting the door opened by referring to it may have made the point. If it were me, and I was really interested in expanding it, I'd copy the filmography page to a subpage in your userspace and start working on that article in more detail. The main article is way too long by guidelines, so there should be little issue with expanding the filmography into its own article. If you need any assistance in getting it copied to your userspace, let me know. Wildhartlivie (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cummings with Rains in Kings Row.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Cummings with Rains in Kings Row.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image unintentionally removed by change in name of file from "Kings" to "King's." Problem fixed and image no longer orphaned. Stetsonharry (talk) 14:22, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Lovers and Lollipops

Hello! Your submission of Lovers and Lollipops at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Shubinator (talk) 02:25, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll take another look at the sources and propose a fix. Stetsonharry (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lovers and Lollipops

On May 1, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lovers and Lollipops, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 06:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films April 2009 Newsletter

The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Myhers and lindfors in weddings and babies.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Myhers and lindfors in weddings and babies.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Weddings and Babies

On May 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Weddings and Babies, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 03:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Weddings and babies opening titles.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Weddings and babies opening titles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 08:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films May 2009 Newsletter

The May 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Film article collaborations

I guess you're not aware of all the edit wars User:Collectonian starts when other people add information to articles she thinks she owns. 209.247.22.164 (talk) 16:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've had my differences with User:Collectonian, some rather sharp, but have not found her to be an edit warrior. If you have a specific problem, there are various ways of dealing with it, such as asking for a third opinion or posting on the appropriate wikiproject. Also I think that it is not a good idea in general to make specific comments about editors, as they can be considered a personal attack. Best to confine comments to the substance of the subject at hand and not whether a particular editor acts in such-and-such a fashion.

I suggest that you obtain and use a screen name. Editors who are not logged in are not always given appropriate courtesy and treatment. It's not right, but it happens. Stetsonharry (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it is not a good idea to make specific comments about editors, which is why I didn't refer to Collectonian by name on the film project talk page. However, I feel editors should be able to freely discuss whatever they want on their own talk pages without being accused of making personal attacks, as long as they're not making the comments on the talk page of the editor they're criticizing, although I also think anyone who is thin-skinned shouldn't be writing for Wikipedia! :) BTW, Collectonian's edit wars have been with many people who have screen names, not just anonymous users, so using a screen name won't necessarily change the situation. The only time I see her back off is if another film project coordinator jumps into the fray and disagrees with her, at which point she walks away from the discussion but never ever admits she was wrong. The really annoying thing is when she reverts grammar and spelling corrections, because she's very bad at both! 209.247.22.164 (talk) 16:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films June 2009 Newsletter

The June 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New stuff

New ideas that go beyond the guidelines are cropping up at Talk:Jayne Mansfield. Could you take a look? Aditya^(talk • contribs) 11:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More Jayne Mansfield

Hi, User:Aditya Kabir disagrees because I reverted a comment at the image page and has pointed me to a couple of other edits, including this edit at the talk page of another user. You were giving him a gentle warning about removing a warning message, but you may not be aware, that even though it's not seen as good form, he is allowed to remove the message. The assumption is that if he's removed it, he's also seen it. Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace includes this point "....be sure to remember that any editor—including anonymous IPs—may remove messages at will from their own talk page." Much as I believe that removing the warning can sometimes be an indication of bad faith, he can remove them if he so wishes. Also looking at the message that was removed, he was accused of vandalism. User:Wbrz is not my favourite editor, but that particular edit was not vandalism, so he can't be expected to take kindly to that kind of accusation. If the strongest action he chose to take was to remove the warning from his page, that should have been good news for everybody concerned. Rossrs (talk) 05:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quite funny assumption of bad faith. As the edit summary that evidently got him inflamed was actually auto-generated by Wikipedia:Twinkle. Funny to see how people immediately believes that if you don't agree to them you must be a very bad person indeed. Lolz. Aditya^(talk • contribs) 16:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Well that's my mistake then. I didn't realize that Twinkle was spontaneously making edits under your user name, Aditya. Bad Twinkle! Rossrs (talk) 22:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes youe mistake twice over, as twinkle didn't make the edit. It made the edit summary, including the word "vandalism", which you are complaining about. I can not see any need to twist around other people's words, apart from getting pleasure out of hurting others. Which you have done pretty successfully. Sad. Aditya^(talk • contribs) 15:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Georges Guétary

On July 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Georges Guétary, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 06:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films July 2009 Newsletter

The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:18, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2009 Newsletter

The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re:Charlie Sheen

I am fine with leaving the reassessment request. I truly considered simply downgrading the article to B Class but was concerned that someone would take exception. My thinking was that the article had been around for over a year in this condition and called a good article, so two or three more weeks wouldn't matter. Frankly, I'm more concerned with what's going on with the edit warring over the wording of the one section in the article, that one of the editors involved in the edit warring is someone whose main body of work here seems to be 9/11 conspiracy theories and what is truly undue weight being given this particular incident. It's going to end up with the article locked (rightly so, I think) and possibly a lot of dispute mediation. Not particularly something I want to be heavily involved in, acutally. Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/Election 5

Hi, you may have already noticed but WikiProject Films are currently in the process of electing a number of project coordinators to serve over the next six months. Basically, the role of a coordinator is to help keep the project active and up to date, participate in relevant project discussions and wherever possible offer guidance and help to our other members. You already seem to be fairly active within the project and your mainspace contributions look fairly solid, so I think you would make a good candidate. You can find more info at the linked page above. I hope you consider putting your name forward! :) PC78 (talk) 11:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I second the support and hope you will consider! Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 16:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really flattered, guys. I just am not sure that I have the time to do a good job. Stetsonharry (talk) 19:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The agenda is extensive, but the objectives are not those that can be done so quickly. I think above all, what we ask of a coordinator is to be an active voice in discussions, such as supporting or opposing certain proposals, outlining the reasons for your stance, and providing constructive criticism. We have not always had busy terms; WT:FILMC shows that the past term was fairly slow. Past coordinators have had different skill sets, and we ask questions of each other, so collaboration can be a learning process. :) Asking questions is the best tactic to use; I have no doubt one of us will be able to provide a good answer for you! Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 19:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILM September Election Voting

The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films September 2009 Newsletter

The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:39, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Harold Israel

On October 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Harold Israel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—Ed (talk • contribs) 23:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nelson Leigh

didn't he do the narration for the film about admiral nimitz starring james cagney? didn't he have a powerful distinctive voice and did narrations in other films? or am i thinking of someone else?

thanks, wnewbury Wnewbury (talk) 00:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS October Newsletter

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Awards box discussion

Hi. There is currently a discussion here regarding the use of navbox awards templates for Razzie Awards that partly includes the "Worst Picture" template related to WP:FILM. Your comments are very welcome. (P.S. Please note I am not canvassing. There seems to be a lot of regular contributors currently absent from Wikipedia and all comments are needed.) Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call

DYK for Edge of the City

On December 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Edge of the City, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, fellow film fan!

This is to ask for your input on Balalaika, MGM 1939. Though I'm a good editor/copy writer and have been working on it since August (09), this is my first major research project of any description, anywhere. User talk:Nehrams2020 has been kind enough to help me, and I'm hoping you will look the article over; I would really appreciate your comments and suggestions, especially additional free sources of information/photos, to round it off nicely. Thank you, Shir-El too 15:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:35, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you run for RFA?

I've been looking at your contributions, especially relating to movies, and as there is something of a shortage of admins in that area, would you consider running for RFA? I'm more than happy to nominate you GTD 15:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's flattering but I don't think I have the patience. By the way, I've been wading into some tempestuous BLP waters lately. I see that you've been around for a while and have an interest in BLPs, so I'd be curious to get an independent assessment from you on the issues I've been piling onto. Stetsonharry (talk) 15:52, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cassavetes life magazine cover.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cassavetes life magazine cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stetsonharry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was so disgusted when I saw that I was blocked by Lar, a person with whom I was engaged in a content dispute, that I decided to let it pass. I have done a great deal of good for this project and I was so disgusted that I justed wanted to do other things with my spare time. But it grated at me so I have reconsidered, and am now requesting an unblock. This block was directly contrary to WP:BLOCK, in that it was carried out by an editor (Lar) with whom I was engaged in a content dispute over the now-merged article, Robertson vs. McGraw-Hill. Lar was vehement in his support for keeping this article, which has since been merged with Tiger Management as suggested by the closing administrator in the deletion discussion. I am not the sockpuppet of any user. My contributions speak for themselves. I have carried out 3609 edits, 2450 in user space, including eleven articles that were recognized as DYKs. My contributions were such that I was recently asked to run as an administrator. I have edits to 475 unique articles, and in all my edits, taking into consideration the learning curve, I have been a positive influence. I am actually proud of my contributions to Wikipedia. There was no basis for blocking my account, it was carried out improperly, and I request that the block be lifted. Stetsonharry (talk) 21:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please appeal to the functionaries' mailing list; regular administrators cannot overrule a block based off of checkuser evidence. NW (Talk) 21:18, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stetsonharry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would respectfully suggest that the block was such an abuse of administrator tools that it is incumbent that it be lifted. In effect, Lar "buried the evidence" by blocking me, making it impossible for me to bring his abuse of his tools to the attention of the community. The template placed on my user page says "see contributions for evidence." Indeed, my contributions are evidence of a solid contributor who is no one's sockpuppet. In such an instance, this merely proves that checkuser is a flawed detection tool. I have indeed brought this to the attention of the functionaries list, but I do not believe that administrators are barred from carrying out an unblock in an instance of abuse of administrator tools by an editor engaged in a content dispute with another editor.

Decline reason:

Checkuser is usually pretty reliable. If I understand you correctly, you're saying that the real checkuser results do not connect you with User:JohnnyB256, but that User:Lar has falsely claimed that they do in order to block you for reasons related to a conflict between you. That's the sort of accusation that it wouldn't be appropriate for me to unblock based on - especially since I don't have access to the checkuser results. If you're sure that User:Lar has lied about the checkuser results in order to block you unfairly, you should take the advice above and use WP:FUNCT. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You aren't fooling anyone [redacted]. Viridae^Talk 00:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So first I'm blocked by User:Lar in an abuse of tools, and now I get the above from User:Viridae, who is an administator, posting a harassing message to this page with no possible purpose other than to harass, maliciously, and in violation of WP:OUTING. Does User:Viridae get blocked for harassment and violating WP:OUTING? Does User:Lar get sanctioned for violating the blocking policy? Stetsonharry (talk) 00:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• The edits referring to your RL name have now been suppressed per policy. I've also left a note with User:Viridae explaining why this was inappropriate, regardless of whether an editor is banned or not. Re. your block, as checkuser I see no reason to unblock your account at this time. If you wish further recourse, I suggest you refer the matter to the Arbitration Committee - Alison ^❤ 01:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aylmer and Hawkins in two headed spy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aylmer and Hawkins in two headed spy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 14:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members	Editorial LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Paperback edition of The London Cage.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Paperback edition of The London Cage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced; Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy	Editorial Opportunities for new military history articles
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants	Editorial In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 19:40, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)	Editorial In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:01, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Violent saturday publicity shot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Violent saturday publicity shot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 00:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:11, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:44, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:49, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Falk--murder inc.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Falk--murder inc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 00:51, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 21:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 00:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Dancing in the dark, from bandwagon.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dancing in the dark, from bandwagon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Coretheapple (talk) 14:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Shine on Your Shoes from The Band Wagon.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shine on Your Shoes from The Band Wagon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Coretheapple (talk) 14:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^(t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Kelly

Hi,

We are Cornell University students working on a class project that involves the editing of Wikipedia pages. We are all very new to the Wikipedia editing process, and as such we were hoping for some feedback from some more experienced editors on our edits to the Grace Kelly article. We were wondering if you could assist us by verifying our sources, which we posted [[2]] on the article's talk page. We were also hoping to make some minor changes to the structure of the article and were hoping for some input on that as well. Our plan for the new structure is as follows:

PERSONAL LIFE

Family

Marriage

Wedding

Later Years

Death

Career

Movies

Awards

Fashion

Modeling

Legacy

Style

Links to the Community

Historical Sites

Philanthropy

Our group members have the following user pages:

- dcl248

- Kategruenberg

- Mfrosselot

- CeciliaIachetta

In this link you can find our Wikipedia class page and the description of our assignment: Cornell University Online Communities (Fall 2014)

We hope to hear back from you soon! Kategruenberg (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Basehart and keith in fourteen hours.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Basehart and keith in fourteen hours.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Keith, dasilva, moorhead, douglas in fourteen hours.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keith, dasilva, moorhead, douglas in fourteen hours.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paul Douglas in Fourteen Hours.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Douglas in Fourteen Hours.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lawrence Tierney in Dillinger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lawrence Tierney in Dillinger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Oliver and sanchez in the pawnbroker.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Oliver and sanchez in the pawnbroker.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Coburn and Reagan in Kings Row.jpg

The file File:Coburn and Reagan in Kings Row.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]