en User talk:Steamerrr

December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hosur has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hosur was changed by Steamerrr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853012 on 2017-12-30T13:20:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Steamerrr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

March 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Badaga language, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kannada, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — LeoFrank ^Talk 08:17, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Gazoth. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Bangalore, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Gazoth (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Satavahana dynasty, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. utcursch | talk 13:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. This is with reference to your edits changing the Other languages to Kannada despite Kannada being listed in the official languages. Next time you continue, you are likely to be blocked from editing. — LeoFrank ^Talk 03:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Telugu language. Shellwood (talk) 02:53, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Linguisticgeek (talk) 15:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Satavahana dynasty. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 17:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Halmidi inscription. utcursch | talk 17:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to be made in good faith, but please note that you cannot use a Wikipedia article itself as a source (see WP:CIRCULAR), as you did here. Also, please don't add random blog posts as citations, as you did here -- these are not reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. utcursch | talk 17:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. utcursch | talk 16:07, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, you added unreliable sources here and here. You also cited a Wikipedia article as a source, despite being explicitly told not to do so above. Please use this week-long period to go through WP:RS. utcursch | talk 16:10, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continued disruption, disregard for WP:V policy, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rakshit Shetty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bunt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long term disruptive editing to push an agenda.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 04:29, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]