Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Sugar (Maroon 5 song)".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your actions at this article are incredibly inappropriate. You were very clearly notified of the discussion at NFCR and had a long window of time to participate, but you chose not to. So instead of working there to help form consensus, you choose to use your willful ignorance as an excuse to keep things as you prefer them? My friend, that is not how it works. I highly advise you not continue reverting unless you're willing to continue the discussion and help form consensus, otherwise you might end up with an ANI report for WP:GAMING. –Chase (talk / contribs) 19:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Chasewc91: First of all, I'm not your friend, so don't refer to me as that. I don't have to particulate in a discussion if I don't want to (not to mention I have much more important things to do). There was clearly no consensus over the matter (I did keep tabs on the discussion from time to time), whether or not I was involved in the discussion, so there was no reason for you to just go ahead with it. I don't even recall vocalizing my opinion when it comes to the covers. My revert was in you removing Pitbull from the infobox, when both him and Iggy were clearly credited as both featured artists on the single. The Pitbull version was never released to iTunes because you could already buy it as part of the album. Both were still marketed as a single, and charted using both versions. There are two single covers, and there are remixes released with both artists. You can bet that if there was consensus on the matter, I wouldn't have reverted you. Please take your empty threats elsewhere and get the hell of my talk page. Unless you would like to talk in a civil matter for once. — Status (talk · contribs) 19:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you had a problem with one aspect of my edit, then just fix that instead of reverting everything point-blank. (This is also mentioned on GAMING; see WP:STONEWALL #3.) I'll gladly leave now, but I would advise not commenting on others' civility when you're the one using phrases such as "get the hell [off]". It's just a tad hypocritical. –Chase (talk / contribs) 19:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Chasewc91: That was my personal problem with your edit, but there still was no consensus over whether or not both covers can remain in the article. You've got to give respect to get it. — Status (talk · contribs) 19:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
When all who were opposed to the cover's removal were notified of a discussion regarding it and (mostly) refused to participate, and those who did discuss agreed that only one cover should be used, that should reflect current consensus. As WP:SILENCE says, "A corollary is that if you disagree, the onus is on you to say so." –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
peer review second opinion and section comments request
@Status: Hello, I recently did a peer review of an article here, but I need a second opinion. Would you mind looking? Also, if you have the time I'd appreciate it you could could look at my peer review request here and tell me what the standard of my section is. (B, GA, FA class?) Cheers, Neuroxic (talk) 02:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
e[reply]
Hello Status. I was wondering if you could spare some time to review two articles, one for Avengers: Age of Ultron or Ant-Man. These two articles are part of a WP:GT nomination, and the peer reviews are holding up that nomination. We are hoping to get them completed by the end of the month. Any time or help you can provide to these is greatly appreciated. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Invitation!
You have been invited to join the Taylor Swift WikiProject, a WikiProject on the English Wikipedia dedicated to improving articles and lists related to Taylor Swift. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project pageand add your name to the list of participants. Thank You.
Adrenalina
HI, the song is by WISIN, not RICKY, when the labels release the song in Europe they need release with Ricky's name because Wisin isn't known but happenned time and they fixed it. LOOK AT THE LINKS AND SEE THE CREDITS OF THE SONG: Wisin feat. Ricky Martin and J Lo OR SEE Ricky Martin discography. Please don't revert my changes. - Luis Nuñez (talk) 31 March 2015 (UTC)
A site admin has already put that photo back on the page so, if you don't want it there, you should take it to the talk page.
Having said that, let's review:
1.Images that show multiple elements of the list at the same time, such as a cast shot or montage for a television show, are strongly preferred over individual images. Such an image should be provided by the copyright holder or scanned/captured directly from the copyrighted work, instead of being created from multiple non-free images by the user directly (as the "extent" of use is determined by the number and resolution of non-free images, and not the number of files.)
Doesn't apply at all.
2.Images which are discussed in detail in the context of the article body, such as a discussion of the art style, or a contentious element of the work, are preferable to those that simply provide visual identification of the elements.
See #1.
3.An image that provides a representative visual reference for other elements in the article, such as what an alien race may look like on a science-fiction television show, is preferred over providing a picture of each element discussed.
Same as #2.
4. Basically, let's just go to 5 & 6.
There is no picture of the actress on her page and she is a pretty notable character who was just involved in a high-profile murder. There's no reason why that photo shouldn't be there.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Cebr1979: What are the reasons the photo should be there? Other than the fact of showing what she looks like? A non-free image must serve a purpose, especially in lists; it is more lenient if the character has their own separate article. A relevant image would show her character doing something in an episode, with commentary on why that storyline is important to the year of 2013. — Status (talk · contribs) 04:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
She was the love of Noah's life (I don't know if you even watch the show or not so this could all be in vain but, he's a core character) and the picture did explain that. This talk has also been had through edit histories and it was decided the photo could remain so I don't see why we need to have it all over again simply because Arre9 decided (again) that she doesn't want it there. That's what talk pages are for.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Cebr1979: Please, feel free to discuss on the talk page why you believe that the image is needed then. I fail to see where "it was decided the photo could remain". — Status (talk · contribs) 04:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, in order to create more relevance, I guess we could go find a picture of her when she was just a dead body. Her murder is currently a big deal. I'll let the other users know.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker): sorry for the intrusion, but... Cebr, you are now grasping at straws trying to prove this character is relevant. She was a recurring character who was killed off because the new head writer promised not to kill off important characters. That should say enough about her alleged relevance. Secondly, you do realize that the admin who re-added the image was just carrying out standard procedure? That is no indication of any alleged decision that the weak image with a weak rationale should remain. — Arre04:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
When you say characters like Angelina Veneziano and Sam Gibson require their own pages just because you created them, Arre9, you really can't expect me to pay any attention to anything you say with the words "relevant" or "notable" in them. At least Courtney was relevant enough to be killed off so characters will talk about her again... Anyways, there will be a photo. I know you won't like that (you just said so on your talk page) but, a relevant photo will be found.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:54, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Those characters (who were regulars) are relevant enough because there were enough reliable sources to create articles in the first place. If Courtney had her own article, she would warrant an image. It's not that I "won't like that". It would be fun if Wikipedia could have unlimited non-free images. But Wiki doesn't work that way. — Arre05:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, just came to check if you've replied to my message, and I guess not, but see you've still been editing in the two days since I messaged you upon a glance from your recent contribs. I'd really appreciate sorting this difference out, instead of having to drag it to the articles talk page. Thanks, Azealia911talk10:07, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hilary Duff singles
So i can see you want to act like a snide veteran for whatever reason. Look up the definition of a single. If a song isn't on a retail copy of an album, its not a single. Deluxe albums are in stores. Fan exclusive versions that have to be bought in a specific store (or in this case off her website) do not qualify "Chasing the Sun" and "All About You" as singles. Luckily, I don't really care to fix this issue by indicating how you've undone my edits without a reason (TW is Twinkle, shows nothing) because the album is mediocre cookie cutter pop music.
Hello Status. I see you aren't very active these days. Just letting you know that I've added your name to the page linked above due to inactivity. If you ever return, just remember to remove your name from the list. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:44, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
