|
User talk:SriMesh/Archive 3
View User Page DO NOT ADD COMMENTS HERE PLEASE Did it work?I noticed your question at Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage#Make a periodic to do list. Did you try it? And did it work? The Transhumanist 19:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC) User:Sirkad/hidden barnstar
User:Onceonthisisland/prize User:The Hybrid/SPBox
User:GeneralIroh/Userboxes/Secret
User:Jonathan/Found It! User:Dillio411/hidden/bigbox
User:Chetblong/Super Secret Page/star
User:Flamingtorch372/Hidden Barnstar CardYou should be notified......Of the discussion I have posted on the Saskatchewan Roads page. This may be something you should read.Mitch32contribs 15:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your welcomeThanks a lot for your welcome, the banners and comments on George Exton Lloyd. I have no particular interest in Saskatchewan, my interest in Lloyd is family history: he is my great-grandfather. I have access to a lot of materials about him and hope to, over time, build a good article; of course the big challenge is getting past family stories and into checkable references! On the challenge of getting from "stub" to "start" class, I've upgraded the citations using templates as you suggested. Any further suggestions of where to focus my energies? Clippership (talk) 18:28, 25 December 2007 (UTC) Please take a look at the article. Most of your suggestions are executed by me and the main contributor of the article User:Devi bhakta.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 07:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC) To begin improving the quality of our stubs, it has been suggested that we delete all navigational templates. More broadly, we have to decide on various conventions, which can apply to Saskatchewan road articles; please participate at WT:CANRD if interested. –Pomte 02:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Re: BarnstarThanks. I hope to produce all the 900s-roads to better condition in the future (914 is my next target). I hardly get a barnstar so this is greatly appreciated. I'll some productions for SK Roads up in a day or two. Mitch32contribs 22:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, would you like to GA review this article too ? --Redtigerxyz (talk) 11:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Bhagavad Gita is one of those Hinduism articles that I have not worked much on. But, i nominated it as i want to work on it and i felt a GA review will help it be better, just like a peer review. I did not use peer review because the response i got there for Shaktism was an automated review. Thats it. I have addressed some of your concerns about MOS, images, refs. Please strike out the issues that you think are resolved. I also have few queries (left as a note on the talk) about the modifications. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. When using {{cite web}}, the accessdate field should be entered as 2008-01-04 and not January 4, 2008, otherwise it gets redlinked in the references. Regards, — BillC talk 02:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Hi Julia. I have undertaken a rewrite and reorganization of content on the Willowgrove article. Since you created it recently, I didn't want to just arbitrarily overwrite it without getting your feedback first. The new page is currently here - I would appreciate your comments. -Drm310 (talk) 08:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks for your feedback on the article! I have made the changes and logged it on the Talk:List of neighbourhoods in Saskatoon page. -Drm310 (talk) 04:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC) Thank youThank you for the mention in the SK newsletter. I hope that banner consolidation will result in better article exposure. --Qyd (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC) University of Saskatchewan has an Image:Sylvia Fedoruk.jpg on it that was working correctly, and I am missing someting as it is showing code in the article and not the image.SriMesh | talk 04:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Sri, I don't question Emily Carr's notability. But the quotations don't mention BC. How do you know they're about BC? You got them from ThinkExist, Who Said and someone's blog, none of which include a source we could check. (By the way, since you do not actually have a citation from a specific work, these quotes are considered unsourced by wikiquote standards. Just because you think you know who said it doesn't mean it's sourced). If you have better sources that prove these statements are about BC, by all means include them. The other two quotations aren't really notable, they're just tourism and investor propaganda. But that's just my opinion. Others may not see it that way. If I were you, I would put my arguments in the vote for deletion thread. Currently you are only defending the layout, which is fine. You need to address (in that forum) my charge that the page lacks content. --ubiquity (talk) 04:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
|
