User talk:Sparkgap

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Sparkgap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Mountains-to-Sea Trail‎. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CutOffTies (talk) 02:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

North Carolina State Parks

Thanks for taking an interest in editing the state parks of North Carolina. I have been working on these and many other state parks for some time now and am happy to have someone else working on the NC state parks. Your edits look really good so far. If you want to reply, please reply on my talk page. Dincher (talk) 19:39, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on the List of North Carolina state parks is pretty impressive. Have you looked at List of Pennsylvania state parks? It is a featured list. I wish I had more time to contribute, but life is very busy these days. Dincher (talk) 13:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take a look at this picture and confirm whether or not it is in Haw River State Park? According to Flickr it is. I don't remember where I got the other one. It was probably from Flickr but was just the Haw River. Gerry D (talk) 01:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That picture does look very much like the board-walk at Haw River State Park. I think it likely is, but I don't see enough detail to be 100% sure. If that image has GPS coordinates, which I was unable to find, that would help place it firmly in the park. –Sparkgap (talk) 02:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see coordinates either. Its placement on the map makes me really think it's in the park. It appears to be just upstream from a lake and is near Conference Center Drive. The conference center is what is being converted into the park. Do you live closeby and could you get a picture? Gerry D (talk) 13:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
After that description, I looked at the flickr map again and discovered I was automatically disabling a script that would allow me to zoom in to the location. Anyway, after looking at a zoomed in map, the image location is within GPS error of where the board walk should be, and that lake is a major park feature. I'm now confident the image is from the park's boardwalk.
As far as getting a picture, I'm sure I have several suitable ones of different parts of the park. I would just have to find it. I have taken a plethora of photographs from every protected area I have visited, but I've never fully organized my collection of digital photos. I've also not uploaded a photo to Wikicommons yet, nor read about how to do so. –Sparkgap (talk) 23:37, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to categories

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that you can link directly to categories and files by adding a colon to the beginning of a link, as I've done here. You don't have to copy and paste the entire URL. --Gyrobo (talk) 00:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I thought there might be a way, but I didn't quickly find out how. –Sparkgap (talk) 02:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Protected areas

Hi Sparkgap, and welcome to WikiProject Protected areas! The project has been somewhat sleepy lately, but I hope that activity can be increased considerably through a number of initiatives. I'm thinking that maybe a Portal might be useful. I also advanced two proposals to speed up assessments and to set up the popular pages tool for the WikiProject. Your thoughts on these proposals would be welcome. --Elekhh (talk) 00:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Leave No Trace

I believe that the recent move of Leave No Trace to Leave No Trace (organization) does not have consensus. Please join the discussion at Talk:Leave No Trace (organization)#Reverting move to Leave No Trace (organization). Thanks! —hike395 (talk) 01:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

136kHz

You have moved 136 kHz to 2200-meter band with no prior discussion as far as I can see. The only consensus I can see is a Wikipedia consensus. In the UK, as the first country to gain an allocation, the band is ALWAYS referred to as 136kHz. I only see it referred to as 2200m in the USA, a country that still has not got access to that band. I am tempted to revert these changes. Dsergeant (talk) 05:47, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Amateur radio discussed this issue while ago, and it is referred to under the announcements:
 All amateur band articles moved from the form "x meters" or "x centimeters" to "x-meter band" or "x-centimeter band"
  • The discussion called for standardizing all the amateur radio bands under a name format to deal with problems of every band article using a regional name (EG: 4 metres vs 4 meters vs 4 metre band vs 4 meters band vs 4 metre ham band, etc). I don't know why, but the 136 kHz / 2200 meter band seemed to be forgotten. The discussion is here.
  • I didn't post anything on the talk page because I thought the mater was settled by the WikiProject and hence non-controversial. I also thought the article had become neglected and unwatched due to how few edits had been made to it in years and how out-of-date some of the information in it had become. If I had thought anyone might have raised issue with the name change, I would have left the name alone and asked about changing it on the talk page, with a reference to the prior WikiProject discussion.
  • As an aside, the US is not the only place that refers to the band as 2200 meters: IARU region 1, Belgian ham page
  • And on a minor-note, amateur radio operators in the US do have "access" to the band, via experimental licenses, but there is not an allocation to the amateur radio service in the US. Though I feel this is irrelevant to what the article's name should be.
–Sparkgap (talk) 06:57, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comments, and the link to the old discussion - which I see I commented on 3 years ago... I am still not really in favour of the change and I think it would be useful if you opened a discussion on the talk page, that has long been on my watch list. I used to be active on 136kHz some years ago, also 500kHz. Your edits to Amateur radio frequency allocations also seem to have raised some objections. 73 Dave G3YMC Dsergeant (talk) 10:37, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, I will open a discussion on the article's talk page soon, unless you meant the WikiProject's talk page. I also noticed the talk on Amateur radio frequency allocations, and I think only one sentence was objected to. I had already replied to that, and I see the concern. 73 –Sparkgap (talk) 02:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I opened a discussion on the article's talk page, and I referred to it on the WikiProject's talk page. -Sparkgap (talk) 23:23, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For protecting Wilkes County! CutOffTies (talk) 01:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, CutOffTies. I didn't know a Barnstar for Anti-Vandalism existed.  :) –Sparkgap (talk) 09:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

North Carolina International Port

If there were available facts (rather than opinions) supporting or justifying the construction of the proposed port, they would be cited in the article. If you look at the history of the piece, the only alternate viewpoints have been wholesale bulk erasures without providing any factual statements or references. Your negative citations at the top of the article are inappropriate.Skyler69 (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)Skyler69[reply]


Opinions deleted. Reference links reduced (mostly, where possible) to only independent sources. More pro-port info added (independent pro-port references are very limited). Bias still leans anti-port, but independent references in support of the port are scarce. Wikiedit2228 (talk) 19:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Wikiedit2228[reply]

Edits by Ballard47 to Alcoa Power Generating Inc.

I started a discussion here. Perhaps I should have done that before adding anything, but the edits I made were the ones I thought would work.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 23-centimeter band, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WARC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 600-meter amateur radio band, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RSGB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sparkgap. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amateur radio.
Message added 22:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I don't want to spam you, but I think this is important, and would like to know your opinion. WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 22:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SUL

This is a confirmation note that I am interested in unifying my accounts, and I think I unwittingly complicated things by creating fr:user:Sparkgap2. The documents on how to resolve this mater are confusing. -–Sparkgap (talk) 01:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amateur radio repeater, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Band, SSB and CW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki 60 meter band page - You hold an Anti-Vandalism Barnstar ?

You hold an Anti-Vandalism Barnstar ? That's a joke ! Not content with changing my text in the Amateur Radio Bands Template page concerning ITU Radio Regulation 4.4, which, together with its link to ITU is perfectly clear and is far more accurate than your replacement wording, you now proceed to decimate the External Links section, abusing the Wikistyle 'rules' to do so.

Needless to say I have re-instated it.

Why is it that the 60 meter band page can remain in a stable state for something like 6 months - nobody complains - and then you come along and start messing about with it? You don't make any positive contributions of new material, (or material from your own country, for that matter) - just negativity all the time. If that isn't vandalism, I don't know what is.

This page has now become a well-respected, accurate piece of encyclopaedic work and one of the sources used and quoted by IARU. Your actions are not just upsetting me, but doing a disservice to Amateur Radio itself. I presume you're active on 5 MHz/60m ? And have a callsign (instead of hiding behind the Username of 'SparkGap')?

Paul Gaskell (G4MWO) Paul Gaskell (talk) 04:22, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of North Carolina state forests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Theodore Roosevelt State Natural Area was accepted

Theodore Roosevelt State Natural Area, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Georgia (U.S. state) hiking trails template help!

Hi,

Thanks for the quick (and easy) fix! I didn't realize that the name field was an active variable to the Navbox template - so apologies for asking for help before checking out the Navbox documentation. Should have done that first.

So you are saying that I can replace:

| name = Georgia (U.S. state) hiking trails

with just:

| name = {{subst:PAGENAME}}


Thanks Roswell native (talk) 17:43, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Blood Mountain Wilderness
added a link pointing to Black bear
Shining Rock Wilderness
added a link pointing to Black bear

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi, There Sparkgap! I noticed you are a member of the Protected areas wiki project. I was wondering if you could help with an article? I have been wanting to make an article on Rocky Fork State Park (Tennessee) in Unicoi and Greene Counties in Tennessee. Could you help me? --ACase0000 (talk) 11:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Also according to a story published today in the Greeneville Sun the park is/will be 9,800 acres. Do you think that should be added? --ACase0000 (talk) 15:48, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of National Wild and Scenic Rivers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hood River, Fish Creek and Fifteenmile Creek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 3 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sparkgap. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sparkgap. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sparkgap. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mountain Bogs National Wildlife Refuge) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mountain Bogs National Wildlife Refuge.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Barbara (WVS)}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Best Regards, Barbara ✐✉ 23:26, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of NC State University forests for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of NC State University forests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NC State University forests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gorges State Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to get WikiProject Amateur Radio back on the air!

Hi, I'm Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) and I'm currently doing my best to resurrect the amateur radio WikiProject. A lot of the articles need some serious work and so I'm trying to organize an article improvement drive in October. If you're interested check out the link to the drive and the project page. Right now everything is in the planning stages, trying to find people interested, articles to focus on, etc. So if you know anyone who would like to help out feel free to invite them! If you no longer interested in this project that's a-ok just remove yourself from the list on the project page and I'll never badger you again. 73! Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 00:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gateway Station (Charlotte), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interim.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]