User talk:Spacepotato/Archive 6

AfD nomination of Regions of Asia

An article that you have been involved in editing, Regions of Asia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regions of Asia. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 08:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox constellation

Hello Spacepotato, we should discuss the issues about the number of nearby stars and nearest star in infobox constellation. We'll discuss it in Template talk:Infobox constellation#Nearby stars in infobox. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 20:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Email's out. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 14:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Syncategoremata/Draft. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The e-mail notice was welcome as I've been off-wiki for a while. Re the problem discussed in the draft, I assembled some evidence some time ago in User:Spacepotato/Examples of original research in Wikipedia. Spacepotato (talk) 21:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great! You are absolutely welcome. I am happy for you joining us. Another email is out. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 10:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a couple of examples from your User:Spacepotato/Examples of original research in Wikipedia page but I've lost the energy to copy everything across. If it's okay with you, could I also add a direct link from the RfC/U to that page (and to your User:Spacepotato/Misuse of sources page)?

Many thanks for this and all the best. –Syncategoremata (talk) 22:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, certainly. Spacepotato (talk) 23:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFC discussion of User:Jagged 85

A request for comments has been filed concerning the conduct of Jagged 85 (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jagged 85. -- Syncategoremata (talk) 17:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay but I've been meaning to thank you for signing the closing summary to this RfC/U. I'm glad that it is now behind us and I hope we never have to go through something like that again.

All the best. –Syncategoremata (talk) 21:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Original Intel Pentium (P5 microarchitecture)#Requested move

There is a proposal to rename Original Intel Pentium (P5 microarchitecture) to P5 (microarchitecture). Since you have recently been active on this topic please add your comments and show your support (for or against). Thank you. Uzume (talk) 00:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 21:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move of tauon and tauon neutrino

Hello, the move of tauon to tau (particle) and tauon neutrino to tau neutrino was unilaterally reverted after the discussion was closed, I have therefore reopened the discussion here. Icalanise (talk) 18:12, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]