en User talk:Slovenski Volk Archive 7

Origin of national identities

Hi Hxseek! How are things going? I keep running into conflicts with Croatian nationalists who seem to be the most persistent of the bunch. I keep reiterating the same arguments on the origins of the Croatian nation and identity, and it's annoying. I'm losing too much time I want to dedicate to other more productive things, so I'd like to have it somewhere summarized so that it can easily be invoked in discussions. Do you think wee need an article, or even better a series of articles for every European nation, that specifically deal with origins of modern-day national identities? I couldn't find any central place to discuss that and related issues are usually dispersed among disparate sections of unrelated articles. It could be inserted as a subtopic inside the {{Europe topic}} template. I'd like the summarize the conclusions from Fine's great boook but can't seem to find the place... --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 14:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't talk to Arbcom (don't even know the procedure). Yes they are all more or less brainwashed but they can be educated. Think about it: if someone can be indoctrinated with "bad" ideology, they can also be indoctrinated with "good" ideology! Well, perhaps not them but their kids (this is where wiki comes into play), but the principle still holds. Here it's all about collecting sources and if they persist if POV pushing just report them and au revoir. I've looked into your case but don't understand why you were banned from editing at all. Next time just use talk page to announce your modifications to articles. I think I'll compile something for Croats from Fine, Kordić and Bukowski, they would be good for start. I keep running away from these topics but they always somehow pop up. When you leave such articles on their own they inevitably get corrupted but POV pushers. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see thought police has warned you again.. So much for "free" encyclopedia when you are not even allowed to make talk page discussions about a topic. I'm puzzled by these measures because you can always circumvent them by editing under IP for the rest of your life. In any case, sorry for getting you into trouble, cheers! --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

Hi, another admin brought to my attention your recent edits to ANI. Since you were mentioned by name, I don't have a problem with you responding to questions or comments directed at you personally, but engaging in discussion about Balkans-related articles is arguably a violation of your topic ban. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt this time, but in future, I would recommend you consider the scope of the topic ban to include discussion of Balkans topics anywhere on Wikipedia. If you're unsure about whether an edit would violate the topic ban, ask me or another admin. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New R1a spatial distribution maps by Underhill et al. 2014

Hello Slovenski_Volk, can you create copies of these two R1a spatial frequency maps (Z282 and Z93)? This would be nice. Kind regards. --Mountaindwellerman (talk) 12:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Slovenski Volk

There are no discussion threads at ARE except for the section used by administrators. Please keep your comments to your own section of the appeal, do not post in other editor's sections. Thank you. 19:49, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement appeal

Per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Slovenski Volk, your editing restrictions have been lifted. Happy editing, but please be careful and never engage in edit-warring.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48h for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Apparently, you have learnt nothing from the editing restricions. Lifting of the sanctions should not be considered as a permission to immediately start edit-warring. Further blocks will be of increasing duration.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Slovenski Volk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not necessarily wishing to appeal; but I want to note I did one revert; then discussed on the talk page. Is this an 'edit war' ?Slovenski Volk (talk) 08:12, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree with the below, and since you removed another editor's comments wholesale, I'd count the first of those edits as a revert, too. Huon (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.