User talk:Slivicon

Welcome!

Hello, Slivicon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Jeraphine (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Jeraphine Slivicon (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vine copula

Hello.

I've done some edits on the article titled Vine copula to bring it closer to the norms of WP:MOS. In particular:

  • Vine Copulas is an inappropriate title for two reason: the capitalization of the initial C, and the use of the plural. Wikipedia articles don't do that. I changed the title accordingly.
  • Similarly one does not capitalize initial letters merely because they are in a section heading.
  • The introductory section should not have a section heading.
  • Usually the title phrase should appear in the first sentence. I haven't changed that. Perhaps after pondering it a bit, I will rewrite it in a way that does that and explains at the outset to the lay reader that mathematics is what it is about.

Michael Hardy (talk) 05:01, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael Hardy: I was just doing some Wikignoming on that page, so whatever you feel is appropriate :) --Slivicon (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Church Building categories

Hi, I've noticed from my watch list that you have changed several articles from Category:13th-century religious buildings to Category:13th-century church buildings. I note the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 May 1#Churches/Church buildings has not yet been resolved and wonder if there is much point in making these changes until the naming issue is resolved?— Rod talk 19:48, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodw: Category:13th-century religious buildings is a container cat for categories only, not articles. They must be moved to a subcat. If you have a more appropriate subcat in mind, your assistance is appreciated. --Slivicon (talk) 19:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would just wait until that debate is resolved otherwise they may need to be done again.— Rod talk 19:55, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bots


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actors from Louisville, Kentucky move

I'm not sure why this category was moved. Its new naming is nothing like all the other similar categories, so why is this one being singled out? I hope this wasn't done for disruptive purposes to prove some point about containers (which isn't true, by the way). Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:14, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevietheman: It wasn't singled out or to disrupt, I'm working on container categories A-Z. There are too many categories which are tagged as containers but either should not be containers or do not clearly indicate what they contain and leave room for articles to be categorized within as a result. The move is to improve the clarity of the container definition. --Slivicon (talk) 22:18, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, if you want to be insistent about this, at least change (or plan to change soon) all the other actor from city categories to match because they generally have the same subcategories. Otherwise, this one will stick out like a sore thumb, and then another editor will toy with it. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:23, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Stevietheman: Actually, if you're insistent about "all the others", "all the others" are not set as container categories, for example, Category:Actors_from_Waukegan,_Illinois. If you like the old name, remove the container tag. I am working on container categories, so no other "Actors from ..." categories showed up in my list. In effect, your category stuck out like a sore thumb in my container categories list. I wouldn't rename the others, because they are not container categories. They make sense as is, categories with articles related to the category. --Slivicon (talk) 22:27, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Effectively, many of them are containers. A container tag is to notify people about that fact. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 23:36, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Stevietheman: What about doing something like using {{catdiffuse}} instead of {{container}} with the old cat name? --Slivicon (talk) 22:49, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's a container and no articles would naturally go into it. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 23:36, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevietheman: Someone left me a message that I'm supposed to use CFD for category moves, I thought that was only if it was controversial. So, I'm going to revert as I wasn't aware of this. --Slivicon (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is controversial (for I disagree with it), and I was going to have to start a CfD or move discussion for the community to help decide it if this wasn't ameliorated one way or the other. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 23:36, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Stevietheman: Well you don't need to worry about that, now, as I would not put it up on CFD, because I think the actual issue is that this cat is the only one out of all of the other cats by similar name that has {{container}} in it, so it's inconsistent. Changing it's name so that it can continue to have container in it (wrongly in my opinion based on all the dozens of others of its kind) is not really the way to go, and the community would probably agree the name should stay. I see you feel strongly that it should have container in it, even though no other like it does, but that's what is so great about a wiki, everyone is entitled to their opinion. It's not something I care about enough to argue about, though. I made an attempt to improve, it was resisted and found not to be improving, I move on. Someone else who cares more can take it on if they so choose. :) --Slivicon (talk) 23:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion

Hi, I can see that the move you made to Category:American speculative fiction writers by genre is sensible, and probably has no ill effects in this case, but please use the process at WP:CFD for moving categories in future. – Fayenatic London 23:04, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Fayenatic london:I wasn't aware that category moves had to go to CFD, so I'll keep that in mind now, thank you. --Slivicon (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers! – Fayenatic London 23:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the rename does have some (small) ill effects. If you look at Category:American fiction writers or Category:Speculative fiction writers you'll see that this category now has a name that's inconsistent with, for example, Category:British speculative fiction writers. The British category also contains an article that shows there can be writers that don't neatly fit into a particular genre. Hence, IMO, it would be best to put the category back to its original name. I think the Container tag should be removed from this category (a Container tag may be appropriate for a category like US-senators-by-state, but categorizing writers by genre is much "messier").
P.S. Please don't be put off working to improve the category structure. DexDor (talk) 20:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@DexDor: Would you be interested to please help facilitate that revert, as I have noticed that I could not move back a category, since it appears the soft redirect left behind is not considered by the system when it checks to see if I can move it back (as in if I could move back a page if it is only a "normal" redirect and no edit history). It says I don't have permission. I could manually move the content back, but then that doesn't move the edit history back. --Slivicon (talk) 22:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like an administrator (FL?) has already moved it back to Category:American speculative fiction writers. I was about to remove the Container tag, but then I found that it was added as a result of this discussion so it'd be best to discuss it on the talk page before removing the Container tag. DexDor (talk) 05:14, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@DexDor: Thanks for your time and efforts :) --Slivicon (talk) 14:26, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're doing a great job. Just one comment on your edit summaries: you say "Removed Category:X using HotCat = container cat, already in subcat Y", but I don't think it's necessary to refer to the category being a container category. The relevant guideline, WP:SUBCAT, applies whether the parent category is a container or not. DexDor (talk) 20:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@DexDor: Thank you for the encouragement. I was unsure, as I know some people seem to want articles in both the subcat and the parent cat. Does that only apply if the parent cat has been tagged as "non-diffusing"? I'll go read that WP:SUBCAT you mentioned again. --Slivicon (talk) 20:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Argentine female high jumpers

Category:Argentine female high jumpers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 20:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Container

The container tag in australian cats, and various states that do not have a clean empty cat - does not mean the removal of the tag! the logic is reversed when you do that. The container tag is to specifically address the people who do go to the cat that there is an article that needs to be taken out and re-catted, not the tag!!! JarrahTree 00:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: Feel free to reinstate where you want it, as nobody seems to have consensus on this topic from what I've seen so far in talking about it - mainly I'm finding container categories where articles will not fit in existing subcats, and many categories would need to be created with few articles, rather than going with that it's not a container cat by "definition". I actually tried that approach as well (creating the missing subcats and putting the articles in), and the categories got swiftly called up for deletion by people. So far, I've found people very inconsistent in their definition of what is a container and what is not and when it should be removed and when it should not. I've already had several people telling me to "obviously remove it as it is obviously not a container", when I have not seen what makes it "obvious". Then people like you saying never to remove a container tag. So, I just make a judgement call as I go along, since nobody seems to have a clear, agreed upon definition. --Slivicon (talk) 01:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JarrahTree: Also, feel free to weigh in your $0.02 at this discussion --Slivicon (talk) 01:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JarrahTree: Also, might I suggest for the ones you feel should be put back, that you put in a comment tag and possibly talk page, something to the effect that "there are articles here which should not be here, they need to be taken out of the category and re-categorized, and this is a container category that should not have any articles in it because blah blah blah", or something along those lines, to avoid a future repeat and bring clarity to the cat. --Slivicon (talk) 01:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for going to the time to explain. Inconsistencies abound. One has to be very philiosophical, and also be aware that some policies and precedents may have been established years ago, but practice is different from the actual rules. In the very early days there was a mantra 'ignore all rules' in more recent years people will fight to the death over some established practices that have no clear policy or practice to follow.
It all goes back to category trees, and where some enthusiastic editors create parallel trees, and also forget to check alternatives when creating new trees or bunches or whatever. Just remember the real world is full of paradoxes, contradictions and counter intuitive behaviours, wikipedia is no different  :( JarrahTree 01:37, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indigenous peoples of the Americas by century

Category:Indigenous peoples of the Americas by century, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 23:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Navigational boxes

This one really is a genuine container category - fairly obvious really.

I cleared out something like 130 templates from this cat some time ago, and regularly remove the odd one or two new ones that creep in. We're basically left with {{Navbox}} and its siblings, which should indeed be recategorized I left them for a while, as there are one or two other subcats there that are not quite right, and it is best to consider the whole lot together. Quite likely that some discussion will be required to decide the best approach.

It is importaant that {{Container category}} should remain, so that editors don't inadvertently add templates to this cat, and so that any new ones are promptly removed.

--NSH002 (talk) 07:16, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NSH002: Speaking of "obvious", how can Category:Navigational boxes be a container with articles? By definition it says right on it, only subcats. Are you planning to create subcats for the remaining articles, otherwise catdiffuse is the appropriate choice if and until you get around to subcategorizing as you mentioned. --Slivicon (talk) 13:07, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Simple, it's the top-level cat for all navboxes, so it can hardly be anything other than a container cat. The handful of templates (not articles) remaining there can and should be removed from the cat; the reason they haven't (yet) been recategorized is that it will take a bit of work to do so, which might entail some discussion first. And yes, that might (or might not) mean creating one or two additional subcats. If I were to do this, I would want to spend some time thinking it through first, time which (for now) I would rather spend on other matters; meanwhile a handful of templates that are slightly miscategorized don't bother me that much. --NSH002 (talk) 17:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NSH002:Well, semantics aside, it's still a category that has a big banner that says "contain only categories" and it does not, case and point. Still, I've made my suggestion as part of my effort to clean up container category misuse/misrepresentation, it is now in the edit history and explained here; it was undone and I've no desire to press the issue further, I leave it to someone who cares more about the category in particular to be more aggressively interested in correcting the category so it actually reflects the statement it includes in its banner. --Slivicon (talk) 20:10, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion continued at Category talk:Navigational boxes. --NSH002 (talk) 07:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sort keys

I don't think these sort keys make sense[1][2] as they're books known by their full name – czar 23:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: OK, undone. Slivicon (talk) 00:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

US mil user cats

I saw your message on Buaidh's talk. If users wish to associate themselves with the US Military in general rather than (or as well as - I don't think the corresponding violation of WP:SUBCAT is a problem) with a particular branch then that's fine (like I have a UK userbox rather than an England userbox). Thus, the template (and the similar User:UBX/US military veteran which populates another category that's currently tagged as a container category) is fine. The solution in this case is to remove the container tag from these categories. A subcat "Wikipedians in the United States Armed Forces by branch" could be created with a container tag, but I don't see a need for such a category. DexDor (talk) 02:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DexDor: Sounds good to me. --Slivicon (talk) 03:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization of Crime in US States articles

Hi Slivicon,

I noticed you just removed all of the "Crime in state" articles from Category:Crime in the United States by state. I don't think I agree with that change. Those articles all seem like they should be peers of each other in a categorical hierarchy, so I think it would be best for all of those articles to be in a category together. I think those should be placed back in Category:Crime in the United States by state and the category page should be modified to not use the "container category" template. Instead, I think it should use the "allincluded" template and state that those categories summarizing crime in the state as a whole are all in both the crime by state category and one of the subcategories. I think that would be best both in terms of aiding navigation and in having articles that are peers be in a category together. Calathan (talk) 20:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Calathan: I respectfully disagree on all counts. It's a clear issue of WP:SUBCAT (articles should be in the most specific subcategory). Each article is already a member of the state subcategory in Category:Crime in the United States by state, there is no need for them to also be in the parent category Category:Crime in the United States by state. On top of that, Category:Crime in the United States by state is a container category, and a valid one. It is grouping articles by state subcategory, the container tag should not be removed (and as such, additionally, no articles should be directly categorized in a container category). If you really feel strongly about it, go ahead and do what you wish, as I do not engage in edit warring, but I stand by my reasoning. Slivicon (talk) 21:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are many situations where it is appropriate to have pages be in a category and a subcategory of that category. The template Template:All included exists specially to be used in such cases. Basically, whenever it is logical and convenient (in terms of aiding navigation), pages should appear in both a category and a subcategory. Take for example Category:Bridges in New York City, one of the examples listed at Template:All included. Of course all bridges in Queens or Manhattan are also in New York City, yet they are listed in both Category:Bridges in New York City and categories like Category:Bridges in Manhattan because that way of categorizing the pages is more convenient for navigation. There are many thousands of articles that are in both a category and a subcategory, and where that is accepted usage, so just referring to WP:SUBCAT isn't a good enough explanation of why you think an exception shouldn't be made for these articles. To me this seems like exactly the right place for an exception to be made, as it aids navigation and groups articles that are peers together into a category. About the category being a container catgory, I'm saying it shouldn't be one, because again I think it would aid navigation to have the category include some articles. Calathan (talk) 21:36, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Calathan: Yes, I'm aware of {{allincluded}} and those situations. I simply don't agree that this is the same. A more similar category would be Category:Bridges by country, where there is a clear subcat scheme in place grouping articles by country subcategory. There are countless other "x by state" categories similarly constructed. I would agree with your navigation reason if there weren't already state subcats created, illustrating a very well defined use of {{container category}} and a clear situation of WP:SUBCAT. I simply don't find this is a situation where {{allincluded}} and removing the container tag is anything but destructive to what the editors who started this were working towards. Slivicon (talk) 21:49, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
About "what the editors who started this were working towards", the same editor who made the first edit to Category:Crime in the United States by state ia the one who added a lot of the individual articles to that category, so he or she apparently didn't intend for it to be a container category. Calathan (talk) 22:04, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Calathan: I would recommend you take your argument to Project:WikiProject United States where you may be able to get consensus or perhaps better feedback than from me, as there should be people there with a strong interest in the subject matter. I've been working very closely with container categories for a while now exclusively, as well as WP:SUBCAT, and from the hundreds of categories and thousands of edits so far, this is something I've seen a great many times already - a very clear case of WP:SUBCAT and proper use of container, so if you don't simply want to proceed on your own with the changes you're interested in making, you'll need to go elsewhere (such as that wikiproject) to discuss. (I doubt I would be trying to stop you, as that's not how I operate - my work is in the edit history, I leave it at that - if someone else comes along and wants to do something different, that's up to them) Best of luck. Slivicon (talk) 21:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'll ask for opinions there. Calathan (talk) 22:04, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Byrne (author)

More of a general cue sports history writer, and also a pool-specific instructional writer. The HTML comment at the article about how to categorize him was inaccurate.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  00:45, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SMcCandlish: Alright, that means the cat needs to be non-container. Slivicon (talk) 01:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, fixed it the other day.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  01:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SMcCandlish: I meant Category:Cue_sports_writers_and_broadcasters - I just removed container, due to Robert Byrne and the others being directly in the cat. Slivicon (talk) 01:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I must be thinking of another one. I rm'd container cat tag from another of these the other day (another one where we're not likely to ever have enough entries to justify a separate carom subcat).  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  01:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion

Hi, thanks for adding a CFD template to Category:Wikipedians who like Boondocks. When you do this, you also have to start a discussion, following the instructions that appear within the template. I've changed the template to a speedy version and done this now. Drop me a note if you ever need help with CFD. – Fayenatic London 22:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Fayenatic london: Thanks very much for the help and guidance. Slivicon (talk) 23:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to rename categories

Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:16th-century Irish physicians and Category:17th-century Irish physicians Hugo999 (talk) 11:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Businesspeople by century also men by century

Please see my proposal to delete categories Category:19th-century businessmen or Category:19th-century male military personnel. and to upmerge/rename Category:16th-century English merchants and Category:17th-century Dutch merchants. Hugo999 (talk) 10:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of categories

Please see my revised proposal to delete or delete and upmerge:

Category:19th-century businessmen (upmerge)
Category:19th-century male military personnel (delete). Hugo999 (talk) 11:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed renaming of category

Please see my proposal to rename Category: 20th-century MPs of the United Kingdom House of Commons, by Parliament to Category: 20th-century British politicians, which will no longer be a "container” category". Hugo999 (talk) 12:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of Categories

Please see my proposal to merge Category:Ukrainian medical doctors into Category:Ukrainian physicians Hugo999 (talk) 23:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Slivicon!

Happy New Year!

Slivicon,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 16:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to user talk pages.

Dear Slivicon,
Thank you once again for helping me back in August, and have a great New Year!
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 16:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pdebee: Thank you, and to you as well :) --Slivicon (talk) 18:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Family law by religion

As you added a containerize template in Category:Family law by religion, could you indicate here whether or not you agree with renaming the category to Category:Family law in religion? Because this rename would deliberately decontainerize the category. Thanks for your cooperation. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Slivicon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Slivicon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to rename category Ukrainian medical doctors

Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Ukrainian medical doctors to Category:Ukrainian physicians Hugo999 (talk) 08:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:11th-century Norman people has been nominated for discussion

Category:11th-century Norman people, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization of Japanese Weekend School of New York

Hi, Slivicon! I noticed back in 2016 that Japanese Weekend School of New York was categorized as "Private elementary school", "Private middle school", and "private high school".

I understand that this is a weekend school and not a full-time day school, and I'm wondering whether those categories should have weekend schools or not. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:38, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of people by association has been nominated for discussion

Category:Lists of people by association, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Slivicon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:User sul

A tag has been placed on Category:User sul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:12th-century Afghan people

A tag has been placed on Category:12th-century Afghan people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:World War I merchant ships of Austria-Hungary

A tag has been placed on Category:World War I merchant ships of Austria-Hungary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Peninsulas of New Hampshire

A tag has been placed on Category:Peninsulas of New Hampshire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century male conductors (music) has been nominated for merging

Category:19th-century male conductors (music) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cratstats/doc

Template:Cratstats/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century Albanian military personnel has been nominated for splitting

Category:19th-century Albanian military personnel has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Albanian sportspeople has been nominated for merging

Category:20th-century Albanian sportspeople has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Albanian sports coaches has been nominated for merging

Category:20th-century Albanian sports coaches has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century Albanian sportspeople has been nominated for merging

Category:21st-century Albanian sportspeople has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century Albanian sports coaches has been nominated for splitting

Category:21st-century Albanian sports coaches has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Dahomeyan people has been nominated for merging

Category:20th-century Dahomeyan people has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:12, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Spanish Guinean people has been nominated for merging

Category:20th-century Spanish Guinean people has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century Spanish Guinean people has been nominated for merging

Category:19th-century Spanish Guinean people has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of fictional superhuman characters has been nominated for renaming

Category:Lists of fictional superhuman characters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century Albanian sports coaches has been nominated for splitting

Category:21st-century Albanian sports coaches has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Albanian sports coaches has been nominated for splitting

Category:20th-century Albanian sports coaches has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century Albanian models has been nominated for splitting

Category:21st-century Albanian models has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Albanian models has been nominated for splitting

Category:20th-century Albanian models has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:15th-century Soninke people has been nominated for merging

Category:15th-century Soninke people has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:User pli

A tag has been placed on Category:User pli indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:User sou-3

A tag has been placed on Category:User sou-3 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:16th-century Malay people has been nominated for splitting

Category:16th-century Malay people has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:18th-century Xhosa people has been nominated for merging

Category:18th-century Xhosa people has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 15 § X by ethnic or national origin

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 15 § X by ethnic or national origin on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 20 § Buildings and structures completed by year, before 1000

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 20 § Buildings and structures completed by year, before 1000 on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Asian Games competitors by year has been nominated for deletion

Category:20th-century Asian Games competitors by year has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Commonwealth Games competitors by year has been nominated for deletion

Category:20th-century Commonwealth Games competitors by year has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Olympic competitors by year has been nominated for deletion

Category:20th-century Olympic competitors by year has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:18th-century Kongo people has been nominated for splitting

Category:18th-century Kongo people has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century Kongo people has been nominated for merging

Category:19th-century Kongo people has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:10th-century Somali people has been nominated for renaming

Category:10th-century Somali people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:11th-century Somali people has been nominated for renaming

Category:11th-century Somali people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 7 § Category:Buildings and structures by decade of destruction

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 7 § Category:Buildings and structures by decade of destruction on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 17:36, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]