User talk:Sliv812


Welcome!

Here are some cookies to welcome you! :D
Welcome to Wikipedia, Sliv812! I am NAHID, and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

NAHID 20:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas List

Oversight on my part. I was redirecting the shorter articles on Grant's non-charting singles, and I didn't notice the further assertations of notability on that one. The fact that Kelly Clarkson's version charted is probably enough for it to stay. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:43, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding feedback

No problem. When adding feedback to a discussion about the deletion or merge of a page, it's customary at the beginning of your comment to include * Keep / * Delete (for a deletion discussion), or * Support / * Oppose (for a merge discussion), followed by your reason why. I have been fixing some of the links that TenPoundHammer deleted, since he seemed to have jumped the gun on a couple articles, but I look forward to your comments on the List of Christmas hit singles deletion proposal. Oh, and when leaving a comment there, or on someone's talk page, always finish it with four tildes (~), so that it will automatically give you credit for the comment. Fortdj33 (talk) 23:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HI :)

Yes I just noticed! Its about time, well now its topped two component chart in Billboard and already charted in Japan. Looks like we have our hands full! :D--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:01, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you like MC

Check this out :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 19:42, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hahahaha, I'm sure there is :) Don't worry, just keep up the good work :D--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 03:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, why thank you :) I also was wondering whether to add it, I thought it was pretty cute and reliably sourced, so I put it as "Trivia" hahaah :) DO you think that section is written okay?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hahahaha, don't worry buddy, feel free to change anything you see fit :) Its a free article! I just did the work lol--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 01:15, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Christmas Record

Thanks for your comment. It seems from your contributions list that I've touched on your specialist subject! - so, if there's any more information you can add, please do so. Did the album ever make any charts, for instance? Regards, Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AIWFCIY

Hi Sliv, thanks for taking such care of the article! I have closely monitored her changes and they are good faith. Not everyone will agree about that news thing, so thats the only loss. Everything else looks pretty good, take a look ;)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 20:14, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey :) I forgot, can you comment and express your opinion at the "AIWFCIY FAC"? It will help reach consensus :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 00:18, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Hi Sliv. Yes I happen to know where its from. Its from Mariah Daily Journal a website thats been around from a long time. Look at the link, its there :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 00:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its all your buddy :D--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 00:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Sliv812/Best-selling christmas/holiday singles has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/holiday singles, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 01:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Best-selling Christmas/holiday singles in the United States, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

sonia♫ 08:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've named it to match the albums list, but I'm not sure if the current titles are ideal. Thank you for all your work! sonia♫ 08:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Sonia. I'm fairly new at editing wikipedia articles (I've only been doing it for two or three years, though not on a consistent basis). Can you refer me to guidelines on how to title articles? Also, are there any general online tutorials on creating and editing wikipedia articles? Thanks! --Sliv812 (talk) 19:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Two or three years is hardly very new! You've been around since 2007, and I only since late 2008. My concerns with the existing titles are that no one is going to search for "christmas/holiday" as a phrase, and that Christmas on its own is probably more appropriate given holiday is a rather vague word. However, I don't think there's any other precedent here but the albums article, so I followed that.
As for titling guidelines : Wikipedia:Article titles. It does seem to support "naturalness", hmm. Perhaps we should move those articles to remove the slash? WP:LISTNAME is a more specific list-related guideline, but doesn't seem to say anything about this particular situation.
General tutorials-- there are a handful, but they're generally targetted at very new users, which you're certainly not. Is there anything in particular you were thinking of? There are lots of videos and pages about specific things, but linking all I found appropriate would result in a sea of blue links. sonia♫ 20:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Best-selling Christmas/holiday singles in the United States, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Feliz Navidad and The Christmas Shoes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Home for Christmas
List of Christmas/holiday hit singles in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Jimmie Rodgers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Christmas/holiday hit singles in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Rob Thomas and Joe Ward
Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Challenge Records

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Gay anthem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Company B (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:44, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Single Harry Simeone Chorale-The Little Drummer Boy cover.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Single Harry Simeone Chorale-The Little Drummer Boy cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sliv812. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sliv812. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to bother you, but it has been a week since you commented on Talk:List of popular Christmas singles in the United States#Changes, saying that you would read it and give input later. Fortdj33 has not reply to my last post 5 days ago, and as I said, if there's no one showing an effort to discuss or work together, I will change it back (which I don't think should have been reverted in the first place), and I'm sure he wouldn't like that. So, please help keep it from being a war between 2 editors. --Musdan77 (talk) 04:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Musdan77, my apologies for the long delay (as I have been extremely busy with both work and holiday shopping needs over the last couple of weeks), but I have finally added my feedback to the thread on the Talk page of the List of popular Christmas singles in the United States article. I tried to target the content of my comments to the article itself (and specifically the table you created in comparison to the original table) and avoid the personal "back and forth" confrontational comments between you and Fortdj33. I do hope my feedback is constructive in reaching some type of consensus, and does not wind up in resulting in either an escalation of the tension between the two of you or a new confrontation between me and either (or both) of you. --Sliv812 (talk) 04:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. See my (relatively short) reply there. --Musdan77 (talk) 02:00, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I read it yesterday. I also added a small addendum to my response on the Talk page for the article for something I neglected to mention. After adding new entries to the table last night, I was quickly reminded just how much time and effort it takes to manage that page. And from that, Musdan77, it made me truly appreciate all the time and effort it took for you to devise that new version of the table, and then retrofit all the existing data into it. I for one know that it had to be no small task, as there is a LOT of data to both review and whittle through on that page, and additional research on your part was likely necessary. I can't thank you enough for what is likely going to be the start of the next version of the table going forward! --Sliv812 (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for those words of encouragement. I didn't add your additions to what I have in my sandbox. You can if you want -- or I can sometime. --Musdan77 (talk) 20:31, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Musdan77. But unless I'm mistaken, I don't think I have access to your Sandbox. I wish I did, because I wouldn't mind transferring my recent updates in the main article to your Sandbox. In addition, there are still some charted singles in the reference book Christmas in the Charts 1920–2004 by Joel Whitburn that have yet to be added to the main article...ones that I've been meaning to add for quite some time. --Sliv812 (talk) 03:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sliv812, I hate to put you in the middle of this, but unfortunately the discussion on the talk page of this article has stalled again. IMO, Musdan77 thinks he can pick and choose which rules he is going to follow. I admit my part in this disagreement, but I have tried to explain myself, I have tried to offer a solution, and all he wants to do is argue that my points aren't valid, because they don't fit his POV. When someone cannot take responsibility for his edits, and stop making personal attacks, that goes against the collaborative nature of Wikipedia, and makes it very difficult for us to come to a consensus. I too have been meaning to add information from Christmas in the Charts 1920–2004, but I don't want to do that until we can agree on the format of the article. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:46, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, now it looks like Fortdj33 doesn't even know how to act on a user talk page, by butting in on a conversation, acting as if I'm not involved here and even continuing to spread his false accusations here too. That's all I want to say on that (I mean, it evidently does no good to say anything anyway - because all he wants to do is cause strife). Anyway, back to the issue. Did you click on the link I gave? Here it is again. It should work. And I guess I'll have to remove some that just added after what Fortdj33 said. --Musdan77 (talk) 01:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Musdan77, I don't know why you continue to take this so personally. You are not the only person who is interested in improving this article, and you do not have the exclusive right to talk about it. I'm not sure why you think that I am trying to "cause strife", when I have pleaded several times for us to come to a consensus, and all you have done is argue with me. If you are open to having people contribute to the version on your sandbox, I can add the information there that I think is missing, and maybe then we can get closer to implementing it on the actual article. Fortdj33 (talk) 11:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1) If you want to talk to me (civilly), you could/should do it on my talk page, not someone else's. (2) When I'm talking facts, it's not "arguing", it's debating/discussing. But when you continually accuse me of things that's beyond the pale, I have to call you out on it. --Musdan77 (talk) 21:57, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Musdan77:
  1. I initially came here to leave a message for Sliv812, and then you accused me of not knowing "how to act on a user talk page", which is why I directed my response at you. But once again, my response was about us working together towards a consensus, and yours was another personal attack...
  2. Call it "debating" if you like, but every time you respond directly to me, it is always to tell me how wrong I am. I can provide numerous examples if you want me to "call you out on it", but I would much rather that we actually discuss how to improve the article. I really don't care where we discuss it, but how many different talk pages do you want to argue with me on?
Sliv812:
Obviously you and I are not the only editors who are invested in making sure the article List of popular Christmas singles in the United States is as accurate as possible. Since Musdan77 and I cannot seem to agree on what the format of the article should be, I would like to know what information you want to add from Christmas in the Charts 1920–2004. I'm not opposed to doing the research and making the edits, but hopefully we can agree on how it should be displayed. Fortdj33 (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fortdj33, it seems you are incapable of understanding how your words and actions affect others. Once again, you use the egregious term "personal attack", when you know how it offended me the first time and was even worse the second time – and I even showed how accusing someone of attacking (especially when it's not true) "is considered a form of personal attack" itself (and on Christmas Day! It's supposed to be a time of love, joy & peace!). And no, this not the place for that (actually no place is), and I wouldn't blame Sliv812 if he just deleted this whole section. And again, debating is part of discussion: each person tells how they believe they are right and how the other person is wrong – by giving the facts. And that's what I've done from the very beginning. —Musdan77 (talk) 20:53, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sliv812. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Single Bing Crosby - White Christmas cover.jpg

Hello. I placed the PROD tag on one of your uploads File:Single Bing Crosby - White Christmas cover.jpg. You have seven days to contest/remove the tag. Once removed, I won't be able to reinsert it per use-PROD-once rule; there is WP:FFD. If still uncontested after such time passes, the image will then be deleted. --George Ho (talk) 01:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Ho, I noticed you applied the same PROD tags to most (if not all) of the images in the article "White Christmas (song)". My question is why? Why don't these images fall under the "fair use" doctrine? There are hundreds (if not thousands) of other Wikipedia articles that displays copyright-protected images under the "fair use" doctrine. Does this mean all such images must be removed throughout the site? Sliv812 (talk) 08:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Attention Wikipedia User Ss112

Do NOT leave any more of your obnoxious, self-righteous, harassing, and annoying messages on my Talk page. If you want to undo any of my editing revisions on other pages, simply leave your comments there in the revision history on the applicable page. Anything you leave here will be ignored and immediately deleted. Capeesh? Sliv812 (talk) 02:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christmas (Cher album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]