User talk:Simon Adler/Archive 2
Username questionIrondome, I'm curious, does your username reference Israel's missile defense system? I've looked around on your page and it appears you are likely jewish. Are you by any chance a rabbi? Sincerely, GDP (talk) 08:07, 12 August 2018 (UTC) I'm just really curious as I'm a Jew myself. --GDP (talk) 23:13, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
1/ I like things that make whooshing sounds, a highly sophisticated and costly 'weapon' system which was not designed to take human life appeals to me on several levels. 2/ I identify as an East London ethnic Jew. I am a Liberal Jew, which means we get to have more fun. 3/ I drink and smoke and do very un-rebbe stuff, so I am not a Rabbi. I am interested in Kabbalah. 4/ My personal Rabbi is Danny Rich, who was kind enough to officiate at the funeral of my late mother, Estelle Adler, of blessed memory. 5/ I take the piss out of life in general, and WP absurdities, with the notorious Martinevans123 talk. I have sought spiritual advice on this, and have been advised that this is an ethically good thing. I have been catching up with the subjects you have been editing, and some of the difficulties you and others have encountered by reading all your contributions. This may take a couple of days before I have got what passes for my head, fully around the subject. We must discuss in depth your perception of WP:RS and what media you do use. As I said, I think you are WP:HERE and wish to help. We just need to get you out of your comfort zone. We all do, occasionally. WP:NPOV is the hardest thing to achieve and maintain. It's almost spiritual sometimes. Please read and read and re-read it. It is the oxygen of WP. Without it, the project (I dislike that term) will suffocate. If you wish to assist you, I am quite happy to do that. Kind regards, Simon. Irondome (talk) 01:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
more traditional forms of worship, if one wishes to. I am unsure what the Space Force entails, but sounds a bit Project Horizon. In those days the US and the USSR thought big. Very 50's. If you are comfortable with the idea, tell me your first name. It helps to humanize colleagues. I am ploughing through your edits, trying to get up to speed. The areas you are interested in I don't touch to be honest, but that does not mean I cannot begin to edit them. I have a reasonable knowledge of the subjects. Keep open channels with those you have engaged with my friend, and keep an open mind. I will be on and off in the next week, as me and my partner have taken up Wild camping and bushcraft. Using a tarp, trying to be minimalist. Keeps you young lol. Our concessions to comfort are air beds and a half pint bottle of rum to enliven our tea :). So it's Ray Mears vids on youtube ha ha. Seiously, we love nature, and getting outdoors again will be a big plus for us, after too much city living. I will try to keep up on your edits. Happy to mentor you. I have certain ground rules. Will fill you in on those next week if I have time. You seem to be settling in ok, and not acting like a edit warrior. Those types are impossible to mentor, and I have had a couple. Anyway, see you around. Simon. Irondome (talk) 02:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2018)
Books & Bytes – Issue 29Books & Bytes
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta! Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC) Disable the templates while posting.Dont worry, I got your ass covered. cheers--DBigXrayᗙ 23:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2018)
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2018)
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2018)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. A cup of tea for you!
Milhist coordinator election voting has commencedG'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused. Hello, Simon Adler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Martinevans123 (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
You've got mail!Hello, Simon Adler. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 19:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the GABgab 19:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2018)
NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018Hello Simon Adler, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC) To those who do, have an easy fast. For those who don't, improve an article and enjoy the simple things
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2018)
Have your say!Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2018)
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2018)
This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2018)
NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
Hello Simon Adler, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2018)
Books & Bytes, Issue 30Books & Bytes
French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta! Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC) ANI closeI'm asking you to revert your non-admin close. Nothing was "learned" as the editor in question refused to even acknowledge there is something wrong in that kind of behauvior. I believe the close is inappropriate especially in the light of Snow Rise's comment, but I'm not going to revert it myself. Do you think ANI is incapable of reaching a consensus in incivility issues? --Pudeo (talk) 09:51, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2018)
No Marx brothers film...Will ever compete with Monty Python or Mel Brooks for drunken Hilarity. Just thought I'd let you know. ;) ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 02:58, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
PingHello, Simon Adler. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the - BilCat (talk) 02:10, 30 October 2018 (UTC) Rervert questionI changed the word "pursuing" because to me it seemed to imply following or pestering, perhaps based in anti-Semitism. Maybe "pursuing conversion of" would be a better replacement?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jews&type=revision&diff=866860634&oldid=866171850&diffmode=source Mjsteiner (talk) 03:39, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2018)
KurskI reverted you. Please, read the discussion at WP:RSN#WebArchive as a source for further details.--Paul Siebert (talk) 04:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Policy shortcut WP:PRIMARY Primary sources are original materials that are close to an event, and are often accounts written by people who are directly involved. They offer an insider's view of an event, a period of history, a work of art, a political decision, and so on. Primary sources may or may not be independent sources. An account of a traffic incident written by a witness is a primary source of information about the event; similarly, a scientific paper documenting a new experiment conducted by the author is a primary source on the outcome of that experiment. Historical documents such as diaries are primary sources.[c] Policy: Unless restricted by another policy, primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them.[d] Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source. Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so. Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them. Do not add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Wikipedia a primary source of that material. Use extra caution when handling primary sources about living people; see WP:Biographies of living persons § Avoid misuse of primary sources, which is policy.
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2018)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. re: Dyk issuesI'll respond here for ease of conversation, through I have no objection if you copy my comment to the other discussion and reply there. I appreciate your detailed explanation of your reasons, to which I'll reply: 1) as far as I am aware, the views in your first bullet point are your own and do not represent a consensus for what makes a DYK. In particular, I do not believe there is any consensus for DYKs being limited to non-controversial topics. As I noted elsewhere, this is a dangerous turn away from WP:NOTCENSORED. Now, this is my personal POV, but I consider censorship to be more dangerous to society that taking offence, and censorship to avoid offence is IMHO no more dangerous than censorship through copyright (perhaps an article I should write). 2) Another editor I think raised the recent Pittsburgh massacre. All unfortunate, but coincidences, and English Wikipedia is global. If we try to take into account everyone who may be offended because some past or present coincidence, we would not publish anything (should we not publish any DYKs related to males on International Women's Day? Etc. It's a slippery slope once we start making any such gestures, also problematic from the neutrality standpoing - as in, trying not to offend group A may offend group B). Now, I have no problems delaying a DYK for a few days or even a week or two, because I don't particularly care which day it is displayed, but in principle, again, I fear this opens a lot of window to abuse (censorship) of Wikipedia. (I also just noticed there's no article on Category:Criticism of political correctness... 3) Re: Polish-Jewish issues. Errr. I am not aware this particular proverb has been part of any media controversy related to those issues, so it's a good example of how we can censor a ton of content (any topic related to Polish Jewish history) because of some mildly related general controversy. Not too mention this is all inconsistent, this years I've DYKed articles on Polish-Jewish topics such as , Eliezer Gruenbaum, The Black Book of Polish Jewry and Secret City (book). Neither of them have raised any concerns, and TBH I think that the case of Gruenbaum is much more controversial than the current proverb (it has been discussed in media quite extensively, unlike the said proverb which nobody but one academic cares about). Or consider Report to the Secretary on the Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of the Jews, how come nobody raised issues that this article is not very favorable of the US government? Or Embassy of Japan in Seoul, surely some Japanese or Korean people could be offended by the that topic (since the embassy is mainly notable for some anti-Japanese/Korean clashes it has been a site of). My recent DYK on Lü Ban (director) is surely offensive to the Chinese government (which already blocks Wikipedia, but if we make a good showing of not DYKing, and preferably deleting such articles, maybe Wikipedia will be less controversial to the Chinese Communist Partyand will get unblocked, hmmm?). Singling out this one DYK is problematic on so many levels I can't believe this discussion is still ongoing. But to finish on a positive note, it certainly resulted in the article being significantly improved, and it is certainly even a better candidate for a DYK than it was a while back. Any suggestions for a neutral hook are appreciated, and I invite you to join discussions on article's talk (through everything has been pretty stable for the last few days, I think). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:04, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Hello Simon Adler,
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2018)
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Simon Adler. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2018)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2018)
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awardsNominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC) Maybe you just need a little 20-year nap? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC) Or a week? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
We all need an occasional wiki-break sometimes, or just a slow-down. Just know that we're all here for you, and thinking of you. - BilCat (talk) 22:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC) Did someone say Hi Viz? Throw a smoke-bomb for me. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:25, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
North American F-86 SabreI note you are not moving this issue to the talk page. 92.39.207.50 (talk) 16:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2018)
It's closing in on us
NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018Hello Simon Adler,
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
See also the list of top 100 reviewers.
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC) Fucked up ping[FBDB] When you fuck up a ping [2], it cannot be unfucked by editing. You gotta start fresh and at a new place(line), if you really want the fucks to be given. see WP:PING--DBigXrayᗙ 15:07, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awardsVoting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC) ImpressionsI hope you don't get the wrong impression and think I'm anal about the smallest details, like when I went back and corrected that image caption. (short pause) Ok, well I am. 😉 Atsme✍🏻📧 03:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry fucking christmass
This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2018)
Happy Saturnalia
Merry Merry
Books & Bytes, Issue 31Books & Bytes
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta! Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC) Happy Holidays
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2018)
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
XmasThis week's article for improvement (week 1, 2018)
Happy New Year, Simon Adler!Simon Adler, Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2019)
2019Not too late, I hope ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2019)
HappyThunder Road Kafka Liz (talk) 10:38, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Help a Stanford student project?Hi Simon Adler - I'm a Stanford student working on a project on how to improve Wikipedia edit abuse filtering. Would you be willing to talk for 20-30 minutes about your experience working with Wikipedia over the years? Anything you can share would be incredibly helpful! You can contact me at dlevine2@stanford.edu. Thank you and apologies if I misused your page in any way! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:4D00:8BA0:D871:9D55:1510:36F (talk) 23:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2019)
Hello, Simon Adler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Jack Nissenthall. In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2019)
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2019)
The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2019)
I'm not dead. To my friends/pagewatchersI am very ashamed that I did not return the kind messages over the holiday period and the many emails I have received. I ran away. Serious depression and a realisation that I am not a useful contributor has kept me away. I have not retired and my absence was no political/philosophical/WP comment. Just felt the walls closing in. My heartfelt apologies. Si. Simon Adler (talk) 03:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2019)
Tiny pingSent you a small email Kafka Liz (talk) 02:05, 23 February 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2019)
Books & Bytes, Issue 32Books & Bytes
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta! Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC) The Signpost: 28 February 2019
This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2019)
The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. This week's article for improvement (week 11, 2019)
NPR Newsletter No.17Hello Simon Adler,
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2019)
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
This week's article for improvement (week 14, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2019)
The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2019)
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2019)
The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2019)
NPR Newsletter No.18Hello Simon Adler,
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250 Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2019)
Books & Bytes, Issue 33Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2019)
The Signpost: 31 May 2019
This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2019)
The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2019)
New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019Hello Simon Adler,
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages. Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC) The June 2019 Signpost is out!
This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2019)
Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019Books & Bytes
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta! Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2019)
The Signpost: 31 July 2019
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2019)
The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Your draft article, Draft:Jack NissenthallHello, Simon Adler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jack Nissenthall". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HawkAussie (talk) 23:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2019)
Backlog BanzaiIn the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2019)
The Signpost: 30 August 2019
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2019)
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2019)
New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019Hello Simon Adler,
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs. Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools. Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done. DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC) Milhist coordinator election voting has commencedG'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2019)
The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way markG'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2019)
Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019Books & Bytes
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2019)
|