|
User talk:Shrikanthv/Archive 1
Hi I am interested to get in touch regarding information on this page. Can you please write to me on agr.parul@gmail.com Study Wikipedia policyWikipedia has a sizable set of policies and guidelines that you do not appear to be aware of. It is not a free place to get your message out to the world but an well organized project that supports volunteers in building an encyclopedia and the rules are there for that reason. I imagine it is frustrating to be blocked from participating in the project, especially if participation is related to your job, but I think you will have more success in getting unblocked if you start by becoming very familiar with the policies and guidelines before asserting your value to the project. For example, it appears that you attempted to avoid your block by starting a new account (User:Vshrikanth) with which you continued in behavior that violated policy on promotional content. You probably were unaware that it was a serious violation of policy to do that. Rather than charging ahead with claims of being useful to the project, I think your chances would be much better if you showed some signs of having studied the policies and guidelines in which you are now seriously entangled. Here are some articles that might help you figure out how things work and perhaps how to extract yourself from the mess you're in (assuming that's possible at this point):
If you have any questions, please post them here or on my talk page. Jojalozzo 16:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: Larsen & ToubroHello Shrikanthv. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Larsen & Toubro, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: needs clean up, not deletion. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 20:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
Your recent edits
Also, please demonstrate on Talk:Upanishads how the information in the article does not match the sources cited. Simply tagging after previously unbalancing gives the impression you are acting with an agenda. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC) CollaboratingI see you are engaged in a conflict at Upanishads. Editors who have difficulty working collegially will eventually lose the privilege of editing entirely and I think you may be at risk in that way. I think you may be able to avoid most of these conflicts by using the article talk pages more and asking more questions instead of asserting your position. Try asking why something is be said a certain way rather than just editing it the way you want it. I also advise against using any of the article deletion or rating tools until you are more familiar with them. Abusing them is also going to contribute to a reputation for disruptive editing. Jojalozzo 15:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC) I hope you will see my advice as helpful. You have started out editing Wikipedia very aggressively and I do not think your confrontational approach is going to achieve the results you wish for, on the contrary it's likely to get you banned permanently from the project. Wikipedia is not a place where editors own ideas or needs take priority. I think you can see how aggressive debate is reflected back to you in kind and I think that if you attempt a more humble approach in the future you will not only generate more cooperation but also more willingness in others to explain the how and why of current article content and to listen to your ideas for how and why we might improve it. I advise you to ask questions in a respectful manner rather than making accusations or stating blanket objections. Do your best to show good faith that others are attempting to develop an encyclopedia that is fair and accurate just as you are. Jojalozzo 16:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC) Your recent edits
Your recent edits
March 2012
Adding scriptsNamaskara Shrikanth, if you didn't know, the Indian community decided not to include Indic scripts in articles, like the ones you added to Bangalore. For your reference, this is the link to the discussion. Please avoid adding scripts in native languages to articles. Thank you for your work! Lynch7 09:52, 12 April 2012 (UTC)  You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Removing content at Variable-frequency driveI understand that you object to the removal of information you posted to Variable-frequency drive about specific products. If you think there is good reason to keep that content then you need to make that argument on the article's talk page. To remove other content on specific products is most likely going to bring administrative action against you and will do nothing to restore the content that you are interested in. I recommend you undo your recent deletions as a sign of your good faith in our community processes, then go to the talk page and post your arguments either for restoring the content you wish to see on the page or for deleting the content you do not think belongs there. Jojalozzo 15:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 19Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC) AfDYou might want to rephrase your latest contributions to the List of Iyers AfD. Most of what you say is incomprehensible to me. - Sitush (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC) AwayHi Shrikanth, sorry, was away for a few weeks (and will be on and off for a few more), sorry couldn't respond to your talk page posts. Lynch7 08:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC) Removal of linksPlease do not remove legitimate links from articles, as you did recently with regard to Siddha Yoga. It's disruptive behaviour which is likely to result in sanctions. Regards, Gatoclass (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
AN[1] — goethean ॐ 17:46, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Interwiki linksPlease stop placing interwiki links to the tops of articles. They belong on the bottom, with the rest of the interwiki links. See Help:Interlanguage_links. --NeilN talk to me 23:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC) Braking chopper Good Article nominationHi Shrikanthv. I regret to inform you that I have failed your GA nomination of Braking chopper. See the review page for advice on what needs fixing. You might want to review the good article criteria and possibly think of sending an article or two to peer review until you get the hang of what is expected. I notice you have other articles nominated. DC injection braking is also a long way from being a Good article and has many of the same problems as Braking Chopper. Variable-frequency drive is better, but still needs quite a bit of work (short lead, overciting, misplaced citations). Don't be discouraged, getting a Good article can be difficult. AIRcorn (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
white people/black peopleHi Shrikanthv - the other editor has now gone ahead and created what appear to be two new WP:POVFORK pages, White (skin color) and Black (skin color). Much of the material is basically just a copy and paste of what he previously added to the "black people" and "white people" articles and argued for in the rfc. Note the intros:
It is literally the same skin color-based classification scheme that he has been arguing for all along on the respective articles. This is despite the reached consensus that the "white" and "black" social constructs are independent of skin color and are to be discussed on the "white people" and "black people" articles, respectively; the biology of human skin coloration would likewise be dealt with separately. It unfortunately doesn't end there, though, because he has also apparently created a Template:Skin colors, where he links to these fork pages. I have commented on this latest development on the rfc. When and if you have the time, your thoughts on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards Soupforone (talk) 19:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Janaseva vidya kendra.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Janaseva vidya kendra.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 13:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC) Please do not be disheartenedNominating Devita Saraf as an article for deletion was a sensible thing to do. You have serious doubts about the article and this is a key place to get a community consensus about your doubts vs the article's validity or otherwise. I'd very much like to have been able to agree with your nomination and support you. But that is an emotional thing. I find the article to be distasteful. But it is, technically, an article about a person whose notability is sufficient to merit an article. I think the article we have at present ought not to be the form the eventual article takes. I have already pruned some dead wood from it. For the future keep your enthusiasm and sense of fair play in the forefront of your mind. And do something wise with this AfD: Treat it as a fire and forget missile. It will either hit the target or not. Move ahead with something else and let it do what it will do unaided by further input from you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:23, 23 August 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 11:42, 31 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 11:42, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: .orga.inHi Shrikanthv. Just a note to let you know that I've declined your CSD tag on .orga.in; nothing on the page suggests that it's a hoax. Yunshui 雲水 13:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 07:09, 4 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Yunshui 雲水 07:09, 4 September 2012 (UTC) SVS Educational InstitutionsSVS Educational Institutions is not an advert article please remove Db-inc Template Thanks. Ramesh Ramaiah talk 12:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 08:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Please do not accuse another editor of vandalism for deleting a prod notice. See WP:PROD#Objecting. Prod notices may be removed by any editor and once deleted should not be restored. Take to AfD instead. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Deprod Neo-AdvaitaI have removed the {{prod}} tag from Neo-Advaita, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Joshua Jonathan (talk) 18:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Sreelakshmi SureshIf you seriously believe me to have a WP:COI with the article, then you need to put that forward through WP:ANI, and openly accuse me -- at which point I would be happy to defend myself. You, however, can't simply go to an article and undo an editors contributions on speculation with no proof and assume that is okay. If you did any searching, you would see that I belong to several Canadian Wikipedia projects and edit heavily on a wide range of Western topics. Sreelakshmi Suresh is the only India-related and tech-related article I regularly edit as part of my long history defending its rights per WP:GNG in 2007. Per WP:VANDAL, you need to be very careful when accusing someone of "vandalism" as you did in your edit summary. Know that I am an established editor in good standing as long as 2006 with over 10,000 edits. Assume good faith when dealing with other established editors. If you accuse me of vandalism, and truly believe that I am a vandal, then we need to take this also to ANI. I take vandalism accusations very seriously. Mkdwtalk 21:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
--LVerina (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC) Rachana Shah: speedy A7 contested (again)Hi Shrikanthv, as you'll see from the history of Rachana Shah, shortly after the article was created by another user, an admin declined an A7 speedy deletion, as notability has been clearly asserted. See also the talk page. More likely a case for afd? Regards, Esowteric+Talk 11:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC) AdoptionHi Shrikanthv. As I mentioned in my brief note on Saturday, I've be very happy to adopt you and help you naviagate the waters of Wikipedia. I see from looking over your contributions that you've already been involved in a number of areas, particularly deletion processes, which is good to see. I tend to be a rather hands-off mentor - I will look over your edits every now and then and raise anything I think was done particularly well, or that could have been handled differently; and I'll happily answer any questions you have - but if you'd prefer a more structured, task orientated approach I can do that instead; just let me know. It would help me to know what sort of areas you'd specifically like to edit in, and what you think you need the most help with; I can then tailor my approach accordingly. I'm looking forward to working with you and helping you make Wikipedia better! Yunshui 雲水 06:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC) Rachana Shah continuedYes, you're quite right. I have removed "Her endurance of the year-long ordeal ... ...": (1) It's unreliably sourced and (2) It's non-essential. Please remember to assume good faith. Esowteric+Talk 16:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC) See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachana Shah (2nd nomination). Regards, Esowteric+Talk 16:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: India?Hello Shrikanthv. Just to let you know, this article does not meet our criteria for speedy deletion. Please be sure you are familiar with the criteria before tagging Thanks. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 17:36, 20 September 2012 (UTC) Rachana Shah continued... againHi Shrikanthv. I've also !voted to delete the article at the AfD discussion. Your analysis of the sources is pretty accurate. However, the main issue is not the verifiability of the text - for the most part, the sources do verify what's said in the article. Verification is separate from notability, and that's where the article fails the inclusion criteria - because Mrs Shah has not received significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources, she doesn't meet the basic notability requirements. The distinction between the two is important - verifiability, while a core policy, doesn't govern which subjects get articles written about them. It's possible to have an article, like this one, where everything in the text is verifiable and yet the article as a whole should still be deleted. Notability is the criteria for a subject to be included, verifiability is the criteria for information about that subject to be included. In other words, WP:N says who and what we write about, WP:V says what we write about them. I hope that makes some sense! Yunshui 雲水 07:16, 21 September 2012 (UTC) DeletionHi Shrikanthv. I've had a glance over your recent contributions, and I'm seeing a lot of work in the area of deletion. That's not a problem - I spend a great deal of my own wiki-time working in CSD, so it's good that we have a shared "interest" - but you seem to have a relatively high rate of misses, with a lot of your CSD tags being declined for one reason or another. Reading through the deletion policy again is always a good idea, but you might also find this essay of mine a helpful (and more concise!) read. Since you use Twinkle, it might be helpful for both of us if you created a CSD log to keep track of your nominations. To do this, go to the Twinkle preferences panel and near the bottom of the Speedy Deletion section, tick the box labelled "Keep a log in userspace of all CSD nominations". This will create the subpage User:Shrikanthv/CSD log, and every time you place a CSD tag, Twinkle will automatically keep a record on that page. Mine, for example, is here: User:Yunshui/CSD log. If you think it would be helpful, I can spend some time devising a short test for you to help you towards a better understanding of the CSD criteria; let me know if you'd like this. Otherwise, feel free to ask me if you're thinking about tagging a page for deletion but aren't sure whether it meets the criteria. Cheers, Yunshui 雲水 07:32, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Sanjay PugaliaShrikanthv, Please read the Sanjay Pugalia entry in light of it most recent changes, which includes a notability statement, better organization, further citation, and new material. Currently, its assessment is stub. The most recent changes should merit a reconsideration of a nomination to delete and possibly a raise in status from stub to start. I would be interested in your thoughts. Thank you, Crtew (talk) 05:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Janaseva vidya kendra.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Janaseva vidya kendra.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:30, 27 September 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined at Jolly P JoyIn fairness, you can't access the previously deleted version of this page, so you weren't to know that it was substantially different (it is, trust me). However, it would have been worth taking note of the sources and considering whether the article in its present state merited deletion, especially since an AfD had already been started. Just because an article has been deleted via AfD before doesn't necessarily mean that the subject isn't worth having an article on at all. Yunshui 雲水 12:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
This, on the other hand, was an excellent call - not only was A7 right on the money, but you could definitely have added your favourite G11 tag to this page too! Yunshui 雲水 12:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 13:21, 8 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Yunshui 雲水 13:21, 8 October 2012 (UTC) More on speedy deletionsHi Shrikanthv. Following a couple of your recent CSD nominations, I thought I'd introduce you to a couple of useful rules of thumb regarding the use of CSD tags.
Hope that helps make things a little clearer. Yunshui 雲水 10:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC) SPI investigationHi Shrikanthv. Just for future reference, when you file a report at SPI you don't need to append "User:" in front of the suspects' usernames. The syntax used at SPI adds that automatically, so when you link to User:Jollypjoy the software will be looking for User:User:Jollypjoy, an account which doesn't exist. I've fixed the formatting for you, so the investigation is now at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jollypjoy. I haven't commented on the investigation myself, but your evidence looks fairly sound. Yunshui 雲水 08:32, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Contesting your A7Hi Shrikanthv! Just to let you know I wrote a paragraph contesting your A7 on Talk:Akhil Bharat Nepali Ekta Samaj. I admire your motivation overall. By the way, there is a fun project called Check Wikipedia, have you tried it? It tells you what to fix where, a great way to be very useful to Wikipedia. I use it (and similar fixup tools) a lot myself too :-) Cheers! Nicolas1981 (talk) 08:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletions againI have had to decline many of your speedy deletion tags today, with many of the articles involved being nowhere close to meeting the criteria. This is one example, where you tagged an article as not indicating importance or significance when it said that the subject was the mayor of a major city and a member of a state legislature. You will find many other examples in your contribution history. Please refrain from tagging any more articles for speedy deletion until you have familiarised yourself with the criteria at WP:CSD. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:30, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, You added a warning on this article, but you did not specify what are the issues on the talk page. Unless you do so shortly, I will remove the warning. Thanks, Yann (talk) 05:39, 12 October 2012 (UTC) A friendly suggestionHi Shrikanthv. I'd like to offer you a suggestion, based on the recent issues you've been having with CSD and other deletion processes. Since you started editing a couple of months ago, the vast majority of your edits have been concerned with deletions - CSD, AFD and PRODs have accounted for most of your work here. There's nothing wrong with that - I actually spend most of my own time on Wikipedia deleting things that shouldn't be here - but you seem to have struggled with many of the nuances of the deletion policy, and it's brought you into conflict with other editors as a result. Might I suggest that you change your focus, at least temporarily, to another aspect of Wikipedia? One of the reasons I'm comfortable around deletion work is because I've also spent a lot of time creating articles, which means that I've become very familiar with the various policies covering content. You might find it useful, not to mention rewarding, to try your hand at creating some pages from scratch; it's very satisfying and will hugely improve your accuracy in deletion tagging. Ideas for content creation are everywhere (check out my essay on the subject for some pointers) - start by trying to create a basic stub, then maybe set yourself the goal of getting an article onto the main page via the Did you know? process. If you need help at any stage, from choosing a notable topic to promoting something to Featured article status, please ask me; I'll be more than happy to help. All the best, Yunshui 雲水 09:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 09:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Yunshui 雲水 09:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC) Ananda (Hindu Astrology)Dear Shrikanthv, I was annoyed with you, certainly I was, but for the sake of the kind of work which we do here I chose to forget my annoyance. However, you are at liberty to wipeout all that I have posted, there will not be a single word of objection uttered by me. You very well know I don't own the space occupied by the article created by you. 59.97.64.187 (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)P.S.Soni Ruchi (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 08:39, 8 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Yunshui 雲水 08:39, 8 November 2012 (UTC) Black peopleGreetings Shrikanthv; there is a user on the black people article who has sought to include some of the material that was deemed offtopic in the recent rfc discussion. Specifically, text and an image on Australian Aborigines as "black people" [2]. I've tried explaining to and quoting for him what the community's decision was but to little effect. If it's not any trouble, could you perhaps clarify for him what exactly was the general consensus? It should only take a minute or two. Kind regards- Soupforone (talk) 23:35, 21 November 2012 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Soupforone (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC) DYK nomination of Voltage controller
Declined speed deletion, and final warningI have just declined your speedy deletion request on Arunava Sen. Winning a major prize like the Infosys Prize is clearly a claim of importance. I'm not certain it's enough to pass our notability guidelines for biographical articles, but it's clearly more than enough to pass A7. A lot of editors above have told you that you're simply not understanding speedy deletions. At this point, I'm explicitly telling you that you may no longer tag articles for speedy deletion--if you do, I will block you. Your errors not only cause extra work for administrators, but can easily drive away a new contributor who feels de-valued because their work was nominated for speedy deletion. This is disruptive and damaging to the encyclopedia as a whole. Perhaps if you can seek some formal mentorship from some of the people above (if they'll have you), and they're willing to guide you through the process for quite a while, you could maybe return to this in the future. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
TalkbalkYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Soupforone (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: Minimolude AchanHello Shrikanthv. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Minimolude Achan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: article is about a film, not a person, so A7 does not apply. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC) I have today recast and expanded the article Neechabhanga Raja yoga, I intend to expand it later further along with Viparita Raja yoga. Now, you can remove from this article the tag that you had appended a few days ago. You have dressed me up with a Barnstar without myself having made any contribution, kindly remove it. Thanks.Tarun marwaha (talk) 09:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC) please have a look here and comment here as a discussion Shrikanthv (talk) 12:50, 11 December 2012 (UTC) Thanks for your effort on Neechabhanga Raja yoga. I have today recast and expanded the article - Viparita Raja yoga. Kindly attend to it as well.Tarun marwaha (talk) 09:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 08:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Yunshui 雲水 08:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 08:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Userright granted! Yunshui 雲水 08:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC) GA review!I have reverted your Swami Vivekananda GA nomination! Did you make any edit there or are you aware of current status? --Tito Dutta (talk) 10:39, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
The article is just started, you can help here! You can use cite book template. How are you preparing Google Books citation? Manually? --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:10, 17 December 2012 (UTC) FARI undid your request for GA Reassessment because we can go for FAR straight away. GAR will take time and even to stand a outside chance of making it to Jan 12th we have to nominate the article for FA now. I am waiting for Dwaipayan's comments on the article. Correct Knowledge«৳alk» 13:34, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
QuestionGreetings Shrikanthv! The rfc on the black people page has almost reached an end. However, there's one last matter that I was hoping you could perhaps help clarify. Australian Aborigines and many South Asians apparently "share many cultural, linguistic, physical and genetic features" [3]. Given this, do you think it's consistent to exclude one and not the other? Please advise. kind regards -- Soupforone (talk) 23:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC) Notice! (For undiscussed approaches)This is a clear notice. Stop random jumping what you have been doing. Your GA nomination of Swami Vivekananda was reverted twice in last 2 days which could be a good lesson to you. But, you failed to learn anything from it and have nominated it for FA today. You have done nothing in that article and cared to say no one that you were going to nominate. At least I'll not withdraw the nomination and going to co-operate there (I'll see what others say) just because I want to see the article on the main page on 12 January. Reply in this talk page. --Tito Dutta (talk) 15:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Voltage controller
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC) Again..Uff, who told you to go ahead and translude the page? Right after the transclusion it was found that lyrics characters are not counted, the transclusion was kept in incubator for 1-2 days! Why did you transcluded it without expanding the article? --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:56, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
STOP..and try to learn how WIkipedia works! --Tito Dutta (talk) 10:46, 22 December 2012 (UTC) MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India (2nd nomination)Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India (2nd nomination), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India (2nd nomination) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tito Dutta (talk) 23:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC) Deletion criteria!Please read the deletion criteria before nominating articles for deletion. As in here, there was already a reference in that article. If you have questions you can ask at help desk or my talk page! --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC) Hi Shrikanthv, I see you've edited Sri Aurobindo. I've checked the article, and it needs some work before it can proceed to GA. I've put it on hold to allow time for this. Would you be able to co-ordinate this work? I can try other editors but since you probably know them already, it might be best if you did it. Please let me know what you decide. All the best Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC) Hi, I see you're at work on the article. I invited some other editors with no immediate result, but it is a holiday period. On references, two things. a) if you are using the same one several times (like the Sketch from the ashram), then you should use [1] the first time, and [1] (by itself) all subsequent times, so only one ref appears at the end of the article, with multiple usages listed. This avoids misleading readers and keeps the article tidy; makes it easy to reuse common sources, too. b) it's a bit flaky using Ashram sources as these are not independent; it may be all right to establish details of fact, but if other sources are available that would be better. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC) Ah, and you have three different references all with the title "The Mother" - I think you should distinguish these in some way, if indeed better sources for all of them can't be found. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:24, 1 January 2013 (UTC) DeletionsHi Shrikanthv. I've had a complaint from Tito Dutta on my talkpage regarding your recent deletion nominations, and I have to say, I agree with his concerns. Your use of the You've consistently run into problems with Wikipedia's deletion policy - I seem to recall that the very first issues I had to address with you all stemmed from incorrect CSD tagging - and it's reached a point now where I'm concerned that you're going to get yourself into trouble with it. As a result, I'm asking you to voluntarily refrain from nominating any page for deletion, via any method (CSD, PROD, BLPPROD or AFD), for a minimum of three months - during that time, we'll work on your understanding of the deletion policy and how it applies. You're welcome (encouraged, in fact) to comment on existing AFDs, since this will help show your understanding of the relevent policies, but please don't start any yourself. There is plenty more to do on Wikipedia (I see that you're getting the hang of article editing and using references, which is excellent), and once I'm convinced that you have a thorough understanding of the deletion policy I'd be happy for you to get involved in that field again. For now, though, please hold off on making any more nominations. If you come across a page that you feel strongly should be deleted, please ask me first (or another experienced editor if I'm not available) before doing anything with it. Feel free to drop me a line on my talkpage if you have any questions. Yunshui 雲水 09:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Gross misunderstanding of BLP PROD bordering upon vandalism
Hi , yes i think it was an error, please have look at the above talks , currently i will not be involved in deletion tags for next three months. and will only start after guidence from my mentor Shrikanthv (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Your AfD nominationsShrikanthji, is it not time that you removed your Afd nominations on A Guide to Human Conduct and Yogic Treatments and Natural Remedies? --Abhidevananda (talk) 01:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Shrikanthv after your proposal for deletion I've expanded Yogic Treatments and Natural Remedies's article inserting new academic/scientific sources to highlight the clear article's encyclopedic value. I think you can now remove the AFD nomination. Thanks--Cornelius383 (talk) 02:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Some good words!Some wise people told– Only he has a right to criticize who has a hand to help
That shows, not a single issue above is a very big issue at this moment. That's all! I often wonder why I write such long posts...--Tito Dutta (talk) 13:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Deletion revisitedHi Shrikanthv. Sorry it's taken me a few days to get back to you with this. I've created a couple of new adoption pages that will hopefully further your understanding of the deletion process; take a look when you have the opportunity: User:Yunshui/Adoption/Shrikanthv/PROD and User:Yunshui/Adoption/Shrikanthv/AFD. By the way, I second Chiswick Chap above; good work on the Sri Aurobindo article! Yunshui 雲水 10:34, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
AdoptionHi Shrikanthv. I don't know whether you've retired from Wikipedia entirely or if you're still knocking around as a reader - either way, you haven't edited anything for the last three months, and so I think it's probably sensible to bring our adoption arrangement to an end. If you like to stay on as an adoptee, please drop me a note and I'll happily reinitiate the process. All the best, in life, Wikipedia and everything. Yunshui 雲水 13:14, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Chandan DasguptaHello Shrikanth, I propose to remove the "delete" tag from this article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chandan_Dasgupta#Chandan_Dasgupta It may require clean-up, but certainly not deletion. Pranabnlp (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC) BLPPRODWelcome back. I notice that you've been placing a lot of BLPPPROD tags recently, and I'm afraid you have been doing so incorrectly. Please read the BLPPROD policy, which clearly states that if an article contains any sources (regardless of whether they meet the reliable sources guideline or not) it cannot be tagged for deletion via this method. You struggled with deletion issues last year and clearly still have a lot to learn about correct deletion tagging; I would strongly suggest that you avoid doing any work in deletion tagging for the time being. Yunshui 雲水 08:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 08:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Yunshui 雲水 08:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Sri AurobindoHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sri Aurobindo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Just a note, if an editor removes a proposed deletion tag, even if the removal is not accompanied by a reason for removal, the deletion is considered contested and that article is ineligible for proposed deletion from that point forward. The only exception would be where removal of a tag was done as a clear act of vandalism or blanking the page, or if the editor removing the tag was violating a ban in the process. If you or another editor wish to see this article deleted, please consider bringing it to articles for deletion, thank you. -- Atama頭 22:12, 21 March 2014 (UTC) March 2014
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Sri AurobindoThe article Sri Aurobindo you nominated as a good article has passed Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
-- 05:18, Monday, January 6, 2025 (UTC)
Aam Aadmi PartyYou have reverted four of my small edits with existing citation saying "Please state the sources and discuss in talk page before addition. (TW)". I have reinstated my edits, can you please review my changes and confirm that they are not-sourced and violating Wikipedia guidelines? I believe that I need not create a discussion in Talk Page for these one-word or one-sentence edits sourced from the existing citation.
I changed "certain states" to "Karnataka". Saved Edit summary text: Without the date the sentence seems to imply that it was a direct consequence of Hazare request that he stopped the fast. On the other hand Kejriwal himself has not said it was the deciding factor. He continued to fast for another 7 days. The citation is present, I added the date " on March 29 ". Appended "Rs 220 crore" to "driven by subsidy". Citation is present. Saved Edit summary text: Changed to maintain neutral point of view. The earlier statement sent a message that Jung was being dictatorial whereas he was only saying that it has to follow Transaction of Business Rules (TBR), 2002. The Law Ministry backed. The citation is present. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aam_Aadmi_Party&diff=0&oldid=602231831
April 2014
01 April 2014why did you remove articleForward Press (Magazine).It is not good of you.I'm correspondence of Forward Press from Aligarh.It is very popular magazine.Its published more than 10,000 copies per month.It is bilingual (Hindi & English languages).Famous writer Gail Omvedt writes also for Forward Press.click this- https://twitter.com/PrabhuGuptara/status/166817411981508610 http://www.andrews.edu/sed/leadership_dept/adjunct_faculty_info/wolf_thom.html Jschauhan2013 (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC) 4 April 2014 ModiWhat did i remove from the Narendra Modi page? Tri400 (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC) About Talk:Arvind KejriwalHi, I have merged your original entry sub-headed NEWS to another main section headed Merged entry on a specific news incident. However, no alterations have been made to the original post and replies. Talk:Arvind_Kejriwal#Merged_entry_on_a_specific_news_incident
About Katikala Siva Bhagya RaoYou have deleted the page Katikala Siva Bhagya Rao. The man runs an NGO offering free services to over 22000 backward caste people in Andhra Pradesh, India. The work this man does may not reach the elite media because all his work is in the villages at the grass root level. The man needs commendation and a wiki page is the least one can do for him. I also have given newspaper articles about his service work. The language could have been more simplistic, agreed. But certainly isn't 'instant delete' worthy. Whilst, movie stars with mere 1,2 movies have wiki articles, why should a government servant who spend the last three decades in helping people through his NGO not deserve a wiki page? Can you please help me put up this page again. -- Hunking Hunk DeletionOkay, this needs to stop. Whilst occasionally you make a good call on articles which need to be deleted, the signal-to-noise ratio is so low that it verges on the disruptive. This isn't a new development, either; since you started here, you have demonstrated consistently poor judgement in the application of CSD, PROD, BLPPROD and AFD tags, and the last month or so has shown that there has been little improvement in this area. I'm therefore, regretfully, laying down a final warning: if you make another inappropriate deletion request, via any deletion mechanism, I or another administrator may block your account without warning. This has gone on for far too long - turn your attention to other areas of Wikipedia (I know you were looking at GA recently) and leave the whole sphere of deletion alone. I'm sorry it's come to this, but enough is enough. Yunshui 雲水 08:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Narendra Modi Poll projectionDear Mr Shrikanth. THe discussion talk page on polls projections regarding Narendra Modi is waiting for you. Please do not show so much desperation to delete what all opinion polls are projecting. Have an open mind and face the reality of poll projection outcome.210.212.144.133 (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC) GA reassessmentSri Aurobindo, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. - Sitush (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC) AurobindoHi, regarding the GA delisting of Sri Aurobindo, you say that there was no consensus for it. WP:CONSENSUSis not a vote but rather a decision based on assessment of arguments that in turn are based on policy compliance. Even you have said that the article has many faults, and others (including me) have said the same. It is not GA standard & I think it will take quite a bit of work to make it so. - Sitush (talk) 23:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Revert in CytusHi. In adding to the playable song list, I have effectively manually reverted your revert in Cytus. This uses citing to the version 6.1.0 of the game, hopefully addressing your "unreferenced addition of data". 野狼院ひさし Hisashi Yarouin 06:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC) Mir Mandow RindMir Mandow Rind is nominated for deletion. Discussion is possible here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mir Mandow Rind. The Banner talk 17:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC) Hooray!
Quality of sourcesA copyvio has been detected and removed from the Sri Aurobindo article, and another source needs to be verified. It will be necessary to address any concerns people may have about the reliability of the sources used, or the article may be delisted. There is discussion on the talk page. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.pngHi I replied to your discussion here: [4]. Thanks for reporting the file, but WP:AFD was the wrong process. I tagged it as orphaned fair use. If you think it is copyvio/incorrect source you should tag for that additionally, using WP:CSD:F3, F7 or F9, and given the history of the uploader I have to say that seems likely to be the case. If you need help, let me know, but I only come here once a week or so now, so might not reply immediately. Cheers. Begoon talk 18:17, 14 November 2014 (UTC) Hi! Just noticed you patrolled and tagged this article. Would you care to clarify some of the issues you see with the article? Thanks, Tyrol5 [Talk] 19:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 2Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dahlander pole changing motor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cranes and Fans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Sauer articleHi. The football player Maximilian Sauer meets the notability criteria for football players, and it's sourced by reliable third-party sources. So, what issues do you see with the article? Alexpostfacto (talk) 10:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Albert Samuel TwortMy brother, who created the article, asked me what to do about it. I've no issue with you placing the csd tag on the article, but have userfied it to allow him to work it up. It may be that notability cannot be asserted, but let's give him a chance. Best, Mjroots (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Dahlander pole changing motor
Hi. I have declined your speedy deletion nomination - WP:CSD#A9 only applies if the artist has no article, but Raman Jaraš has one. JohnCD (talk) 15:40, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
BNA access It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC) CanvassingHello Shrikanthv, It appears that you have been canvassing users to participate in your AfD for saffron terror. You should note that there are guidelines for WP:Canvassing, which you are expected to follow. If you do not follow them, all the votes that you have canvassed will be in danger of being discounted. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 11:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
TaggingEarlier this month you tagged Uygar Aktan with 9 problems, about half of which were relevant. If all of them were relevant, then it would still not be useful because the relevant tags could be overlooked. For more information, see WP:TAGBOMB. --AmaryllisGardener talk 02:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Tagging 2Why did you revert my edit? All the tags removed applied to the page. Explain how they don't. Speedy Climber (talk) 06:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Dahlander pole changing motor
Harrias talk 12:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC) December 2014
Reference Errors on 24 December
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 25 December 2014 (UTC) hii why the edit made on [arvind kejriwal] is not constructive ? aren't accusations with references are not included in any wiki article ? [arvind kejriwal] has been accused of stealing some one else works and why not bring this accusation or controversy into light ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krazylearner (talk • contribs) 15:33, 27 December 2014 (UTC) regarding plagiarism accusations on arvind kejriwalhii why the edit made on [arvind kejriwal] is not constructive ? aren't accusations with references are not included in any wiki article ? [arvind kejriwal] has been accused of stealing some one else works and why not bring this accusation or controversy into light ? Elsevier accessIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC) BOCDThis[5] is virtually unsourced because the given information is not backed by source. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
ReferencesYou set up a page for proposed deletion. Name : Reet Sharma References:Reet Sharma in new show Reet sharma to enter Iss pyar ko kya naam dun Tanishqsh (talk) 11:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Nish About Page DeletionHi This is Tanishq. I would like to tell you that there are various (reliable) sources such as Times Of India's report on Reet Sharma (Times Of India is India's largest newspaper and the reporting rooted name), and her entrance in the new show. There are also articles published on news channel website, for example telechakkar.com about Reet Sharma and her projects. I have reliably entered the variable sources on her Wikipedia page. Kindly remove the tag as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanishqsh (talk • contribs) 13:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC) About Page Deletion ContinuedHi Shrikanth, I thank you for the welcome. I did have a look for tellychakkar's operations and it is a newschannel based only for bollywood and not a fan-site. I am in no way related to Reet Sharma. Second, she has been mentioned in the vocal-visual news of Times Of India. Hence, kindly remove the tags and the notification of deletion. --Tanishqsh (talk) 13:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC) speedy deletionI;ve had to decline two of your speedy deletions. The criterion for deleting via A7 is no indication of any plausible significance or importance. This is a much looser requirement than for actual notability. A substantial public career is an indication of significance, even if it does not met WP:N. The way to deal with articles like these where you doubt the notability is to use either Prod or AFD (or BLP Prod if a living person and unsourced) DGG ( talk ) 17:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC) Roby DattaHello, I am new here. Could you help me with the Roby Datta page? Feel free to e-mail me at adutt77@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adutt77 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 3Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hinduism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Passion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Warnings for rticle Sagar MohantyHi Shrikanthv, I thank you for taking the time to review and suggest improvements to the Sagar Mohanty article from a third party point of view. I appreciate this because as a new comer to this medium, it helps me learn quickly and better understand the environment. I noticed that two of the warnings were similar and address the same issue of neutrality. It also appears to me after some analysis that I really need to improve this article based on your remarks. Therefore, I will work through these issues one by one. Please also note that as I move along, I will also delete the related warnings. If you have some specific advice to improve this article, I will be pleased to hear them. As the founder of Wikipedia Jimmy Wales once said: "Do not bite the newbies". Thank you Djamourou (talk) 14:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC) March 2015
 Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
in useWhen updating an article, you can use the {{in use}} template. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Reference Errors on 11 March
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC) BuddhismHi Shrikanthv. I don't know if you read my response at my talkpage; I'll copy ithere, and add some more.
Also recommended, as a follow-up: Buddha-nature, especially Buddha-nature#Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra. Following some of Blades' diffs on Thigle, I also read a comment by Thigle that Mahayana was the "original Buddhism", and Abhidharmic Buddhism was a later development. I don't know if that's correct, but after reading those two sections mentioned above, you tell me: if this was "the original Buddhism", how different is it from Vedanta? I'd say: not. It was highly surprising for me to realize this, and I still don't know if it is correct; but it's amazing. And take note: I'm not writing here that Vedanta is not different from (Mahayana) Buddhism, I'm writing that this "oldest Buddhism", if the info is correct, is hardly different from Vedanta. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC) You may also be interested in this site Zennist. This guy is also arguing that the oldest Buddhism did adhere to some sort of atman, and that Buddhism can't be understood without such an idea. Quote:
Now, Atman/Brahman originally also meant something like the animating principle, didn't it? "Brahm", to grow, to expand. The contemporary English translation of "satcitananda" as "being-consciousness-bliss" may be too simple, losing very important nuances; "consciousness" may be too simple a translation, as if "it" is just a "thing", an object. Food for thought here... Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
now on our topic: there is tendencies in Indian Buddhists and Vedantists for ascetism and this has twisted , turned the truths according to its requirement. the same spirit of ascetism (either Buddhistic & Vedantic) considers only one part of the equation "the one without a second" (vedantins ) or as you mentioned "absolutes" (buddhism) but the other part "all is Brahman" as been termed as illusion (maya, Karma) or adopted to the meaning of the first one.(not nullyfying vedantins totally but expanding on the missing part), Note as you mention above wheel with Nirvana, the absolute or " absolutes" as you term it in the centre, giving a simili let us say you have never seen a ocean , suddenly you see a ocean and at first sight see waves comming at great heights out of it and now declare "ha the ocean is a turbulant entity" now you go near it and go inside it (below into ocean depths) and meet a person who is in perfect peace and declares "ocean is actually at perfect peace, the waves are illusion a mere construction"(vedantins) and the other guy says "their is neither" (buddhist) "all is Brahman ?"
(continuing your last sentences) there were two parts before veda"anta" from veda "the path of knowledge" = "Vedanta" and "path of ananda" = "Tantra" or vama marga (not to be confused with tantric traditions of buddhism nor with other derated practises ..), in Tantra focus shifts to prakriti or the pouring of atman into energy, there is action, creation, the ananda of becoming ..... you were right in qouting the difference between vedanta & Buddhisim but as you see above there is much comming Shrikanthv (talk) 12:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Your Nomination for speedy deletionHello. The original photo was found on the website of the University. It was licensed under CC By 4.0. This was the source. I do not understand, why was it deleted from Vijender Kumar! Educationtemple (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC) MeditationShrikanthv, do you practice meditation? Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Billy Lynch (Australian footballer)Hi Shrikanthv, I saw your note letting me know you unreviewed the page I created - I was just wondering why you did this? I'm a bit out of the loop on that sort of stuff! Cheers Terlob (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2015 (UTC) Hillhouse CapitalHi. I noticed you tagged an article that I edited which says that this article has "multiple issues." I am a little new to wikipedia, and I hope you can point out to me what changes I need to make in order to meet the standards of wikipedia to avoid the "close connection" tag, the "original research" tag, and the "notability" tag. Perhaps these tags don't have anything to do with my edits, but the edits that came before me? since the article was up since January, and I only made my first edits in March, can it be that the problems are from previous edits that came before mine? If that is the case, I am ready to change those edits too, in order to improve the article to meet wikipedia quality standards. I really appreciate your help. the article in question is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillhouse_Capital_Group. thanks again.Jiminycricket55 (talk) 06:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC) Chelsea Clintom"Objectionable text with a poor source" is a compleat explanation of why I removed that text. I suggest that you stop using automated tools like Twinkle and begin to apply your mind, assuming you have one, before interfering with constructive editors. I also suggest you read WP:CIR and WP:AGF. Needless to say I am reverting your mindless edit. ShoeMacneil (talk) 04:35, 17 April 2015 (UTC) Your edit to this BLP article page was in direct contravention of Wikimedia Terms of Use. I have undone it. ShoeMacneil (talk) 04:41, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
You've got mail!Message added 21:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Reverting to old contentsSo if you gonna revert back to old contents independent of whether the added changes or contents has merit or not then what's the point of contributing ??? So I came back to contribute to Wikipedia but now I feel like why should I ?? Ksubburaj (talk) 16:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC) Hi, Nice that you wanted to talk, please note that for a single topic there could be numerous point of view, and just like yourself there would be many who would like to contribute, can it happen that there could be difference on what is right! ? , so usually we have talk page where we can discuss this and sort it out. please note politics related article are one of the worst case scenario for this. Shrikanthv (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC) KarnatakaSir, as per the law of the land, no state in india can have state flag. It is only Jammu and Kashmir that is presently having a state flag as per Article 370. The Government doesn't allow or there is no such provision that allows state to have separate flag. its unconstitutional. Karnataka has no official state flag, and the flag in the article is not an official one. Its a cultural "Kannada Flag" Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kannada_flag http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/ampnbspNo-state-flag-for-Karnatakaampnbsp/articleshow/11000220.cms? Hope the sources are enough proof, and hence its not viable to put the kannada flag as the state flag in the Wiki Article. Qwerty3594 (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC) Visit Talk:Kargil WarVisit Talk:Kargil War Tejas MRCA (talk) 15:51, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Tejas MRCA (talk) 15:51, 2 July 2015 (UTC) need help in editinghi Shrikanthv, I am writing about various civil servants of India ..who are really helpful to the people ..right now I am writing on "sridhar babu addanki[[6]]", please do help in editing to make the article elegant and in a proper manner ..the article has been deleted once due to poor references .I managed to get proper references now and I am writing in sandbox ..please do edit the article and help me to get it in to main stream swaroop 12:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakthi swaroop (talk • contribs)
WP:ANII have reverted your close and requested an admin close at ANI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#RFC_Close_for_Ayurveda —Kww(talk) 14:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC) MentoringThanks for your thrust; highly appreciated. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:18, 22 July 2015 (UTC) ArchiveHi Shrikanthv. Do you need some help with your archives? I noticed that a large mass of threads as archived, and remembered that you put them back at your talkpage some time ago. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Why did you want that page deleted? Other than an IP edit breaking the template (easily reverted), I don't see anything obviously wrong with it. —Kusma (t·c) 14:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your explanations! In any case a blossoming girl's name is better than mumps :) —Kusma (t·c) 05:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC) The case for the article on the Indian given name article titled "Vishwajeet"The name Henry has an entire Wikipedia page, as it is a notable given name of English origin. Similarly there are hundreds of notable given names of Indian origin that have their own page (such as Rahul, Soumya, Abhishek, etc.). Please refer to the following wikipedia pages for further evidence of popular Indian given names having their own Wikipedia pages: -
The popularity of the name is established by means of adding a list of notable people with the given name, as is the case with most of the articles in the above mentioned categories. Therefore, the page on the Indian masculine name Vishwajeet deserves a Wikipedia page for the benefit of the users as a source for useful information on the history and meaning of the name. However, users are free to make appropriate edits as they seem fit, and wherever necessary. Either the deletion tag needs to be removed, or all the hundreds of pages on Indian given names need to be tagged for deletion with immediate effect, which would call for the deletion of every other article on given names irrespective of country of origin. Kreplach123 (talk) 17:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC) Hi, Please note that just being present does not bring notability and also mere asserting that it should be present nor pointing out to something else brings the article any notability, do not panic it is deletion discussion not a speedy delete tag , so lets see the out come and please bring your points to relevant talk page Shrikanthv (talk) 06:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC) BLP ProdHello, Shrikanthv. :) While investigating copyright concerns raised with P Muniraju Gowda, I noticed that you had nominated it for BLP Prod. I have had to remove that nomination, as unfortunately the article does not qualify. Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people notes that a BLP Prod can be proposed only if an article does not have any sources at all - whether reliable or unreliable. At the time you placed the PROD, the article included reference to [11], which makes it ineligible for that process. Before nominating articles for this process, please make sure that they contain no sources in any form. Meanwhile, it may be appropriate to pursue deletion of this article under another process. I have not yet completed my copyright check, but it is definitely in need of much work! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Discussion to reapply modifications on RackBank pageHi Shrikanthv! I would sincerely like to request you to redo my recent contributions to RackBank. I made those modifications to the page as there were several issues that were raised because the content of the page seemed quite like an advertisement. My aim was to provide relevant information about the company so that people would easily get to know about it. Therefore, I'd you to redo the exact modifications and in case, you feel that some other modifications can be made, kindly let me know.
Deleting Mandya Sri Shirdi Satya Sai BabaThis place has attained significant importance over the last few years since its establishment. It is NOT about a company or corporation or organisation. In India all temples which are of public importance are either run by an individual or a trust as a custodian of the public faith and commitment. it is more of charity to run the temple. The details of the place, provided in this article has been provided and detailed as there have been many miracles which have taken place for devotees over the least three upon visit to the temple. In the recent times, there have been thousands of piligrims thronging to the temple. It is building to be a place of significant importance for the Sai Baba devotees in the southern region of India and therefore, believe the article would provide vital and unknown information about this place. The place is a temple and a place of pilgrimage for the devotees of Shirdi Sai Baba. Therefore, please do reconsider the deletion and reinstate the article, as it would benefit the thousands of pilgrims who are now seeking information on this new place of miracles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srarun (talk • contribs) 14:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC) Hi Shrikanthv. I took alook at Integral yoga; here are my (first?) comments:
A lot of work to do indeed! Succes, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC) PS: the following sources may be usefull:
Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Chandrashekar KupperiHello Shrikanthv, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chandrashekar Kupperi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 20:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC) Integral Yoga & Integral psychologyHi Shrikanthv. I think that Integral Yoga and Integral psychology (Sri Aurobindo) could be merged; what do you think? Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: FirstshowreviewHi Shrikanthv! Thank you for showing interest in our page. This is to inform you that I have declined the deletion of page Firstshowreview because it does not violate of the regulations. The page does not have any promotional or advertising content. You can check other pages who have similar content such as bollywood hungama etc. Please let us know if you are not satisfied with our explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malayalammovie2013 (talk • contribs) 09:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC) Whad do you mean by merge with a redirect? Probably move.Xx236 (talk) 09:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Re: "Not using Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising at Shravya Varma"I understand Wikipedia article creation policy and i am no where breaching the codes and conduct. request you to remove the warning tag. I work for an organization where i manage the digital images of renowned celebrities and artist. you should understand the purpose of creating an article on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmeesathya (talk • contribs) 07:11, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 6 October
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC) Are you aware of this comedy?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/_Kautilya3 He has included your name with mine. I never had any interaction with you but this guy has some serious problems. This was his reply to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/NA122 He even accused two users of being RAW employee. --The Avengers (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC) This is seriously funny let's wait and watch Shrikanthv (talk) 04:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC) SPI Noitice [sic]
Nonono. I'm a sock of VictoriaGrayson (or vice versa), as everybody knows. Maybe Ms Sarah Welch is also a sock of us, so, we're in good company. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Of course this was meant humorously, and not as a mean punch towards you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
ModiHi! After proposing merger, you have to start a merger discussion giving your rationale for the proposal. The discussion should be started at the talk page of the proposed target article i.e. Talk:Narendra Modi in this case. You have missed that. So please start the discussion.
HI, Did not knew what was going on these pages & have not edited nor involved in these pages for a while now but after this got some how got intertwingled , I agree with you H Shrikanthv (talk) 09:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for providing the photos to Mirra Alfassa. I did some fixes therein, as per the edit tags active since 2014. Since you seem to be interested in the subject, please fix the references style, too, paying close attention to RS and the wiki links that lead to wrong articles. Zezen (talk) 18:15, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Metatron's CubeHi there. I saw that you made a comment about Flower of Life so perhaps you would like to comment about the proposed deletion of Metatron's Cube, which I believe is of the same significance and basis, although the article is presently not as developed. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 07:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Indian peopleHello, User:Shrikanthv i would like to notify that User:Kkm010 has been disturbing ethnic infobox on this page. I have told him again and again that infobox is not a gallery for every well known Indian person, however he keeps widening it and cluttering the page. The current infobox has been kept nuteral for a reasion as it gives better representation of women and minorities. I would also like to note that i have sourced and worked on this page for past week and there is still a lot to sourced, particularly in history section. 117.192.201.56 (talk) 19:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Hi, Chandni SharmaHello!! Thanks for visiting the article I created Chandni Sharma. I noticed you placed a few tags on the article which I removed by mistake without fixing the problem. I would like to know what can be done to remove those tags. As I am new to wikipedia I am still learning and I read you quoted that the creator is closely connected to the person whose article is that but let me clear this I not at all connected to that person and the tag regarding original research for that all the links and sources have been added. So will you please tell me what efforts can be made to make the article neutral and tag free. And please help me provide with the guidelines to create a better article. As I am a beauty pageant enthusiast and have keen interest in beauty pageants and its performers and I would like to make better articles of notable subjects related to beauty pageants. Zack Martin 2000 (talk) 07:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC) Please read before tagging articles as unreferenced. The referencing was poorly done, but it was there in the very first edit. LadyofShalott 02:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC) Talkback message from Tito DuttaMessage added 17:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Tito Dutta (talk) 17:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC) Talkback message from Tito DuttaMessage added 13:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Tito Dutta (talk) 13:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC) Talkback message from Maslowsneeds Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Maslowsneeds (talk) 17:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon starts in 24 hoursHello,  Thanks a lot for signing up as a participant in the Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon. We want to inform you that this edit-a-thon will start in next 24 hours or so (25 January 0:00 UTC). Here are a few handy tips:
Thank you and happy editing. Talkback message from Tito DuttaMessage added 07:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Tito Dutta (talk) 07:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 27Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mysore Rosewood Inlay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yellow wood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC) GI edit-a-thon 2016 updatesGeographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon 2016 has started, here are a few updates:
If you are an experienced editor, become an ambassador. Ambassadors are community representatives and they will review articles created/expanded during this edit-a-thon, and perform a few other administrative tasks.
Please translate this event page into your own language. Event page has been started in Bengali, English and Telugu, please start a similar page on your event page too.
See more ideas and share your own here.
Please see a few media coverages on this event: The Times of India, IndiaEducationDiary, The Hindu.
Please keep checking the Meta-Wiki event page for latest updates. All the best and keep on creating and expanding articles. :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC) 7 more days to create or expand articles Hello, thanks a lot for participating in Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon. We understand that perhaps 7 days (i.e. 25 January to 31 January) were not sufficient to write on a topic like this, and/or you may need some more time to create/improve articles, so let's extend this event for a few more days. The edit-a-thon will continue till 10 February 2016 and that means you have got 7 more days to create or expand articles (or imprpove the articles you have already created or expanded).
The rules remain unchanged. Please report your created or expanded articles.
Editors, who have not joined this edit-a-thon, may also join now. 
Reviewing of all articles should be done before the end of this month (i.e. February 2016). We'll keep you informed. You may also check the event page for more details.
A special barnstar will be given to all the participants who will create or expand articles during this edit-a-thon. The editors, who will perform exceptionally well, may be given an Indic Geographical Indication product or object. However, please note, nothing other than the barnstar has been finalized or guaranteed. We'll keep you informed.
Feel free to ask question(s) here. -- User:Titodutta (talk) sent using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC) GI edit-a-thon updates Thank you for participating in the Geographical Indications in India edit-a-thon. The review of the articles have started and we hope that it'll finish in next 2-3 weeks.
Prizes/awards have not been finalized still. These are the current ideas:
We'll keep you informed.
Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
--Ipigott (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC) (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) Thanks, Shrikanthv, for joining up so quickly and already contributing to our project. I picked your name up from the Indian notice board discussions. I see you placed "Mirra Alfassa's artistic works" in the DYK section but I cannot find an article with that name and the Mirra Alfassa article does not seem to have been nominated for DYK. Maybe it's something under development?--Ipigott (talk) 12:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
WP:INCOTMFollowing the discussion, I have started this section, could you do initial works before we ask the larger team to participate? Or if you have any suggestions, please let me know. --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC) vidhi mehta is known singer she also sung a happy ending movie songs and she was also a contestant of sa re ga ma u can google her name and u will get many refrence link about her u can see her video of live performance or official songs at youtube
Punjab edit-a-thon: Write for glory Hello friend, Click here to subscribe/unsubscribe.
Rio Olympics Edit-a-thonDear Friends & Wikipedians, Celebrate the world's biggest sporting festival on Wikipedia. The Rio Olympics Edit-a-thon aims to pay tribute to Indian athletes and sportsperson who represent India at Olympics. Please find more details here. The Athlete who represent their country at Olympics, often fail to attain their due recognition. They bring glory to the nation. Let's write articles on them, as a mark of tribute. For every 20 articles created collectively, a tree will be planted. Similarly, when an editor completes 20 articles, a book will be awarded to him/her. Check the main page for more details. Thank you. Abhinav619 (sent using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC), subscribe/unsubscribe) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Shrikanthv. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Thank you for cookiesHello Shrinkathv and thank you for your kind and welcoming message. Yes I enjoy editing, proof reading, copy editing and topics about spirituality and sports. I also have a particular admiration for Mirra Alfassa. Congratulations on creating a very good and positive page about her. Kind regards Maryanne Maryanne881 (talk) 02:11, 13 April 2017 (UTC) Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Krishna you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. No connection with lairaHello shirikanthv This is for your clarity brother i have no connection with laira nor she is known to me anyway — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imrankhaider (talk • contribs) 21:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC) Samir abbas article was just written as a tribute to great journalistI am not connected to samir. I wrote the article because he is a legend in the media industry . He has worked as a journalist for 17 years and remained on key posts. I thought i should add his information on wikipedia so that it comes in public domain. Being an indian brother i would request you to make any changes in the article but please remove the tag AFD . §Imrankhaider (talk) 22:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Link to reliable resourceHi shrikanthv . As you said you cannot find reliable resources www.hindi.news18.com/tag/samir-abbas/ hope this link will serve the purpose as far the notabilty is concerned . He was awarded as indias best news anchor in 2013. If possible now kindly remove the tag brotherImrankhaider (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Dear shirkanthv I am new on wikipedia and has no connection with senior editors nor do i know how to interact with them. Please if you feel we can improve the article then remove the tag. Moreover he comes every day on a nation wide channel as lead news anchor. Hence his notability or popularity cannot be doubted as News18 india is a leading channel. Kindly remove the tag brother i shall be thankful to you . Imrankhaider (talk) 17:09, 16 August 2017 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: Kunal madhiwalaHello Shrikanthv. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kunal madhiwala, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Playing a non-extra role in a notable movie/TV show indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI#ACTOR). Thank you. SoWhy 15:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC) How is adding his controversial status "Wp:NOTNEWS"?--Shinnosukeandme (talk) 09:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Ram RahimHis parents' names are already mentioned in the side bar with his picture. Why do you insist on mentioning that again in the early life section? PS: Why do you wrongly mention them as Sikh when his family is a dera followers .Sikhism clearly bars its adharents from following such deras where Guru Granth Sahib is not kept as the central scripture. They ARE ofcourse Jat, though, the fact which I did not delete. So do clarify this instead of indulging on the edit war.
The article Krishna you nominated as a good article has passed Krishna has been nominated for Did You Know Hello, Shrikanthv. Krishna, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know DYK for KrishnaOn 21 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Krishna, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Krishna is the Hindu god of compassion, tenderness, and love? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Krishna. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Krishna), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hampi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Ellora Caves and other articles in South Asian arts / monuments space articlesShrikanthv: If you have time to continue our collaboration on GA nom/reviews, a few more articles have been scrubbed by our GOCE team and seem ready for GA noms. For example, see Ellora Caves. Thanks for the help, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC) The article Hampi you nominated as a good article has passed ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Shrikanthv. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) DYK processShrikanthv: The Hampi DYK is already approved. We can't add new ALTs, as any new ALT will require a restart of the DYK review. The Hampi ruins are not ancient, a term that generally is understood as before about 6th century CE. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 12:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC) ConstructsGreetings! An account has been tweaking the lede here, changing the page's scope contrary to the discussed consensus. Could you please keep an eye on it? Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC) DYK for HampiOn 21 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hampi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before its destruction, the UNESCO world heritage site Hampi (partly pictured) was the center of the world's second-largest medieval city after Beijing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hampi. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hampi), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Sri Aurobindo problemHi, in case the ping does not work, I've left at note at Talk:Sri Aurobindo about an edit that you made. It broke the citation but I am not sure what source you were then intending to refer to. It still shows as an error and, although I realise you are not terribly active here at the moment, I suspect you are best placed to fix it. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC) please see my new section on sri aurobindo talk pageplease see my new section on sri aurobindo talk page feel free to delete this section i've added. thanks shrikanth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Demetrius333 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC) Revised text Sri AurobindoFollowing your notice, I have removed some material which I may drop, or revise later, and made a few changes. Please let me know whether there are any problems left in the text now. I have copied it into my Sandbox, kindly mark passages there, if needed. --Raimundo (talk) 07:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Performance fabricsThank you for iVoting. Could you sign as well, as I don't want to put a "this unsigned comment was made by ..." as it looks naff. -Roxy, the dog. barcus 12:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC) Thank you so much for the compliment. Grateful. --Bugs2beatles 08:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugs2beatles (talk • contribs) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![[4]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/File:Flag_of_the_Bharatiya_Janata_Party.png&oldid=633836790){kind=link}
