User talk:SharonkilfoyWelcomeHello Sharonkilfoy and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.
ukexpat (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC) The Respite CenterHi there, I just noticed your help request, and thought I'd volunteer to help in any way I can. Indeed, if you're not interested in learning how to edit for yourself, then yes, just type the page in rough, and I'd be happy to format it for Wikipedia. One thing though- you must give references to reliable sources for the information. The website of the organisation itself would not be suitable, because it's a 'primary source' - all the facts would have to be supported by references to things such as newspaper articles or books. Alternatively, you could have a go at creating it yourself; I've dealt with 5 people in the same situation as yourself, in the past 3 months. They have all managed to make successful articles. It might sound complex at first, but it's really not so bad.
Sorry if this seems like a lot of info to take in, but from experience I've found it to be the best approach. There are lots of people in the Wikipedia community who will help you in any ways we can. Best of luck; please leave me a message some time, and let me know how you're getting along. Chzz ► 09:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC) P.S. One more person has just this minute asked a similar question - again, might be useful for you both to make contact;
Chzz ► 11:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Hello, Sharonkilfoy. You have new messages at Chzz's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Chzz ► 09:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia, fellow Wisconsinite and freelancer!The problem I have to warn you about is that (counter-intuitive as it may seem), starting new articles is perhaps the worst possible way to begin editing Wikipedia. New articles, particularly articles about small organizations you know well, are replete with traps such as our policies on organizational notability and (as somebody has already mentioned here on your talkpage) possible conflict of interest. It may seem more boring, but I earnestly suggest that you start slow by working on article improvement. My favorite route is simply clicking the "random article" link on the upper left of this screen, and looking the article over to see how it may be improved: corrections, additions (properly sourced and cited), of course), etc. Much though I admire the Respite Center and the Willy Street folks, I don't think either of them is going to qualify as having encyclopedic levels of notability. I also commend to you our Manual of Style. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
|