User talk:ShakingSpirit/Archive/Archive-Jan2007

re: ShakingBot

Sorry. I've seen a couple of *Bot usernames recently that were not valid bots. When I saw it had been a couple of hours and a user page hadn't been created, I thought it had been another one of those. I should have done a "What links here" on the ShakingBot userpage and I would have seen the bot request. I didn't think of that and I apologize. It's also what I get from just pattern matching on the names - I didn't notice that it was created by you (which is shown in the log) and I should have.

As for the {{UsernameBlocked}}, those typically are not put on the talk page anymore by username patrolers per WP:DNFT. We seem to have some folks who love to create inappropriate usernames for there own sake. The block message contains the same information.

Again, my apoligies. -- JLaTondre 06:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it was an honest mistake, just got me a bit annoyed that I was finally cleared to test my bot, then it was blocked ^_^ Still, sorted now, no harm done ShakingSpirittalk 06:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Dark Eden Image

I hope I can get the hang of things hehe, let me know how I go on the Dark Eden page :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by D33ath (talk • contribs) 09:43, 30 December 2006

I've tagged the image for you, so ignore OrphanBot ^_^ To put it to the DarkEden page, you need to add [[Image:Slayer_Roahm.jpg‎]] or to add it as a thumbnail, do [[Image:Slayer_Roahm.jpg|thumb|Your caption goes here]].
Feel free to experiment in my sandbox, not my talk page ;) ShakingSpirittalk 09:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My User Page

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. I appreciate it 16px‎ Cheers! xCentaur |  talk  10:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

be more careful!

when reverting -- Jmax- 10:04, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies; you reverting just before me must have thrown my script off, I didn't even get an edit conflict :/ ShakingSpirittalk 10:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Holy crap, you're fast!

Wow, you sure spotted my comment on that page really fast! Thanks for letting me know how that turned out. --Kevin (TALK) 03:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for pointing out the problem ^_^ ShakingSpirittalk 03:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AST artcle

The whole article isn't a copyright violation, just everything between the introductory paragraph and "See Also".
68.8.108.62 04:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That IS the whole article; the infobox is just a template ShakingSpirittalk 04:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just meant the first paragraph:

Aspartate Transaminase (AST) also called Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) or aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) (EC 2.6.1.1) is similar to alanine transaminase (ALT) in that it is another enzyme associated with liver parenchymal cells. It is raised in acute liver damage. It is also present in red blood cells and cardiac muscle.

I don't see that on the WebMD page anywhere... it was the original stub, someone came and added the copyrighted stuff later.
68.8.108.62 05:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shaking Bot

The new ShakingBot seems interesting. Is it just a link checker? If it is how did you import it to Wikipedia. I have content checkers that might be of use. Redskunk 23:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All the details on ShakingBot can be found on its BRFA ^_^ ShakingSpirittalk 03:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So how did you put the program on Wikipedia? Redskunk 03:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's not "on" wikipedia, it runs from my server and edits wikipedia via an API made for bots ^_^ ShakingSpirittalk 03:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This whole thing on Wikipedia bots is confusing. Is there an arcticle on it? Redskunk 03:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not that I know of, though Wikipedia:Creating a bot does carry some insight :) ShakingSpirittalk 03:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It was VERY insightful. Redskunk 03:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, let me know if you ever think of making a bot yourself! ^_^ ShakingSpirittalk 03:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sure will! Redskunk 03:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Viva Muhammad

Can you explain that again? Redskunk 21:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, should have explained myself better ^_^ 'Speedy' tags are the speedy deletion tags, and they take the form {{db-xx}}, where 'xx' is a two letter code for why the article should be speedy deleted. There's a full list over at WP:CFSD. {{db-a7}} is the tag used for a non-notable person/website/band/etc.
I don't like using speedy A7 tags when a user makes an article about themselves, because it's kinda WP:BITE, so I always move it to their User: page. Doing so leaves behind a redirect on the original article, so I tag that with {{db-r2}}, which is used for redirects to User: space ^_^ Any questions? ShakingSpirittalk 21:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to what? Redskunk 21:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
When you move a page, the original page is replaced with a redirect to where the new page is. E.g. Moving Old Page to New Page would leave a redirect on Old Page pointing to New Page. As redirects aren't allowed to point to anything except article/WP: space, they should be speedy R2'd if you move a page to User: ShakingSpirittalk 21:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So just to get this right you redirect their arcticle to their user talk? Redskunk 21:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nono, you move it to their User: page (unless they already have one, but most newbies don't). The redirect is created automatically, which you don't want, so then you tag the redirect for speedy deletion. ShakingSpirittalk 21:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So you just move the page to their main user page. Then you tag the redirect page for speedy deletion? Redskunk 21:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yup! Or atleast, that's what I do ^_^ There's no rules set it stone, but I find that's the nicest way; keeps wikipedia clean without biting the newbies ^_^ ShakingSpirittalk 21:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DarknessBot

If you want D-Bot, you can do it. ;) -- ~D-Lord (Sign!) (TCE) 11:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine ^_^ My email address is Anthy |AT| ShakingSpirit |DOT| co |DOT| uk, or you can find me on IRC as ShakingSpirit - I'm sure you don't want to discuss the details on a page anyone can view ^_^ ShakingSpirittalk 12:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll email the password to you. -- ~D-Lord (Sign!) (TCE) 11:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I just saw the page and I can't thank you enough! *yawn* I'm getting tired... -- ~D-Lord (Sign!) (TCE) 01:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leetnetworks

Yeah man cool, he just wants free traffic for his forum while still contributing nothing D33ath 11:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to your archive in Nov and the Talk page for DarkEden.

Also, a quote from WP:EL- Advertising and Conflicts of interest.

If the link is to a relevant and informative site that should otherwise be included, please consider mentioning it on the talk page and let neutral and independent Wikipedia editors decide whether to add it.

Mysterial 17:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

sorry for the revert

It was a mistake. I didn't notice that much. I reverted back to your edit.

Again, sorry. It was an error. --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 02:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I moved the page just before you tagged it for speedy, no way you could have known ^_^ ShakingSpirittalk 02:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar from WP:UW

The Working Man's Barnstar
I award this barnstar to ShakingSpirit for your help and assistance in getting the WikiProject user warnings to the review phase, and to let you know your work has been appreciated. Khukri (talk . contribs) 22:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks muchly! ^_^ ShakingSpirittalk 22:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hey, I see your tidying up the templates. Do me a favour will you please, can you just check on english/american spellings as well whilst yer at it please? If not no probs I'll have a crack at it later. Cheers ears Khukri (talk . contribs) 15:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ShakingSpirit/Archive...

Congratulations, ShakingSpirit/Archive. You have been chosen to be the yellow ball of my header!

-- ~D-Lord (Sign!) (TCE) 20:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]






Replied on their talk page (~added for archival purposes~) ShakingSpirittalk 23:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DarknessBot

I was wondering if you could send me the source/program of DarknessBot so that I can run it on a different wiki? --Simonkoldyk 20:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on their talk page (~added for archival purposes~) ShakingSpirittalk 23:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I've seen you so many times beating me to reverting vandalism... Happy editing! Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 22:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, thanks for the barnstar! Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 23:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What goes around, comes around ^_^ ShakingSpirittalk 23:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I would like to express my sincere apologies for the disruptive edit I made to George W. Bush; it was absolutely unnecessary. A man after my own heart, you are! I, too, am a fan of the Amarok media player, and would never listen to the fine compositions of such great composers as Beethoven, Dufay, and Kanye West, on any other platform! Have at thee, kind sir! --Mentaka 01:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good man! Now don't lose that attitude ;) ShakingSpirittalk 01:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected Vandalism

No problem. I was just changing her name since she went by Wisp in the movie. Cyberia23 02:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No reply needed (~added for archival purposes~) ShakingSpirittalk 08:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stephan Pastis edits

That guy is back at it again, already. I'm not sure of the steps to actually get him banned, and since you're Wiki-savvy, would you mind giving it a try? Thanks a lot. SGreenwell 02:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on their talk page (~added for archival purposes~) ShakingSpirittalk 08:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Hey, just wanted to say thanks ShakingSpirit for the Barnstar. I really appreciate it! --Zapvet 00:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, you earned it ^_^ ShakingSpirittalk 08:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bot functions

sorry for the late reply.. u know in our wiki the templates must be in the left side. but when users create it, it's in the right side. we have to add a little code to the template. Its kinda difficult to add it to all the templates. so can u do that? Thanks!! By the way wats python and pywiki?? --Glacious 15:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't quite understand, what exactly do you need doing? Remember that I don't speak a word of Dhivehi/Mahl, and I've no idea how your writing is supposed to look! ^_^
Python is a programming language, and Pywikipedia is a framework which runs ontop of it, making it easier to code bots and other wiki-connected apps without dealing with all the low-level network code. ShakingSpirittalk 16:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK! hehe! i know that u would not understand Dhivehi Language.

OK, Here's How it works.. We just copy the English template code to make our templates and change the specific places. In the template, these codes are there:

class="infobox" style="width: 20em; align: left; text-align: right; style="float: left; font-size: 90%;" cellspacing="2"

But we have to manually add this part to the template

style="float: left;

So what i would like to do is to make a bot to detect templates without this code, such as in this article. A perfect template with the style code will look like this. Though u dont know Dhivehi language please feel free to check the difference between the two articles. ;)

So will it be any difficulties for u??

Thanks for ur time.

By the way thanks for creating ur user in our Wiki...!!

--Glacious 14:55, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding myspace groups

A lot of the clients or shall we call them victims from the behaviour modification are often dumped back home suffering very heavily from Post-traumatic stress disorder after having been confined for years under condition we would not even put people in prison under.

See: http://www.paulareeves.com/Photo%20Gallery/1-Photo_gallery.htm

Being tied up in a dog cage is the most advanced psychological accepted method and according to the industry necessary in order modify the behaviour of the client.

I would argument whether it is appropriate or not. That is not the purpose of wikipedia to decide whether such methods should be used. We should just describe them.

If the client do not make it trough the program when they become 18 of age, they are dumped on the street with 50 dollars and their parents have been educated not to let them inside their old home anymore. That is where the myspace-groups comes into business. They function as a meetingpoint and as a form for group therapy so the clients can enter society once again.

Of course it is not wikipedia's job to heal people. But one of the first thing many client do when they return home is to investigate whether it all have been a bad dream. Normally their parent have ordered a transport company to get their children in handcuffs in the middle of the night. So it is a kind of surreal for them.

As I read it, it is the concern of spam, which is the reason for not including the myspace group. But what if the links could be added as text only?

Covergaard 21:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]