User talk:Serienfan2010/Archive 2

Archive 1Archive 2

2012–13 United States network television schedule

Hello! I see that you have reverted my content. I'm not mad, I want to just say that those cancellations for Breaking In and Best Friends Forever have not been confirmed. I know you may be reading TV by the Numbers, which is okay, but they sometimes have cancellations that have been unconfirmed, like Pan Am. Please don't place a cancellation there until it's confirmed. Thanks ;). 76.116.112.84 (talk) 20:12, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by American Broadcasting Company

Please note that the shows Don't Trust the B---- in Apartment 23 and Missing are still on the air. Therefore, they are not to be removed from the article until they have aired their very last episode. If there anything, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. Thank you. Farine (talk) 02:19, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

A Gifted Man

Hello! Just so you know, A Gifted Man was not yet canceled (although it will be), and TV by the Numbers is not perfectly reliable. Unless you can prove something on The Futon Critic, don't add the cancellation on the network schedules, please! 76.116.112.84 (talk) 11:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

No, TV by the Numbers is a reliable source. And the site has confirm the cancellation, so we add there on the articles. In addition TFC is a little slow in updates. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 11:58, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
I usually only trust The Futon Critic; that's why I kept changing things. Still, I think we should wait for a confirmation by The Futon Critic. 76.116.112.84 (talk) 12:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
That's your mind, but other sites are also reliable sources. And it's vandalism to remove sourced content without a valid reason. You have no valis reason, so please leave it there. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Blanking Apologies

Hi! Sorry I made you revert my vandalism. I was trying to edit some shows, but I blanked out half the 2011–12 United States network television schedule. I wrote a public apology on Talk:2011–12 United States network television schedule#Blanking Apologies. 76.116.112.84 (talk) 19:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

talkback

Hello, Serienfan2010. You have new messages at Talk:Magic City (TV series).
Message added 02:12, 21 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Matthewedwards (talk · contribs)

Dallas 2012 episode titles

Serienfan2010, why do you keep on reverting the episode listing for the series? Last I checked Ultimatedallas.com WAS the official site, and even says so on the link for the site on search engines. TheFutonCritic.com? what is that, and what are you talking about? Blakebs 02:58, 03 April 2012 (CST)

Up All Night

I see that you went ahead and decided to the delete the article for season 1. I read what you cited in the edit summary, and it made things more clear. I understand why the article was deleted, however Im not comfortable with how this was achieved. Requests for making a new article have been on the list of episodes' talk page for months, and no one, including you said anything about it being too soon. After seeing NO OBJECTIONS, i thought most editors were in agreement that it was time for a new article, so I started to write the article. I was editing for hours, and working hard, with no help from other editors. You ignored this and deleted, without suggesting it on the talk page, or ANYTHING. I felt that it was time for a new article since the main article mentions NOTHING since the pilot, in terms of ratings, news, etc. It was my understanding that before making a large edit, the polite thing to do was to say that you were going to do it on a talk page. I know that this isn't an official rule, but in the future you might have less of these angry messages on your talk pages in you were nice. Caringtype1 (talk) 02:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

First, the article is not delete, because this can made the admins only. Second, I have already given the same User on another talk page a answer, why there is no extra season article. [1] And on Talk:List of Whitney episodes have a another User given the same answer, as I did. But he ignores that. PS: This is my talk page, that other site was a archive only. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 04:00, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

This is not the case with Up All Night. I didn't know the technical term, so that is why i used "deleted". Up All Night is a different show than Whitney, or new girl. Whitney's main article covers everything the season page would, so I agree with you about that one. the New Girl discussion should not apply to UAN because they are different shows, and the articles are different. An argument made on Whitney's talk page, doesn't count for UAN's. I just wanted you to know how hurt I was after my hard work was erased without a fair fight.Caringtype1 (talk) 04:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Up All Night (continued)

I saw your deletion of the Up All Night season page. The user and I had a talk on the episode list talk page, determining we should create a season page. Yes, I know what WP:SIZESPLIT is and I have read it, but to remove someone's work, that's just rude. Please don't just randomly remove season pages; help them instead. I'm not mad; I want to help other users. Thanks! 68.44.51.49 (talk) 22:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Serienfan2010's reasoning for reverting the split was quite valid. I have reverted again, explaining why at Talk:List of Up All Night episodes.[2] The decision to split was made without any justification, it has been opposed and needs to be discussed. --AussieLegend (talk) 01:00, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Invitation!

Hello Serienfan2010, I would like to thank you for your contributions to a Grey's Anatomy-related article. Since it appears you are interested in this topic, I would like to personally invite you to join WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! This project consists of a group of users, collaborating to make articles related to Grey's Anatomy better. Our primary goal is to get as many articles as we can promoted to good and featured statuses, by developing articles, and reverting vandalism. We would be extraordinarily pleased if you decided to join our WikiProject, and help make a difference. If you are interested, all you have to do is add this code: [[Category:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy participants]], to your user page, and you are officially a member. If you are having trouble joining, or have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask me. Again, thank you for your help, and I hope to see you as a member of the project soon! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

2 Broke Girls

Hi, I was trying to split 2 Broke Girls seasons but it's not, can you do it? MichelleTheola (talk) 19:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Dogging

Ive noticed that you are dogging my edits. Please be aware that this is considered harassment, which may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. LiamNolan24 (talk) 18:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

When you vandalism on articles that I have on my Watchlist, then will I reverted these. That has nothing to do with WP:HOUND. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Please review the Wikipedia definition of vandalism. This behavior is considered harassment and your response borderlines a personal attack. LiamNolan24 (talk) 20:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
And again: When you reverted correct infos with a incorrect reason, than I will reverted you. It's not a personal attack on you or something else. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 21:13, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Serienfan2010. You have new messages at Talk:Malibu Country.
Message added 18:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Webclient101talk 18:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

User:Thomasfan5034

You've previously had interaction with User:Thomasfan5034, who is indefinitely blocked, or one of his alleged sockpuppets. There is now an SPI discussion in progress that you may be able to provide some insight into. If you are interested, the discussion may be found at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thomasfan5034. Thank you. --AussieLegend (✉) 11:49, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)